Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Maureen McAllister EX Air Force BRAT and he belief she is a MILITARY EXPERT

1 view
Skip to first unread message

krp

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 5:43:19 AM12/22/09
to

"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:54ca8471-a8b0-4e44...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...

>> >> MOE> By your own words your term of service as 4 years active 2years
>> >> MOE> reserve. Hardly time to be a " weapons instructor"
>>
>> >> KRP > How much time would it TAKE General McAllister?
>>
>> >> GH> She'll have to consult with the COMMODE DOOR.
>>
>> >> Maybe *SHE* would take more than 6 YEARS to learn which way to point a
>> >> gun, but then she is Captain of the BIMBO team.
>>
>> > MOE> At the time of your " service" Kennie, the total tour was about
>> > six
>> > MOE> years, mainly because the AF was overmanned and was letting guys
>> > loose
>> > MOE> from service left and right.
>>
>> > I know that you **THINK** of yourself as a military expert, BUT, Miss
>> > BRAT, you are NOT! In 1959 by Air Force Regulations the term of
>> > enlistment
>> > was 4 years REGULAR AIR FORCE (active duty) and two years READY
>> > RESERVE.
>> > Not "about" Maureen, EXACTLY! Actually in that period the Air Force was
>> > NOT overmanned by any great degree.
>>
>> > MOE> But the term of YOUR " service" comapred with what you CLAIM you
>> > were
>> > MOE> in the Air Force doesn't jive. For example the command would NEVER
>> > MOE> have a young recruit be an "advisor". Advisors were usually an
>> > offcier
>> > MOE> level position. YOu never were an officer, though you would love
>> > to
>> > MOE> claim otherwise.

>> Did I give any dates for that Maureen? It was certainly NOT when I was
>> in basic training. It cane years later. No Maureen you confuse "ADVISORS"
>> with INSTRUCTORS. Not at all the same thing, and most INSTRUCTORS were
>> enlisted grades. I never claimed to have been an officer, that's YOUR
>> fantasy, Maureen. I know you ***THINK*** of yourself as KNOWING
>> everything
>> about the military, being a BRAT and all. However when I enlisted we were
>> subjected to many tests. You could OPT to take the testing for pilot
>> training. As to your IDIOTIC CLAIMS that one HAD to be commissioned as an
>> officer to take pilot training - YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT!!!! I served with
>> men who washed out of pilot training. Depending on how long they survived
>> the school that came out with an airman or a sergeant of they lasted long
>> enough. YOU are a BLOW HARD Maureen at the time I served one got their
>> commissions in one of several ways;
>>
>> 1. The BRAND NEW Air force Academy. (1st class was 1959)
>> 2. ROTC in college.
>> 3. Officer Candidate School.
>> 4. Officer Training School.
>> 5. Upon GRADUATION from one of the training schools such as for pilots or
>> navigators.
>>
>> Maureen OTS had it's last class in 1962. I had an appointment to it
>> arranged by my Congressman. I elected NOT to attend the class and took my
>> discharge instead since it came so late. I had applied 2 years before and
>> was denied supposedly because I was "critical" what was a "load." All the
>> crap took almost 2 years and by that time I wanted to be married and to
>> go
>> to college.

> MOE> Show your DD-214 and prove your claims about your AF service Kennie.

As your pal Sullivan so eloquently says so often, GFYS! My discharge
certificate PROVES that I served HONORABLY which is the ONLY point on the
floor, aside from your insane claims. YOU screech that the DD-256 does NOT
prove "honorable service." Try telling that to REAL Veterans, Maureen. I am
NOT going to post my DD-214 or my Air Force form 7 you YOU to play with
PSYCHO! Or your buddy David Moore.

You know Maureen - Air Force BRATS were a pain in the ass and a
necessary thing service members HAD to deal with when they served. Most
BRATS got over being such assholes when they became adults. However not ALL
ever made the change from child to adult. YOU are in the later group.They
STILL have loud mouths and small brains and think they KNOW IT ALL. The
worst were the BRATS of JUNIOR OFFICERS who though they OUTRANKED their
parents and demanded to be saluted like they were officers themselves and
generally treated ernlisted personell like slaves on a plantation. We did
our best to IGNORE the diaper brigade as much as possible.


womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 6:35:31 AM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 4:43 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>  "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Kennie, trying to make multiple threads saying the same old shit?

My arguments still are valid. Your blusterings aren't going to change
that.

You are a liar and you show it every day.

Wanna continue attacking my father Kennie?

Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm

Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com

Greegor

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 1:47:44 PM12/22/09
to
KRP wrote

Moe >  Wanna continue attacking my father Kennie?

What part of the above was an attack on your FATHER, Moe?

lostintranslation

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 11:37:29 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 22, 5:43 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>  "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

DD256AF is a honorable discharge from the reserves. Talked to a
recruiter today. Can we lay this all to rest now?

lostintranslation

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 11:38:18 PM12/22/09
to

And greg, STFU. Unless you served in the military or are a military
brat, fuck off

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 1:33:16 AM12/23/09
to
On Dec 22, 10:37 pm, lostintranslation

The DD-214 would show the details about Kennie's service record. It
would prove or disprove his claims he' s made online about his AF
service.

And LIT, recruiters are not exactly full of honesty. They have been
known to deceive people into signing up.''

lostintranslation

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:01:02 AM12/23/09
to

Oh, I know that. This guy had no reason to lie to me though. Good
grief it sounds like im siding with ken but im not. he either served
or he didn't. i do think he did serve but not in the capacity he
claims to have served. i suppose we can sll sit here and debate it
with the fat schmuck until we are blue in the face or his head finally
explodes but without him providing absolute proof, this is going to go
on forever.

Greegor

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 1:12:16 AM12/24/09
to
KRP > As your pal Sullivan so eloquently says so
KRP > often, GFYS! My discharge certificate
KRP > PROVES that I served HONORABLY which
KRP > is the ONLY point on the floor, aside from
KRP > your insane claims. YOU screech that the
KRP > DD-256 does NOT prove "honorable service."
KRP >Try telling that to REAL Veterans, Maureen.
KRP > I am NOT going to post my DD-214 or my
KRP > Air Force form 7 you YOU to play with
KRP > PSYCHO! Or your buddy David Moore.
KRP >
KRP > You know Maureen - Air Force BRATS were
KRP > a pain in the ass and a necessary thing
KRP > service members HAD to deal with when
KRP > they served. Most BRATS got over being
KRP > such assholes when they became adults.
KRP > However not ALL ever made the change
KRP > from child to adult. YOU are in the later
KRP > group.They STILL have loud mouths and
KRP > small brains and think they KNOW IT ALL.
KRP > The worst were the BRATS of JUNIOR
KRP > OFFICERS who though they OUTRANKED
KRP > their parents and demanded to be saluted
KRP > like they were officers themselves and
KRP > generally treated ernlisted personell like
KRP > slaves on a plantation. We did our best
KRP > to IGNORE the diaper brigade as much as possible.

Moe >  Wanna continue attacking my father Kennie?

G > What part of the above was an attack on your FATHER, Moe?

LIT > And greg, STFU.  Unless you served in the
LIT > military or are a military brat, fuck off.

What part of the above was an attack on Moe's FATHER?

Greegor

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 1:19:55 AM12/24/09
to
LIT > [...] but without him providing absolute
LIT > proof, this is going to go on forever.

But I thought you just conclusively proved he lied.
I'm starting to think you don't believe in your own proof!

LOL

Kent Wills

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 4:12:36 AM12/24/09
to
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:12:16 -0800 (PST), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>LIT > And greg, STFU. =A0Unless you served in the


>LIT > military or are a military brat, fuck off.
>

You keep having "=A0" in your posts, Greg. You've claimed to be
a fairly knowledgeable computer "expert" a few times. Odd that you've
been UNABLE to explain why these characters keep appearing in your
posts.
Ken was having them as well, though I haven't seen a post from
him with the characters for a few days.
What are you doing that is causing them? I'm very curious.
Be sure HIDE and NOT answer. That is, after all, what you do
best. Well, that and attack, to the degree possible on-line, anyone
who beats your precious CPS.

>What part of the above was an attack on Moe's FATHER?

Where, outside of your drug induced delusions, does LIT make the
claim you present? Be specific (a win for you), or admit, again, that
your admitted use and abuse of illegal drugs forced you to lie.
Of course you will HIDE and NOT answer. If I were a betting man,
I'd put $10,000.00 on red and a few hundred on you hiding from my
comment.

A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):

Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."


"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser

" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services

With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."

"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.

--a true story


As of Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009:

Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:

Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00


$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00

Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.

"I am now a "founded" child abuser for making a
7 year old take a fast cold shower."
-- Gregory Scot "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson bragging in MID
<cu6H6.14493$3c6.3...@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>

Greegor

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 12:05:56 PM12/24/09
to
LIT > And greg, STFU. =A0Unless you served in the
LIT > military or are a military brat, fuck off.

KBW > You keep having "=A0" in your posts, Greg.

Not in LIT's comment or my quote of it.
Only where you apparently added it to the quote.

They seem to be a byproduct of anonymizers
and script kiddy stuff.

[...]

LIT > And greg, STFU. Unless you served in the


LIT > military or are a military brat, fuck off.

What part of the above was an attack on Moe's FATHER?

Kent Wills

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 2:46:41 PM12/24/09
to
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:05:56 -0800 (PST), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>LIT > And greg, STFU. =A0Unless you served in the
>LIT > military or are a military brat, fuck off.
>
>KBW > You keep having "=A0" in your posts, Greg.
>
>Not in LIT's comment or my quote of it.

Not in LIT's original post, but it did appear in your quote, in
addition to your comments. This happens with nearly every post from
you.
Pangborn has commented on similar aspects of your posts in the
past.

>Only where you apparently added it to the quote.
>
>They seem to be a byproduct of anonymizers
>and script kiddy stuff.

So you admit you use anonymizers and the like. I must admit I
didn't think you would ever do so.
I've long suspected you were the one authoring the more recent
forgeries, allowing Pangborn to take 100% of the blame. Until you
slipped up and admitted you use them, it was easy to believe it was
Ken. The proof that he's done so in the past is undeniable.
Now that you've slipped and admitted you make use of them, please
explain your motivation. Why did you do it? Has Ken angered you in
some way?
I admit the reason is none of my business. That you admit you do
it is enough. Still, I would like to know why you've turned on Ken.
You two have been attacking each other, albeit very weakly, for weeks.

First, I'm not LIT. I know your Fregoli is working overtime,
due, I suspect, to the stress of another Christmas with NO income
(unless you got on welfare). It can't be easy for you.
Second, prove I've ever claimed it was, a win for you, or admit
that it's another of your drug induced lies, another loss for you.

Greegor

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 11:29:38 PM12/24/09
to
Do you have a DISCHARGE, Moe?

pohaku kane

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 11:52:32 PM12/24/09
to
Greegor wrote:
> Do you have a DISCHARGE, Moe?

Merry Christmas, Greg

Greegor

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 5:00:21 PM12/25/09
to

And to Ann!

Good luck with the Alz, Don!

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages