In article <
196ff1e4a1f6f57b...@remailer.org.uk>
Nathan Hale <
nob...@remailer.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Yes, it's a shame that such an established remailer was left to
> wither on the vine when all that was required was a little
> TLC from the remop.
Be proactive. Build one to take his place.
If you're smart enough.