Newsweek Interactive on AOL: Diary of a Scandal by Isikoff
Allan Favish
NEWSWEEK
Newsweek Interactive on AOL
January 21, 1998
Diary of a Scandal
By Michael Isikoff
Last weekend, there were two extraordinary dramas playing out in
Washington. On Saturday, at the offices of his attorney Robert Bennett,
President Clinton was being questioned, under oath, by Paula Jones's
lawyers as a media army waited outside. Clinton was asked if he had ever
had a sexual encounter with Jones. As he has before, Clinton denied it.
But unknown to the reporters in the street, the president was also asked
about a woman named Monica Lewinsky. Eager to prove a pattern of sexual
harassment, Jones's lawyers were searching for other women who might
have been the subject of Clinton's advances. Under oath, the president
denied ever having had a sexual relationship with Lewinsky.
Across town, in a small apartment at the Watergate, Lewinsky was in a
bind. She had been informed the day before that Whitewater special
prosecutor Kenneth Starr was investigating her for perjury and
obstruction of justice in the Paula Jones case. Lewinsky had signed an
affidavit swearing that she had never had a sexual relationship with the
president. But, Starr's deputies had informed her, they had tapes of her
suggesting that her denial was a lie--and that they suspected she had
been advised to lie by the president and by the president's friend and
adviser, Washington superlawyer Vernon Jordan. Now Starr's people
offered her a tough choice: cooperate with prosecutors and turn against
the president, or face the possibility of criminal charges
herself.NEWSWEEK was aware of Lewinsky's situation. For nearly a year,
NEWSWEEK's Michael Isikoff had been aware of allegations that Clinton
was having a sexual relationship with Lewinsky. That Wednesday, January
14, Isikoff learned that Starr was investigating obstruction of justice
and perjury in the Paula Jones case, and that Lewinsky was a target of
the investigation. For the next three days, Isikoff continued to report
the story. On Saturday at 12:30 a.m., Isikoff and NEWSWEEK editors heard
a tape of conversations between Lewinsky and a woman named Linda Tripp.
NEWSWEEK could not independently verify the authenticity of the
recording, and some of the statements on the tape raise questions about
Lewinsky's credibility.
But the tape seems to confirm that Lewinsky told at least one friend
on repeated occasions that she was having an affair with the president,
and that she had discussed with Clinton and Jordan the fact that she had
been subpoenaed in the Paula Jones case. On the tape, Lewinsky sounded
distraught but not unbalanced. She talks spontaneously about what she
suggests is a sexual relationship with the president, expresses her
anguish about being brought into the Paula Jones case, and plaintively
declares her wish that the president would "settle" the case.
Dejectedly, she says that Clinton is "in denial. He'll never settle."
Lewinsky affirms to Tripp that Lewinsky will deny any sexual
relationship when she is deposed by Jones's lawyers. "Look," she says,
"I will deny it so he will not get screwed in the case, but I'm going to
get screwed personally," Lewinsky says. When Tripp asks why, Lewinsky
replies, "because it will be obvious... it will be obvious to him...
that I told you." However, there was no clear evidence on the tape that
would confirm or deny Tripp's allegation that Clinton or Vernon Jordan
had coached Lewinsky to lie.
Because the magazine did not have enough time for sufficient
independent reporting on Lewinsky, her credibility, and her alleged role
in the drama--and in hopes of learning more about the truth by not
interfering with Starr's probe at a critical juncture --NEWSWEEK decided
to hold off publishing the story last week. Above all, because
Lewinsky's name had not surfaced, NEWSWEEK's editors felt there was
insufficient hard evidence to drag her into the media maelstrom.
On Tuesday, Jan. 20, the story began to leak out to a number of news
organizations. On Wednesday, Jan. 21, NEWSWEEK obtained what may be an
important new piece of evidence. It is a written document allegedly
given to Tripp by Lewinsky. The document coaches Tripp on "points to
make in affidavit" in order to contradict the account of another former
White House staffer, Kathleen Willey, who recently testified in her own
deposition to unsolicited sexual advances made by the president in 1993.
It was Tripp who partly confirmed Willey's claims that she had had a
sexual encounter with Clinton--as reported in a NEWSWEEK story in
August. In these talking points, Tripp is urged to undercut Willey's
credibility, be a "team player" and submit an affidavit for review to
"Bennett's people"--Clinton's lawyers. It's not clear who prepared these
talking points, but Starr believes that Lewinsky did not write them
herself. He is investigating whether the instructions came from Jordan
or other friends of the president. President Clinton has denied all
allegations of a sexual relationship with Lewinsky or a cover-up; Jordan
refused to comment on Wednesday and his lawyer did not return repeated
phone calls.
NEWSWEEK will have full coverage of this entire story in its next
issue, on newsstands Monday, January 26. But because NEWSWEEK and others
have been able to confirm further details of the investigation--and
because the magazine has developed exclusive reporting on the nature of
the evidence--the editors of NEWSWEEK have decided to publish this
chronology of events on NEWSWEEK Interactive on AOL :
Monday morning, January 12. Linda Tripp, met with her lawyers in
Washington. She had been subpoenaed in the Jones case and needed to
prepare her testimony. She had a disagreement with her lawyers, whom she
feared were too close to the White House. Angrily, she left her lawyers'
office and called the office of Whitewater independent counsel Kenneth
Starr. Within a few hours, there were federal prosecutors and an FBI
agent sitting in Tripp's living room in Columbia, Md. They heard Tripp
tell an extraordinary story--and much of the drama that follows is based
on Tripp's version of events.
She told the FBI agents and Starr's deputies that she had been a
friend of Monica Lewinsky, 24. Lewinsky and Tripp worked together in the
public affairs office at the Pentagon. Tripp described Lewinsky's
background: Lewinsky had gone to work at the White House as an intern in
the summer of 1995 shortly after graduating from Lewis and Clark College
in Oregon. In December 1995, Lewinsky had been given full-time job as a
staffer in the legislative affairs office in the White House. The
previous month, Lewinsky allegedly told Tripp, she had begun having a
sexual relationship with President Clinton. Lewinsky was 21 at the time.
As Lewinsky told the story to Tripp, Lewinsky had been attracted to the
president. At a White House party in mid-November 1995, Lewinsky wore a
revealing dress and made eye contact with Clinton as he worked the
crowd. The president and the young staffer had begun a consensual affair
shortly thereafter. The president and Lewinsky allegedly had a number of
sexual encounters, most of them during late-afternoon or weekend visits
(and one late at night in a small private study off the Oval Office).
Lewinsky told Tripp that she was flattered and excited by the attention
from the president. She told Tripp that the president would sometimes
ignore her frantic phone calls, but at other times he would call her in
the middle of the night. Tripp told Starr's staff that she had
personally heard messages from Clinton on Lewinsky's answering machine.
Tripp also told Starr's deputies that she had been angered and
offended by what she considered the president's "callous" behavior
toward Lewinsky. Tripp, a longtime federal employee who had begun work
at the White House in the Bush administration, had had a number of
run-ins with the Clinton White House. In 1993, Tripp was an executive
assistant to Bernard Nussbaum, then the White House counsel. Early in
the Whitewater probe, she had testified before a federal grand jury and
the Senate Whitewater investigating committee about the so-called
Travelgate affair, the firing of staffers in the White House travel
office by the Clinton administration in 1993. She told Starr's
assistants that she had been urged by her lawyers--whom the White House
arranged to represent her--not to volunteer information she had about
Hillary Clinton's role in Travelgate. Tripp also talked to Starr's
deputies about Kathleen Willey. In the fall of 1993, Tripp said, she had
seen Willey, a White House aide, shortly after Willey emerged from the
Oval Office with her make-up smeared and her clothing askew. Willey told
Tripp that she had just had a sexual encounter with the president. In
late July, Tripp had told this story to NEWSWEEK, which published it in
an issue the first week of August. At the time, Bennett, Clinton's
lawyer, publicly questioned Tripp's credibility. Tripp became concerned
that she would be put in a compromised position if she was later
subpoenaed by Jones's lawyers: either perjure herself, or tell the truth
and be attacked by the White House--possibly at the cost of her job at
the Pentagon. It was then, Tripp said, that she began to secretly record
her phone conversations with Monica. Tripp's lawyer, Jim Moody, denied
that his client has a personal vendetta against the president. "She is
not an enemy of this administration. She is a proponent of the truth."
As she anticipated, Tripp had been subpoenaed in mid-December by
Jones's lawyers, who were trying to locate any and all alleged paramours
of the president to bolster their sexual harassment case against
Clinton. Realizing that she would have to testify under oath, Tripp told
Lewinsky that she was going to tell the truth--that Lewinsky had told
her that she was having an affair with the president. According to
Tripp, Lewinsky responded that she intended to lie. She told Tripp that
Clinton had told her not to worry about the Jones case because Jones's
lawyers would never find out about the relationship. According to Tripp,
Lewinsky said that Clinton had advised her to deny the affair. Tripp
also reported that Lewinsky had told here that she had met with Vernon
Jordan, Clinton's old friend and personal adviser.
Lewinsky first went to see Jordan at the instruction of Betty Currie,
Clinton's personal secretary, last November. Jordan asked her to take
her frustration and anger at Clinton and vent it at him. Lewinsky told
Jordan she was worried about a subpoena from Jones's lawyers. Jordan
offered to set Lewinsky up with an attorney, Frank Carter. (Carter
declined comment.) According to Tripp, Lewinsky assured Jordan she would
stick with "the cover story." Lewinsky said, "This is what I signed up
for when I began the relationship."
Tripp told Starr that Lewinsky met again with Jordan at a later date
in the back of his limousine. Jordan advised Lewinsky to remain silent.
"They can't prove anything," Jordan allegedly told her. "If they thought
they could, your answer is it didn't happen, it wasn't me." He told her
that witnesses are never indicted for perjury in civil cases. He also
promised to help Lewinsky get a job in the private sector. Earlier this
month, Lewinsky responded to a subpoena in the Jones case by signing a
sealed affidavit swearing that she had no relevant information to offer.
In the affidavit, Lewinsky swore that she never had had a sexual
relationship with Clinton.
At that first meeting on Monday, January 12, Starr's deputies
listened to Tripp's story with great interest. After four years and at
least $30 million, the investigation by the independent prosecutor's
office is still moving slowly. Starr's deputies believe that they are
being stonewalled by the White House at every turn. Here was an
opportunity to get inside the president's protective circle. Jordan was
of particular interest to Starr. Jordan is already under investigation
by Starr in another matter, involving former Deputy Attorney General
Webster Hubbell. Jordan is one of several friends of Clinton who helped
get Hubbell lucrative consulting fees when Hubbell was under
investigation by the Whitewater special prosecutor in 1994. Starr is
investigating whether Jordan and others were funnelling hush money to
Hubbell.
Starr's interest was also piqued by Tripp's tapes of her
conversations with Lewinsky, which Tripp turned over to Starr in
response to a subpoena. There are 17 of these audio tapes, consisting of
about 20 hours of surreptitiously-taped phone conversations. Most of the
tapes were made from Tripp's home in Maryland, a state which generally
prohibits taping unless all parties to the conversation consent. (Tripp
argues that the tapes were justified because she was trying to protect
herself against allegations of perjury, according to her lawyer.)
NEWSWEEK has heard several of these conversations. On the 90-minute
tape, Lewinsky can be heard weeping and clearly intimating that she had
a sexual relationship with the president. She says that she intends to
lie about it if questioned by Paula Jones's lawyers. She never directly
names the president, referring instead to "the big he" and "the creep,"
but it is obvious from the tape that she is referring to Clinton. She
ponders telling Clinton that she has revealed the affair to others,
including Tripp. She hopes that, somehow, Clinton can be persuaded to
settle with Jones. Maybe, Lewinsky wonders, she should threaten to tell
all--tell Clinton that she intends to tell the truth if she is
questioned by Jones's lawyers. "Look," Lewinsky says to Tripp, "Maybe we
should just tell the creep. Maybe we should just say, don't ever talk to
me again, I f----d you over [by telling others about the affair], now
you have this information, do whatever you want with it." Linda says,
"Well, if you want to do that, that's what I would do. But I don't know
if you're comfortable with that. I think he [the president] should
know." But Monica, sounding despairing, responds, "He won't settle [the
Paula Jones case]. He's in denial." At another point in the tape, she
says she simply cannot tell Clinton that she has revealed the affair to
several others. "If I do that," she moans, "I'm just going to f---ing
kill myself."
On the tape, Lewinsky can also be heard saying, "I have lied my
entire life." In the context of the conversation, she is saying that it
wasn't hard for her to conceal her sexual relationship with Clinton. But
the statement raises the possibility that the affair itself was a lie,
an exaggeration of a flirtatious moment, perhaps, that grew into a big
lie. Still, Lewinsky sounds truly worried that her alleged relationship
with Clinton will be exposed. She begs Tripp to lie about it. She speaks
of exchanging gifts and letters with the president and worries that
Jones's lawyers will find them and use them as incriminating evidence.
At one point she says, "I was thinking about the fact that I sent a note
to Nancy [Hernreich, as assistant to the president], a note to Betty
[Currie, the president's personal secretary], and a note to creep to
thank them all for when my family came for the radio address. The note I
sent to him, 'Dear Schmucko, thank you for being, as my little nephew
said, it was great to meet the principal of the United States.'" Later
she says that Clinton gave her a dress, and she makes a vague reference
to an official photograph that Clinton sent her, apparently with some
kind of personal inscription. She suggests to Tripp that, in response to
the subpoena from Jones's lawyers, which asks for any letters,
photographs, gifts, etc. that she received from Clinton, that she turn
over a different photograph that the president gave her, one without the
inscription.
NEWSWEEK has obtained receipts from a Washington messenger service
showing that Lewinsky sent packages addressed to the White House on nine
separate occasions between October 7, 1997, and December 8, 1997. The
contact number on the packages is 456-2990, the phone number of
Clinton's personal secretary, Betty Currie. According to Tripp, Lewinsky
told her that the packages were letters and in one case a
sexually-provocative audio tape for President Clinton. Asked about the
deliveries last week by NEWSWEEK, Currie said she didn't recall them,
but that she would look into the matter and get back to a reporter.
Contacted again on Wednesday, Jan. 21, Currie said, "I have no knowledge
whatsoever," and hung up the phone.
Another piece of key evidence would be secret service logs that would
show whether Lewinsky came and went from the White House at odd hours.
Jones's lawyers have subpoenaed secret service records, but the Justice
Department has moved to quash that subpoena, citing in part executive
privilege. Sources say that records show a "pattern of visits" by
Lewinsky to the White House "in the late afternoons and evenings," with
Currie listed as the contact.
Other administration aides wondered about Lewinsky, who was moved to
the Pentagon in 1996. Lewinsky told Willie Blackwell, former deputy
assistant secretary of defense, that she lost her job at the office of
White House legislative affairs when Evelyn Lieberman, then deputy White
House chief of staff, twice spotted her hanging around the West Wing and
questioned why she was there. A spokesman for Lieberman said that
Lieberman was displeased with Lewinsky's performance in part because she
was spending a lot of time in the Rose Garden and at White House events
rather than doing her job. It was the run-in with Lieberman, Lewinsky
told Tripp, that prompted White House personnel to arrange a job for
Lewinsky with Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon. Lewinsky told Tripp that the
president had assured her that he would "get her back" after the
election, but it never happened.
On the tape recorded conversations that NEWSWEEK listened to--a
conversations that happened shortly before Christmas--there is at least
two references to Jordan's first name, Vernon. It appears that Lewinsky
did meet with Jordan, or at least claims to have met with him. The
references to Jordan are cryptic, however, and neither support nor
contradict the allegation that Jordan was encouraging Lewinsky to lie.
She talks about acting "based on what Vernon said," but it's not clear
what Jordan told her to say. At another point in the tape, in an
apparent reference to the multiple subpoenas from Jones's lawyers, Tripp
says, "Maybe Vernon was right, it's a huge fishing net because of the
rumor." On Wednesday, Jan. 21, William Hundley, Jordan's lawyer, did not
return repeated phone calls.
Tuesday, January 13. As she recounted her story to Starr's team on
Monday, Tripp said that she was meeting with Lewinsky for drinks at the
Ritz Carlton bar at Pentagon City the next day. Starr's deputies set up
a sting operation. On Tuesday, the FBI agents working for Starr wired
Tripp with a secret listening device. When Tripp met with Lewinsky
around noon, there was a team of FBI agents and prosecutors listening as
a hidden tape recorded the conversation. According to knowledgable
sources, Lewinsky again discussed conversations with Jordan about
keeping quiet in the Jones case. She also talked about Jordan's efforts
to get her a job in New York. (Lewinsky quit her Pentagon job on
December 26; MacAndrews & Forbes, a New York firm that owns Revlon,
confirmed that they offered Lewinsky a public relations job this month
after she was referred to the company by Jordan, a member of Revlon's
board of directors.) The incriminating tape gave Starr's deputies hope
that they could "flip" Lewinsky and make a her a witness for the
prosecution. They hoped to "sting" Jordan or Currie by getting Lewinsky
to place phone calls to them that Starr's staff would monitor.
Wednesday, January 14. Lewinsky picks up Tripp at the Pentagon and
offers to drive her home. Lewinsky gives Tripp "talking points" about
how she should respond to questions from Jones's lawyers in the Willey
matter. NEWSWEEK has obtained the document. "Points to make in
affidavit," it reads. Tripp is to modify comments she had made to
NEWSWEEK back in July--that she had seen Willey coming out of the Oval
Office with her make-up smeared. Tripp is now to tell Jones's lawyers
that "you do not believe that what she claimed happened really happened.
You now find it completely plausible that she herself smeared her
lipstick, untucked her blouse, etc." The document also seems to reflect
concerns that Tripp has already told others about Lewinsky's claims of a
sexual relationship with the president. In case Tripp is questioned
about the rumors about Lewinsky by Jones's lawyers, the talking points
suggest that she say Lewinsky "turned out to be this huge liar" who
"left the White House because she was stalking the P or something like
that."
At about this time, NEWSWEEK learned that Starr was investigating
Lewinsky, Jordan, and Clinton. NEWSWEEK told Starr's deputies that the
magazine was planning to run with the story in the issue that appeared
that Monday. NEWSWEEK needed to get a response from the people involved.
Starr's deputies asked NEWSWEEK to hold off. The investigation was at a
delicate stage. Starr was hoping to confront Lewinsky and persuade her
to cooperate as a witness for the prosecution. Starr's deputies did not
want to tip off Lewinsky or Jordan or the White House. NEWSWEEK agreed
to wait until Friday afternoon, in part because the magazine was
reluctant to interfere with an ongoing federal investigation and in part
because the editors believed that NEWSWEEK would learn more about the
truth behind the story by waiting.
Friday, January 16. Starr decided to formally expand his inquiry to
investigate subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice in the
Paula Jones case. In conversations the previous day, Starr's deputies
had described Jordan as a principal target of the probe, and got Justice
Department approval to seek a formal expansion of his jurisdiction. The
three-judge appeals court panel that supervises the independent counsel
gave its authorization. That same day, Starr's deputies had Tripp lure
Lewinsky to another meeting at the Ritz Carlton. As the two were sitting
down for lunch, FBI agents for Starr moved in and asked Lewinsky to step
upstairs for a talk.
Friday-Saturday, January 16-17. Starr's deputies tried to "flip"
Lewinsky. Obviously, she was in a fix. If she admitted to the affair,
she would be contradicting her own sworn affidavit. But if she denied
it, she would be vulnerable to criminal prosecution. Lewinsky called her
mother in Los Angeles. At the urging of Starr's staff, NEWSWEEK decided
to wait one more day before contacting Lewinsky and Jordan for comment.
Saturday, January 17. A Los Angeles lawyer, William Ginsburg, flew to
Washington to represent Lewinsky. Still uncertain about whether Lewinsky
was telling the truth about a sexual relationship with Clinton and a
White House cover-up, and running out of time to reach the major players
in the story--or assess Lewinsky's credibility or role--NEWSWEEK, whose
deadline is Saturday night, decided to hold off publication.
Monday, January 19. Negotiations between Starr's staff and her
attorneys broke down. On Monday morning, Lewinsky's name surfaced in the
Drudge Report, a widely read but somewhat unreliable gossip column on
the Internet. Drudge had picked up rumors that NEWSWEEK was debating
whether to run a piece about Lewinsky, and reported that after a
"screaming fight" in the editors' offices on Saturday night, the story
had been spiked. (There had been no screaming; the story was not spiked
but put on hold while NEWSWEEK's reporters continued to gather
information.) According to Starr's deputies, the fear that Lewinsky's
name would become widely known was enough to torpedo the negotiations
between Starr and her Lewinsky's lawyers. As of now, Lewinsky is not
cooperating. According to knowledgeable sources, Starr is now
considering whether to indict her for perjury. Lewinsky is scheduled to
be deposed by Jones's lawyers on Friday. Sources tell NEWSWEEK that she
will take the Fifth Amendment.
Newsweek Interactive on AOL
January 21, 1998
--
Regards,
Allan J. Favish
http://members.aol.com/AllanF8702/page1.htm
David Martin
> As Lewinsky told the story to Tripp, Lewinsky had been attracted to the
> president. At a White House party in mid-November 1995, Lewinsky wore a
> revealing dress and made eye contact with Clinton as he worked the
> crowd. The president and the young staffer had begun a consensual affair shortly thereafter.
Yep. That'll usually do it. This story certainly has the ring of
truth, even if it does come from Newsweek.
F.W. Groth
David Martin wrote:
>
> > As Lewinsky told the story to Tripp, Lewinsky had been attracted to the
> > president. At a White House party in mid-November 1995, Lewinsky wore a
> > revealing dress and made eye contact with Clinton as he worked the
> > crowd. The president and the young staffer had begun a consensual affair shortly thereafter.
>
> truth, even if it does come from Newsweek.
In case anyone cares, and is not an AOL user, Newsweek has posted the chronology of
how their story was handled and a fairly detailed summary of what they know and when
they knew it on the Washington Post website,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/digest/nat10.htm
Hit the jump "Newsweek Explains". Long story short (according to Newsweek), Starr's
people roped in Lewinski last Friday and were trying to turn her from that point on
through Saturday. Newsweek supposedly shelved the story because Starr's office asked
them to and because they couldn't back check the story sufficiently.
fg
L. Shelton Bumgarner
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 23:04:16 -0500, David Martin <dcd...@erols.com>
wrote:
>> As Lewinsky told the story to Tripp, Lewinsky had been attracted to the
>> president. At a White House party in mid-November 1995, Lewinsky wore a
>> revealing dress and made eye contact with Clinton as he worked the
>> crowd. The president and the young staffer had begun a consensual affair shortly thereafter.
>
>Yep. That'll usually do it. This story certainly has the ring of
>truth, even if it does come from Newsweek.
The last time I read something like that was during the whole
"cyberporn" thing. Hotwired did a story about how that now infamous
Time article got published. I wonder how many journalists around the
world read that thing for background...
lee
Max Kennedy
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 23:51:26 -0800, "F.W. Groth" <fr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>In case anyone cares, and is not an AOL user, Newsweek has posted the chronology of
>how their story was handled and a fairly detailed summary of what they know and when
>they knew it on the Washington Post website,
Yeah, and Newsweek's chronology, for some strange and unknown reason!, leaves
out the Drudge Report breaking the story.
I have *no* idea why Newsweek would fail to mention that :)
-----
Newsweek's Melted Scoop
Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 22, 1998; Page C1
Newsweek's top editors, after a day of frenetic meetings, sought yesterday
to explain why they failed to publish the story that stunned the nation, an
exclusive piece about allegations that President Clinton encouraged a
24-year-old former White House intern to lie about whether they had an
affair.
As the media furor over the charges reached a fever pitch, the magazine
planned to belatedly post Michael Isikoff's story on its America Online
site, four days after top editors pulled the potentially explosive piece
from this week's issue late Saturday.
Newsweek editors said they delayed the article in part at the request of
independent counsel Kenneth Starr to avoid compromising his investigation.
"On the basis of what we knew Saturday, I am comfortable that we didn't go
ahead with the story," Newsweek President Richard Smith said last night.
"Given the time that was left, we had the ability to get some very
sensational charges out there, but ... when the clock ran out, I wasn't
prepared to air an allegation that a young White House intern had an affair
with the president without more independent reporting on her."
But there are few secrets in the modern media world, and word of Isikoff's
suppressed scoop leaked out through an increasingly familiar route: Matt
Drudge's Internet gossip column. Reporters across Washington, some of whom
were already pursuing the story, kept scrambling for confirmation.
The Washington Post broke the story in its early editions Tuesday night,
followed by ABC News, with a 12:45 a.m. radio report, and the Los Angeles
Times. The reports said Starr is investigating whether Clinton and his
friend Vernon Jordan encouraged former intern Monica Lewinsky to lie to
lawyers for Paula Jones about whether she had an affair with the president.
The story detonated in the media with Watergate-like intensity. CNN, MSNBC
and Fox News Channel provided live coverage of White House spokesman Mike
McCurry's grilling at the daily media briefing, where ABC's Sam Donaldson
asked whether Clinton would cooperate with an impeachment inquiry. Moments
later, Rush Limbaugh read listeners the latest Drudge update.
ABC's Peter Jennings, in Cuba for the pope's visit, broke into regular
programming at 3:32 p.m. to pick up a live feed of Clinton's interview with
PBS's Jim Lehrer, made available by Lehrer's "News Hour." Jennings was
followed two minutes later by NBC's Tom Brokaw. And, in what many CBS
staffers considered an embarrassment, anchor Dan Rather did not get on the
air until more than 20 minutes later. Ted Koppel, meanwhile, returned from
Havana to anchor "Nightline."
All of which underscored the question: What happened at Newsweek?
Some staffers there say the magazine's editors appeared fearful of the
enormity of the charges and the gravity of an obstruction-of-justice
investigation involving the president. Newsweek's Smith kept Donald Graham,
chief executive of the parent Washington Post Co., apprised of the
decision.
While acknowledging "disagreement" among his editors, Smith said: "We were
determined from the beginning not to let the deadline drive the judgment.
... We were all disheartened that we hadn't gotten it across the finish
line before the deadline."
Newsweek sources said Isikoff lobbied vigorously for publication, arguing
that it was not the magazine's role to help Starr do his job. Isikoff would
say only that "there was a vigorous discussion about what was the
journalistically proper thing to do. There were no screaming matches."
For Isikoff, losing the exclusive involved a double dose of déjà vu. As a
Washington Post reporter in 1994, he clashed with his editors over whether
to publish a detailed account of Paula Jones's allegations, then already
public, that Clinton crudely pressed her for sex in a Little Rock hotel
room in 1991. The Post eventually published the story, but not before
Isikoff was suspended for two weeks because of a shouting match with
editors. He joined Newsweek soon afterward.
Last summer, Isikoff was scooped by Drudge on another charge of sexual
misconduct by Clinton. While Newsweek was weighing whether to run his
article on allegations that Clinton made advances toward another former
White House aide, Kathleen Willey, in the executive mansion, Drudge "outed"
the Isikoff piece on computer screens across the country. Drudge says that
leak came from another Newsweek staffer.
"Lightning did strike twice," Drudge said yesterday. "There's something in
the culture of Washington where reporters share their stories, and now
there's an outlet, meaning me. Before we all talked about it, but who's
going to print it? ... This thing just fell into my lap." He said news
organizations were failing to credit him with the scoop.
"Newsweek had significant evidence. Among other things, Isikoff listened to
a tape of Lewinsky describing her relationship with the president, which
was recorded surreptitiously by another former White House aide, Linda
Tripp. Starr's office wanted to use Lewinsky to "sting" Clinton's friend
Jordan in a recorded conversation, according to Newsweek.
Rich Lowry, editor of the National Review, said Newsweek's decision "really
looks as though it was a mistake. The Starr investigation gives it a
legitimate angle; it's not just salacious gossip. I would not want to be
the person in charge of explaining this decision to Isikoff."
For the White House, the self-styled conservative Drudge has become a
growing irritant. White House aide Sidney Blumenthal sued him over a false
report – which the columnist retracted and apologized for – that Blumenthal
once beat his wife.
Former White House aide George Stephanopoulos, now an ABC consultant,
criticized Drudge Sunday on ABC's "This Week." He seized the opportunity
when Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, mentioned Newsweek's
killing of the story. (Kristol says he knew of the imbroglio, from a source
who had heard the tapes, a day before an ABC staffer handed him the Drudge
item.)
"Where did it come from? The Drudge Report," Stephanopoulos said. "We've
all seen how discredited that's been."
------
/---------
People shouldn't expect the mass media to do investigative stories.
That job belongs to the 'fringe' media. -- Ted Koppel
http://www.iglou.com/homepages/mkennedy/press.html
/----------
Ron's dead. They can't indict him.
Nola Hill on Ron Brown
/----------
http://www.iglou.com/homepages/mkennedy/twa2.html
Deneen Sparks
>> As Lewinsky told the story to Tripp, Lewinsky had been attracted to the
>> president. At a White House party in mid-November 1995, Lewinsky wore a
>> revealing dress and made eye contact with Clinton as he worked the
>> crowd. The president and the young staffer had begun a consensual affair shortly thereafter.
>
>Yep. That'll usually do it. This story certainly has the ring of
>truth, even if it does come from Newsweek.
A man is a man is a man - even if he is the president!
Peace, newsgroup: alt.thebird
Deneen Sparks, editor, THE GREAT SPECKLED BIRD
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/7835/thebird.html
What if they had a war, and nobody came?