Paul W. Schleck <
psch...@panix.com> wrote:
>"Believe it or not, being a jerk on the internet used to be considered
>charming. Insults were simpler, more benign, a learning experience. It
>even had a different name: flaming.
>Early Usenet groups (similar to chat rooms)
What idiot would say "similar to chat rooms"?
Usenet is very different than any other form of communication because,
in followup, the Message-ID is appended to the References header, making
threading possible. Certain important early newsreaders figured out how
to implement threading. This could be but generally isn't done on
mailing lists using the In-Reply-To header. It's far more difficult
to create a thread tree on a mailing list, especially since subscribers
won't archive all messages.
In most other forums, the messages are displayed in order they were
received or some other order chosen by the user, if such flexibility is
offered. Threading isn't a feature.
The other difference of unmoderated Usenet is the lack of ownership of a
group. The regulars decide what is to be discussed.
Gosh, it sure would be nice if Paul were to choose to participate in
Usenet by posting his own thoughts and not synopses of articles written
by others that Paul himself cannot be bothered to comment on. I'm sure
37 other people have said this to you already about whatever the hell it
is you are trying to do.