--
A random weirdo
"When it comes to flea markets, tacky is a compliment. If you are
afraid of tacky, go to the mall. But if you're bored with malls and the
tragically homogenous retail scene in general, go to a flea market. The
tackier the better."--Dave Bird
> Anyone here other than spammers? Yes? No?
No.
--
- Cassandra J. Nichols
Yes?? no.
Ryan
>Anyone here other than spammers? Yes? No?
OMG! YOU'RE ALIVE. O_o
--
Kat
"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out
of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters."
-Frank Lloyd Wright
Damnit, you beat me to it. :(
Hi, Weirdo. I thought you were one of the many who'd dropped off the
face of the earth. Nice to see an oldbie arise from the endless grey sea
of RL.
--
Eyeglazer, Lord of Boredom.
Abandon hope, and ye abolish fear.
My shock at the fact that people are here will continue for months to come.
-Wyvern
Yes, yes, and hello. How's you?
Wow, a few oldies suddenly popping up...
--
Darren Grey, aka Tekhne
>"Some Weirdo" wrote in message...
>> Anyone here other than spammers? Yes? No?
>
>Yes, yes, and hello. How's you?
>
>Wow, a few oldies suddenly popping up...
Yes, well. We keep to ourselves, mostly. Just pop in when
something other than spam shows up.
and
Eyeglazer said:
>Cassandra J. Nichols wrote:
>> Some Weirdo wrote:
>>> Anyone here other than spammers? Yes? No?
>> No.
>Damnit, you beat me to it. :(
>Hi, Weirdo. I thought you were one of the many who'd dropped off the
>face of the earth. Nice to see an oldbie arise from the endless grey sea
>of RL.
Yep. My college stuff got a lot more hectic, I got bored with all the
arguing and trolling on AGFF, and some other stuff was going on in RL,
so I decided I'd leave for a bit. I'd imagine some of that's the same
reason some people leave, for RL reasons; I'd never noticed just how
time consuming digging through AGFF was, and I had a relatively LIGHT
schedule, compared to what a lot of other people were doing. I probably
shouldn't be on here in the first place (since there's really something
I ought to be working on) but I noticed some recent ("recent" in
geologic terms, anyway) posts and thought I'd poke the group to see if
anything happened.
Hello again, everyone. :)
Same here, except I kind of found it out by acciedent. I was half
expecting to have to wait a while for an answer since the last post (as
opposed to spam) was sometime in 2004. How many of you guys are posting
via google, by the way? I'm just wondering, because I know they've got
a thing where they'll send you an email when there's new posts. It's
been so long that I can't remember whether news readers will do that,
too.
--
A. Weirdo
>Yes, yes, and hello. How's you?
I'm okay. I've been busy working on my writing while I've been waiting
for my real job to start up again. (Yearbook publishing, unfortunately,
is seasonal work) How've you been, btw?
>Wow, a few oldies suddenly popping up...
Looks like it. O_o
--
A. Weirdo
>>Hi, Weirdo. I thought you were one of the many who'd dropped off the
>>face of the earth. Nice to see an oldbie arise from the endless grey sea
>>of RL.
>
> Yep. My college stuff got a lot more hectic, I got bored with all the
> arguing and trolling on AGFF, and some other stuff was going on in RL,
> so I decided I'd leave for a bit. I'd imagine some of that's the same
> reason some people leave, for RL reasons;
Either that, or people who left when the world moved on. But yeah.
> I'd never noticed just how
> time consuming digging through AGFF was, and I had a relatively LIGHT
> schedule, compared to what a lot of other people were doing. I probably
> shouldn't be on here in the first place (since there's really something
> I ought to be working on)
All the better reason not to work on it. ;-P
> but I noticed some recent ("recent" in
> geologic terms, anyway) posts and thought I'd poke the group to see if
> anything happened.
Several of us keep an eye on it just because we don't feel like removing
it from our sub lists, I'd guess. About once a year someone will say
something and there'll be a flash crowd. Like now. This is all your
fault. ;-)
Most of the old regs communicate through Aim these days, actually.
> Hello again, everyone. :)
Welcome to the Noise...again.
I would imagine so.
--
CX
Ah that's cool - lots of old AGFFers seem to have gotten into writing...
I've been up and down and all around, but mostly okay I guess. Nothing of
much interest...
>>Wow, a few oldies suddenly popping up...
>
> Looks like it. O_o
Kinda freaky actually. It's like dropping a pebble into a pond and
expecting a small ripple, then suddenly a big splash comes out... I guess
I'm not the only who's kept subscribed to the group for a while "just in
case"...
--
Darren Grey
I keep the group subscribed, and usually hit the 'get new
headers' button about once a day just for kicks. I'm probably
secondary to blame for the sudden flood since I mentioned to
Eyeglazer that Weirdo had posted when I noticed the post. ^^;;;
Aw, you've shattered the illusion now. I figured everyone was sitting
gripped to the edge of their seats for months waiting for someone to make a
post, and as soon as one person does everyone swarms in to reply. But no,
you have to go and ruin that idea :-(
--
Grey
Terribly sorry. ;)
You perhaps do not remember me, but Eye just told me about this. I didn't
really come here during my previous AGFF regdom... but anyway, hello all.
Slipgate
I would imagine do, re, mi, fa, and ti, in exchange.
Slipgate
Apparently poking this newsgroup is like poking a blowfish, except I
don't think this newsgroup can be made into tasty poisonous sashimi.
>Most of the old regs communicate through Aim these days, actually.
I have a bunch of names on my buddy list, but I'm sure most of them
are old. I guess I need to start using AIM again.
>> Hello again, everyone. :)
>Welcome to the Noise...again.
--
>"John Zeitler" <john.zeit...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
>news:OOydna7JB99...@speakeasy.net...
>> Some Weirdo wrote:
>>> Anyone here other than spammers? Yes? No?
>> I would imagine so.
> >--
> >CX
>I would imagine do, re, mi, fa, and ti, in exchange.
In response to that, I'm imagining that drunken kareoke is going to
break out at any moment.
Oh, and hello CX and Slipgate!
--
A. Weirdo
>Eyeglazer wrote:
>>Several of us keep an eye on it just because we don't feel like removing
>>it from our sub lists, I'd guess. About once a year someone will say
>>something and there'll be a flash crowd. Like now. This is all your
>>fault. ;-)
>
>Apparently poking this newsgroup is like poking a blowfish, except I
>don't think this newsgroup can be made into tasty poisonous sashimi.
Well, no. I don't think we were planning on killing you....
>
>>Most of the old regs communicate through Aim these days, actually.
>
>I have a bunch of names on my buddy list, but I'm sure most of them
>are old. I guess I need to start using AIM again.
I can pretty well guarantee mine's outdated. Hell, I never used
the same aim name more than a few months even when I was on
AGFF, why would I do so anywhere else? ;)
>
>>> Hello again, everyone. :)
>
>>Welcome to the Noise...again.
NOISE
The twin powers of Nostalgia and Curiosity. Fear ye the forces ye have
tapped! ....for a few days, anyway. Then you'll go about your business.
Move along.
>>Most of the old regs communicate through Aim these days, actually.
>
> I have a bunch of names on my buddy list, but I'm sure most of them
> are old. I guess I need to start using AIM again.
I'm still on as Eyeglazer daily. Feel free to drop me a line if you want.
--
Eyeglazer, Lord of Boredom.
Not all moths are drawn by the brightness of the light. Some are there
for the flame.
> I have a bunch of names on my buddy list, but I'm sure most of them
> are old. I guess I need to start using AIM again.
I think my AIM list has over 200 people in the "AGFF" group.
> Some Weirdo wrote:
>
>> I have a bunch of names on my buddy list, but I'm sure most of them
>> are old. I guess I need to start using AIM again.
>
> I think my AIM list has over 200 people in the "AGFF" group.
Make that over 200 user names. A lot were the same people.
Well anyway, Slipgate0 for me. I screen folks, so please identify yourself
;).
Oh, really?
*hides knife*
*walks away whistling innocently*
>>>Most of the old regs communicate through Aim these days, actually.
>>
>>I have a bunch of names on my buddy list, but I'm sure most of them
>>are old. I guess I need to start using AIM again.
>
> I can pretty well guarantee mine's outdated. Hell, I never used
> the same aim name more than a few months even when I was on
> AGFF, why would I do so anywhere else? ;)
There's too many chat clients, I can never stick with one - thankfully
Trillian helps with that. Knowing what Google are like their new GTalk is
bound to take over the world, in spite of having a name that sounds like a
sex line...
--
Darren Grey
AIM: DarrenJohnGrey
ICQ: 41880116
Yahoo IM: darrenjohngrey
MSN:darrenj...@hotmail.com
GTalk:darrenj...@gmail.com
Anyone still use the 'AGFF' ID on AIM?
RelMark
I haven't seen it on in ages, so I doubt it.
>> I think my AIM list has over 200 people in the "AGFF" group.
>Make that over 200 user names. A lot were the same people.
>
>-
> - Cassandra J. Nichols
Yeah. I have the same problem. My problem is that I'm not sure which
are the "new" names and which are the old ones.
My aim name is the same as it was: aweirdo42. I had another one, but it
got suspended for some reason or another.
--
A. Weirdo
> Anyone still use the 'AGFF' ID on AIM?
It got removed and the user name is now reserved. I still remember the
password, too....
> Well anyway, Slipgate0 for me. I screen folks, so please identify yourself
> ;).
cassiejn, here. Say "hi", everyone!
>RelMark wrote:
>
>> Anyone still use the 'AGFF' ID on AIM?
>
>It got removed and the user name is now reserved. I still remember the
>password, too....
You're doing better than me. I don't remember any of the open
stuff. I remember people messaging me with it, though. And
usually telling them to bugger off since it was usually someone
trolling with it.
UseNet messages expire, right? Does google groups get crawled any?
Ismail
"Cassandra J. Nichols" <cass...@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:oIXWe.61908$vo5....@fe01.news.easynews.com...
Even if it did, I don't think a spider could pick out a screen name from
a normal sentence like that. There's no easy marker like there is for
email addresses. (@ symbol)
Ironically, most of them get met with my away message about how I'm grading
stuff. Not so hot, the fact is that the away message constitutes a reply
that lets them know its a valid AIM name.
Perhaps I should experiment more with invisibility...
"Eyeglazer" <no...@none.none> wrote in message
news:L11Ye.166$Ql....@bignews3.bellsouth.net...