Re: banned news froup

[Sn!pe]

mixed nuts <melops...@undulatus.budgie> wrote:

> On 8/21/2021 19:53, Sn!pe wrote:
> > Janithor <Jani...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/21/2021 3:10 PM, Nixed Mutt wrote:
> >>> mixed nuts <melops...@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
> >>>> On 8/21/2021 17:52, Janithor wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/21/2021 2:39 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> >>>>>> On 8/21/2021 15:58, Sn!pe wrote:
> >>>>>>> Janithor <Jani...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 8/21/2021 2:43 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> alt.checkmate
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> haw haw haw!!!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The Goathead is like the Green Zone, they can't touch this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> AC being on aioe's no-poasting list is the best thing that's happened
> >>>>>>> for ages. It'll keep out ~loads~ of crap from malicious miscreants,
> >>>>>>> xpoasting vagabonds, fr0ggers and sundry other ne'er-do-wells.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> aioe is a t0rll-conduit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> AC is an actively attracting nuisance. aioe is the least of issues.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> AC has cancel-cultured itself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They can't cancel the Goathead.
> >>>>
> >>>> They can if everybody crossposts to limburg, gun and ozzie groups and
> >>>> shit starts to fly and the mudbird blames paul and demands cancellation.
> >>>
> >>> u nuts, bro?
> >>
> >> Gentlemen, this is not AC. Decorum, please.
> >
> > What if some malign individual crossposts the Goat to limburg, gun
> > and ozzie groups and shit starts to fly and an assorted foodstuff
> > character blames a fine, upstanding avian (who only desires what's
> > best for Usenet as a whole and AC in particular) and then demands
> > the Goat's cancellation?
> >
> > That would not only be a vile calumny, such a demand would be utterly
> > reprehensible. I do hope such a thing never comes to pass, oh dear
> > me no. Surely nobody would do such a vindictive thing, would they?
> > I can't think of anybody like that in our little circle of friends.
>
> I can.

Teh Gerk?

--
^Ï^ <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

My pet rock Gordon just is.