Why Ukraine In NATO Could Be A Nuclear Nightmare For America

[Leroy N. Soetoro]

https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/04/why-ukraine-in-nato-could-be-a-
nuclear-nightmare-for-america/

It should be a no-brainer for America’s leaders to permanently slam the
door on the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO.

In Washington, D.C., the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is the
equivalent of a foreign policy holy sacrament. To listen to many
policymakers and foreign policy commentators, you would think NATO is as
essential to America as our Constitution, apple pie, or baseball.

Questioning its continued utility in the post-Cold War era — or its
further expansion — elicits accusations of being everything from un-
American to a Putin stooge. This has made it almost impossible to have a
substantive discussion about a military alliance designed to deter the
threat of the Soviet Union — a country that hasn’t existed for more than
30 years.

Look no further than the fact that only one senator, Josh Hawley, voted
against the accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO in June. Hawley
rightly questioned whether it was wise to extend America’s security
umbrella to two wealthy European welfare states that have been safe and
secure as neutral nations for more than 70 years, especially considering
other pressing challenges at home and abroad. The bipartisan vitriol
hurled at Hawley for his reasonable stance showed that Washington is far
from ready to discuss the future of the NATO alliance like adults.

This wasn’t always the case. The United States was a nation founded on a
suspicion of permanent alliances, especially with Europe. George
Washington in his farewell address advised “to steer clear of permanent
alliances with any portion of the foreign world…” and specifically against
“interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe.” This approach
to alliances guided American foreign policy for most of our history and
kept us out of the chaos of 19th-century Europe.

There is good reason for our leaders to revisit the wise words of our
first president. Just last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
demanded an accelerated accession to NATO, claiming that Ukraine is
already a de facto member of the alliance. Due to the collective defense
obligations of NATO members spelled out in Article 5 of the North Atlantic
Treaty, this could mean committing America’s sons and daughters to fight
in an ongoing war with a nuclear-armed Russia.

In a diplomatic cable dispatched in 2008, then-U.S. ambassador and current
CIA Director William Burns wrote, “NATO enlargement, particularly to
Ukraine, remains an ‘emotional and neuralgic’ issue for Russia.” For the
United States, however, there are simply no vital American interests at
stake that warrant a nuclear showdown with Moscow.

Allowing Ukraine to join NATO — and thereby committing America’s full
military arsenal to the negligible matter of who governs the Donbas —
would significantly raise the possibility of nuclear devastation. It is
therefore essential that American policymakers firmly reject Ukraine’s
demands to join NATO while slamming shut the “open door” policy offered at
the 2008 Bucharest Summit.

Even absent the current conflict, NATO membership for Ukraine would be
costly to Americans. According to a report published by the Center for
Strategic and International Studies prior to the launch of the current
Russian invasion, the upfront costs would be up to $27 billion with annual
costs totaling up to $11 billion for American taxpayers if Ukraine joins
NATO. The United States military would also be required to permanently
deploy tens of thousands more troops to Europe, which would further strain
a military that is already over-tasked around the world and facing
significant challenges with recruiting.

A further expansion of NATO and increased deployment of U.S. troops to
Europe would also encourage more European free-riding. Already, rich
European states that should have more of a stake in what happens in
Eastern Europe are contributing significantly less than the United States
to the defense of Ukraine.

Worse, promised defense spending increases by countries such as Germany
may not materialize. And why would they? The United States has doubled
down in Europe, spending tens of billions of dollars and deploying more
troops to Eastern Europe to support Ukraine and reassure nervous allies.
None of this has been fixed to greater defense spending by our NATO
allies. The Europeans have no incentive to stop treating Uncle Sam like
Uncle Sucker.

For these reasons, it should be a no-brainer for America’s leaders to
permanently slam the door on the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO. But
for many, blind loyalty to NATO trumps common sense.

Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., told Politico he supports Ukraine’s rapid
accession to NATO, despite the ongoing war. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,
while not specifically endorsing NATO membership for Ukraine, did say she
supports a “security guarantee” for the country, which could be granted
through NATO. Even the Biden administration, while not endorsing rapid
accession to NATO, did keep the door open for their membership at a later
date.

American leaders should put the interests of the American people first —
and certainly before those of an alliance that long ago outlived its
original purpose. Putting Ukraine under America’s security umbrella
through NATO would lead to disastrous results. Beyond the risk of a
nuclear conflict, spending tens of billions of dollars to expand NATO to
Ukraine or other European countries is foolish during a time of record
inflation, a $30 trillion national debt, and the rising threat of China in
Asia.

The American people are owed a much more serious evaluation of NATO and
its continued utility than the emotional nostalgia that dominates the
discourse in policymaking circles.


--
"LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
recover with no after effects.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.n...@mail.house.gov

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

[dobkun]

On 2022-10-04 21:55:43 +0000, Leroy N. Soetoro said:

> https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/04/why-ukraine-in-nato-could-be-a-
> nuclear-nightmare-for-america/
>
> It should be a no-brainer for America’s leaders to permanently slam the
> door on the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO.
>
> In Washington, D.C., the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is the
> equivalent of a foreign policy holy sacrament. To listen to many
> policymakers and foreign policy commentators, you would think NATO is as
> essential to America as our Constitution, apple pie, or baseball.
>
> Questioning its continued utility in the post-Cold War era — or its
> further expansion — elicits accusations of being everything from un-
> American to a Putin stooge. This has made it almost impossible to have a
> substantive discussion about a military alliance designed to deter the
> threat of the Soviet Union — a country that hasn’t existed for more than
> 30 years.
>

> <...>
we don't make nukes, neither we will legalise them