****Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth****
Marjorie Knoller
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish
media is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
"The great masses of people ... will more easily fall victims to a big
lie than to a small one."
Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray
this statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But
if we read this selection in context, we find that he is speaking of
the Jews who had ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how
the German people fell victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler
even tells us what this great lie is that duped the German people into
being controlled by the Jews. He continues:
"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the
application of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the
Jews; for their entire existence is built on one single great lie,
namely, that here one had to deal with a religious brotherhood, while
in fact one has to deal with a race - what a race! As such they have
been nailed down forever, in an eternally correct sentence of
fundamental truth, by one of the greatest minds of mankind; he called
them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does not realize this or
does not want to believe this will never be able to help truth to
victory in this world."
Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th
century German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true nature
of Jews. We do not need to rely upon the opinions of German
philosophers and political leaders regarding this character trait of
the Jews, for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
"You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your
father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and
he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him. When
he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, because he is a liar, and the
father of it" (John 8:44 AST).
Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing
myths" (Titus 1:14). But Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed
Germany and what have destroyed America today. Herr Hitler may have
been correct in what he felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there
are many, many more which have had a damning effect on the white race.
One of the greatest is certainly the lie of the Hebrew Masoretic Text
and the removal of the Greek Septuagint from the hands of white
Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the same poisonous venom.
One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is Albert Einstein.
Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who
drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is
made an idol to young people and his very name has become synonymous
with genius. The truth, however, is very different. The reality is
that Einstein was an inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own
shoelaces; he contributed nothing original to the field of quantum
mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary he stole the ideas
of other men and the Jewish media made him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his
only brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other
people's ideas, passing them off as his own.
Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this
story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education
that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the
age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he
left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper
of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein
failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich. This
exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed
himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a
lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering
school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still
could not get a position at the engineering school! Unable to go to
the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend)
at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third
class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified
position. Even after publishing his so-called groundbreaking papers of
1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only
elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing
at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not
quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical
documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely
qualified.
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while
continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without
success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth.
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of
university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or
any of the things normally associated with an academic setting,
Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the
field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published
in 1905. Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat,
including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to
believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the
blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an
admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of
26 without any real education. However, a simpler explanation exists:
he stole the ideas and plagiarized the papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source
of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by
Einstein's worshippers as totally new and completely different, each
of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers
dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:
1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4. The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of
relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to
Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein
called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come
in 1915). This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics
and was based upon two premises: 1) in the absence of acceleration,
the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and 2) since the
speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the
time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose
frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an
observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same
place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as
one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower
velocities where time would pass faster.
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis
for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being
originally Einstein's. First of all, the idea that the speed of light
was a constant and was independent of the motion of its source was not
Einstein's at all, but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James
Maxwell. Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first
proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He wrote an article to
this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His
ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and
the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz,
Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of
light was independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this
piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before
Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to
conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be
explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by
relativity but they did not understand relativity. They had attempted
to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium
thought to be necessary for the propagation of light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George
FitzGerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing
radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the
Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained if,
"... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are
moving through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the
square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed
the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout
the 1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and
wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory
detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In
1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the
Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7
years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz transformations, the
series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz.
They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the
time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of
light. In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper regarding the
Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of
these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time
intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their
succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be
defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as
simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize
the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.
Thus we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term
'Special Theory of Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over
the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most important
lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of
his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while
Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed
regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office
in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to
give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early
physicists knew that he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of
another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the
irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the
molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement
had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827.
The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory
of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian
Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert
Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion
contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they
had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper
regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a
third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed
by the famous equation E=mc^2. Einstein's biographers categorize this
as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this
idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper,
it was not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought
later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not
original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown
in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and
by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there
was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just
electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's
plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet
unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many
of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety
of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and
energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904
in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized
version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenörhl had
received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of
Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a
simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish
physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the
mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc^2 was the
logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it. Thus,
the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally, and most
importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. It is ludicrous to
believe that Einstein developed this postulate, particularly in light
of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to
conduct the appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the
scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this
theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree
(e.g., salts of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein
understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By
saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not understand basic
scientific principles and that he was writing about a topic that he
did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht
remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible
experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the
foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the
photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release of
electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of
light. This area of research is particularly important to the Einstein
myth because it was for this topic that he unjustly received his 1922
Nobel Prize.
But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who
deserve the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point
for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in
finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the
photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by
Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard,
worked on understanding this phenomenon. Lenard was the first to show
that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect
was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of
the light. This was an important breakthrough.
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern
day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's
work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in
finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900
and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to
talking about one particular type of energy - light energy. But the
principles and equations governing the process in general had been
deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious
conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete
packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was
original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific
community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the
patent office until 1909 when it was arranged for him to take a
position at a school by World Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919
newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a
position where he could begin to use other people's work as his own
more openly. He engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove
the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those
theories, and then he could present the research as his own or at
least take partial credit. In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and
express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently
developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity.
This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he
would publish in 1915. But the mathematical work was not done by
Einstein - he was incapable of it. Instead, it was performed by the
mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical
principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop
a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics
used to describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity
to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and
their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they
pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913
based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann
to Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the
conclusions were incorrect. It appears that Grossmann was not smart
enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look
elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his
correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its
publication that he, "...completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert
and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most
brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another
mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area
of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of
Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to
believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions
regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their
thinking. However, the exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the
majority of his General Relativity work from these two men, the rest
being taken from Grossmann. Hilbert submitted for publication, a week
before Einstein completed his work, a paper which contained the
correct field equations of General Relativity. What this means is that
Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same
conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an
opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were
Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not
necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of
publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed,
delivered in the form of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and
Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On
November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for
sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the
20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two
weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered
their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of
his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that Einstein
quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to beat
Hilbert to the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began
to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised
him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert
made the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he
delivered his work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher
quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many
problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We
know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper
is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and
electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is
the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of
the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community
all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria
declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz,
Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory
of relativity..."
However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The
Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead
they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein. As we mentioned
earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in
plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should
bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse
of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was
observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the
General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media
immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero,
at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline
of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the
Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the
force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following
years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein
was heralded as the originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because
of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received the Nobel
Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the photoelectric
effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an
important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had
been established as an idol to the popular masses of England and
America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he is
erroneously believed to be today. As such, he immediately began his
work as a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that
if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding
of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions
regarding political and social issues. This is exactly what World
Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering.
They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert to be
recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a
strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle
names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In
August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding
installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a
proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading
German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the
Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he
deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved
either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been
important German theologians, and during World War II he would stay in
Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he
could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to
be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would
go on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a
public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich. This
Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern
physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein, who
apparently could not understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare
genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and
contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty
principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and
the binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry. No, the
Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted as a genius because he would go
on to head the German atomic bomb project and serve prison time after
the war for his involvement with the Third Reich.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white
Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and
even Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and
evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead,
they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he
repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or
nearsighted comments regarding the work he had supposedly done. For
example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article
in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of
practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe
that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to
drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for
instance-then, according to Einstein, you are wrong..."
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he
had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time
theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb
and nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919,
he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he
began his real purpose - evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and
World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time, all
of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in each
instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that
led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in
order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of
academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a
fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to
promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain
membership in a Commission of the League of Nations. In February of
1923, Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he
becomes a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New
Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and
Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by
criticizing the work of Schrödinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief
illness, he resumes his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent
Israel and at the same time a World Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although
he would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated
war against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he
thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the
request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an
American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not
Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of the
bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for
either.
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World
Government, with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation.
This push continues through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein,
who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of Israel, both
politically and economically, is offered the presidency of Israel. He
declines. In 1953, he spends his time attacking the McCarthy
Committee, and he supports Communists such as J. Robert Oppenheimer.
He encourages civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy trials.
Finally, on April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue dies.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid
statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and
exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to
promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more
and more of the men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and
more able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen
lying has culminated in the Jew controlled Time magazine naming
Einstein "The Person of the Century" at the close of 1999. It may be
demonstrated that the Jewish lies have become more bold with the
passage of time because Einstein was never named "Man of the Year"
while he was alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he is
named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the
"Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of
the Year" while he was still living by Time magazine, and according to
a December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen
over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations
fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by
Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious candidate. Still
the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein, which has articles
by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and
Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary
to include an article rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious
choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen
Hawking which purports to be a history of the theory of relativity. In
it, Hawking admits many of the things in this article, such as the
fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before
Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of
relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also writes,
"Einstein...was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in
Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich,
who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. ...
Einstein was horrified by this ... Most scientists, however, accepted
the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent
agreement with observations ... They are the basis of modern
developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the
foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the
past half-century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all
of the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein
was so stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of
modern science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified field
theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that
"success eluded" Einstein in the field of explaining the
contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today, these
contradictions are explained by the unified field theory, but
Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the least intelligent of
20th century scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory
or the unified field theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most
ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully
pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and
the Jewish owners of Time magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give
the title to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice
would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If they
wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally changed the
landscape of 20th century science, then the obvious choice would be
William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the
transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and
computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and
watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed incomprehensible
advances in all fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms
of science today would be basically in the same place that they were
in the late 1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William
Shockley because he spent the majority of his scientific career
demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites and
arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the
Jews to financially destroy Shockley who founded the first company in
the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews
hired away his entire staff and used them to start Fairchild
semiconductor, the company that today is known as Intel.
No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time
be recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German
scientists who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles
Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and
certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists
and geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist,
Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything white.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race
and of the Germans in particular in the following statements. He was
asked what he thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans
after the war and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since
1870...Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected
Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful
intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. ... The
Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be
re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting..."
Wavy Pee G
"Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.16bde0a2d...@24.2.2.74...
You couldn't be wronger. Einstein's favourite flavour of ice-cream was
Vanilla.
Carlos Antunes
exactly what?
Marjorie Knoller wrote:
>
> Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
>
--
"You are a child of the universe,
no less than the trees & the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you,
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should."
Max Ehrmann in DESIDERATA, 1927
Loren Dickens
newsgroup.
It seems you lost your way, It's possible you may have turned left when you
were obviously intending on going right.
"Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> schreef in bericht
news:MPG.16bde0a2d...@24.2.2.74...
thawle...@tdl.com
wrote:
>And the relevance of this post to misc.immigration.usa newsgroup is
>exactly what?
A troll..what else?
TowNIN
fuck is this in the NIN group? Trent Reznor is anything BUT racist. Stay
the fuck out, you trailer-trash failed-abortion piece of dirty shit wipe.
Ken johnson
;)
Ben
(sorry, just the first thing that popped into my head)
"Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.16bde0a2d...@24.2.2.74...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
>
>
> One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish
> media is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
<snip>
Spread Eagle
> Please refrain from posting racially motivated political statements in this
> newsgroup.
First, I viscerally disagree with everything that this poster had to
say, but I will defend to the death his/her right to say it. Not an
original thought (Nathan Hale?), I know, but I like it, agree with it,
and own it as my own. Knowledge, interpersonal growth, and,
ultimately, civilization, flower under the free, unhindered exhange of
ideas, and decidedly not by the squelching thereof. It is when
bankrupt ideas and philosophies are exposed to fresh air and sunlight
that they are seen for what they are, and are then once and for all
discredited. When they are artificially driven underground they
fester in paranoia, mutate, and then become truly noxious. This is
something that the politically correct crowd just can't seem to get a
handle on (perhaps they have their own fear of exposure). Debate,
even passionately and with zeal, if you are inclined, but don't
squelch.
Second, the posting was not "racial." All people fall generally into
one three "races": Caucasian, Asian and Black. Jews and Arabs are
semitic peoples, a subset of the Caucasian race. The poster's
comments were anti-Jewish. They were not anti-semitic generally, and
surely not anti-Caucasian generally. You may object to the poster's
anti-Jewish statements, and I would refer you to the first paragraph
hereinabove.
Spread Eagle
Thomas Friedman
"TowNIN" <tow...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:s1_48.20946$ag5.2...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> Do the world a favor and eat a fucking bullet you piece of shit. Why the
> fuck is this in the NIN group? Trent Reznor is anything BUT racist. Stay
> the fuck out, you trailer-trash failed-abortion piece of dirty shit wipe.
Well, clearly you don't know her name. Marjorie Knoller is on trial for allowing her dog
to eat a lesbian in San Francisco. She also stands accused, though not in court, of having
sex with the dog. Further, though Marjorie is a Jew, or to quote her attorney "a nice
Jewish girl from Brooklyn", she has adopted as her son a high level member of the Aryan
Brotherhood prison gang currently doing a near life term in Pelican Bay.
stardome
Obviosly you've spent a great deal of time and thought on this writing. It
definatly presents a very powerful opinion and different point of view. I
would ask though that you include a bibliography and a reference page that
some of us may be able to read your research and come to our own conclusion.
Having been involved with a great deal of sciences myself I would also
remind you that in science nothing is unique, every idea is built upon one
previous to it, and even though an idea is know sometimes it needs
rediscovering in a more relavent enviroment. I'm not very well read on
Einstein, and am in no position to debate his achivements, deserved or not,
so please don't take this as an attack on you. I do however feel as though
this piece is a "smoking gun" that you will want to be very careful as to
whom you present it to. I found many of the comments to be very offensive
to me and I'm not even jewish. I would also advise that before you charge a
group of people with the moral decay of the US or world in genral that you
take a look at what your values and moral code are. If you don't find
anything wrong with them then take a look to see what you are doing to help
improve the moral values of the world. From your writing I get the
impression that you have a strong belief in christianity. (I may be wrong,
but like I said it's just an impression I get.) If you are a christian of
some sort then you do have to recognize the fact that Jesus Christ himself
was jewish. I do take my hat off to the jewish people for their strength
and endurance since the conception of the religion. They've had to endure
hardships that no other religion to my knowledge has had to endure. Before
you get all bent out of shape in blaming them, look throughout history at
the horrible events that have been carried out in the name of religion, not
excluding the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, and in current history the
bombing of the World Trade Center. I'm not religios, but I'm not an athiest
either. I do believe that there is a greater purpose in this great big
universe than we are prevy to at this time and that death is not an end, but
an end to a chapter of existance. Good luck to you as a person, but please
keep your closed minded religios opinions on a more appropriate newsgroup.
ews:MPG.16bde0a2d...@24.2.2.74...
Paul Heslop
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
>
> re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting..."
er...yes...how...er..interesting.
--
Paul... (Ignore that)
_____________________________________
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
NM
---snippage---
> say,
Well racists, xenophobes and anti-semites will say literally anything.
> but I will defend to the death his/her right to say it. Not an
> original thought (Nathan Hale?),
No Hale regretted that he had but one life to give for his country. The
free speech quote is from: Beatrice Hall - I disapprove of what you say,
but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
-- The Friends of Voltaire, 1906
It is widely attributed to Voltaire himself.
> Second, the posting was not "racial." All people fall generally into
> one three "races": Caucasian, Asian and Black. Jews and Arabs are
> semitic peoples, a subset of the Caucasian race. The poster's
> comments were anti-Jewish. They were not anti-semitic generally,
While you are technically correct, in common parlance "anti-semitic"
means anti-jewish. Get used to it. Here is the most common dictionary
definition for "anti-semite"
an暗i-Sem搏te n.
One who discriminates against or who is hostile toward or prejudiced
against Jews
> and
> surely not anti-Caucasian generally.
You'll find that most if not all anti-semites (or anti-jewish people you
seem to prefer) don't consider Jews to be "caucasion" or "white".
> You may object to the poster's
> anti-Jewish statements, and I would refer you to the first paragraph
> hereinabove.
Perhaps the first ammendment as well. In reality though, in this forum,
the anti-semitical rantings get posted along with the invariable flames
against the anti-semite poster and they all say what they want when they
want.
NM
Loren Dickens
You are absolutely right as far as pointing out that the posters comments
were not racial. Sorry.
I also agree that a person has a right to free speech and opinions.
However, I come here to read the entertaining post (mostly) concerning
writing and have no interest in reading someone's dated and politically
twisted views. If I wanted to do that I'd read the New York Post.
Furthermore I can assure you that I am not a politically correct fanatic.
Anyway thanks for your comments and pointing out my incorrect usage of the
word racial.
Loren.
"Spread Eagle" <red...@virtualhosts.net> schreef in bericht
news:7059619f.02012...@posting.google.com...
theMule
The thing is, most of what the poster said was rooted in fact, and there is
some truth to the idea that Einstein was overated, there were certainly many
scientist of that era that were his equal. He did have excellent PR skills,
and he fit the mold of the eccentric scientist better that the others of his
time - note that einstein was not a major contributor to the Manhattan
project - other than the original letter urging FDR to begin such a project.
In fact, there has been speculation by revisionist feminist historians that
it was really Einsteins first Wife, who was in fact most responsible for his
work. She did do some of the proofs he needed, and his work definitly went
down hill after their divorice. His second marriage was to his cousin, who
was dutiful, made him happy, but he never had the same quality of work
.
"Loren Dickens" <loren....@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:a346sb$h0p$1...@reader06.wxs.nl...
Thomas Friedman
> Dear Spread Eagle,
> You are absolutely right as far as pointing out that the posters comments
> were not racial. Sorry.
> I also agree that a person has a right to free speech and opinions.
Marjorie Knoller in the words of her attorney is "a nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn."
Her husband Robert converted to Judaism.
----------------------------------------------
"I hope so," said Knoller's attorney, Nedra Ruiz, who added that she disagreed with the
judge and said that bail of $1 million is "unnecessary" because of no flight risk.
"She's stunned; she feels she deserves release on her own recognizance," Ruiz said about
her client's reaction.
At the hearing, Ruiz described Knoller as a "nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn" with ties to
the community and no criminal record.
----------------------------------------------
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/01/MN19935.DTL
Woman's bail cut in half in dog case
Knoller no more risk than Noel, judge says
Jaxon Van Derbeken, Chronicle Staff Writer Saturday, September 1, 2001
San Francisco -- In a surprise move, a San Francisco judge cut bail in half yesterday for
a woman facing second-degree murder charges in the dog-mauling death of her neighbor.
Superior Court Judge James Warren reduced Marjorie Knoller's bail to $1 million from the
$2 million originally set when she was jailed in March along with her husband, Robert
Noel.
Warren said that while Knoller may be facing more serious charges than Noel -- who is
still being held on $1 million bond on manslaughter charges -- she is no more of a risk to
jump bail.
The ruling followed a daylong, often heated hearing in which prosecutors argued that the
accused couple had strong ties to the "vile, vicious, murderous" Aryan Brotherhood prison
gang. Warren kept details of prosecutors' accusations secret to avoid adding to pretrial
publicity surrounding the case.
In arguing against cutting Knoller's bail, the prosecution also said that the couple are
flight risks and that Knoller had done nothing to help Diane Whipple as she lay dying in
her Pacific Heights apartment building after the dog attack.
The defense countered that the prosecution was "cruel" for suggesting that Knoller let
Whipple die after the Jan. 26 attack by the Presa Canario dog that Noel and Knoller had
been keeping.
The defense stressed that both defendants had an unblemished reputation and strong ties to
the community. Far from letting Whipple die, they said, Knoller had acted heroically.
In the end, Warren acknowledged prosecution arguments about the risks involved but ordered
the bail reduced based on his theory of equal flight risk.
Prosecutors had no comment on the ruling, citing Warren's gag order in the case. But a
private attorney suing the couple for wrongful death was puzzled by the decision.
"It doesn't make sense. . . . I don't understand it," said Michael Cardoza, who along with
his client, Sharon Smith, attended the first part of the hearing.
It is unclear whether Knoller can raise even the reduced bail sum.
"I hope so," said Knoller's attorney, Nedra Ruiz, who added that she disagreed with the
judge and said that bail of $1 million is "unnecessary" because of no flight risk.
"She's stunned; she feels she deserves release on her own recognizance," Ruiz said about
her client's reaction.
At the hearing, Ruiz described Knoller as a "nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn" with ties to
the community and no criminal record.
"There's nothing in this evidence to show she was anything but brave in the face of a
tragedy that would strike most people speechless, that might dement a person," Ruiz told
Warren.
Later she said Knoller "put her body on (Whipple) to protect her from this crazed, damned
dog."
Prosecutor James Hammer bristled at the suggestion that Knoller valiantly fought to
protect Whipple's life.
"If Marjorie Knoller's such a hero, why didn't she give first aid to Diane Whipple while
she was dying?" Hammer said. "If Marjorie Knoller's such a hero, why didn't she call 911?
And if Marjorie Knoller's such a hero, why did she go on national television and blame
Diane Whipple for her own death?"
When he again stressed Knoller's failure to help Whipple, Knoller shouted, "I did too, you
son of a bitch!" That brought a threat from the judge to remove her from court.
Much of the testimony in the hearing concerned the alleged ties the accused may have to
the Aryan Brotherhood, in part through a Pelican Bay State Prison inmate they adopted.
The judge appeared to agree with the prosecution that there was cause for concern, saying,
"The court does find that Aryan Brotherhood is a danger, that people are in danger and
that witnesses in this case are in danger. . . . The Aryan Brotherhood is potentially a
resource of some value to the defense."
He also noted prosecutors' argument on the couple's alleged flight risk. Prosecutors
pointed out that the couple drove at high speeds while being followed by police after
testifying before a grand jury that would later indict them.
That was not enough, however, for Warren to order Knoller's bail kept at $2 million.