‘Lockdowns are a big mistake:’ World Health Organization and other experts now ADMIT global economic shutdowns for COVID-19 are WRONG

[Andrew W]

‘Lockdowns are a big mistake:’ World Health Organization and other experts
now ADMIT global economic shutdowns for COVID-19 are WRONG

https://www.naturalhealth365.com/who-covid-lockdowns-3592.html


(NaturalHealth365) In a reversal few saw coming but most understand,
officials from the World Health Organization (WHO) has finally condemned the
global economic shutdowns. Far from saving people’s lives, these shutdowns
have in their estimation caused “irreparable damage” to citizens of the
world – especially the most vulnerable among us – and have sparked a
concerning upward trend of poverty and mental health issues.

The concern is so widespread and severe that epidemiologists from Stanford
University, Oxford University, and Harvard University have put together a
petition calling to finally end the unethical madness of COVID lockdowns.

WHO ADMITS: COVID lockdowns made “poor people an awful lot poorer” and may
double the rates of malnutrition
In an interview with British media outlet The Spectator, Dr. David Nabarro
of the WHO admitted that “we…do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means
of control of [the novel coronavirus pandemic].”

Are you surprised, Governor Newsom and Governor Cuomo?!

According to Dr. Nabarro, an unavoidable consequence of the lockdown has
been “making poor people an awful lot poorer….It seems that we may well have
a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a
doubling of child malnutrition.”

He cites economic devastation in regions like the Caribbean as examples of
the profound mess lockdowns and travel restrictions have caused.

Do NOT ignore the health dangers linked to toxic indoor air. These
chemicals - the 'off-gassing' of paints, mattresses, carpets and other
home/office building materials - increase your risk of headaches, dementia,
heart disease and cancer.

Get the BEST indoor air purification system - at the LOWEST price,
exclusively for NaturalHealth365 readers. I, personally use this system in
my home AND office. Click HERE to order now - before the sale ends.

Mental health consequences of these ill-advised and protracted shutdowns
cannot be ignored, either. For example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) announced in August that there were “considerably
elevated adverse mental health conditions associated with COVID-19,” with
fully 40% of American adults struggling with worsening mental health,
increased thoughts of suicide, and increased use of drugs and alcohol.

“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified,” Dr. Nabarro continued in
The Spectator, “is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your
resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large,
we’d rather not do it.” And as battered as the WHO’s reputation may be,
their concerns are fully supported by a growing collection of international
experts from the fields of epidemiology, finance, public health, psychiatry,
and more.

“The Great Barrington Declaration” makes these key points about ending the
economic shutdowns … can we call on our local and national leaders to pay
attention?
Spearheaded by Ivy league professors, a petition called the Great Barrington
Declaration is making its rounds and currently features over 40,000
signatures. It calls to end the current lockdown policies which “are
producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.”

Here are a few key points from the petition:

The lockdowns are contributing to “worsening cardiovascular disease
outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health,” among
other issues – the effects of which will be felt for years to come
COVID-19 is less dangerous for children than the seasonal flu (which the CDC
isn’t even surveilling right now, according to their website); it follows
that keeping kids out of school is considered a “grave injustice”
Indeed, continuing the lockdown for everyone is unconscionable –
extracurricular activities, schools, restaurants, and businesses should be
open and “those who are not vulnerable” (that is, anyone who is not old or
chronically ill) should be “immediately” allowed to “resume life as normal“
Lastly, say what you will about “herd immunity,” but an important point
should not be lost here: this cohort of the world’s leading epidemiologists
and physicians admit that building of coronavirus immunity throughout the
population is “not dependent” on a vaccine. Therefore, holding the world
hostage until a vaccine is available is simply not the way to minimize
deaths and social harm.

Time will tell when world leaders will finally pay attention and heed these
dire warnings.

Sources for this article include:

Infectioncontroltoday.com
CDC.gov
GBDeclaration.org
News.com.au
CDC.gov


https://www.naturalhealth365.com/who-covid-lockdowns-3592.html



http://www.rumormillnews.com -- The best alternative news site

[M I Wakefield]

On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:27:15 +1100, "Andrew W"
<spam_a...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>
>‘Lockdowns are a big mistake:’ World Health Organization and other experts
>now ADMIT global economic shutdowns for COVID-19 are WRONG
>
>https://www.naturalhealth365.com/who-covid-lockdowns-3592.html

You disgusting, lying, fuckwit:

In response to a question about the economic consequences of
lockdowns, Nabarro said: “We in the World Health Organization do not
advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus. The
only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to
reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources; protect your health
workers who are exhausted. But by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Nabarro then went on to describe potential economic consequences,
including effects on the tourism industry and farmers or the worsening
of world poverty.

We checked with Nabarro to find out if the clip accurately reflected
the points he raised during a nearly 20-minute interview. He
responded, by email: “My comments were taken totally out of context.
The WHO position is consistent.”

https://khn.org/news/fact-check-world-health-organization-did-not-change-its-lockdown-stance-or-admit-president-trump-was-right/

I'd say you were "intellectually dishonest", but for that to be true,
you'd have to possess an intellect.

[Ted]

On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:14:20 -0400, M I Wakefield <no...@present.com>
wrote:

Thanks for clarifying, Wakefield.

[Chris Saccocia]

In article <rmk0n5$65o$1...@dont-email.me>, spam_a...@optusnet.com.au
says...
> a
>

What's wrong with shooting anti maskers? They're a nusiance and a
health hazard.


Their antimask friends can take care of the bodies.


Spraying their protests with bullets could be considered a public
health measure.


After the election Biden will have putin on the end of a rope.