Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Gender affirming surgery?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

tibron

unread,
Mar 24, 2023, 2:49:25 AM3/24/23
to
bigdog <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6c4545f2-6f4e-49b0...@googlegroups.com:

> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/iowa-governor-signs-gender-affi
> rming-care-ban-bathroom-law/ar-AA1903tp?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=35fd
> 6e4fde4f4e59b20c0ceee13437e5&ei=6
>
> "They are also prohibited from conducting gender-affirming surgeries,
> even though Iowa doctors say the surgeries are already rare."
>
> Gender-affirming surgery is just doublespeak for child mutilation.
> Lefties are fond of using doublespeak to disguise what they are really
> doing.
>
> Doublespeak is defined as follows:
> "Doublespeak is language that deliberately obscures, disguises,
> distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take the
> form of euphemisms (e.g., "downsizing" for layoffs and "servicing the
> target" for bombing),[1] in which case it is primarily meant to make
> the truth sound more palatable. It may also refer to intentional
> ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning. In such
> cases, doublespeak disguises the nature of the truth."
>
> Lefties used to do this with fiscal issues calling tax increases
> "revenue enhancements"
>
> Now they throw around terms like gender fluid or non-binary. It's a
> bastardization of the language. It's right out of 1984.

Jamie Lee Curtis approves. Not so sure I approve of her anymore, if I
ever really did.
0 new messages