info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Science Disproves Evolution
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Wally Chapman
Feb 18, 2009, 1:53:39 PM2/18/09
to
Pahu wrote:
> Fossil Gaps
>
> If evolution happened, the fossil record should show continuous and
> gradual changes from the bottom to the top layers. Actually, many gaps
> or discontinuities appear throughout the fossil record (a).
>
> a. “But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have
> existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the
> crust of the earth?” Darwin, The Origin of Species, p. 163.
>
> “... the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed
> [must] truly be enormous. Why then is not every geological formation
> and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly
> does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this,
> perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged
> against the theory [of evolution].” Ibid., p. 323.
>
> Darwin then explained that he thought that these gaps existed because
> of the “imperfection of the geologic record.” Early Darwinians
> expected the gaps would be filled as fossil exploration continued.
> Most paleontologists now agree that this expectation has not been
> fulfilled.
>
> http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences27.html#wp1049019
>
So, can we destroy the earth with this knowledge?
> Fossil Gaps
>
> If evolution happened, the fossil record should show continuous and
> gradual changes from the bottom to the top layers. Actually, many gaps
> or discontinuities appear throughout the fossil record (a).
>
> a. “But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have
> existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the
> crust of the earth?” Darwin, The Origin of Species, p. 163.
>
> “... the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed
> [must] truly be enormous. Why then is not every geological formation
> and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly
> does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this,
> perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged
> against the theory [of evolution].” Ibid., p. 323.
>
> Darwin then explained that he thought that these gaps existed because
> of the “imperfection of the geologic record.” Early Darwinians
> expected the gaps would be filled as fossil exploration continued.
> Most paleontologists now agree that this expectation has not been
> fulfilled.
>
> http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences27.html#wp1049019
>
So, can we destroy the earth with this knowledge?
Wally
john kahila
Feb 23, 2009, 10:48:14 PM2/23/09
to
In article <IeKdnfXurI22xAHU...@bright.net>,
shel...@yahoo.com says...
> Pahu wrote:
> > Fossil Gaps
> >
> > If evolution happened, the fossil record should show continuous and
> > gradual changes from the bottom to the top layers. Actually, many gaps
> > or discontinuities appear throughout the fossil record (a).
> >
> > a. ?But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have
> > existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the
> > crust of the earth?? Darwin, The Origin of Species, p. 163.
> >
> > ?... the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed
> > [must] truly be enormous. Why then is not every geological formation
> > and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly
> > does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this,
> > perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged
> > against the theory [of evolution].? Ibid., p. 323.
> >
> > Darwin then explained that he thought that these gaps existed because
> > of the ?imperfection of the geologic record.? Early Darwinians
> > expected the gaps would be filled as fossil exploration continued.
> > Most paleontologists now agree that this expectation has not been
> > fulfilled.
> >
> > http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences27.html#wp1049019
> >
> So, can we destroy the earth with this knowledge?
>
> Wally
shel...@yahoo.com says...
> Pahu wrote:
> > Fossil Gaps
> >
> > If evolution happened, the fossil record should show continuous and
> > gradual changes from the bottom to the top layers. Actually, many gaps
> > or discontinuities appear throughout the fossil record (a).
> >
> > existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the
> >
> > ?... the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed
> > [must] truly be enormous. Why then is not every geological formation
> > and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly
> > does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this,
> > perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged
> >
> > Darwin then explained that he thought that these gaps existed because
> > expected the gaps would be filled as fossil exploration continued.
> > Most paleontologists now agree that this expectation has not been
> > fulfilled.
> >
> > http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences27.html#wp1049019
> >
> So, can we destroy the earth with this knowledge?
>
> Wally
Well, we could at least tie it into knots.
http://paranormal.about.com/od/lifeafterdeath/a/evol-afterlife.htm
jtk
0 new messages