> short...@nowhere.net(Shorty)
> ''stagger: ''Yo pimple face jack bait. Yo hoe is calling for din
> din...join her at the troff foole. hog sloppin time!! BAW-HAWWW----
>
> ~
>
> ~
>
> ~ <stagger:
> = = Well look who finally came out of the ''ignore closet''.= = :)0(:
> It was inevitable, and it wuz a sure nuff gar-ron-tee. :)o(:
>
http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/13298/
http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/13298/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/13298/
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
> misty forest wrote:
Actually, she did not. Starting from the first article in my list pane:
| From: E J <X_a...@webtv.net>
| Subject: Re: Today's Moronic Cryptic Message
| Organization: Proverbs 3:27
| Message-ID: <intitq$ukl$4...@dont-email.me>
| Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
Then there is:
| From: Stagger Lee <road...@webtv.net>
| Subject: 2011 Mar 19 18:10
| Organization: Proverbs 3:13,14
| Message-ID: <inunqr$v63$4...@dont-email.me>
| Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
Then there is:
| From: misty forest <The_Mist...@webtv.net>
| Subject: 2011 May 17 11:09 Tue
| Organization: Proverbs 3:29
| Message-ID: <io9ott$3tg$4...@dont-email.me>
| Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
So don't try to tell me that three articles in a row, posted through the
same service: Eternal-September, and posted using the same client: MS
Windows Mail, are three different people. These three articles were posted
by the same person. Apparently, this 'E J' fool thinks he can pull some wool
over our eyes. What a maroon!
Next time you reply to an article, do yourself a favor. If this "Mozilla
3.03" you are using is truly a Mozilla-class agent, use the [Ctrl+U] keys,
and check the article source information. The headers will reveal clues
about who actually posted what.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
http://www.kgw.com/news/Mailman-Suspended-for--119879359.html?commentPage=4#comments
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
statistically speaking there's
practically, at least, a 1 in 42
chance of winning at tic tac toe.
there may be scenarios with
higher probable outcomes
for a tic tac toe.
but once a you recognize the pattern
there's basically
a zero chance of getting
a tic tac toe.
what's kind of funny,
though it may seem sort of hokie
is that,
what if there was this combination safe
that had a snickers bar inside
and the key to get inside and
get at the snickers bar
was getting a tic tac toe.
now, if you play it the 'normal' way
and try to -win- at tic tac toe,
you never win and you never get at the snickers bar,
but if you could convince yourselves to cooperate
and play to get the tic tac toe
as opposed to -winning- at tic tac toe,
you could easily work out a tic tac toe
in a matter of moments and get
the snickers bar and -win-
the candy.
but who's gunna trust whom
to actually -win- the
tic tac toe
and open the combination
safe and get the candy bar
and then share that candy bar because
it was some sort of joint effort?
otherise, it's a perpetual 'cats' game
and the snickers bar never gets got.
but you played to -win-
and never did win.
must be some sort of wierd thing.
like i said,
it seems hokie.
of course you could switch
snickers bar for perpetual bliss,
but i was just making an example.
like sometimes, in certain areas,
to play to -win-
results in perpetual nothingness in a cats game,
and you always 'lose'.
not that this other thing is playing to lose,
but you can't -win- at that thing playing to -win-.'
or,
playing to -win- takes on
a different character that it
may have in some other areas.
anyway, i see now that tic tac toe
does have some sort of purpose.
it's not just an exercise in futility
that would be the secondary meaning.
it must be sort of like playing house,
cuz, when i was a little person,
we played war,
"bang bang, you're dead"
"bullet proof vest"
"bullet proof everything"
i never played house...
maybe once or twice.
but i see this thing in tic tac toe.
you _can_ -win- at tic tac toe.
it's just a differnt kind of -win-
maybe i always knew that.
sure seems clear, now.
"i have not yet begun,
to fight no more forever"
of course, there's people who play house
who start drawing lines down the middle of it
and end up going to war
so, that's no criterion.
they shoulda figgered out from tic tac toe.
depends on how you look at it
like you need to have peace talks
before you go to war
cuz after,
it always ends up in cats
tic tac toe
the amazing maze...
____________________________
start ____________________________ finish
try not to get stuck
# statistically speaking there's
# practically, at least, a 1 in 42
# chance of winning at tic tac toe.
# there may be scenarios with
# higher probable outcomes
# for a tic tac toe.
like, if you said that "God"
was some sort of dyad/unity
and 'they' play "tic tac toe for Creation"
if you say that this "God"
is in diametric opposition,
and "plays to 'win'"
you never get a tic tac toe,
and therefore, no Creation happens,
because you can't 'win' -that way-
so, in this sort of look,
'they' the "God" 'dyad/unity'
must play a complementary game
on the 1 in 42 chance,
and then "God" 'wins' and
Creation happens.
-that- is the only 'permutation'
that will result in Creation;
a successful 'tic tac toe'
[like the "six numbers" bit]
of course, if you like greater complexity,
you can extend this sort of 'group theory'
out into more dimensions,
but the standard methodology is the same.
to get the 'tic tac toe' and trigger Creation,
'they' the God dyad/unity,
must cooperatively complement and not
stand in diametric opposition.
and see, that's why
the Oppositional Adversary
lands in a snare.
that persona/e, ends up in
an argument with itself
and can never complete
the tic tac toe,
and just won't hear
anything
# the amazing maze...
# ____________________________
# start ____________________________ finish
### try not to get stuck
ooh ooh ooh.... "whyaduck"
...sometimes to have to break to 'win'
> > that had a snickers bar inside
> > and the key to get inside and
> > get at the snickers bar
> > was getting a tic tac toe.
in this case, the correct combination is the key.
the way i figure it, Jesus practically -lets you-
'win' the first time, and that sort of gets you into the Temple,
but, to get in to the "Holiest of all places"
you have to reciprocate and show your trust for Jesus.
and that's the 'key'
and this trust shows itself in other interpersonal relationships.
it's a really easy game,
but, you can get stuck...
comprendo?
> short...@nowhere.net(Shorty)
> ''stagger: ''Yo pimple face jack bait. Yo hoe is calling for din
> din...join her at the troff foole. hog sloppin time!! BAW-HAWWW----
>
> ~
>
> ~
>
> ~ <stagger:
> = = Well look who finally came out of the ''ignore closet''.= = :)0(:
> It was inevitable, and it wuz a sure nuff gar-ron-tee. :)o(:
>
http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/13298/
Thanks for asking.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Hope you have a nice weekend, in your part of the nation.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
How long have been ''trolling'' reason I ask, until lately, I've never
heard of you?
0
2
4
6
8
years
> short...@nowhere.net(Shorty)
> ''stagger: ''Yo pimple face jack bait. Yo hoe is calling for din
> din...join her at the troff foole. hog sloppin time!! BAW-HAWWW----
>
> ~
>
> ~
>
> ~ <stagger:
> = = Well look who finally came out of the ''ignore closet''.= = :)0(:
> It was inevitable, and it wuz a sure nuff gar-ron-tee. :)o(:
>
http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/13298/
________
GrouponT Official Site
1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Get 50-90% off your city's best!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3231/4db5302593a5d9f046st06vuc
On Jun 16, 2:07 pm, Gene Poole <bee...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 5:14 AM, Stagger Lee wrote:
>
>
>
> > "E J" <X_ak...@webtv.net> wrote in message
> >news:intitq$ukl$4...@dont-email.me...
> >> ?
> >> "Stagger Lee" <roadp...@webtv.net> wrote in message
> >>news:18406-4CD...@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net...
>
> >>> shortst...@nowhere.net(Shorty)
Lumpy?
Also: don't knock masturbation. It's sex with someone I love.
Also also: don't top psot. this isn't WebTV
--
Gene Poole
Does anyone still remember that?
I'll take it under advisement
= = = 175. post and responses on this thread, gotta be some kinda
record...of course Eddie, has posted 151 of them...but, atleast it is
a manometer of a thread.....like no other.......chee-wah-wah.
Zzzz.
§
This is no early July.
I do stumpies...
&rate,
§£€$¥
#
Alt.Online-Service.Webtv
"Tu B'Av"
> > >>> It was inevitable, and it wuz a sure nuff gar-ron-tee. :)o(:
> > >>http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/02468/
> > No! and I don't giev a good god damn!
> Alt.Online-Service.Webtv
> "Tu B'Av"
tub of ice cream
--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ne...@netfront.net ---
#############
Exodus 16:15
1 Samuel 30:13
> Timothy Sutter wrote:
> EJEddie wrote:
> > Gene Poole wrote:
> > > Stagger Lee wrote:
> > > > "E J" wrote...
> > > >> ?
> > > >> "Stagger Lee" wrote...
> > > >>> (Shorty)
> > > >>> It was inevitable, and it wuz a sure nuff gar-ron-tee. :)o(:
> > > >>http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/02468/
> > > No! and I don't giev a good god damn!
> > Alt.Online-Service.Webtv
> > "Tu B'Av"
> tub of ice cream
> #############
>
> Exodus 16:15
> 1 Samuel 30:13
> #############
happy burfday
¡Nacho Olé!
> Timothy Sutter wrote:
> > > EJEddie wrote:
> > > Timothy Sutter wrote:
> > > EJEddie wrote:
> > > > Gene Poole wrote:
> > > > > Stagger Lee wrote:
> > > > > > "E J" wrote...
> > > > > >> ?
> > > > > >> "Stagger Lee" wrote...
> > > > > >>> (Shorty)
> > > > > >>> It was inevitable, and it wuz a sure nuff gar-ron-tee. :)o(:
> > > > > >>http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/02468/
> > > > > No! and I don't giev a good god damn!
> > > > Alt.Online-Service.Webtv
> > > > "Tu B'Av"
> > > tub of ice cream
> > > #############
> > > Exodus 16:15
> > > 1 Samuel 30:13
> > > #############
> > happy burfday
> ĄNacho Olé!
cheery o
######-##########
0 2468 0 8642 0 2468
£€¥¡@&$
%§#¤
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
"1 - 3 - Gil"
> > cheery o
> ######-##########
> 0 2468 0 8642 0 2468 0
>> £€¥¡@&$
>> %§#¤
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> "1 - 3 - Gil"
2011 Aug 13 Sat Tu B'Av
> 2011 Aug 13 Sat Tu B'Av
08642
> 08642
20864
> > 08642
> 20864
tube of toothpaste
If you must guess, then you won't get it.
> Timothy Sutter wrote:
> > > > > >http://www.songmeanings.net/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Tu B'Av"
> > > > > > > > > > > > Exodus 16:15
> > > > > > > > > > 1 Samuel 30:13
> > > > > 2011 Aug 13 Sat Tu B'Av
> > > > 08642
> > > 20864
> > tube of toothpaste
> If you must guess, then you won't get it.
i don't must guess and i don't much care about 'getting' it.
> > > tube of toothpaste
> > If you must guess, then you won't get it.
> i don't must guess and i don't much care about 'getting' it.
tub of lard
2011 Nov 10 20:16 Thu
> Timothy Sutter wrote:
> > > > > > > > >http://www.songmeanings.net/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Tu B'Av"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Exodus 16:15
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Samuel 30:13
> > > > > > > > 2011 Aug 13 Sat Tu B'Av
> > > > > > > 08642
> > > > > > 20864
> > > > > tube of toothpaste
> > > > If you must guess, then you won't get it.
> > > i don't must guess and i don't much care about 'getting' it.
> > tub of lard
> 2011 Nov 10 20:16 Thu
it's not my war
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
"2 4 6 8"
Zzzz.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
{[(£>$)]}
Zzzz.
??
"You can't support an operation without operations support."
J Phillips, President
ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ
C FM
Zzzz.
L'Shana Tova tikateivu
L'Shana Tova v'teichateimu