Father's Rights Groups - Like Pushing A Car Uphill With A Rope
fathersrightsblow
and google groups. Here they can post their bilious poison amongst
themselves with great entertainment value to people like me, who
monitor so called 'father's rights groups'.
It's an enjoyable thing for me, to see the divided and impotent
father's rights movement post web based hate literature in some kind of
web based "drumming circle". When will they ever learn?
They say family courts are unjust, but rather than change their
personal situation and rebuild their personal lives, they spend all
their energy bitching and whining about the evil courts and biased
judges. They spend their time posting to feminist newsgroups in an
abusive tone: somehow, some way, they must lash out at women because
they have been neutered by the courts.
And justifiably neutered I might add. At the heart of the matter is the
simple fact that men are lazy. Too lazy to become the fathers they
claim to be. Wrapping themselves in the garb of victimization, they are
a shadow of the people they used to be: hopeful, optimistic and useful
to their communities, wives and families.
Facts about the fathers rights movement are as follows:
1) There is no movement. They have no political clout whatsoever.
Reports of their political clout have been greatly exaggerated because
fathers rights groups are a loose collective of individual men who call
themselves a group.
2) Among existing quasi-organized groups, there is a black hole of
apathy. Poorly led and plagued by infighting (they are always whipping
it out) they cannot build consensus to do anything more than conduct
weekly "bitch sessions" in church basements and living rooms all over
North America.
3) If they ever do meet with some degree of success, they implode. One
need only look at how infighting led to the implosion of
Fathers-4-Justice. Yeah, talking about kidnapping Tony Blair's kid is
gonna win you a lot of friends and influence in the corridors of power.
Fucktards.
4) There will never be an effective fathers rights movement with any
political clout because at the heart of the matter is the simple fact
that it takes cooperation to build a successful movement and it also
takes some degree of motivation to enable a movement's members. The
father's rights "non-movement" possesses niether. Mostly because men
are too lazy to do anything (no surprise there) and also because just
as men don't like to ask for directions, go to the doctor or do
anything that would make them feel like they know precisely what they
are doing.
Have you ever pushed a car uphill with a rope? That's the father's
rights movement. Limp, flaccid and emasculated. The entertaining irony
is that it isn't feminists doing this to men, it's men doing it to
themselves.
Keep pushing guys, someday you might get it.
krp -
"fathersrightsblow" <fathersr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149941412.3...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> The last bastion of angry men is the Internet and namely, yahoogroups
> and google groups. Here they can post their bilious poison amongst
> themselves with great entertainment value to people like me, who
> monitor so called 'father's rights groups'.
It's far from the last one. But you are right, if you look at the
history of father's rights groups, men's rights groups, whatever you'd like
to call them, 99.9% of their efforts have been confined to internece warfare
and little boys pissing contests. Whenever anyone tries to get something
positive accomplished there come the rest of the "great leaders" to tear
down whatever somebody else starts. It is all fratricide.
> It's an enjoyable thing for me, to see the divided and impotent
> father's rights movement post web based hate literature in some kind of
> web based "drumming circle". When will they ever learn?
Impotent they may be. But the anger is justified.
> They say family courts are unjust, but rather than change their
> personal situation and rebuild their personal lives, they spend all
> their energy bitching and whining about the evil courts and biased
> judges. They spend their time posting to feminist newsgroups in an
> abusive tone: somehow, some way, they must lash out at women because
> they have been neutered by the courts.
A valid point. The cloest thing to an exception has been ACFC.
> And justifiably neutered I might add. At the heart of the matter is the
> simple fact that men are lazy. Too lazy to become the fathers they
> claim to be. Wrapping themselves in the garb of victimization, they are
> a shadow of the people they used to be: hopeful, optimistic and useful
> to their communities, wives and families.
That's bullshit.
> Facts about the fathers rights movement are as follows:
> 1) There is no movement. They have no political clout whatsoever.
> Reports of their political clout have been greatly exaggerated because
> fathers rights groups are a loose collective of individual men who call
> themselves a group.
Well you are right and wrong. It's more like a "rabble" than a group.
And people like Turdbrain Turam are the best examples of why they are.
> 2) Among existing quasi-organized groups, there is a black hole of
> apathy. Poorly led and plagued by infighting (they are always whipping
> it out) they cannot build consensus to do anything more than conduct
> weekly "bitch sessions" in church basements and living rooms all over
> North America.
You've been to them huh? Pity parties. The amazing thing is that at one
time I dared suggest a rememdy to that very problem, by getting
organiozational help from SCORE. (Service Corps of Retired Executives)
You'd have thought I asked them to part with their Corvettes. As long as the
"father's movement" is led by a bunch of mental cripples on EGO trips - it
will remain a JOKE!
> 3) If they ever do meet with some degree of success, they implode. One
> need only look at how infighting led to the implosion of
> Fathers-4-Justice. Yeah, talking about kidnapping Tony Blair's kid is
> gonna win you a lot of friends and influence in the corridors of power.
> Fucktards.
Well that story was a plant from its enemies. But your general point is
valid.
> 4) There will never be an effective fathers rights movement with any
> political clout because at the heart of the matter is the simple fact
> that it takes cooperation to build a successful movement and it also
> takes some degree of motivation to enable a movement's members. The
> father's rights "non-movement" possesses niether. Mostly because men
> are too lazy to do anything (no surprise there) and also because just
> as men don't like to ask for directions, go to the doctor or do
> anything that would make them feel like they know precisely what they
> are doing.
You are right about the problem, but not the cause. It isn't that men
are lazy - although many want something for nothing. They bitch at lawyers
etc who try to help them because they think they should do it for FREE if
they "really cared." It is because so many men are little mommy's boys.
> Have you ever pushed a car uphill with a rope? That's the father's
> rights movement. Limp, flaccid and emasculated. The entertaining irony
> is that it isn't feminists doing this to men, it's men doing it to
> themselves. Keep pushing guys, someday you might get it.
I don't see it in MY lifetime as long as men remain the way they are,
wanting something for nothing and whining like babies when they don't get
it.
krp -
<G6Aig.1595$WM4.1347@trnddc01>...
> There's nothing wrong with looking in other people's medicine
> cabinets.
krp -
" -" <nntp.n...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:m3fw$ybs....@newsread1.news.pasearth1ink.nut...
> There's nothing wrong with looking in other people's medicine
> cabinets.
Yes they are with their LITTLE BOT! How cute!
SPAM!
krp -
> I'd give you a piece of my mind, but I ate the last bit.
Dustbin
> "fathersrightsblow" <fathersr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1149941412.3...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>>The last bastion of angry men is the Internet and namely, yahoogroups
>>and google groups.
twenty-five years trying to get somewhere with
the legal system; it is simply a dictatorship
that allows females to do as they please while
liberally shitting on men.
I have spent more than twenty years trying to
get somewhere with the media; I have never got
past the feminist gatekeepers. And so it goes
on. Men perhaps end up violent because it is the
only thing left when simply abused at every turn
and no one will even begin to take us serious.
> Here they can post their bilious poison amongst
>>themselves with great entertainment value to people like me, who
>>monitor so called 'father's rights groups'.
>
>
> It's far from the last one. But you are right, if you look at the
> history of father's rights groups, men's rights groups, whatever you'd like
> to call them, 99.9% of their efforts have been confined to internece warfare
> and little boys pissing contests. Whenever anyone tries to get something
> positive accomplished there come the rest of the "great leaders" to tear
> down whatever somebody else starts. It is all fratricide.
>
>
>>It's an enjoyable thing for me, to see the divided and impotent
>>father's rights movement post web based hate literature in some kind of
>>web based "drumming circle". When will they ever learn?
Men get nowhere because the capitalist system
does not want them to get anywhere.
The first men's group was set up in US in 1960
to address such matters as the way men are
treated in divorce and rape cases, since then
largely nothing.
The first womens group was set up in the US in
1965; in two years they had a declaration from
the UN and in ten years they had some kind of
equality legislation.
Men are still trying to get something done about
both rape and divorce courts; but politicians
have their eyes on the female vote. This is why
I have been saying since the late eighties that
the right to vote for women must be repealed.
That, for the present appears to be the only way
we will get anywhere.
D.
--
=======================
Women have spent the last
30 years proving that men
have been right for the
last 30 centuries.
=======================
fathersrightsblow
think fathers are more oppressed than African Americans were before
Martin Luther King? There aren't any feminists out there telling men to
go to the back of the bus or to drink from "men only" water fountains.
The reason that fathers groups have no political clout (aside from what
I have already written) is the simple fact that men/fathers are not
oppressed by our culture. The last time I looked, men oppress
themselves because they don't go to the doctor to get their prostate
checked, they don't seek counselling when they are experiencing a
crisis.. no, men like to "take it like a man".
You cannot blame feminists or courts for father's inability to create
their so called "movement". Your analogy is that men are just "too
beaten" by the "system" to do anything about their lot in life and if
that is true, then it highlights the superiority of women and the
feminist movement: women have experienced far more oppression than men,
but we actually get out there and change the world. The only thing men
do well is change the channel of their wide screen tv.
Divorce is easier on women because women know how to reach out for
help. They form useful support networks. They support each other. Men
on the other hand refuse to do this, and then are relegated to posting
their bile on usenet when they get their asses kicked in family court.
Divorced fathers are the new impotency in need of personal viagra.
MCP
krp
"Dustbin" <dustbin...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:01Sig.367976$xt.4...@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>The last bastion of angry men is the Internet and namely, yahoogroups
>>>and google groups.
> It is all we are left with. I have spent over twenty-five years trying to
> get somewhere with the legal system; it is simply a dictatorship that
> allows females to do as they please while liberally shitting on men.
The "movement" as such has been trying much longer than that.
> I have spent more than twenty years trying to get somewhere with the
> media; I have never got past the feminist gatekeepers. And so it goes on.
> Men perhaps end up violent because it is the only thing left when simply
> abused at every turn and no one will even begin to take us serious.
To be sure the feminazis do guard the gates of much of the media.
>> Here they can post their bilious poison amongst themselves with great
>> entertainment value to people like me, who
>>>monitor so called 'father's rights groups'.
>>
>> It's far from the last one. But you are right, if you look at the
>> history of father's rights groups, men's rights groups, whatever you'd
>> like to call them, 99.9% of their efforts have been confined to internece
>> warfare and little boys pissing contests. Whenever anyone tries to get
>> something positive accomplished there come the rest of the "great
>> leaders" to tear down whatever somebody else starts. It is all
>> fratricide.
>>
>>
>>>It's an enjoyable thing for me, to see the divided and impotent
>>>father's rights movement post web based hate literature in some kind of
>>>web based "drumming circle". When will they ever learn?
> Men get nowhere because the capitalist system does not want them to get
> anywhere.
> The first men's group was set up in US in 1960 to address such matters as
> the way men are treated in divorce and rape cases, since then largely
> nothing.
Charlie Metz' first group was in the mid 50's.
> The first womens group was set up in the US in 1965; in two years they had
> a declaration from the UN and in ten years they had some kind of equality
> legislation.
Women's "suffrage" groups predated NOW by a century.
> Men are still trying to get something done about both rape and divorce
> courts; but politicians have their eyes on the female vote. This is why I
> have been saying since the late eighties that the right to vote for women
> must be repealed. That, for the present appears to be the only way we
> will get anywhere.
Taking the vote from them won't change a thing. Oddly a woman recently
told me that men made their biggest mistake "when they let us out of the
kitchens." Unless you are prepared to revert women to being barefoot and
pregnant depriving them of the vote won't change anything. Our problem is
ourselves. We fail to realize that 90% of women are as opposed to radical
feminism as we are. Until we can reach out to them and convince them we are
"sane" instead of demonstrating that we're not, things will keep getting get
worse. First we need to clean up OUR act!
krp
<nGUig.1289$db5.125@trnddc03>...
> If you promise to miss me, I will go away.
krp
> The reason that fathers groups have no political clout (aside from what
> I have already written) is the simple fact that men/fathers are not
> oppressed by our culture.
That's bullshit!
> You cannot blame feminists or courts for father's inability to create
> their so called "movement".
You're right. Our pitiful male ego pissing contests do it for you. Take
a look at the pathetic contests in soc.men today. Look at the extremes.
Look, for example at Turdbrain Turam....... Then look at the MALES from
Altenate Kooks like Ratzio Peter Ross, Chad Stone etc. Look at all the
testosterone! Look at a bunch of little boys waving their dicks at each
other trying to be the alpha male. I know that Ratz and his pals in AUK
think they are not doing that. LIKE BLOODY HELL! They are worse even that
Turdbrain is! It's self hatred as males.
> Divorce is easier on women because women know how to reach out for
> help. They form useful support networks. They support each other. Men
> on the other hand refuse to do this, and then are relegated to posting
> their bile on usenet when they get their asses kicked in family court.
> Divorced fathers are the new impotency in need of personal viagra.
When you're right you're right. However never write off solely to sexual
impotence what stupidity also explains.
fathersrightsblow
ROFLMFAO!
What colour is the sky in that world?
>>To be sure the feminazis do guard the gates of much of the media.<<
Oh, really? Well that's kind of interesting because the media is owned
by men. That tells me that men must sell out pretty damned quick.
> >> It's far from the last one. But you are right, if you look at the
> >> history of father's rights groups, men's rights groups, whatever you'd
> >> like to call them, 99.9% of their efforts have been confined to internece
> >> warfare and little boys pissing contests. Whenever anyone tries to get
> >> something positive accomplished there come the rest of the "great
> >> leaders" to tear down whatever somebody else starts. It is all
> >> fratricide.<<
No argument here. Father's rights groups and so called "activists"
would rather "eat their own" than work together. Still having problems
understanding why this is feminism's fault.
>>First we need to clean up OUR act!<<
LOL. See now that's funny because men can't even clean their own homes.
They get women to do it for them. But seriously, I see no threat from
father's groups at all. I just enjoy rattling their cages once in a
while. They pose no threat to the status quo because they attack each
other rather than help each other.
krp
> Why do you have fanny farts after sex?
fathersrightsblow
a look at the pathetic contests in soc.men today.<<
Confirming my initial hypothesis that reports of father's rights groups
having any kind of political influce is greatly exaggerated. The
pissing contests in soc. men exist on every newsgroup and newslist that
claims to represent men and fathers. Good comedy I'd daresay!
The irony is that while they are whipping it out to see whose is
bigger, even if they finally found the one guy with the biggest member,
he would be a guy with a really big dick surrounded by limp and flaccid
little dicks. He would be the international leader of a non-movement
that exists largely in cyber space.
Ergo - father's rights activists are full of shit, their claims of
victimization at the hands of evil feminists and divorce courts is
laughable and claims that an actual "movement" exists is a big fat lie.
>>When you're right you're right. However never write off solely to sexual
> impotence what stupidity also explains.<<
Describing them as stupid is too kind. Father's rights groups need to
be led and managed by women - just like a household is led and managed
by a woman. Basically father's rights groups want the laws to change
while they watch Monday night football. Fucktards.
Quietlies
father's rights blows - I think he has actually used whole phrases he
has used under his real name lol. Too funny.
MCP
It's not the MEN on these groups who are impotent,it is the pussy whipped
little
mommy's boys who come on to these groups and continue to demean what they
do!
MCP
fathersrightsblow
> little
> mommy's boys who come on to these groups and continue to demean what they
> do!<<
I am not demeaning what anyone other that so-called father's rights
groups are doing. How do these groups help fathers? Exactly what do
they do that offers anything more than posting rubbish about feminists
and hate literature about women? Were I a father going through a
divorce, how would a father's rights group help me? If the best they
can offer is flaming each other and a vague promise of "changing the
law", what laws have they changed? What have they REALLY done for
fathers lately?
I am not the enemy, I am simply stating facts. I agree that divorce is
probably a terrible experience for anyone going through it. I also
think that promising a father that the laws will change and "join our
group to change the law" when that group exists largely in cyber space
is false advertising and harmful to fathers.
krp
>>>You're right. Our pitiful male ego pissing contests do it for you. Take
> a look at the pathetic contests in soc.men today.<<
> Confirming my initial hypothesis that reports of father's rights groups
> having any kind of political influce is greatly exaggerated. The
> pissing contests in soc. men exist on every newsgroup and newslist that
> claims to represent men and fathers. Good comedy I'd daresay!
ANy notion that an effective political force for men exists is a
delusion. The father's rights movement more resembles a Chinese Fire Drill
than anything a politician would ever take seriously.
> The irony is that while they are whipping it out to see whose is
> bigger, even if they finally found the one guy with the biggest member,
> he would be a guy with a really big dick surrounded by limp and flaccid
> little dicks. He would be the international leader of a non-movement
> that exists largely in cyber space.
There are lots of the "GREAT LEADERS" who think they are the BIG DICKS!
> Ergo - father's rights activists are full of shit, their claims of
> victimization at the hands of evil feminists and divorce courts is
> laughable and claims that an actual "movement" exists is a big fat lie.
You are right that many acticists are full of shit, the victimization is
REAL. Any group with ZERO political clout is going to be a victim. Black
people were victims (as in 2/3rds of a human being) until they finally
ORGANIZED...
>>>When you're right you're right. However never write off solely to sexual
>> impotence what stupidity also explains.<<
> Describing them as stupid is too kind. Father's rights groups need to
> be led and managed by women - just like a household is led and managed
> by a woman. Basically father's rights groups want the laws to change
> while they watch Monday night football. Fucktards.
Again the problems are the BLOWHARDS (like Turin who tear down anyone
else's work) and that too many men come to the movement looking for a MOMMY
to save them instead of a motivation to change anything. HELP ME and I'm
gone.
krp
> iam ask about sperm inside anal make any thing such as disease?
GL Fowler
wrote:
Don't play with him/her and they'll go away, the one thing they can't
tolerate is silence to their own rant. Killfiles work wonders....
A jury is 12 individuals who decides who has the best lawyer.
- Mark Twain
krp
news:R%Uig.370690$xt.2...@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>> When you're right you're right. However never write off solely to
>>> sexual
>>> impotence what stupidity also explains.
> It's not the MEN on these groups who are impotent,it is the pussy whipped
> little
> mommy's boys who come on to these groups and continue to demean what they
> do!
Guy I have 30 years of seeing the men who come to the groups looking for
help. They want somebody to SAVE them with near ZERO effort on their own
part. They want it done FOR them. They don't come to change things except
for their own pathetic asses.
Gotta tell you this. When I first got involved with the "men's movement"
I spent YEARS helping guys for FREE. Getting lawyers to donate time, etc. I
lived with the childish belief that the men we helped would become dedicated
to a movement to help others like themselves. BULLSHIT! As soon as we solved
THEIR problem - they were GONE - Not even a "thank you." They had NO time
for the group. ZERO! It was back to softball practice. I finally had my fill
of that with the DEMANDS growing that I was NOT going to give ALL of my life
for nothing. So I started charging for my knowledge. And I STILL hear the
David Moore's and Turdbrain Turams who life has dealt severe personal
blows - WHINE like little babies that somebody would actually get paid for
helping. God they whine like little children. I'm tired of listening to
whining. I don't like when women do it - I HATE it when men do it.
I have seen the men who COME to the groups - they want a handout. They
think we OWE it to them!
krp
> If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?
krp
MCP>>>> It's not the MEN on these groups who are impotent,it is the pussy
whipped little
>> mommy's boys who come on to these groups and continue to demean what they
>> do!<<
> I am not demeaning what anyone other that so-called father's rights
> groups are doing. How do these groups help fathers? Exactly what do
> they do that offers anything more than posting rubbish about feminists
> and hate literature about women?
Point taken. MOSTLY what the groups are - are PITY PARTIES where men can
get together and WHINE - with a local POPE in charge - sitting on his throne
where his "subjects" can come forward and kiss his ring. What do they do?
Attack everyone else trying to do something. They are pathetic copies of
little "warlords" with their pathetic spheres of influence. EVERY attempt at
UNIFYING the movement and building it has been thwarted by these PATHETIC
warlords.
krp
> I used a 60% carbolic acid home-made face peel yesterday. I left the
> stuff on for only 45 minutes, but it left burn marks all over my face.
> I washed my face with ivory soap before and after the peel. Will these
> burn wounds heal without leaving scars?
krp
>>>To be sure the feminazis do guard the gates of much of the media.<<
> Oh, really? Well that's kind of interesting because the media is owned
> by men. That tells me that men must sell out pretty damned quick.
Does it come as a surprise to you that men are prisoners of their penis?
Look at Bill Clinto for god's sake. Men would sell their mother for a piece
of ass from a chick! But the FACT is that as you look at broadcast media,
near 100% of ASSIGNMENT EDITORS are women. Local and national. And THEY
decide what is news and what isn't and HOW it will be covered. Print media
has pretty much the same process where WHAT yopu see and hear is filtered
through a VAGINA!
> No argument here. Father's rights groups and so called "activists"
> would rather "eat their own" than work together. Still having problems
> understanding why this is feminism's fault.
Ain't that the truth. I worked my ass off for TWO YEARS - pulle din lots
of personal markers to get apprfoved for a half million dollar anual
renewing grant to help indigent fathers with meritorious cases. As soon as I
annonced it - the "GREAT LEADERS" (warlords) came unglued! One DEMANDED that
the money be used for his drea, of a slick publication. Another demanded
that it be sued to put HIM on a speaking tour on joint custody. Others had
their own ideas. The Joint Custody guy got ahold of the foundation mad emany
FALSE claims (that we didn't have 501 (c) (3) status etc and he did - he
didn't we did) and threatened lwssuits and going to the media. Others did
similar shit. Needless to say we did NOT get the $500,000..................
We also had a chence to get several Hollywood celebrities behind us - that
too was SHOT DOWN by people who caused the people to conclude that the men's
movement was make up of a bunch of psychos. Which - of course - IT IS! If
you ahve ANY questions - even small ones - read Turbrain Turam's ranting.
That seals the pouch!
krp
> I have heard allot about 'orgasms' but what are they?
MCP
"Lost" <lost...@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:448c337c$0$16388$892e...@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> "fathersrightsblow" <fathersr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>I also
>>think that promising a father that the laws will change and "join our
>>group to change the law" when that group exists largely in cyber space
>>is false advertising and harmful to fathers.
>
> the group is really nonexistent. A pressure group, for example, can
> function just as well when its members communicate online as when they
> talk face to face.
>
> As an example, before so many feminisers got into soc.men, the
> regulars here often combined to conduct email, letter and phone
> campaigns with such targets as politicians, the media and big
> business. British family law is presently undergoing a major change
> because of pressure that originated in soc.men.
>
> True, some men have carried the battle beyond email campaigns and
> you've watched them on television. However, they would have had no
> success at all if the politicians and media hadn't received a
> concerted positive reaction from many men. The men are real enough,
> even if they use the internet to deliver their message.
>
> Internet groups serve several functions, including
> consciousness-raising (men sometimes accept inequities because 'that's
> the way it is'), enabling men to talk about their problems and, by no
> means least, letting them know that they're not alone.
>
> The traditional media has done a good job of silencing men's rights
> proponents by using 'shame' tactics; real men don't cry, you're not a
> real man if you complain, and so on. That has led directly to men
> being murdered and their killers going unpunished because they are
> female.
>
> To some extent, the anonymity of the internet removes most of that
> shame until the men come to realise that they have nothing to be
> ashamed of. That's why the feminazis and their lapdogs constantly try
> to shame men on men's rights groups.
Agreed
I for one have spent a lot of my time over the years writing and e-mailing
not
only the media and politicians but anyone who bashes men,and have had a lot
of success.It has personally cost me a good bit of time and money as i also
donate
to worthy men's groups.And if my actions have saved just ONE man from the
shit
that has been thrown at me then it will all have been woth it.
Just to give an example of what can be achieved with a little pressure,in
the city i
live the public buses and bus shelters used to be plastered with huge
adverts of
(ZERO TOLLERANCE OF MEN IN DOMESTIC ABUSE) and (POSTERS DEPICTING RAPE)
these have now all been removed with a little kick up the butt by myself and
a few others.
In fact how things have changed,i was driving into an ASDA superstore last
week and there was
a huge floodlit sign up saying (do you know that every five minutes a MAN
dies from prostate cancer)
so yes i would say there IS progress,just KEEP UP THE PRESSURE.
MCP
GL Fowler
wrote:
You need to find another line of work..
krp
"GL Fowler" <km...@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:n3mo8297jme79dplk...@4ax.com...
>
> You need to find another line of work..
>
Don't think so. Have helped thousands of dads win custody over the past 30
years. THAT, is changing things. The more judges are made to get used to
giving dads custody the more often it'll happen.
Listen to the dykes in NOW scream about it. In the 70's dads almost NEVER
got custody. It is now happening often enough to have the Femmis in full
blown PANIC mode.
krp
> When you open a bag of cotton balls, is the top one meant to be thrown
> away?
GL Fowler
wrote:
Well you can't have your cake and eat it too! Either you are in the
game to help or you are not, if in, then thick skin is a mandatory
requirement.
What did you expect, that somehow the one's who came to you would be
any different than the general population of whom they were called?
Most won't know the name of the janitor who cleans their office
building either.
GL Fowler
wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:49:47 GMT, " krp" <web2...@verizon.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>Do they type in all caps when in PANIC mode, KennyKakes?
>
Freddy, your fly is open again....
Aratzio
double secret probation because:
>Don't think so. Have helped thousands of dads win custody over the past 30
>years. THAT, is changing things. The more judges are made to get used to
>giving dads custody the more often it'll happen.
>
>Listen to the dykes in NOW scream about it. In the 70's dads almost NEVER
>got custody. It is now happening often enough to have the Femmis in full
>blown PANIC mode.
>
>
Here is where you and I will always differ. You are all abut the men
and shafting the women. I am for the best parent being awarded
physical custody and both sharing the financial responsibilities.
It is not about men and women, you tard, it is about the children. But
all you fuckwits can ever focus upon is some faux gender war that you
and your opposite extremists are fighting. Fuck the kids, they are
just pawns to you fucksticks.
--
alt.hackers.malicious - Wanker Stomping Award - 2005
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - Jan, 2006
alt.usenet.kooks - Hammer of Thor - July, 2005
alt.flame - Worst Flame War - 2005
Please ask your admin to be adding alt.aratzio to your news server
alt.aratzio Usenet asshole Aratzio
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae....@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."
VjikQueen of soc.froot explaining sock paranoia:
Message-ID: <760l32t9k1upl5ilq...@4ax.com>
"Yep. Whether or not they're you, they're you, doesn't make no diff in
how I treat them."
krp
"GL Fowler" <km...@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>>> You need to find another line of work..
>>>
>>
>>Don't think so. Have helped thousands of dads win custody over the past 30
>>years. THAT, is changing things. The more judges are made to get used to
>>giving dads custody the more often it'll happen.
>>
>>Listen to the dykes in NOW scream about it. In the 70's dads almost NEVER
>>got custody. It is now happening often enough to have the Femmis in full
>>blown PANIC mode.
> Well you can't have your cake and eat it too! Either you are in the
> game to help or you are not, if in, then thick skin is a mandatory
> requirement.
I'm in the game to help, but also make a living.
> What did you expect, that somehow the one's who came to you would be
> any different than the general population of whom they were called?
> Most won't know the name of the janitor who cleans their office
> building either.
That's THEIR problem. Not mine.
krp
"Fred Hall" <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e6i79l$g3m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> You need to find another line of work..
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don't think so. Have helped thousands of dads win custody over the past
>>>>30
>>>>years. THAT, is changing things. The more judges are made to get used to
>>>>giving dads custody the more often it'll happen.
>>>>
>>>>Listen to the dykes in NOW scream about it. In the 70's dads almost
>>>>NEVER
>>>>got custody. It is now happening often enough to have the Femmis in full
>>>>blown PANIC mode.
>>>
>>>Do they type in all caps when in PANIC mode, KennyKakes?
>>>
>>Freddy, your fly is open again....
>
Nothing that small would have much of an influence on anyone Freddy.
krp
> I'm quite comfortable wearing the same underwear three or four times
> without washing them.
krp
> I think out loud, therefore you can hear me.
Aratzio
double secret probation because:
>
>"GL Fowler" <km...@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>news:nq5p82pikg3gonvgt...@4ax.com...
>
>>>> You need to find another line of work..
>>>>
>>>
>>>Don't think so. Have helped thousands of dads win custody over the past 30
>>>years. THAT, is changing things. The more judges are made to get used to
>>>giving dads custody the more often it'll happen.
>>>
>>>Listen to the dykes in NOW scream about it. In the 70's dads almost NEVER
>>>got custody. It is now happening often enough to have the Femmis in full
>>>blown PANIC mode.
>
>> Well you can't have your cake and eat it too! Either you are in the
>> game to help or you are not, if in, then thick skin is a mandatory
>> requirement.
>
> I'm in the game to help, but also make a living.
So Kenny Kakes, to insure you have a job, you make sure to foment
enough discord so as to continue to make money.
How nice when thy admit what is their true rationale.
krp
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1p8p82lqrdhiri68k...@4ax.com...
>>>>> You need to find another line of work..
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don't think so. Have helped thousands of dads win custody over the past
>>>>30
>>>>years. THAT, is changing things. The more judges are made to get used to
>>>>giving dads custody the more often it'll happen.
>>>>
>>>>Listen to the dykes in NOW scream about it. In the 70's dads almost
>>>>NEVER
>>>>got custody. It is now happening often enough to have the Femmis in full
>>>>blown PANIC mode.
>>
>>> Well you can't have your cake and eat it too! Either you are in the
>>> game to help or you are not, if in, then thick skin is a mandatory
>>> requirement.
>>
>> I'm in the game to help, but also make a living.
>
> So Kenny Kakes, to insure you have a job, you make sure to foment
> enough discord so as to continue to make money.
Oh Ratz you're so cute - now go out and play. In traffic - on the
Interstate.
krp
> I FEEL MUCH BETTER NOW, SINCE I'VE GIVEN UP ALL HOPE!!!
Howard Bear
I saw a picture of meat loaf today with his underwear tatooed on.
Does it count?
Aratzio
double secret probation because:
>
So you avoid that question.
How about this one:
Do you believe making posts to usenet that exacerbate situations in
real life is a good marketing tool for your business?
fathersrightsblow
>
> The fact that a group exists largely in cyber space doesn't mean that
> the group is really nonexistent. A pressure group, for example, can
> function just as well when its members communicate online as when they
> talk face to face.
Gimme a break. You are either a group/organization/organized or you are
not. Maybe the reason these so called groups exist on cyberspace is
because were you ever to get them all in the same room they'd start
whipping it out.
>
> As an example, before so many feminisers got into soc.men, the
> regulars here often combined to conduct email, letter and phone
> campaigns with such targets as politicians, the media and big
> business. British family law is presently undergoing a major change
> because of pressure that originated in soc.men.
Again, gimme a break. Have you seen how many retarded "masculinists"
and "father's rightists" have invaded feminist newsgroups lately?
British family law is undergoing no such change whatsoever. There is no
new legislation being tabled in their House of Commons relating to the
one thing that father's rights groups have demanded, namely, "equal
time in both homes" - a stupid proposition. Children don't function
well under that kind of regime and it's hypocritical for fathers to
want this given that it doesn't exist in the overwhelming number of
marriages.
> True, some men have carried the battle beyond email campaigns and
> you've watched them on television. However, they would have had no
> success at all if the politicians and media hadn't received a
> concerted positive reaction from many men. The men are real enough,
> even if they use the internet to deliver their message.
Perhaps they need to come out of the shadows.
> Internet groups serve several functions, including
> consciousness-raising (men sometimes accept inequities because 'that's
> the way it is'), enabling men to talk about their problems and, by no
> means least, letting them know that they're not alone.
Consciousness raising? Puhhhleeze.The men who access the internet on
father's rights issues are fathers who have been soundly trounced in
family courts. Angry men who are looking for some kind of change to the
law that will give them their sense of power and entitlement over their
children and former wives back. Father's groups claim there are no
services for men in communities? Gimme a break! Get out there and raise
funds.Create the programs if you say they don't exist. Have bake sales.
Conduct capital campaigns. In short, do as women's groups have been
doing for years. Do father's groups do this. Hell no.
>
> The traditional media has done a good job of silencing men's rights
> proponents by using 'shame' tactics; real men don't cry, you're not a
> real man if you complain, and so on. That has led directly to men
> being murdered and their killers going unpunished because they are
> female.
Who owns the traditional media? Men! Maybe you should target the media
owners for betraying their gender! The last time I looked, male killers
outnumber female killers. Might want to check your facts on that one.
Even your "spiritual guru" Warren Farrel has written about the sheer
injustice of men killing other men.
> To some extent, the anonymity of the internet removes most of that
> shame until the men come to realise that they have nothing to be
> ashamed of. That's why the feminazis and their lapdogs constantly try
> to shame men on men's rights groups.
What men's rights groups? Where? Where? Where are their offices? What
is their charitable status? You would have to have actual groups in
order for feminist organizations to actually target them.
krp
>>>>Freddy, your fly is open again....
>>>
>>> Does it excite you?
>>
>>Nothing that small would have much of an influence on anyone Freddy.
>>
>
> unresolved sexual issues, KennyKakes? Or is that just your opinion
> based upon other penises you've admired?
From the laughter of women as you TRY to flash them GIRLYMAN!
krp
> Again, gimme a break. Have you seen how many retarded "masculinists"
> and "father's rightists" have invaded feminist newsgroups lately?
It's called RETALIATION!
krp
>>> So Kenny Kakes, to insure you have a job, you make sure to foment
>>> enough discord so as to continue to make money.
>>
>>
>>Oh Ratz you're so cute - now go out and play. In traffic - on the
>>Interstate.
>>
>
> So you avoid that question.
> How about this one: Do you believe making posts to usenet that exacerbate
> situations in
> real life is a good marketing tool for your business?
Wouldn't know. Why do you do it?
krp
> Why are tough men happy to fight for a purse
krp
> I have this awful, heavy feeling in my head. I think it's the paxil.
krp
> lately wen me n my boyfrined r havin sex i get really a sore bum, it
> lasts about half an hour then fades off. is this normal??
fathersrightsblow
krp wrote:
>
> It's called RETALIATION!
Further confirming my hypothesis about father's rightists caring to
establish control over women.
GL Fowler
wrote:
>Does it excite you?
>
You hope, cut a 1/4 " off you'd have a 6" scar on your ass!!
GL Fowler
Heh, yes, I was only responding to your rant, OK, it was just your
day.. :-)
krp
> krp wrote:
RE: Men posting in women's groups AFTER women post to men's.
>> It's called RETALIATION!
>
> Further confirming my hypothesis about father's rightists caring to
> establish control over women.
What part of they can do it but we can't don't you understand? WHO is
the control freak? The cretins who start it or those who merely respond to
it? You insistence that men CAN'T respond pretty well says who is what here.
krp
"GL Fowler" <km...@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
No problem
krp
> So why shouldn't I stay in this despised, torturous relationship? I
> don't wish to offend anyone, you know.
krp
> I love you.....I know...