anyone wanna breed?
rosaphil
brunette and disease-free.
(manic-depression, okay; schizophrenia, dementia, any sorta venereal
disease -- not)
me, getting way too old. kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford to
take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always an
option).
me, female, too poor to go to a sperm bank, but will consider ice cubes
and a turkey baster.
this is not a joke post.
hurry.
rsvp.
+********** Snail me yer rosehips if you liked this post! ************
*Better Living Thru Better Living!* http://www.interport.net/~rugosa *
Globalhead
In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.99052...@interport.net>, rosaphil
<rug...@interport.net> wrote:
>you, smart, on teh tall side, asian or white, male with high iq and
>brunette and disease-free.
>
In other words the men who'd never date you in real life.
>(manic-depression, okay; schizophrenia, dementia, any sorta venereal
>disease -- not)
>
Well, that rules out 99.9% of the people using AOL.
>me, getting way too old. kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford to
>take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always an
>option).
>
Why is it that only the odd people want to breed?
>me, female, too poor to go to a sperm bank, but will consider ice cubes
>and a turkey baster.
>
How about a dildo and Vaseline?
>this is not a joke post.
>
Yet funny in its own way.
>hurry.
>
Why? Are the doctors threatening to cancel your supervised visits?
Larry.
"You are all a Lost Generation."
-- Gertrude Stein in conversation.
ICQ Number: 37523426
Kredai
Globalhead <globa...@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:7i45m7
> Why is it that only the odd people want to breed?
so, are you odd? or chaste?
(me, I'm odd, just not that odd)
Thrash
>
> you, smart, on teh tall side, asian or white, male with high iq and
> brunette and disease-free.
>
> disease -- not)
>
> take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always an
> option).
>
> and a turkey baster.
>
>
>
> rsvp.
>
> +********** Snail me yer rosehips if you liked this post! ************
> *Better Living Thru Better Living!* http://www.interport.net/~rugosa *
I live in tx
too far away, unless you wanna come here
Thrash
Lindsay Evans
>
> you, smart,
ypu
> on teh tall side,
yup
> asian or white,
yup
> male
ummm.... *looks* ... yup
> with high iq
yup
> and brunette
nup
> and disease-free.
i was last time i looked
>
> (manic-depression, okay; schizophrenia, dementia, any sorta venereal
> disease -- not)
how 'bout being a pathological anarchist who likes to blow shit up?
> me, getting way too old.
*shudder*
> kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford to
> take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always an
> option).
>
> me, female,
good, i would had to stalk you with a nail gun if you were male
> too poor to go to a sperm bank,
hmmm, so you wont pay for my plane fare? [from australia]
> but will consider ice cubes
> and a turkey baster.
hmmm, that sounds interesting ;op
> this is not a joke post.
really? i pissed *my*self laughing
> hurry.
>
> rsvp.
--
"If you can't trust the government,
who can you trust?"
LES GREEN
rosaphil wrote:
>
> you, smart, on teh tall side, asian or white, male with high iq and
> brunette and disease-free.
>
> (manic-depression, okay; schizophrenia, dementia, any sorta venereal
> disease -- not)
>
> me, getting way too old. kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford to
> take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always an
> option).
>
> me, female, too poor to go to a sperm bank, but will consider ice cubes
> and a turkey baster.
>
> this is not a joke post.
>
> hurry.
>
> rsvp.
>
> O.K. I haveto say it , if you are looking for a man with high spirm count try going to a bar ,
>if you go up to a man ( it shuldn't take much to find one that looks right ) and say "buy me a drink and i will rock your world (or f#$% me stud, I love giving oral sex , buy me a drink & i will f$%^ you senceless , .... )and take him home and extract a sample by your favorit means . That's all it would take.
> In closing I would like to say that you are to most puthetic person I have had the displeasure of ever met on line , and if you can't jet a man long enough to get pregers I sugjest that you shave your back ( and front if nessesary ) and gat off line and get a life or eat a bullet and save us from your whining !!!!!!!!!!!!
CyBeR-CeLt
hell am I going to get this out of my keyboard.Oh, here it comes again,
gotts to go.
CyBeR-CeLt
"In the end it all comes down to 1 and 0"
Jennacy Backo
rosaphil <rug...@interport.net> wrote:
> you, smart, on teh tall side, asian or white, male with high iq and
> brunette and disease-free.
I will have to thank you for the laughs as I am rather ill now and
don't feel like laughing for the most part. People always think if
they get selective with their partner, they will have kids with those
traits. But, thanks to the wild cards genes are, this is not the
case. You said you were 'kinda smart', I would think someone of your
high intelligence would realize that.
Added to that, this is not the place if you want a breeding partner. I
wouldn't dip my toes into the gene pool with the rest of the 'punks
here to save my pale hide. ;P
>
> (manic-depression, okay; schizophrenia, dementia, any sorta venereal
> disease -- not)
What's wrong with syphillus? Why oppress our smaller microfriends?
Christ, you make someone all full of pus and rot and you get a bad
rep...
>
> me, getting way too old. kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford
to
> take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always
an
> option).
So if you can take care of the kid financially, you wil be able to
answer the inevitable question of 'Where's my daddy?'? Geez, this is
why I advocate human neutering/spaying. Some people just don't deserve
kids. :P
>
> me, female, too poor to go to a sperm bank, but will consider ice
cubes
> and a turkey baster.
Too poor to go to sperm bank, but can take care of kid on own,
financially. Hmmm, welfare? :P
>
> this is not a joke post.
Oh, *now* you tell us this. I was wondering where the punchline was.
:P
-Jennacy Backo, UberFrau
--
***** Rune Nunc - Laugh Now *****
de...@my-dejanews.com // quelm.draconic.com/~desu
Death rides a pale horse...in bed
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
Fnordian
>answer the inevitable question of 'Where's my daddy?'?
What do these two things have to do with each other at all? Anyone can answer
the question "Where's my daddy?"...even if the answer is "I don't know,"
because he ran off somewhere or "I decided to raise you on my own, because I
didn't know anyone who I would like to raise a child with" and then explain the
biological implications later in life...it's easier than people think to
explain that not all kids have two parents. But really, what do financial
support and answering that question have to do with each other? I'm lost.
--
Lila...taa taa, the lost teletubby...
Designation: -4711 of not-a-goth
"Large breasts are like pets. Everyone likes them, but YOU're the one who has
to take care of them."
SickSickSick
AH.
Does being genetically evil count as a disease?
And seriously, what sort of people do you think frequent internet newsgroups?
Especially alt. hierachy ones...?
Anyway.
o to a sperm bank, but will consider ice cubes
> and a turkey baster.
?
is this some sort of bizarre kitchen based sexual perversion?
Should start a newsgroup
alt.bin.chickenfucker
heh.
HO0J666
In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.99052...@interport.net>,
rosaphil <rug...@interport.net> wrote:
> you, smart, on teh tall side, asian or white, male with high iq and
> brunette and disease-free.
>
> (manic-depression, okay; schizophrenia, dementia, any sorta venereal
> disease -- not)
>
> me, getting way too old. kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford to
> take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always an
> option).
>
> me, female, too poor to go to a sperm bank, but will consider ice cubes
> and a turkey baster.
>
> this is not a joke post.
>
> hurry.
>
> rsvp.
>
> +********** Snail me yer rosehips if you liked this post! ************
> *Better Living Thru Better Living!* http://www.interport.net/~rugosa *
>
>
Larry Madill, Jr.
----------
In article <7i72vg$1ev$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Jennacy Backo <jba...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.99052...@interport.net>,
>>
>> me, getting way too old. kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford
>to
>> take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always
>an
>> option).
>
>So if you can take care of the kid financially, you wil be able to
>answer the inevitable question of 'Where's my daddy?'? Geez, this is
>why I advocate human neutering/spaying. Some people just don't deserve
>kids. :P
>
>>
Please, remember to spay and neuter your homo sapiens.
james evans
only seeing the short term and not the long term future of events like this.
Sounds like they run into the line of fire rather than away.
Jennacy Backo <jba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7i72vg$1ev$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.99052...@interport.net>,
> rosaphil <rug...@interport.net> wrote:
> > you, smart, on teh tall side, asian or white, male with high iq and
> > brunette and disease-free.
>
> I will have to thank you for the laughs as I am rather ill now and
> don't feel like laughing for the most part. People always think if
> they get selective with their partner, they will have kids with those
> traits. But, thanks to the wild cards genes are, this is not the
> case. You said you were 'kinda smart', I would think someone of your
> high intelligence would realize that.
> Added to that, this is not the place if you want a breeding partner. I
> wouldn't dip my toes into the gene pool with the rest of the 'punks
> here to save my pale hide. ;P
>
> >
> > (manic-depression, okay; schizophrenia, dementia, any sorta venereal
> > disease -- not)
>
> What's wrong with syphillus? Why oppress our smaller microfriends?
> Christ, you make someone all full of pus and rot and you get a bad
> rep...
>
> >
> > me, getting way too old. kinda smart. located in nyc. able to afford
> to
> > take care of kid sans financial input from you (though that is always
> an
> > option).
>
> So if you can take care of the kid financially, you wil be able to
> answer the inevitable question of 'Where's my daddy?'? Geez, this is
> why I advocate human neutering/spaying. Some people just don't deserve
> kids. :P
>
> >
> > me, female, too poor to go to a sperm bank, but will consider ice
> cubes
> > and a turkey baster.
>
> Too poor to go to sperm bank, but can take care of kid on own,
> financially. Hmmm, welfare? :P
>
> >
> > this is not a joke post.
>
> Oh, *now* you tell us this. I was wondering where the punchline was.
> :P
>
> -Jennacy Backo, UberFrau
> --
> ***** Rune Nunc - Laugh Now *****
> de...@my-dejanews.com // quelm.draconic.com/~desu
> Death rides a pale horse...in bed
>
>
Jennacy Backo
fnor...@aol.com (Fnordian) wrote:
*snips*
Because 1) money does not raise children, parents do. You cannot raise
a child on just money. There's emotional, mental, psychological
raising... 2) I have clear-cut ideas on children, in that they should
have two parents (among other things) 3) Due to strong feelings of
parenting and humanity in general, I find most people these days
shouldn't be having kids, due to reasons of mental ineptitude,
financial reasons, etc. Added to this, I'm suffering from a head cold
and am not as coherent as I would like to be. :P
If you still can't grasp what I'm getting at, just email me or
something.
-Jennacy Backo, there was a reason why I ramble, but I lost it at
paragraph #247.
<< Mayday >>
> And seriously, what sort of people do you think frequent internet
newsgroups?
>
> Especially alt. hierachy ones...?
>
> Anyway.
>
>
It's funny but everyone seems to have a bad perception of the fellow
cyberpunk who would post in this newsgroup. Come on, just because we all
frequent a cp newsgroup doesn't make us some kind of antisocial anarchial
psychopaths. What does that say for your selves? Maybe you're right
though, I guess your average cyberpunk or say netrunner would have some sort
of emotional deprevation due to the time and emotions devoted to his
console. This should be posted, what are the psychological characteristics
of a cyberpunk. I think the Hacker FAQ covers this. Must this really be
the case, I think it's going to chage sometime in the very near future.
More and more people covering the span of the limitless cyberspace. Do I
predict a surge in emotional disturbances created by the technological front
moving into the next century. I think so, Orwellian, dystopian, hmm,
technology is not a bad thing, technology is largely communication so maybe
it can be countered, like the electronica scene fusing with computer
technology, robotics, AI, sci-fi, and all that good stuff, I think it could
be considered a cultural expansion much like the rennasiance. Who knows,
I'm a babbling troublemaker.
NEil Phillips
wisdom:
>It's funny but everyone seems to have a bad perception of the fellow
>cyberpunk who would post in this newsgroup. Come on, just because we all
>frequent a cp newsgroup doesn't make us some kind of antisocial anarchial
>psychopaths.
Speak for yourself ;)
--
NEil (phil...@gwbbs.net.au)
Support the use of real names on the Internet.
The opinions expressed in this message are not my own,
but rather are those of Microsoft Corporation.
DeepFix
<unl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>It's funny but everyone seems to have a bad perception of the fellow
>cyberpunk who would post in this newsgroup. Come on, just because we all
>frequent a cp newsgroup doesn't make us some kind of antisocial anarchial
>psychopaths.
Hey! Antisocial anarchial psychopaths have feelings too!!
> What does that say for your selves? Maybe you're right
>though, I guess your average cyberpunk or say netrunner would have some sort
>of emotional deprevation due to the time and emotions devoted to his
>console.
Why does no one seem to say the same about saddos who spend 4-6 hours
every evening watching shite television? Especially football programs!
- There was some match on TV last Saturday afternoon, and the streets
of London were noticeably emptier than usual... Weird, but it enhanced
my 'shopping experience' ;- )
DeepFix www.deepfix.freeserve.co.uk ICQ 31621818
'God is dead; but considering the state of the species man is, there
will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, where his shadow will be shown.'
- Nietzsche.
rosaphil
i was gettng worried.
and yes, very odd.
and would come to texas or australia, but they've outlawed orgasm in those
territories i've heard.
and yes, mostly chaste, not chased.
men being good for only two things -- household repairs involving
heavy-lifting and, uhm, forgot the other thing.
email me offline for further discussion.
kinda smart= iq weschler 147-168 on a non-medicated day.
and smart enuff not to go shopping in any bar or not know how to spell
siphillus (sic).
ciao
Goobs.
i would breed, but that would mean i'd have to go offline...it's not worth
it, i don't like reality that much.
> and would come to texas or australia, but they've outlawed orgasm in those
> territories i've heard.
WTF??????????? did someone forget to tell me what the fuck that's s'posed
to mean??????? outlawed orgasm???????? BTW, since when did Australia
become a territory??? good grief! you live in a country for 24 years,
and nobody tells ya anything.
love goobs.
icq: 38131377
**********************************************
IN ORDER TO REPLY TO THIS EMAIL PLEASE REMOVE
"DIE-SPAMMERS-DIE-" BEFORE SENDING.
**********************************************
Globalhead
In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.990526...@interport.net>,
rosaphil <rug...@interport.net> wrote:
>
>and would come to texas or australia, but they've outlawed orgasm in those
>territories i've heard.
>
And as we all know there is no real difference between Australia and Texas.
Larry Madill, Jr.
RBaconL
>and would come to texas or australia, but they've outlawed orgasm in those
>territories i've heard.
Oooooh. My fiancee is going to be pissed. So much for me going to Australia
with her.
Bugger.
-Ricky
--
"'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a
puff of logic."
Petri Niemelä
> rosaphil <rug...@interport.net> wrote:
> >and would come to texas or australia, but they've outlawed orgasm in those
> >territories i've heard.
Hey, hey, hey, what's this breeding thing thread ???
I wanna get in.. any chicks come to mee!!!!
Like Beavis&Butthead said, "I am the great cornholio, I need chicks for my
bungaloo" (or something like that, if someone heard that more accurately, correct
me...)
Hmm.. maybe I'm not great, or even cornholio, but I definetly need chicks for my
bungaloo... :)
--
-=(Petri Niemelä)=-
petri....@netsonic.fi (home)
niemel...@hkol.fi (school)
My Cyberspace Location: www.welcome.to/petesplace
For faster connexion from Finland type www.netsonic.fi/~petrini
Brad Morrison
Petri =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niemel=E4?= <petri....@netsonic.fi> wrote:
>Like Beavis&Butthead said, "I am the great cornholio, I need chicks for my
>bungaloo" (or something like that, if someone heard that more accurately, correct
>me...)
Beavis said, "I am Cornholio. I need TP for my bunghole."
Translation: I'm speeding. I need toilet paper for my ASS!
--
Brad Morrison: br...@neosoft.com
"Press to test."
(click)
"Release to detonate."
lunaslide
>
> In article <37557A5B...@netsonic.fi>,
> Petri =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niemel=E4?= <petri....@netsonic.fi> wrote:
>
> >Like Beavis&Butthead said, "I am the great cornholio, I need chicks for my
> >bungaloo" (or something like that, if someone heard that more accurately, correct
> >me...)
>
> Beavis said, "I am Cornholio. I need TP for my bunghole."
> Translation: I'm speeding. I need toilet paper for my ASS!
lunaslide * PGP key->pgpkeys.mit.edu port 11371
* * * * * * *
I need TCP/IP for my bunghole! * *
* -Jeff Long * *
* * * * * *
SickSickSick
in .app form if you have a NeXTstation (and if not, why not?).
Basically, we tend to be fairly introverted and attracted to anything that
yields a reasonable mental challenge.
I'm not sure how a Cyberpunk would compare to a Hacker as far as this goes,
but that depends on your definition of cyberpunk.
A recent US study used the term to describe hackers with anti-social
tendancies who took out their real life frutrations on the internet.
Which doesn't seem to be what the FAQ says, or indeed the manifesto.
Who knows.
and.
Technology stifles evolution and turns us into a weaker complacent species.
Most technology to date, apart from the internet, is aimed at telling us what
they want us to think. Maybe I took the Unabomber's manifesto too
seriously/but:-
TV is the MOST dangerous, because people don't really pay attention to what
their heads are being filled with, but I'd say the Web was going the same
way. God (or your deity of choice.) save Usenet.
Still, if i ever have kids, im moving somewhere without phone lines or TV.
OJH
[H3r3514rch]
"... A Flask of sobre tea i drink while relay cameras monitor me..."
In article <WV623.8797$K25....@news4.mia>,
"<< Mayday >>" <unl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
> > And seriously, what sort of people do you think frequent internet
> newsgroups?
> >
> > Especially alt. hierachy ones...?
> >
> > Anyway.
> >
> >
>
> It's funny but everyone seems to have a bad perception of the fellow
> cyberpunk who would post in this newsgroup. Come on, just because we all
> frequent a cp newsgroup doesn't make us some kind of antisocial anarchial
> psychopaths. What does that say for your selves? Maybe you're right
> though, I guess your average cyberpunk or say netrunner would have some sort
> of emotional deprevation due to the time and emotions devoted to his
> console. This should be posted, what are the psychological characteristics
> of a cyberpunk. I think the Hacker FAQ covers this. Must this really be
> the case, I think it's going to chage sometime in the very near future.
> More and more people covering the span of the limitless cyberspace. Do I
> predict a surge in emotional disturbances created by the technological front
> moving into the next century. I think so, Orwellian, dystopian, hmm,
> technology is not a bad thing, technology is largely communication so maybe
> it can be countered, like the electronica scene fusing with computer
> technology, robotics, AI, sci-fi, and all that good stuff, I think it could
> be considered a cultural expansion much like the rennasiance. Who knows,
> I'm a babbling troublemaker.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
CyBeR-CeLt
I don't understand how you can make a statement like "Technology stifles
evolution and makes us a weaker species" without backing it up. If anything
technology has made humans as a species stronger. Hell, we couldn't have
killed off the mammoth without stones.
CyBeR-CeLt
"In the end it all comes down to 1 and 0"
SickSickSick <h0...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:7j78u5$v6d$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Flat
maybe i am a anarchic unsocialised psycho !! why not *g*
the point is no i am not!!
maybe cyberpunks are against the system maybe they have anarhic tendencies
maybe they behave crazy sometimes...
but a cyberpunk isnt the usual irc trash you might find - at least imho -
maybe i dont believe in the system buti believe in me, friends, loyalti and
morality
and dont follow stupid foreign rules i follow my own rules...
Shea Hawes
CyBeR-CeLt wrote:
>
> Well have fun by yourself.
> I don't understand how you can make a statement like "Technology stifles
> evolution and makes us a weaker species" without backing it up. If anything
> technology has made humans as a species stronger. Hell, we couldn't have
> killed off the mammoth without stones.
> CyBeR-CeLt
> "In the end it all comes down to 1 and 0"
>
In some cases, technological advancement came about to make up for our
frailties. By relying on the technology and not trying to improve the
problem, which is not always possible, we make ourselves weaker.
Basically, the technology disrupts the process of natural selection,
survival of the fittest. An example I have always thought of though
never voiced before is eye glasses. By using eyeglasses, someone who
normally could not do everything that someone who does not need glasses
could do, can now operate at the same level as everyone else. Say they
end up producing offspring with someone else who's vision is not quite
up to par. Now snowball that out a few generations. You now have a
portion of the population that is dependant on technology to function in
society. Without their glasses, these people are in a sense, weaker
than someone who does not need glasses.
Matthew Devney
And following this train of logic to its conclusion, we see that as long
as that technology is available, all is well and good and evolution is
working as it should. But if that technology should ever go away, then
those who need glasses would be at a decided disadvangate -- and
evolution would quickly do its dirty work and they would be weeded out.
--
Matthew Devney
I can even do reality!
Petri Niemelä
> In some cases, technological advancement came about to make up for our
> frailties. By relying on the technology and not trying to improve the
> problem, which is not always possible, we make ourselves weaker.
> Basically, the technology disrupts the process of natural selection,
> survival of the fittest. An example I have always thought of though
> never voiced before is eye glasses. By using eyeglasses, someone who
> normally could not do everything that someone who does not need glasses
> could do, can now operate at the same level as everyone else. Say they
> end up producing offspring with someone else who's vision is not quite
> up to par. Now snowball that out a few generations. You now have a
> portion of the population that is dependant on technology to function in
> society. Without their glasses, these people are in a sense, weaker
> than someone who does not need glasses.
So, what are you trying to say ?!?
That people who wear eye-class shouldn't be allowed to breed ???
Hey, gimme a fucking break... We're not on stone age, if you've noticed... And
what has happened to you're morality, compassion etc... ???
And besides, for what do we need physical attributes btw ?
We don't have to be the strongest & fittest guy around to be able to breed (and
to kill you're meal), if you're noticed, and I wouldn't like if it were so (and
probably most of worlds population too, who aren't atheletes, or have some
impairment...) Nobody's perfect, and shouldn't be...
Brad Morrison
Petri =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niemel=E4?= <petri....@netsonic.fi> wrote:
>So, what are you trying to say ?!?
>That people who wear eye-class shouldn't be allowed to breed ???
No, he's just saying that technology supersedes the survival of the
fittest. It's the victory of human intelligence over brute force.
Try jerking off before you post next time.
Shea Hawes
questions as well as I could and I don't feel compeled to rewrite what
has already been said. I'll include them here incase you missed them on
your news server.
Matthew Devney wrote:
>And following this train of logic to its conclusion, we see that as long
>as that technology is available, all is well and good and evolution is
>working as it should. But if that technology should ever go away, then
>those who need glasses would be at a decided disadvangate -- and
>evolution would quickly do its dirty work and they would be weeded
>out.
>--
> Matthew Devney
> I can even do reality!
Brad Morrison wrote:
>No, he's just saying that technology supersedes the survival of the
>fittest. It's the victory of human intelligence over brute force.
>
> (snip) some other stuff here but again I don't feel the need to quote it.
>
>--
>Brad Morrison: br...@neosoft.com
>"Press to test."
>(click)
>"Release to detonate."
Petri Niemelä wrote:
>
>
> So, what are you trying to say ?!?
> That people who wear eye-class shouldn't be allowed to breed ???
Bill Weiss
news:7j78u5$v6d$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> I believe this is covered in the Hacker Jargon Dictionary, either online
or
> in .app form if you have a NeXTstation (and if not, why not?).
>
> Basically, we tend to be fairly introverted and attracted to anything that
> yields a reasonable mental challenge.
>
> I'm not sure how a Cyberpunk would compare to a Hacker as far as this
goes,
> but that depends on your definition of cyberpunk.
>
> A recent US study used the term to describe hackers with anti-social
> tendancies who took out their real life frutrations on the internet.
>
> Which doesn't seem to be what the FAQ says, or indeed the manifesto.
>
> Who knows.
This is bugging me. The term hacker does NOT mean someone who breaks into
computers for fun/profit. That is a cracker. A hacker is someone who
codes, especially a skilled coder (remember Snow Crash?).
Sorry, I just had to say it.
--
---------------
Bill Weiss
eCode: bWeiss
Brad Morrison
Bill Weiss <cult...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>This is bugging me. The term hacker does NOT mean someone who breaks into
>computers for fun/profit. That is a cracker. A hacker is someone who
>codes, especially a skilled coder (remember Snow Crash?).
>Sorry, I just had to say it.
I hope someone's always there to say it. It needs saying. The
misunderstanding will always be there in the popular media => it's embedded
in the popular culture, but this culture should definitely know.
Now, there are crackers who are cyberpunks, but many cyberpunks are not
crackers.
schuyler
they's jus lahk Tayax-ayinz theyer, though... They gots lots 'o' guns 'n' wahd
opin spayessez... Sheep too.
Globalhead wrote:
> In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.990526...@interport.net>,
> rosaphil <rug...@interport.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >and would come to texas or australia, but they've outlawed orgasm in those
> >territories i've heard.
> >
>
Matthew Devney
>
<snip>
> This is bugging me. The term hacker does NOT mean someone who breaks into
> computers for fun/profit. That is a cracker. A hacker is someone who
> codes, especially a skilled coder (remember Snow Crash?).
>
> Sorry, I just had to say it.
>
Okay, lissen, I don't want to start an argument, I'm not saying you're
wrong, but I do have to point out that 10 years ago, a cracker was one
who cracked software codes, and a hacker was one who defeated computer
security.
Now don't go and flame me, just realize that when you think someone has
it backwards, they could just be a little late.
Bill Weiss
Matthew Devney <mde...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:375E10...@hotmail.com...
Don't worry, no argument here. I use hacker in the sense of those who use
it fully, coders. A coder can get offended when someone uses the "hacker"
misnomer is security intrusion. Luckily, I'm only half coder :)
--
Bill Weiss
eCode: bWeiss
Matthew Devney
>
> Matthew Devney wrote:
> > Okay, lissen, I don't want to start an argument, I'm not saying you're
> > wrong, but I do have to point out that 10 years ago, a cracker was one
> > who cracked software codes, and a hacker was one who defeated computer
> > security.
>
>
Um... About 10 years of paying attention.
--
Matthew Devney
The only thing that made Jesus different is he had root access,
and he knew how to use it.
Goobs.
> >This is bugging me. The term hacker does NOT mean someone who breaks into
> >computers for fun/profit. That is a cracker. A hacker is someone who
> >codes, especially a skilled coder (remember Snow Crash?).
>
> >Sorry, I just had to say it.
>
> misunderstanding will always be there in the popular media => it's embedded
> in the popular culture, but this culture should definitely know.
>
> Now, there are crackers who are cyberpunks, but many cyberpunks are not
> crackers.
> --
i dunno...i'm fucking 'crackers' and it took me 3 weeks just to install
icq <BG>. there are definitely those of us who like CP who have no idea
about hacking, cracking, or even how to use MS Word. hehehe i even
failed a class in BASIC back in highschool :o)
Goobs.
oh for fuck sake! you yanks are FREAKS!!!! (previous
sentence was meant in the kindest possible way :o) ) not too mention
we don't have "lots 'o' guns". as for outlawing orgasms, reread my second
sentence!!!
> Wut? Ya'll mean Tayax-ayas? Don't know nuthin' 'bout Orstrayluh. Reckon'
> they's jus lahk Tayax-ayinz theyer, though... They gots lots 'o' guns 'n' wahd
> opin spayessez... Sheep too.
>
> > >
> > >and would come to texas or australia, but they've outlawed orgasm in those
> > >territories i've heard.
> > >
> >
> > And as we all know there is no real difference between Australia and Texas.
> >
> > Larry Madill, Jr.
> >
> > "You are all a Lost Generation."
> > -- Gertrude Stein in conversation.
> >
> > ICQ Number: 37523426
>
>
>
Brad Morrison
Goobs. <c.du...@DIE-SPAMMERS-DIE-elvis.murdoch.edu.au> wrote:
(I said):
>> I hope someone's always there to say it. It needs saying. The
>> misunderstanding will always be there in the popular media => it's embedded
>> in the popular culture, but this culture should definitely know.
>> Now, there are crackers who are cyberpunks, but many cyberpunks are not
>> crackers.
>i dunno...i'm fucking 'crackers' and it took me 3 weeks just to install
>icq <BG>. there are definitely those of us who like CP who have no idea
>about hacking, cracking, or even how to use MS Word. hehehe i even
>failed a class in BASIC back in highschool :o)
That was my point, Goobster. The two sets intersect, but neither is a
subset of the other. Case is a c-punk hero, but so is Molly, and I doubt
that she ever got behind a cyberdeck.