On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:18:58 +0000, anominous (Pie Gurl) P...@yahoo.calm
WINNER - KOTM July 2012 and 2012's leading candidate for Kook of the Year
wrote:
> In article <kc2rms$baa$
4...@dont-email.me>, Kook of Kooks and lunatic
> Na'de/rbyshire aka "lipska the kat"
Proof, kook?
> wrote:
>>Attention comp.lang.java.programmer regulars! We bring you this
>>important bulletin!
>
> *WE bring you a more important bulletin!* Lunatic Derbyshire is "lipska
> the kat" whoring for attention in comp.lang.java.programmer
Proof, kook?
> Question: Why you ask?
> Answer: Lunatic
That's a bit muddled. Here, let me clarify that for you.
> Question: Why are "we" bringing you a more important bulletin, you ask?
> Answer: We're a lunatic, including megalomaniacal enough to use the
> royal "we" in this post! In fact we've won the alt.usenet.kooks
> Loony Maroon award! More than once!
Ah, that's better!
>>>>Andrew Wilson <
awils...@gmail.com>
>>>>Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid>
> a Derbyshire sock
Proof, kook?
>>>>Tony Palermo <
to...@yourbasicyahooemail.com>
> a Derbyshire sock
Proof, kook?
>>> These too from CLJP. Whomever is the maintainer of such things is
>>> missing Derbyshire's whipping of CLJP. Net Nanny supremo is our
>>> Paul/Seamus.
>>>
>>> lipska the kat <
lipska...@yahoo.co.uk>
> a Derbyshire sock
Proof, kook?
>>> nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid>
> a Derbyshire sock
Proof, kook? Hell, that isn't even me. That must have been someone
frogging me. Unless you were just stupid enough to include the same
person twice in the list, *and* make some typos, *and* not copy/paste
rather than type everything out twice, which I concede is entirely
possible.
Of course, since it *isn't* me it actually *might* be Derbyshire, but you
have failed to substantiate your claim nonetheless.
>>> anyone <
ieGJnr4a...@z3.com>
> a Derbyshire sock
Proof, kook?
>>> £ew <
1ewb...@gmail.com>
> a Derbyshire sock
Proof, kook?
>>Oh, wait, that wasn't an important bulletin,
>
> You may be interested to know that the paranoid lunatic responsible for
> leaving squirrel litter all over CJLP and attention whoring as ^lipska
> the kat^ is one and the same lunatic (Paul Derbyshire) socking ^nadegda^
> here and now.
Proof, kook?
> 2012]2011]2010]2009]2008 Kook of the Year is\are only some
> of the many awards that Paul Derbyshire(Lipska) has received.
Proof, kook? Even in Ferd's fake awards the Derbyshire phantom wasn't
nominated for, let alone received, any Kook of the Year awards.
On the other hand, in the *real* Usenet kook awards the current front-
running candidate for 2012's KotY is ... you.
Nominated, seconded, and, so far at least, running unopposed. At the rate
things are going, you've got KotY 2012 pretty much sewn up. You're
*winning*, for fuck's sake!
<snicker>
> We especially encourage lipska the kat, Tony Palermo, and Lew, and all
> the rest of Derbyshire's stinky socks to FOAD
How nasty.
> The post that best references Derbyshire's paranoid lunacy is
> Message-ID: <75q66q$5rm$
1...@bertrand.ccs.carleton.ca> (a sampling from the
> "lipska the kat" kook) From lipska's paranoid 1996 "The Cabal FAQ"
Proof, kook?
> "1.
> What is the Cabal?"
> "The Cabal is an organisation of thirteen Carleton University students
> whose purpose seems to be to select from among the people they meet
> certain targets, who are then harassed in a very vicious fashion in all
> electronic media. It seems to be an extracurricular activity motivated
> by hatred and done as a source of entertainment and as a way for the
> cabal members to punish everyone they dislike."
Yeah, yeah, some other nutter posted something remarkably similar. Sounds
like, unless you kooks are *completely* making things up, this Derbyshire
was bullied by some clique or another in school, which happens often
enough to be quite believable, and maybe overreacted or something.
None of which has anything to do with anyone who's posting in the here
and now. Unless lipska, or Wilson, or Palermo, or whoever frogged me as
"nad318b405" actually *is* Derbyshire, which I doubt. You being right
with one of your lunatic accusations is about as likely as me winning the
jackpot in the state lottery. Despite the fact that I never play.
<snicker>
>>sock-du-jour. "nadegda"
Proof, kook? Also you have the quote level wrong, thereby incorrectly
attributing your little burble of paranoia there to me.
As for calling me a "sock-du-jour" when I've been posting with this nym
and from address for months, well, need I remind everyone just how many
times you've won the Loony Maroon Award in alt.usenet.kooks, kooky?
<snicker>
> "I'm a healthy heterosexual female. Got a problem with that, kook?"
Apparently you do, since you keep repeating it (and even, as here,
quoting it in response to a different post that didn't actually contain
that text) and it seems to have you in quite a lather. Are you one of
those freaks that doesn't believe in "girls on the internet" or something?
> Message-ID: <kab5sb$pd$
4...@dont-email.me> worn by Paul "Lipska the
> kat\nadegda" Derbyshire, unhealthy male lunatic.
Proof, kook?
> HTH
It does indeed -- it's yet more grist for the voters to chew on when the
Kook of the Year ballot comes up in a few weeks with your name on it as a
candidate, Murphy.
<snicker>