Those who can't win legitimate debate, always resort to straw-man
tactics. Let's try and limit the discussion to the net, please.
> Besides, I don't think that anyone here is running for Dictator of the
> Internet. Certainly not me. If anything, I have advocated for
> community-based consensus, administration, and governance.
First, an author who willing seems to agree with and use the conclusions
of a humanity hating person like Yoel Roth, you have to take with a
grain of salt.
You are not advocating for a "Dictator" run styled internet. You're
more along the lines of a Marxist styled environment run by a group of
administrators who have been chosen because of their superior values and
selfless motivation. It never works. There is always corruption, and
the stealing of freedom and wealth from the middle class. Your group
will just now be the ones who get to pick the winners and losers. It's
already happening, and has been for years.
I think it's evil, and based on the usual lies. Sometimes intentional,
others simply sophomoric in their logic. At which point I go back to my
original statement that you let it work it out on it's own with as
little governmental interference, regulation, and control as possible.
Let the users decide what they want. People are getting more
knowledgeable, and will refuse participation if things need change. I
simply do not trust any of the world or nation state governing entities
to act honorably. They've not shown any reason to trust them at this
point in time. Though the numbers are great, people were not meant to
be sheep.