info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Britain’s Unethical And Deliberate Micro-Viewpoint Indoctrination In The Schools: It Can Happen Here, And Probably Already Does
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Ejercito
Feb 20, 2023, 11:59:38 AM2/20/23
to
https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
FEBRUARY 20, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL
I have been blissfully ignorant of the existence of Andrew Tate (above)
until very recently; my life was better before. He is considered a
social media influencer, aka “someone with power in the culture without
any genuine reason to have it.” Tate was a professional kickboxer who
appeared on the British reality show “Big Brother”—which is just as
moronic as the American version— and was the source of controversy when
his social media posts got him kicked off the show. He began offering
paid courses and memberships through his website promoting an
“ultra-masculine, ultra-luxurious lifestyle,” as well as sexism and
misogyny. Last year, Tate and his brother were arrested in Romania on
suspicions of human trafficking. He’s also been charged with rape.
In summary, this creep makes Kim Kardashian seem like Eleanor Roosevelt.
But he’s got a buff bod and drives cool cars, so British boys and teens
are suckers for his act. In response, British schools, the New York
Times tells us, are now spending class time condemning Tate rather than
teaching their students math, reading and critical thinking.
“I am sad that I have taken up important curriculum time to talk about
Andrew Tate,” Chloe Stanton, an English teacher in East London tells the
Times. “But women have to fight enough in society without this type of
attitude to deal with.” The Times writes, “Believing that schools are a
microcosm of society — and a preview of its future — educators said it
was crucial to target Mr. Tate’s influence early. Since last fall,
principals have sent letters to parents warning of his reach, and
Britain’s education secretary has said that influencers like Mr. Tate
could reverse the progress made in countering sexism.”
Chloe Stanton also tells the Times that Tate “is brainwashing a
generation of boys, and it’s very frightening. They seem to think he is
right. He’s right because he’s rich.” So she agrees with Britain’s
education secretary and school principals across the country that
teachers have to brainwash the brainwashed boys to reject him.
Wrong. Unethical. I call this “micro-viewpoint indoctrination” because
it is far more specific than the typical educational indoctrination in
environmental activism, anti-gun perspectives, racial grievances and
social justice propaganda. All of these are also unethical, varieties of
political and social thought-control that may be less pernicious than
what the Hitler Youth were subjected to but equally totalitarian in
methodology and principle. However, the anti-Tate brain-washing—good
brainwashing, you know—targets a single individual. It is not the proper
role of the schools to be pushing particular political, ideological and
social agendas, but it is really not the role of the schools to tell
students which individuals they should and shouldn’t be listening to,
watching and favoring.
Tate is an easy call: he’s unequivocally repugnant…but so was Howard
Stern at the peak of his popularity. Andrew Dice Clay. Or, if you
prefer, Stokely Carmichael, Jerry Rubin, Abbie Hoffman, Hugh Hefner, Joe
McCarthy, Angela Davis, Bernie Sanders, Richard Nixon, Jane Fonda,
Timothy Leary, Mick Jagger …or Satan.
The schools and their staff have neither the training, moral standing,
skill or intelligence to presume to tell students who they should or
shouldn’t pay attention to, emulate or admire. They also don’t have
proper authority: parents may lack moral standing, skill or
intelligence, but they have something crucial that teachers don’t have:
the right to raise their children as they see fit.
Tate may be an easy call, but many teachers in the U.S. think that
Donald Trump is just as easy a call: he’s evil, and children must be
taught to fear him. Yet Greta Thunberg—speaking of people with
completely contrived authority—recently said that criminal acts may be
justified, insisting, “If we look through history; if people who were
advocating for example for social justice, if they only used the legal
methods then we wouldn’t be where we are today.” By all means, school
classes at the appropriate level should discuss the ethical issues
raised by such “ends justify the means” advocacy. Teaching that Greta
Thunberg herself must be rejected, however, crosses the same ethics line
that condemning Tate does.
Teachers, woke that most of the ar, would never condemn Thunberg,
however—and that alone demonstrates why Great Britain’s anti-Andrew Tate
campaign is a dangerous slippery slope. Teachers may be less destructive
“influencers” than Tate, but they still can’t be trusted when they
engage in indoctrination rather than teaching facts and skills.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
FEBRUARY 20, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL
I have been blissfully ignorant of the existence of Andrew Tate (above)
until very recently; my life was better before. He is considered a
social media influencer, aka “someone with power in the culture without
any genuine reason to have it.” Tate was a professional kickboxer who
appeared on the British reality show “Big Brother”—which is just as
moronic as the American version— and was the source of controversy when
his social media posts got him kicked off the show. He began offering
paid courses and memberships through his website promoting an
“ultra-masculine, ultra-luxurious lifestyle,” as well as sexism and
misogyny. Last year, Tate and his brother were arrested in Romania on
suspicions of human trafficking. He’s also been charged with rape.
In summary, this creep makes Kim Kardashian seem like Eleanor Roosevelt.
But he’s got a buff bod and drives cool cars, so British boys and teens
are suckers for his act. In response, British schools, the New York
Times tells us, are now spending class time condemning Tate rather than
teaching their students math, reading and critical thinking.
“I am sad that I have taken up important curriculum time to talk about
Andrew Tate,” Chloe Stanton, an English teacher in East London tells the
Times. “But women have to fight enough in society without this type of
attitude to deal with.” The Times writes, “Believing that schools are a
microcosm of society — and a preview of its future — educators said it
was crucial to target Mr. Tate’s influence early. Since last fall,
principals have sent letters to parents warning of his reach, and
Britain’s education secretary has said that influencers like Mr. Tate
could reverse the progress made in countering sexism.”
Chloe Stanton also tells the Times that Tate “is brainwashing a
generation of boys, and it’s very frightening. They seem to think he is
right. He’s right because he’s rich.” So she agrees with Britain’s
education secretary and school principals across the country that
teachers have to brainwash the brainwashed boys to reject him.
Wrong. Unethical. I call this “micro-viewpoint indoctrination” because
it is far more specific than the typical educational indoctrination in
environmental activism, anti-gun perspectives, racial grievances and
social justice propaganda. All of these are also unethical, varieties of
political and social thought-control that may be less pernicious than
what the Hitler Youth were subjected to but equally totalitarian in
methodology and principle. However, the anti-Tate brain-washing—good
brainwashing, you know—targets a single individual. It is not the proper
role of the schools to be pushing particular political, ideological and
social agendas, but it is really not the role of the schools to tell
students which individuals they should and shouldn’t be listening to,
watching and favoring.
Tate is an easy call: he’s unequivocally repugnant…but so was Howard
Stern at the peak of his popularity. Andrew Dice Clay. Or, if you
prefer, Stokely Carmichael, Jerry Rubin, Abbie Hoffman, Hugh Hefner, Joe
McCarthy, Angela Davis, Bernie Sanders, Richard Nixon, Jane Fonda,
Timothy Leary, Mick Jagger …or Satan.
The schools and their staff have neither the training, moral standing,
skill or intelligence to presume to tell students who they should or
shouldn’t pay attention to, emulate or admire. They also don’t have
proper authority: parents may lack moral standing, skill or
intelligence, but they have something crucial that teachers don’t have:
the right to raise their children as they see fit.
Tate may be an easy call, but many teachers in the U.S. think that
Donald Trump is just as easy a call: he’s evil, and children must be
taught to fear him. Yet Greta Thunberg—speaking of people with
completely contrived authority—recently said that criminal acts may be
justified, insisting, “If we look through history; if people who were
advocating for example for social justice, if they only used the legal
methods then we wouldn’t be where we are today.” By all means, school
classes at the appropriate level should discuss the ethical issues
raised by such “ends justify the means” advocacy. Teaching that Greta
Thunberg herself must be rejected, however, crosses the same ethics line
that condemning Tate does.
Teachers, woke that most of the ar, would never condemn Thunberg,
however—and that alone demonstrates why Great Britain’s anti-Andrew Tate
campaign is a dangerous slippery slope. Teachers may be less destructive
“influencers” than Tate, but they still can’t be trusted when they
engage in indoctrination rather than teaching facts and skills.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Feb 20, 2023, 12:27:26 PM2/20/23
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
ethics!
--
Die Juden sind unser Unglück.
- Heinrich Gotthard Freiherr von Treitschke (1834-1896)
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
ethics!
--
Die Juden sind unser Unglück.
- Heinrich Gotthard Freiherr von Treitschke (1834-1896)
Peeler
Feb 20, 2023, 12:53:23 PM2/20/23
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 17:27:25 +0000, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "The REAL Revd Terence
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
>>https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
>
> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
> ethics!
Your master Michael keeps TEACHING you ethics, you subnormal perverted pig!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$Szs1....@usenetxs.com>
ONLY in your wildest gay dreams, gay anal Razovic!
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "The REAL Revd Terence
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
>>https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
>
> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
> ethics!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$Szs1....@usenetxs.com>
ONLY in your wildest gay dreams, gay anal Razovic!
Michael Ejercito
Feb 20, 2023, 1:05:01 PM2/20/23
to
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-8, The REAL Revd Terence
shared, you call me a gook.
It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.
Michael
Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>
>https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
>
> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
> ethics!
Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>
> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
> ethics!
shared, you call me a gook.
It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.
Michael
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Feb 20, 2023, 5:42:10 PM2/20/23
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-8, The REAL Revd Terence
>Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
> > <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
> >
> > What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
> > ethics!
>
> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>shared, you call me a gook.
Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-8, The REAL Revd Terence
>Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
> > <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
> >
> > What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
> > ethics!
>
> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>shared, you call me a gook.
you bitch about being called a gook.
> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
visibly ARE a gook.
> You are a Nazi.
You are a gook.
> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
else.
Michael Ejercito
Feb 20, 2023, 10:27:11 PM2/20/23
to
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-8, The REAL Revd Terence
>> Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
>>>
>>> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
>>> ethics!
>>
>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>> shared, you call me a gook.
>
> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
> you bitch about being called a gook.
>
>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>
> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
> visibly ARE a gook.
Nithing, it is STILL immoral for you to call me a gook!
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-8, The REAL Revd Terence
>> Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
>>>
>>> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
>>> ethics!
>>
>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>> shared, you call me a gook.
>
> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
> you bitch about being called a gook.
>
>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>
> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
> visibly ARE a gook.
>
>> You are a Nazi.
>
> You are a gook.
>
>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, WAAAAAAAY below all
> else.
>
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”
We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”
We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings
Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.
The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.
The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.
This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.
In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
Peeler
Feb 21, 2023, 3:21:00 AM2/21/23
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:42:09 +0000, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
<FLUSH another load of the psychopath's ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS, IDIOTIC &
PSYCHOTIC SHIT>
...and nothing's left, yet again! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"There will always be progressives such as Harriet Harperson who want to
take that extra step forward. Paedophiles are still a long way from
being widely accepted."
MID: <rlMUE.676067$H25....@usenetxs.com>
Your kind will NEVER be accepted, in NO part of the world, you filthy old
reject and pedo swine!
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "The REAL Revd Terence
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
<FLUSH another load of the psychopath's ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS, IDIOTIC &
PSYCHOTIC SHIT>
...and nothing's left, yet again! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
take that extra step forward. Paedophiles are still a long way from
being widely accepted."
MID: <rlMUE.676067$H25....@usenetxs.com>
Your kind will NEVER be accepted, in NO part of the world, you filthy old
reject and pedo swine!
BARRY Z. SHEIN jew paedophile of 700 Washington St B'righton Mass
Feb 21, 2023, 10:31:30 AM2/21/23
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:27:03 -0800, Michael Ejercito
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Feb 21, 2023, 10:35:29 AM2/21/23
to
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:27:03 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>
>>> You are a Nazi.
>>
>> You are a gook.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
How can it be, gook? We are HUMAN and you are subhuman.
>>
>>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>
>> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, WAAAAAAAY below all
>> else.
>>
> You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
You are a gook - subhuman by excretion, ainlungual BY CHOICE. The key
word is CHOICE. You were excreted with the same subhuman DNA as the
rest of the gooks. Your CHOICES made you an ainlunguist.
> Bill explains what nithings are.
Greek Bill and greek you, gook.
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-8, The REAL Revd Terence
>>> Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
>>>>
>>>> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
>>>> ethics!
>>>
>>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>>> shared, you call me a gook.
>>
>> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
>> you bitch about being called a gook.
>>
>>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>>
>> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
>> visibly ARE a gook.
> Nithing, it is STILL immoral for you to call me a gook!
Needledick, it is STILL immoral for you to deny being a gook!
>The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-8, The REAL Revd Terence
>>> Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:59:26 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/02/20/britains-deliberate-micro-viewpoint-indoctrination-in-the-schools-it-can-happen-here-and-probably-already-does/
>>>>
>>>> What the fuck do you know about ethics, gook? You're EXEMPT from
>>>> ethics!
>>>
>>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>>> shared, you call me a gook.
>>
>> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
>> you bitch about being called a gook.
>>
>>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>>
>> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
>> visibly ARE a gook.
> Nithing, it is STILL immoral for you to call me a gook!
>>
>>> You are a Nazi.
>>
>> You are a gook.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>
>> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, WAAAAAAAY below all
>> else.
>>
> You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
word is CHOICE. You were excreted with the same subhuman DNA as the
rest of the gooks. Your CHOICES made you an ainlunguist.
> Bill explains what nithings are.
Andrzej rapes kiddies
Feb 21, 2023, 10:52:34 AM2/21/23
to
Sick old nazoid PAEDO Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron "BARRY Z" wrote:
[flush]
Please stay away from HUMAN forums, you shiteating, pissdrinking, donkeydicksucking,
grannyfucking, jizzlicking, motherless pile of sub-excrement nazoid PAEDO filth who
takes dozens of muzzie dicks up his arse and throat on an hourly basis.
Thank you!
Peeler
Feb 21, 2023, 12:52:18 PM2/21/23
to
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:35:28 +0000, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
IDIOTIC and PSYCHOTIC BULLSHIT>
...and nothing's left, yet again! LOL Innit, our pedophilic punching bag?
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$DQ1.1...@usenetxs.com>
NO, it isn't, you filthy old pedo swine!
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "The REAL Revd Terence
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
<FLUSH another load of the psychopath's absolutely RIDICULOUS, INANE,
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "The REAL Revd Terence
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
IDIOTIC and PSYCHOTIC BULLSHIT>
...and nothing's left, yet again! LOL Innit, our pedophilic punching bag?
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$DQ1.1...@usenetxs.com>
NO, it isn't, you filthy old pedo swine!
Michael Ejercito
Feb 27, 2023, 9:51:04 PM2/27/23
to
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:27:03 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>>>> shared, you call me a gook.
>>>
>>> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
>>> you bitch about being called a gook.
>>>
>>>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>>>
>>> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
>>> visibly ARE a gook.
>> Nithing, it is STILL immoral for you to call me a gook!
>
> Needledick, it is STILL immoral for you to deny being a gook!
>
>>>
>>>> You are a Nazi.
>>>
>>> You are a gook.
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> How can it be, gook? We are HUMAN and you are subhuman.
There is nothing subhuman about me!
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:27:03 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>>>> shared, you call me a gook.
>>>
>>> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
>>> you bitch about being called a gook.
>>>
>>>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>>>
>>> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
>>> visibly ARE a gook.
>> Nithing, it is STILL immoral for you to call me a gook!
>
> Needledick, it is STILL immoral for you to deny being a gook!
>
>>>
>>>> You are a Nazi.
>>>
>>> You are a gook.
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> How can it be, gook? We are HUMAN and you are subhuman.
>>>
>>>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>>
>>> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, WAAAAAAAY below all
>>> else.
>>>
>> You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>> key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>> rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>
> You are a gook - subhuman by excretion, ainlungual BY CHOICE. The key
> word is CHOICE. You were excreted with the same subhuman DNA as the
> rest of the gooks. Your CHOICES made you an ainlunguist.
There is EVERYTYHING subhuman about your character!
>
>> Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> Greek Bill and greek you, gook.
>
Bill so dominated you and humiliated you!
>> Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> Greek Bill and greek you, gook.
>
The following article explains your pathology.
http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/
History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +
ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer
"anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.
Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular
societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:
"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."
When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."
What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet
commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.
Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.
At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.
Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.
With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe
Feb 28, 2023, 9:25:08 AM2/28/23
to
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 18:51:09 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
one!
>>>>
>>>>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>>>
>>>> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, WAAAAAAAY below all
>>>> else.
>>>>
>>> You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>>> key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>>> rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>>
>> You are a gook - subhuman by excretion, ainlungual BY CHOICE. The key
>> word is CHOICE. You were excreted with the same subhuman DNA as the
>> rest of the gooks. Your CHOICES made you an ainlunguist.
> There is nothing subhuman about my DNA.
Your slant eyed gook DNA is subhuman by DEFINITION, gook!
> There is EVERYTYHING subhuman about your character!
How can there be, gook? I'm not subhuman like you!
>>> Bill explains what nithings are.
>>
>> Greek Bill and greek you, gook.
>>
> Bill so dominated you and humiliated you!
I so kicked Bill Levinstein's fat jew ass off this group..he never
showed his contorted rodent-like jew face here again!
> The following article explains your pathology.
Zsuckling jew ani explains YOUR pathology.
>http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/
>
>
> History's oldest hatred
> By Jeff Jacoby
History's oldest REASON for hatred: jew behaviour.
<MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:27:03 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
>>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>>>>> shared, you call me a gook.
>>>>
>>>> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
>>>> you bitch about being called a gook.
>>>>
>>>>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>>>>
>>>> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
>>>> visibly ARE a gook.
>>> Nithing, it is STILL immoral for you to call me a gook!
>>
>> Needledick, it is STILL immoral for you to deny being a gook!
>>
>>>>
>>>>> You are a Nazi.
>>>>
>>>> You are a gook.
>>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> How can it be, gook? We are HUMAN and you are subhuman.
> There is nothing subhuman about me!
You are like TOTALLY subhuman. Look in the g-ddam MIRROR if you have
>The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:27:03 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:04:58 -0800, Michael Ejercito
>>>> <MEje...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Mangina, instead of addressing the merits of the article that I
>>>>> shared, you call me a gook.
>>>>
>>>> Gook, instead of addressing the exemption from ethics that I noted,
>>>> you bitch about being called a gook.
>>>>
>>>>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>>>>
>>>> It is immoral for you to deny being a gook when you clearly and
>>>> visibly ARE a gook.
>>> Nithing, it is STILL immoral for you to call me a gook!
>>
>> Needledick, it is STILL immoral for you to deny being a gook!
>>
>>>>
>>>>> You are a Nazi.
>>>>
>>>> You are a gook.
>>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> How can it be, gook? We are HUMAN and you are subhuman.
> There is nothing subhuman about me!
one!
>>>>
>>>>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>>>
>>>> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, WAAAAAAAY below all
>>>> else.
>>>>
>>> You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>>> key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>>> rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>>
>> You are a gook - subhuman by excretion, ainlungual BY CHOICE. The key
>> word is CHOICE. You were excreted with the same subhuman DNA as the
>> rest of the gooks. Your CHOICES made you an ainlunguist.
> There is nothing subhuman about my DNA.
> There is EVERYTYHING subhuman about your character!
>>> Bill explains what nithings are.
>>
>> Greek Bill and greek you, gook.
>>
> Bill so dominated you and humiliated you!
showed his contorted rodent-like jew face here again!
> The following article explains your pathology.
>http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/
>
>
> History's oldest hatred
> By Jeff Jacoby
Peeler
Feb 28, 2023, 9:50:02 AM2/28/23
to
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 14:25:07 +0000, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
...and nothing's left, again! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "The REAL Revd Terence
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
<FLUSH another load of ridiculous, idiotic & psychotic NONSENSE>
sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "The REAL Revd Terence
Fformby-Smythe", farted again:
...and nothing's left, again! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
Michael Ejercito
Mar 4, 2023, 11:46:23 AM3/4/23
to
0 new messages