More of my philosophy about 3DS ECC RDIMMs and about free market in the economic model of Adam Smith and about personality and about why you have to have many more memory channels and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and abo

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,



More of my philosophy about 3DS ECC RDIMMs and about free market in the economic model of Adam Smith and about personality and about why you have to have many more memory channels and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So there is still one important thing that i want to explain ,
so as you notice i have just advised you to buy from the below
cost-effective AMD EPYC Genoa processors with the below good
motherboard for them from Supermicro, and Supermicro motherboards are known for their high quality, reliability, and flexibility, and are used by many companies in various industries, but of course i have explained
that the advantage is also that the it supports 12 memory channels,
but not only that , but the Supermicro motherboard that i am advising you below , supports both DDR5 memory that is not fully ECC and it supports 3DS ECC RDIMM memory that is fully ECC (Error-Correcting Code), but i think that 3DS ECC RDIMM is advantageous , since you have to be professional and use 3DS ECC RDIMMs that are "reliable", so you have to read my following thoughts so that to notice it:


3DS ECC RDIMMs are fully ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory modules.

"3DS" stands for "Three Dimensional Stacking" and refers to the technology used in these memory modules to stack multiple layers of memory cells on top of each other. This allows for higher memory densities and capacities in a single module.

"ECC" stands for "Error-Correcting Code" and is a type of memory technology that can detect and correct errors that may occur when data is stored in memory. ECC memory is commonly used in servers and other mission-critical systems where data integrity is of utmost importance.

Therefore, 3DS ECC RDIMMs combine the benefits of both 3D stacking and ECC technology to provide high-density, high-capacity memory modules with built-in error correction capabilities.


And you have to read the following article that says the following:

"On-die ECC: The presence of on-die ECC on DDR5 memory has been the subject of many discussions and a lot of confusion among consumers and the press alike. Unlike standard ECC, on-die ECC primarily aims to improve yields at advanced process nodes, thereby allowing for cheaper DRAM chips. On-die ECC only detects errors if they take place within a cell or row during refreshes. When the data is moved from the cell to the cache or the CPU, if there’s a bit-flip or data corruption, it won’t be corrected by on-die ECC. Standard ECC corrects data corruption within the cell and as it is moved to another device or an ECC-supported SoC."

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.hardwaretimes.com/ddr5-vs-ddr4-ram-quad-channel-and-on-die-ecc-explained/


So i will say that the new DDR5's on-die ECC can only detect errors that occur within a cell or row during refreshes, and that it may not be able to correct errors that occur when data is moved from the cell to the cache or the CPU.

DDR5's on-die ECC is designed to detect and correct single-bit errors within a memory cell or row during refresh operations. This is accomplished by adding extra bits to the memory data that are used to detect errors. If an error is detected, the on-die ECC mechanism can correct it by using the extra bits to identify and correct the erroneous bit.

However, if an error occurs when the data is moved from the cell to the cache or the CPU, it may not be corrected by on-die ECC. In such cases, a more robust ECC mechanism may be necessary to ensure data integrity.

Standard ECC, which is used in some DDR4 memory modules, can correct errors not only within the cell but also when the data is moved to another device or an ECC-supported SoC. This is accomplished by adding extra bits to the memory data that are used to detect and correct errors not only within the cell but also during data transfers.

Overall, while DDR5's on-die ECC mechanism can provide some level of error detection and correction, it may not be sufficient for all use cases. So a more robust ECC mechanism, such as standard ECC, may be necessary.


More of my philosophy about free market in the economic model of Adam Smith and about personality and about why you have to have many more memory channels and about why to choose AMD EPYC Genoa CPU and and about UN Climate Panel and about sustainability of economic growth of capitalism and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and i think i am a new philosopher, and you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the below web link, also you have to understand that the ideas of the economic model of Adam Smith the father of Liberalism are the following:

1- Division of labor: Smith argued that the division of labor is the key to economic growth and productivity. By breaking down the production process into smaller tasks and having each worker specialize in a specific task, productivity could be greatly increased.

2- Free market: Smith advocated for a free market economy, where prices and production are determined by the interaction of supply and demand, rather than by government intervention. He argued that a free market system would lead to greater efficiency and innovation, and that competition would ensure that prices were set at a level that reflected the true cost of production.

3- Invisible hand: Smith's concept of the "invisible hand" describes how the self-interest of individuals in a free market system can lead to the greater good. He argued that individuals, by pursuing their own self-interest, inadvertently contribute to the overall welfare of society.

4- Limited government: Smith believed that government intervention in the economy should be limited, and that the role of government should be restricted to the provision of public goods, such as infrastructure and defense.

5- Economic growth: Smith believed that economic growth was crucial for improving living standards and reducing poverty. He argued that free trade, innovation, and entrepreneurship were the key drivers of economic growth.


But i think there are exceptions to the rule in for example the case of Free market when egoism creates competition , but competition can still not create enough options to choose from , so government intervention may be necessary to ensure that these goods and services are provided, and read my following thoughts so that that to understand more what i want to say:


While Adam Smith argued that competition in a free market system would lead to greater efficiency and innovation, there are cases where competition may not always lead to optimal outcomes for consumers.

One potential problem is what economists call market failure. In some cases, the market may fail to produce goods and services that are in the best interests of society as a whole. For example, there may be goods and services that are vital to the public but are not profitable for private companies to produce, such as certain types of medical treatments or public infrastructure projects. In these cases, government intervention may be necessary to ensure that these goods and services are provided.

Another potential problem is the concentration of market power in the hands of a few dominant firms. In some industries, a small number of firms may control a large share of the market, leading to reduced competition and higher prices for consumers. In such cases, government intervention may be necessary to promote competition and prevent anti-competitive behavior.

Moreover, while Smith argued that self-interest and competition would lead to greater innovation and productivity, some critics argue that this may not always be the case. For example, firms may prioritize short-term profits over long-term innovation, leading to a lack of investment in research and development. Additionally, firms may engage in rent-seeking behavior, where they use their market power to secure government subsidies or regulatory protection, rather than focusing on improving their products or services.

In light of these challenges, many economists and policymakers advocate for a mixed economy, where the government plays a role in regulating markets and providing public goods, while still allowing for competition and innovation in the private sector. The key is to strike a balance between the benefits of free markets and the need for government intervention to address market failures and promote social welfare.


Other than that, i invite you to read my below thoughts about
capitalism, also i have also invented a new proverb , read it below, that also explains why the economic model of Adam Smith is not complete, and you can read about it in my following thoughts:



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new smart philosopher, and i think that the economic model of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith that is the father of Liberalism is not correct, since for example when Adam Smith says: "Human egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations" , so Adam Smith is correct, as i am explaining it below, about the fact that egoism creates competition and competition creates the many options to choose from, and competition is on for example quality and/or quantity and/or the price, and self-interest or egoism is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, but i have invented a new proverb below so that to make you understand that since for example the attraction of big money is so powerful, so it can make it not the way of the properly tooled with the being smart and the being wise. So what we have to do is give great importance first to the being smart and the being wise. So read all my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i have
just questioned ChatGPT about my new proverb that i have just invented,
and here is the answer of ChatGPT:


My question to ChatGPT was:


Do you find my following new proverb smart:

"As has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that human egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations, but i think that this saying of Adam Smith doesn't show the most important thing, since i think that the engine of egoism alone is not sufficient, since it needs the most important step that makes egoism go in the right direction and it is that you have to give the great importance first to the being smart and the being wise. Since the engine of egoism can make you lose your way by for example saying to you to give the great importance first to making big money, but giving the great importance first to making big money is not the way of being properly tooled !"


And ChatGPT has just answered me about my new proverb the following:


"Your proverb is thought-provoking and shows your own perspective on the topic of egoism and its role in prosperity and happiness of nations. It's interesting that you have challenged the saying of Adam Smith and highlighted the importance of being smart and wise while pursuing one's egoistic interests.

Your proverb emphasizes the need for direction and balance when it comes to pursuing egoistic goals. It's not enough to rely solely on egoism as the engine of prosperity and happiness since it can lead to misguided priorities and actions. Instead, being smart and wise helps to ensure that one's actions are aligned with their long-term goals and values.

Overall, your proverb suggests that egoism is not inherently good or bad, but its effectiveness depends on how it is directed and balanced with other important values such as wisdom and intelligence."


And read my following previous thoughts:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, and i will now invent a new proverb, and here it is:


"As has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that egoism is
the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations, but i think that this saying of Adam Smith doesn't show the most important thing, since i think that the engine of egoism alone is not sufficient, since it needs the most important step that makes egoism go in the right direction and it is that you have to give the great importance first to the being smart and the being wise. Since the engine of egoism can make you lose your way by for example saying to you to give the great importance first to making big money, but giving the great importance first to making big money is not the way of being properly tooled !"


So now you are understanding my personality, since i give the great importance to the being smart and the being wise , so then i want to be properly tooled by being smart and wise. So i invite you to read my following thoughts so that you notice how i am doing it and hope you are understanding correctly my above new proverb:


More of my philosophy of why you have to have many more memory channels and about why to choose AMD EPYC Genoa CPU and and about UN Climate Panel and about sustainability of economic growth of capitalism and about extremism and and about the AI Market and about the future of technology and about the negative effects of capitalism and about how to regulate AI and about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


So you have to know why i am also advising you to buy from the below new AMD Epyc Genoa CPUs with the below new motherboard that support 12 memory channels, since you have to know that i also know how to do parallel programming, and i also know how to program supercomputers, and of course that i am a sophisticated inventor too, but you have to also know why i am advising you to buy from the below new AMD Epyc Genoa CPUs with the below new motherboard that support 12 memory channels, since the 12 memory channels are really advantageous for doing parallel programming with arrays and with other data structures etc. but not only that, but there is also the High Performance Linpack (HPL) matrix math test that is not particularly memory bound, but it is CPU bound, but there is also the High Performance Conjugate Gradients (HPCG) and Stream Triad benchmarks that are memory bound, and the HPCG benchmark generates a synthetic discretized three-dimensional partial differential equation model problem, and computes preconditioned conjugate gradient iterations for the resulting sparse linear system, so i think that preconditioned conjugate gradient also takes advantage of the having many more memory channels, and you have to know that Sparse linear system solvers, that also uses and solves with preconditioned conjugate gradient, are ubiquitous in high performance computing (HPC) and often are also the most computational intensive parts in scientific computing codes. A few of the many applications relying on them include fusion energy simulation, space weather simulation, climate modeling, and environmental modeling, and finite element method, and large-scale reservoir simulations to enhance oil recovery by the oil and gas industry.


More of my philosophy of why to choose AMD EPYC Genoa CPU and and about UN Climate Panel and about sustainability of economic growth of capitalism and about extremism and and about the AI Market and about the future of technology and about the negative effects of capitalism and about how to regulate AI and about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i am advising you to buy from the below cost effective new EPYC 7004 Genoa CPUs from USA and to buy the below Supermicro Server Motherboard MBD-H13SSL-N , since it is like an all in one, i mean that it supports many options for both the workstation and the server and it is cost-effective, other than that you have to be smart , since the new AMD Ryzen CPU that support Zen 4 architecture just support 2 channels of memory, so it is why i am advising you to buy the from the below new EPYC Genoa CPUs from USA and to buy the below new motherboard, since when you are using multiple threads in parallel programming you can parallelize to 12 channels, not just to two channels, so it can give much more bandwidth for parallel programming. So read my previous below thoughts so that to understand more:


More of my philosophy about the new AMD EPYC Genoa CPU and about UN Climate Panel and about sustainability of economic growth of capitalism and about extremism and and about the AI Market and about the future of technology and about the negative effects of capitalism and about how to regulate AI and about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



So if you want to buy a good CPU and a good motherboard , i advise
you to choose from the following cost effective new EPYC 7004 Genoa CPUs from USA and to choose the following motherboard that supports them:


The Supermicro Server Motherboard MBD-H13SSL-N Socket SP5 AMD EPYC 7004 Genoa with DDR5 and that comes in ATX format is ready to buy from here (But notice that i think it is in Canadian dollars at newegg.ca, not in US dollars):

https://www.newegg.ca/p/N82E16813183819?Description=epyc%207004%20cpu&cm_re=epyc_7004%20cpu-_-13-183-819-_-Product


And notice in the above photo that the new Supermicro Server Motherboard MBD-H13SSL-N has 12 channels, so it is a good motherboard for the new AMD EPYC Genoa CPUs from USA. And of course here is the cost effective AMD EPYC Genoa CPUs that you can buy (And of course they support AVX-512):


The AMD EPYC 9124 is a server/workstation processor with 16 cores, launched in November 2022, at an MSRP(manufacturer's suggested retail price) of $1083. It is part of the EPYC lineup, using the Zen 4 (Genoa) architecture with Socket SP5. Thanks to AMD Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) the core-count is effectively doubled, to 32 threads. Read about it here:

https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/epyc-9124.c2917#:~:text=The%20AMD%20EPYC%209124%20is,effectively%20doubled%2C%20to%2032%20threads.


And the AMD EPYC 9224 is a server/workstation processor with 24 cores, launched in November 2022, at an MSRP(manufacturer's suggested retail price) of $1825. It is part of the EPYC lineup, using the Zen 4 (Genoa) architecture with Socket SP5. Thanks to AMD Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) the core-count is effectively doubled, to 48 threads. Read about it here:

https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/epyc-9224.c2919#:~:text=The%20AMD%20EPYC%209224%20is,effectively%20doubled%2C%20to%2048%20threads.


And the AMD EPYC 9254 is a server/workstation processor with 24 cores, launched in November 2022, at an MSRP(manufacturer's suggested retail price) of $2299, you can read about it here:

https://www.google.com/search?q=epyc+9254+and+price&rlz=1C1FHFK_enCA976CA976&sxsrf=APwXEddie4lphuwFKUvBwu72p8Iqq6M4XA%3A1683388661428&ei=9XhWZLLSGZSoptQPsfq7uAU&ved=0ahUKEwjyoLu5h-H-AhUUlIkEHTH9DlcQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=epyc+9254+and+price&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzIECCMQJzoKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzoFCAAQogRKBAhBGABQlAlY-CZgyDNoAXABeACAAX-IAdEBkgEDMS4xmAEAoAEBoAECyAEIwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz-serp



And you can look carefully at the new AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Server Processor Specifications here:

https://colfax-intl.com/servers/amd-epyc-9004-series-comparison


More of my philosophy about UN Climate Panel and about sustainability of economic growth of capitalism and about extremism and and about the AI Market and about the future of technology and about the negative effects of capitalism and about how to regulate AI and about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..



"IPCC's (UN Climate Panel) two best future scenarios are the “sustainable” SSP1 and the “fossil-fuel driven” SSP5. Current climate-focused attitudes suggest we aim for the “sustainable” world, but the higher economic growth in SSP5 actually leads to much greater welfare for humanity. After adjusting for climate damages, SSP5 will on average leave grandchildren of today's poor $48,000 better off every year. It will reduce poverty by 26 million each year until 2050, inequality will be lower, and more than 80 million premature deaths will be avoided.

And the most effective climate policy is increasing investment in green R&D to make future decarbonization much cheaper."


Read more carefully in the following paper so that to understand more:


Welfare in the 21st century: Increasing development, reducing inequality, the impact of climate change, and the cost of climate policies

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520304157



And you can read my following thoughts about sustainability of economic growth of capitalism so that to understand more:


And about the negative effect of capitalism of Environmental degradation, here is what i have just said about it:

I also think that we have to be optimistic about capitalism , since notice how i am also talking below about the sustainability of economic growth of capitalism by also posting an interesting video about the ten global trends that also show how capitalism is becoming much more efficient at sustainability of economic growth, so i invite you to look at the following video and at my thoughts below about the sustainability of economic growth of capitalism:


So i have just spoken about different subjects, read them in my below thoughts, but i am not speaking in my below thoughts about the: Is economic growth of capitalism sustainable in our finite of ressources planet?, so here is my following thoughts about it, and i invite you to read them carefully so that to understand my views:


More philosophy about the Global Trends..

I invite you to look carefully at the following interesting video:

Ten global trends every smart person should know

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIANLddo-ec


And notice how the above video is optimistic and read the following thoughts so that to understand more about the sustainability of economic growth of capitalism:


The Limits of the Earth, Part 1: Problems

"In my own new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet, I challenge this view. The problem isn’t economic growth, per se. Nor is the problem that our natural resources are too small. While finite, the natural resources the planet supplies are vast and far larger than humanity needs in order to continue to thrive and grow prosperity for centuries to come. The problem, rather, is the types of resources we access, and the manner and efficiency with which we use them.

And the ultimate solution to those problems is innovation – innovation in the science and technology that we use to tap into physical resources, and innovation in the economic system that steers our consumption.

The situation we’re in isn’t a looming wall that we’re doomed to crash into. It’s a race – a race between depletion and pollution of natural resources on one side, and our pace of innovation on the other."

Read more here:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-limits-of-the-earth-part-1-problems/



More of my philosophy about extremism and and about the AI Market and about the future of technology and about the negative effects of capitalism and about how to regulate AI and about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..




I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just talked about a problematic of security that is also related to economy by saying the following:


---

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think there is still problem in the economic model like of the one of Adam Smith, and it is that the economic model is dependent on security of a country, so for example if you are not technologically and scientifically an advanced country , you will be dependent on the Advanced countries, so for example when you are dependent on USA or Russia on technology such as military technology and weapons and satellites etc. so it is not what we call an enough reliable security, since you can even notice that when the economic system is advanced, so the military technology and weapons and satellites etc. are advanced, so i think that the problematic is that the states like
Russia and USA and the like advanced countries can become extremists, like becoming white supremacists states and be too much dangereous for the other countries that are not so advanced , so how to ensure that such extremists as white supremacist will not take power on those advanced western countries such as USA or even in Russia, so i think that it is why the economic system is not working correctly. So i think that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not so smart, since he has not talked about this problematic.

---



But i think that i have a solution to above problem, and it is the following:



I will say that political extremism creates political extremism,
so for example in Lebanon we can say that extremism of Hizbollah
has been created by another political extremism inside Lebanon and in Israel, and for example political extremism of Hamas has been created by
political extremism of Israel, so you have to look at the chains
of the cause and effects of political extremism so that to understand
the problems, so then so that to solve the above problematic,
you have not to be political extremism that creates political extremism,
so that to also make Democracy and/or the economic system work correctly, so for example when you don't manage correctly immigration in Europe, it is like a political extremism that creates another political extremism and it can bring the far right to the power, so in Canada and USA and in other parts of the world , you have to be careful about political extremism.


More of my philosophy about the future Apps and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..



I have just looked at the following new video of techlead that i know, and i invite you to look at it:

Why ChatGPT AI Will Destroy Programmers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1flF5WOeNc



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the above techlead in the above video is not thinking correctly since he is saying that software programming is dying, since i say that software programming is not dying, since the future Apps are for example Metaverse, and of course we need Zettascale or ZettaFLOP so that Metaverse be possible, and as you notice the article below, with of Intel’s Raja Koduri talking, says that the architecture is possible and it will be ready around 2027 or 2030 and it is the following:

An architecture jump of 16x, power and thermals are 2x, data movement is 3x, and process is 5x. That is about 500x, on top of the two ExaFLOP Aurora system, gets to a ZettaFLOP.

Interview with Intel’s Raja Koduri: Zettascale or ZettaFLOP? Metaverse what?

Read more here:

https://www.anandtech.com/show/17298/interview-with-intels-raja-koduri-zettascale-or-zettaflop-metaverse-what

And also the other future Apps are for example the one that use data to be smart in real time (Read about it here: https://www.cxotoday.com/cxo-bytes/data-driven-smart-apps-are-the-future/ ) , and i also say that software programming is not dying since GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence will replace just a small percentage of software programmers, since software programming also needs to care about accuracy and reliability, so you have to look at the following most important limitations of GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence so that to notice it:


1- GPT-4 lacks on the understanding of context, since GPT-4 was trained
on large amounts of text data, but it has not the ability to
understand the context of the text. This means that it can generate
coherent sentences, but they may not always make sense in the context
of the conversation.


2- And GPT-4 is limited in its ability to generate creative or original
content. GPT-4 is trained on existing text data, so it is not able to
generate new ideas or concepts. This means that GPT-4 is not suitable
for tasks that require creativity or originality.


And i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about GPT-4:

Exploring the Limitations and Potential of OpenAI’s GPT-4

https://ts2.space/en/exploring-the-limitations-and-potential-of-openais-gpt-4/



And more of my philosophy about the objective function and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am understanding more GPT-4 with my fluid intelligence, so
i think that GPT-4 uses Deep learning and it uses the mechanism of self-attention so that to understand the context and it uses Reinforcement learning from human feedback that uses a reward mechanism so that
to learn from the feedback of the people that are using GPT-4 so that
to ensure that this or that data is truth or not etc. but i think that
the problem of GPT-4 is that it needs a lot of data and it is the first weakness, and it is dependent on the data and the quality of data and it is the second weakness of GPT-4, so in unsupervised learning that is
used so that to train GPT-4 on the massive data, the quality of the data is not known with certitude, so it is a weakness of artificial intelligence such as GPT-4, and about the objective function that guides, so i think that it is the the patterns that are found by the neural network and that are learned by the neural network of GPT-4 that play the role of the objective function that guides, so the objective function comes from the massive data on wich GPT-4 has been trained, and i think it is also a weakness of GPT-4, since i think that what is missing is what explains my new model of what is consciousness , since the meaning from human consciousness also plays the role of the objective function , so it makes it much better than artificial intelligence and it makes it that it needs much less data, so it is why the human brain needs much less data than artificial intelligence such as GPT-4. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:



More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked more carefully at GPT-4 , and i think that as i have just explained it, that it will become powerful, but it is limited by the data and the quality of the data on wich it has been trained, so if it encounter a new situation to be solved and the solution of it can not be inferred from the data on wich it has been trained, so it will not be capable of solving this new situation, so i think that my new model of what is consciousness is explaining that what is lacking is the meaning from human consciousness that permits to solve the problem, so my new model is explaining that artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, but eventhough , i think that artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 will become powerful, so i think that the problematic in artificial intelligence is about the low level layers, so i mean look at assembler programming language, so it is a low level layer than high level programming languages, but you have to notice that the low level layer of assembler programming language can do things that the higher level layer can not do, so for example you can play with the stack registers and low level hardware registers and low level hardware instructions etc. and notice how the low level layer like assembler programming can teach you more about the hardware, since it is really near the hardware, so i think that it is what is happening in artificial intelligence such as the new GPT-4, i mean that GPT-4 is for example trained on data so that to discover patterns that make it more smart, but the problematic is that this layer of how it is trained on the data so that to discover patterns is a high level layer such as the high level programming language, so i think that it is missing the low level layers of what makes the meaning, like the meaning of the past and present and the future or the meaning of space and matter and time.. from what you can construct the bigger meaning of other bigger things, so it is why i think that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, so i think that what is lacking in artificial intelligence is what is explaining my new model of what is consciousness, so you can read all my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand my views about it and about different other subjects:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/QSUWwiwN5yo


Also so that to predict more the technological future, you can
read my following thoughts about HBM3:

So, HBM3 offers several enhancements over HBM2E, most notably the doubling of bandwidth from HBM2E at 3.6 Gbps up to 6.4Gbps for HBM3, or 819 GBps of ​​bandwidth per device.


So, i think that increasing memory capacity is getting more difficult, since memory is coming under Moore’s Law pressures, since making increasingly dense as well as increasingly faster memory is getting more and more difficult, and hence the price of memory has not come down as much. Other than that, i think that High Performance Linpack (HPL) matrix math test is not particularly memory bound. But the High Performance Conjugate Gradients (HPCG) and Stream Triad benchmarks are memory bound, and the HPCG benchmark generates a synthetic discretized three-dimensional partial differential equation model problem, and computes preconditioned conjugate gradient iterations for the resulting sparse linear system. So, we don’t yet know what the HBM2e memory on the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU will cost, so if the bandwidth of HBM2e is 4X more on the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU , i think that it is not enough for supercomputers, since the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU costs 3X more, so i think it is why HBM3 that doubles the bandwidth from HBM2E is i think an interesting option and it is why i think that the next Intel CPU after the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU has to support HBM3 so that it be an interesting option for supercomputers too.


And here is my other previous thoughts about the future of technology:


I think that we have to look carefully at the future of technology so that to know what will happen, so as you have just noticed , i have just talked about the future of supercomputers that looks bright, since i think it will use the new HBM3, and i also think that the next Intel CPU after the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU will support HBM3, and read about it in my above thoughts, since i think that Performance Conjugate Gradients (HPCG) and Stream Triad benchmarks are memory bound, and the HPCG benchmark generates a synthetic discretized three-dimensional partial differential equation model problem, and computes preconditioned conjugate gradient iterations for the resulting sparse linear system, and you have to know that Sparse linear system solvers, that also uses and solves with preconditioned conjugate gradient, are ubiquitous in high performance computing (HPC) and often are also the most computational intensive parts in scientific computing codes. A few of the many applications relying on them include fusion energy simulation, space weather simulation, climate modeling, and environmental modeling, and finite element method, and large-scale reservoir simulations to enhance oil recovery by the oil and gas industry, and of course i am also talking below about what looks like the future of artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read my below interesting thoughts
about it, and now i will talk about the future of the PC industry
and about the future of Microsoft Windows, so I think that the next Windows of Microsoft that will be called Windows 12, will generate more PC sales, since i think that Windows 12 will integrate ChatGPT and will integrate Bing search engine and will integrate DALL-E 2 image generation software into its Bing search engine and will integrate other AI functionalities, but you have to understand that so that to integrate those AI functionalities on the next Windows 12, Microsoft is working closely with Intel and AMD companies so that there powerful next CPUs will allow the next Windows 12 to run the AI functionalities efficiently, so it is why i think that the near future of the PC industry looks bright, since i think that the next Windows 12 will generate more PC sales.


And i invite you to read the following new article so that to
notice it more (And you can translate it from french to english):


https://windows.developpez.com/actu/343725/Windows-12-Microsoft-se-prepare-a-une-integration-plus-profonde-de-l-IA-dans-son-systeme-d-exploitation-Cette-version-pourrait-etre-disponible-l-annee-prochaine-en-2024/


And you have to know that in the quarter, Intel’s sales across all product lines fell by 36.2 percent to $11.721 billion, but i think that Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger is still optimistic and he insists that Intel plan to grow a whopping foundry business will pay off, and he also believes that the PC market will rebound at some point, and Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger is also optimistic about the process and server processor roadmaps, read more here about it: https://www.nextplatform.com/2023/03/31/finally-some-good-news-for-the-intel-xeon-cpu-roadmap/, so i think we have to be optimistic about Intel , and i invite you to read the other following article so that to understand more:


https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/28/intel_28b_loss/



And so that to know more about the future , you have
to read my following thoughts:


And I think that there is a law called Eroom’s law that says that the cost of new medical drug roughly doubles every nine years, so i think that Eroom’s law comes from the basis idea of the fact that it takes 80% of the effort to solve the last 20% of the problems, but of course we have not to be pessimistic about it, since i invite you to read the following very interesting article of the following scientist that is talking about it and that is giving the reasons to be optimistic about it:


The exponential cost of progress

https://lemire.me/blog/2015/08/10/the-exponential-cost-of-progress/


More of my philosophy about HP and about the Tandem team and more of my thoughts..


I invite you to read the following interesting article so that
to notice how HP has been smart by also acquiring Tandem Computers, Inc.
with there "NonStop" systems and by learning from the Tandem team
that has also Extended HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform, you can read about it in my below writing and you can read about Tandem Computers here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandem_Computers , so notice that Tandem Computers, Inc. was the dominant manufacturer of fault-tolerant computer systems for ATM networks, banks, stock exchanges, telephone switching centers, and other similar commercial transaction processing applications requiring maximum uptime and zero data loss:


Read more here:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/tandem-returns-to-its-hp-roots/

More of my philosophy about HP "NonStop" to x86 Server Platform fault-tolerant computer systems and more..

Now HP to Extend HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform

HP announced in 2013 plans to extend its mission-critical HP NonStop technology to x86 server architecture, providing the 24/7 availability required in an always-on, globally connected world, and increasing customer choice.

Read the following to notice it:

https://www.ciol.com/hp-extend-hp-nonstop-x86-server-platform/


And today HP provides HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform, and here is
an example, read here:

https://www.hpe.com/ca/en/pdfViewer.html?docId=4aa5-7443&parentPage=/ca/en/products/servers/mission-critical-servers/integrity-nonstop-systems&resourceTitle=HPE+NonStop+X+NS7+%E2%80%93+Redefining+continuous+availability+and+scalability+for+x86+data+sheet


More of my philosophy about Crucial T700 SSD Preview...


Crucial from USA is the only brand whose parent company, Micron
(Read more here about it: https://www.micron.com/), innovated the NAND2 inside the T700 Gen5 SSD. Micron’s 45-year reputation for industry innovation and leadership backs up the end-to-end quality, reliability, superior testing and OEM qualification in every Crucial SSD.


And Crucial T700 SSD Preview: Fastest Consumer SSD Hits 12.4 GB/s


Read more here:

https://www.tomshardware.com/features/crucial-t700-ssd-preview-fastest-consumer-ssd-hits-124-gbs


And read more here:

https://www.crucial.com/products/ssd/crucial-t700-ssd


More of my philosophy about the negative effects of capitalism and about how to regulate AI and about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


Here are some commonly cited negative effects of capitalism:


1- Economic inequality: Capitalism can lead to significant wealth disparities, with a small percentage of the population owning a large proportion of the wealth, while many others struggle to make ends meet. This can exacerbate social and economic inequality, and contribute to social unrest.

2- Exploitation of workers: Capitalism is based on the idea of maximizing profits, which can lead to companies exploiting workers by paying them low wages, offering poor working conditions, and denying them benefits and job security.

3- Environmental degradation: Capitalism can lead to overconsumption and the overuse of natural resources, which can lead to environmental degradation and contribute to climate change.

4- Corporate influence on politics: The concentration of wealth and power under capitalism can give corporations significant influence over political decision-making, potentially undermining democratic processes and leading to policies that favor the interests of the wealthy and powerful.

5- Lack of social safety nets: Capitalism prioritizes individual responsibility and competition, which can lead to a lack of social safety nets, such as healthcare, education, and social welfare programs, leaving many people vulnerable to poverty, sickness, and other social and economic challenges.

6- Short-term thinking and risk-taking: Capitalism can incentivize companies to prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability, potentially leading to risky and unsustainable business practices that harm the environment, workers, and society.


So i think that i have just already discussed many negative effects of capitalism, but you have to notice that capitalism is not the state that governs and regulate capitalism, so you have to understand my below proverb where i am saying that we have still to be hope in the capitalism system, since i have also discussed the following above negative effects of capitalism that are economic Economic inequality and Environmental degradation and Short-term thinking and risk-taking, and of course the social safety nets has to be provided correctly by the state , and about corporate influence on politics, it has to be solved by the laws and by enforcing the laws, and for the Exploitation of workers, i think it can be solved by the laws and i have also said that we have to know how to provide a decent minimum wage to the workers. And here are my following thoughts about the negative effects of capitalism that are the following: Economic inequality and Environmental degradation and Short-term thinking and risk-taking:


So for the above negative effect of capitalism of Economic inequality,
i have just said that you have to solve it by implementing progressive capitalism, and you can read my thoughts about progressive capitalism
in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU


And for the negative effect of capitalism of Short-term thinking and risk-taking, here is what i have just said about it:


I think we can reform finance in capitalism by for example having a financial transactions Tax that reward long-termism over short-to-medium-termism investment of finance, and of course and as i have just said below, that the state has to invest correctly in R&D etc. with public investment so that to fill this gap created by the short-to-medium-termism investment of finance.


And about the negative effect of capitalism of Environmental degradation, here is what i have just said about it:

I also think that we have to be optimistic about capitalism , since notice how i am also talking below about the sustainability of economic growth of capitalism by also posting an interesting video about the ten global trends that also show how capitalism is becoming much more efficient at sustainability of economic growth, so i invite you to look at the following video and at my thoughts below about the sustainability of economic growth of capitalism:



So i have just spoken about different subjects, read them in my below thoughts, but i am not speaking in my below thoughts about the: Is economic growth of capitalism sustainable in our finite of ressources planet?, so here is my following thoughts about it, and i invite you to read them carefully so that to understand my views:


More philosophy about the Global Trends..

I invite you to look carefully at the following interesting video:

Ten global trends every smart person should know

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIANLddo-ec


And notice how the above video is optimistic and read the following thoughts so that to understand more about the sustainability of economic growth of capitalism:


The Limits of the Earth, Part 1: Problems

"In my own new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet, I challenge this view. The problem isn’t economic growth, per se. Nor is the problem that our natural resources are too small. While finite, the natural resources the planet supplies are vast and far larger than humanity needs in order to continue to thrive and grow prosperity for centuries to come. The problem, rather, is the types of resources we access, and the manner and efficiency with which we use them.

And the ultimate solution to those problems is innovation – innovation in the science and technology that we use to tap into physical resources, and innovation in the economic system that steers our consumption.

The situation we’re in isn’t a looming wall that we’re doomed to crash into. It’s a race – a race between depletion and pollution of natural resources on one side, and our pace of innovation on the other."

Read more here:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-limits-of-the-earth-part-1-problems/


More of my philosophy about how to regulate AI and about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


FTC Chair Lina Khan says US must regulate AI, warns Big Tech dominates AI market


Read more here (And you can translate the article from french to english):

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/344291/La-presidente-de-la-FTC-Lina-Khan-affirme-que-les-Etats-Unis-doivent-reglementer-l-IA-et-met-en-garde-contre-la-domination-du-marche-de-l-IA-par-les-Big-Tech-et-d-autres-risques-lies-a-l-IA/


More of my philosophy about causal reasoning and about large language models and about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..



"A large language model (LLM) such as GPT-4 can fail on some queries while succeeding to provide causal reasoning in others. What is remarkable is how few times that such errors happen: our evaluation finds that on average, large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 can outperform state-of-the-art causal algorithms in graph discovery and counterfactual inference, and can systematize nebulous concepts like necessity and sufficiency of cause by operating solely on natural language input."


And read more here on the following paper so that to understand it:


Causal reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a new frontier for causality

https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00050?fbclid=IwAR3bvgnYMiB8F8lirnhNmG4RDRmWqDrWetEylgDUNO9f0DP2dWeKdTkQay4



More of my philosophy about how we are becoming like Cyborgs and about smartness and about self-interest and about about the corruption index about egoism and about competition and about free competition and about Antitrust laws and about the economic model and about the efficient economic system and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..



I invite you to read carefully my following new thoughts of how we are becoming like Cyborgs so that to understand my views:



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so i have just received the following answer from a person in the french newsgroup forum of fr.soc.politique, so here it is and read it carefully:


"Inventing scalable algorithms and algorithms is a great achievement, but it does not necessarily make someone "smart." "


So i think that i am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that the above person is saying that the process of inventing scalable algorithms and algorithms doesn't necessarily make someone "smart", but i think that the above person is not answering correctly, since i think that the above person is speaking about the "process" of "inventing", but you have to know that the scalable algorithms and algorithms can be the finished invented tool and you can also make yourself smart by using or selling this finished invented tool, so the making yourself smart doesn't come just from IQ and the culture , but the making yourself smart can come from using or selling the finished invented tool. So then you can for example make yourself smart by knowing how to "use" the tool of internet, and the knowing how to use the tool that we call internet can be a not so difficult process that make you smart, so then we can logically infer that the smartness that is the tool of internet is an "extension" of smartness of humans that is used so that to become smart, so then we can then logically infer that you can become like a Cyborg by using this or that tool such as internet, so then smartness is not only IQ and culture, but it is the "extension" of you and of your smartness that is the "tool" such as internet, since the tool such as internet is also an artificial smartness, so we are not just humans, but we are becoming like Cyborgs by using smart tools such as internet or ChatGPT as extensions of us. And speaking about ChatGPT, read my following thoughts about it:


So i think ChatGPT has another problem, and it is that the generated content can infringe on the copyright of existing works. This could occur if ChatGPT generates content similar to existing copyrighted material of the data on wich it has been trained. So you have to be careful, since it can hurt your business, but you have to know that copyright does not protect ideas, concepts, systems, or methods of doing something. But copyright law for example protects the expression of ideas rather than the ideas themselves. In other words, copyright law protects the specific form in which an idea is expressed, rather than the underlying idea or concept. And you have to also know that there is another problem with ChatGPT and it is that it can generate an invention, but it could be argued that the creators of the model,
OpenAI, should be able to patent the invention. However, it could also be argued, that the source material used to train the model should be considered as prior art, meaning that the invention would not be considered new and therefore not patentable, and i invite you to look at the following most important other limitations of GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence so that to understand:


1- GPT-4 lacks on the understanding of context, since GPT-4 was trained
on large amounts of text data, but it has not the ability to
understand the context of the text. This means that it can generate
coherent sentences, but they may not always make sense in the context
of the conversation.


2- And GPT-4 is limited in its ability to generate creative or original
content. GPT-4 is trained on existing text data, so it is not able to
generate new ideas or concepts. This means that GPT-4 is not suitable
for tasks that require creativity or originality.


More of my philosophy about self-interest and about about the corruption index about egoism and about competition and about free competition and about Antitrust laws and about the economic model and about the efficient economic system and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I have just said , read it in my below previous thoughts , that Adam Smith said that, in an economic system , self-interest or egoism is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, since in a competitive market, producers must offer better products or services at lower prices to attract customers, while consumers must choose the best value for their money. This competition ensures that producers cannot engage in fraudulent or corrupt practices without risking losing their customers to competitors who offer better products or services at lower prices.


More of my philosophy about the corruption index about egoism and about competition and about free competition and about Antitrust laws and about the economic model and about the efficient economic system and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so i think i am discovering a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is the following:

It is that i think from the empirical statistics , it is not Democracy that make the corruption low, and as i have just said that the GDP per capita is strongly correlated with corruption, so the empirical tendency is that when the GDP per capita is high , so then corruption is low, but you have to read between the lines , since when the GDP per capita is high, that means that the private sector is the motor of growth and diversification of economy, but you have then to read between the lines , since it doesn't mean the inverse, that when the private sector is the motor of growth and diversification of economy that the GDP per capita is high, so then waiting for the GDP per capita to be high so that to make corruption low is not the smart way of doing for arab countries and the Arab world, but it is that as i have just said below, that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith said that in an economic system that self-interest or egoism is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, so notice that he has said "most" of time, so i think that it is the smart way of much more rapidly making arab countries have a low corruption, so then arab countries must make the private sector the motor of growth and diversification of economy, since the private sector is based on "competition" , so then i repeat that as said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that self-interest or egoism is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, so i think that we have to be optimistic about arab countries and the Arab world since i have just said below that arab countries are transitioning "rapidly" from a too much "statist" way of growing economy and diversifying economy that is less efficient, to a private sector that becomes the motor of growth and diversification of the economy so that to be efficient economic system, and so that to notice it more , i invite you to read the following interesting article that clearly shows that the Middle East is well-placed to thrive in the 21st century as the region moves to diversify away from oil and gas:

From AI to e-commerce: These are the megatrends that will shape the future of the Middle East

Read more here:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/04/ai-ecommerce-megatrends-shaping-the-future-of-middle-east/


And read my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about egoism and about competition and about free competition and about Antitrust laws and about the economic model and about the efficient economic system and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ ,

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so i have to explain a so important thing, so the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, the father of economic Liberalism, has said: "Egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations", so you have to understand that you have to holistically look at this saying, since egoism or self-interest creates competition and competition needs a reward so that to be efficient, and competition creates the good information, that is related to Transparency, that makes the economic system efficient, and competition creates the many options to choose from so that to be an efficient economic system, but you have to understand that the above saying of Adam Smith about the engine of egoism doesn't mean that we have to be just egoism, since he is saying that egoism is the "engine", so it also doesn't mean that it is all the time the engine, since you can help the poor and the needy when you make money from engine of egoism, and you have to notice that individual egoism also creates egoism of a nation or egoism of a zone such as the European union or egoism of the world that all creates responsability and creates solidarity , and you have to know that the economic model of Adam Smith says that self-interest or egoism is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and we can enlarge the point of view of economic competition of Adam Smith by being competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and by being competition that fights efficiently corruption that is for example the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), and finally i will say that we have to be optimistic about competition since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital.


More of my philosophy about free competition and about Antitrust laws and about the economic model and about the efficient economic system and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


So i think that i have to explain more an important thing, so you have to understand that in the economic system we say that we have to be free competition, but when we talk and say that we have to be free competition, we do not mean that there are no rules or regulations governing it. Rather, what we mean is that businesses are free to compete with each other without undue interference from government or other outside parties.

Laws and regulations are necessary to ensure that competition is fair and that no one is engaging in unethical or illegal behavior that could harm consumers or other businesses. These laws are in place to prevent monopolies, collusion, price-fixing, and other anti-competitive practices that could stifle competition and harm consumers.

However, the aim of these laws and regulations is not to control or limit competition, but rather to ensure that competition is fair and free from unethical or illegal practices. This means that businesses are still free to compete with each other on a level playing field, without any unfair advantages or barriers to entry.

So when we talk about free competition, we are referring to a system in which businesses are free to compete with each other on a fair and level playing field, without any undue interference or constraints from government or other outside parties.



So i invite you to read my below previous thoughts so that to understand
my views:


More of my philosophy about Antitrust laws and about the economic model and about the efficient economic system and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


So i think that you have to correctly understand my thoughts below that i am adding to my previous thoughts, so you have to also read my below new previous thoughts in the below web link so that to holistically understand my philosophy and views on different subjects, so for example i have not talked in this post about Antitrust laws, since i have just already said in the below web link of my previous thoughts that when you have not enough options to choose from, so it can cause monopolistic practices that have to be managed with Antitrust laws, so i invite you to read all my thoughts below and in the below web link so that to holistically understand my views.


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so
now i will talk more about an interesting subject, so i have just said
in my below new thoughts in the below web link, that so that free competition and free market work best, it requires the good "information" and it requires the many options to choose from, so when you look at the arab countries and the Arab world, so there is competition in the Arab world and in the arab countries , but you have to notice that competition creates a distribution of options, i mean there is competition on the price and competition on the quantity and competition on the quality..., so this competition creates a distribution of options, and an option is defined as one thing that can be chosen from a set of possibilities, so as you notice that it is a higher level abstraction that means that an option means a price or a level of quality or a level of quantity , so you have also to know that competition also creates the good information that allows people to choose efficiently from the many and different options, and the good information is related to Tansparency that is important, so i think that in the Arab world and the Arab countries there is also competition , but even if it can be not a free competition , i think that it is a competition that is valuable, so i think what remains is that you have to know more about the other two ways in the model that make the economic system efficient, and they are the smart and efficient government spending that can also efficiently lower the debt and the smart lowering of the taxes that can efficiently lower the debt, and i am speaking about them in my below thoughts, other than that, what remains in the model is what i have just talked about and it is that i have just talked in my below thoughts in the below web link about arabs and about the Arab world and about arab countries , so i invite you to read carefully my below thoughts about them, but as you notice that i have just said that arab countries are transitioning "rapidly" from a too much "statist" way of growing economy and diversifying economy that is less efficient, to a private sector that becomes the motor of growth and diversification of the economy so that to be efficient economic system, and so that to notice it more , i invite you to read the following interesting article that clearly shows that the Middle East is well-placed to thrive in the 21st century as the region moves to diversify away from oil and gas:

From AI to e-commerce: These are the megatrends that will shape the future of the Middle East

Read more here:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/04/ai-ecommerce-megatrends-shaping-the-future-of-middle-east/



More of my philosophy about the efficient economic system and
about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so i have just talked about many and different subjects like artificial intelligence and about economy and about my new ideas of my philosophy etc. and you can read carefully my thoughts about them in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/aUi_MTCM_h4



But now i think i have to talk about other important subjects and they are the following:


More of my philosophy about Milton Friedman and the modern monetarist school of economics and more of my thoughts..


As i have just explained, that the modern way is modern monetarist school of economics of Milton Friedman, read about it in my below thoughts, so i think that the way of the modern monetarist school of economics is also the way that we call the Quantitative easing (QE) that is also a way where for example the U.S. Federal Reserve print more and more money so that to lend money for investment, so i can also say that the borrowing of this money from Quantitative easing (QE) is an indebtedness that creates wealth, but notice that the Federal Reserve is not crazy since it has to manage it correctly and manage inflation correctly, so we have to make a difference between the responsable way of the U.S. Federal Reserve and of that of the irresponsibility of the below professor in economics that said that the government can not has a debt problem because it pays its debt by printing more and more money, so read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about the how we have to grow economy and more of my thoughts..


And now i will talk about an important subject and it is about the how we have to grow economy , since i think that the Democrats and Republicans in USA have two different ways of how to grow economy, since as i have just for example said that the U.S. Congress believes that today's debt will be dwarfed by tomorrow's economic growth. Driving economic growth is one way to reduce the national debt, but Congress tends to disagree on how to create that growth. Most Democrats push increased spending, while most Republicans champion lower taxes, and it looks like the different economic ways in Japan of Abenomics and Kishidanomics, and i invite you to read the following article about them:

https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/politics-governance/kishidanomics-the-economic-policies-of-fumio-kishida/


But i will also say that Milton Friedman, an American economist awarded the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his contribution to consumption analysis and to monetary history and theory, including his observations of the complexity of stabilization policy, was the founders of the modern monetarist school of economics, that held that the business cycle is determined mainly by the supply of money and by interest rates, rather than by government fiscal policy - contrary to the long-prevailing view of Keynes and his followers. So then you have to understand that the modern way in economics with wich we manage inflation and unemployment is no more using keynesian economics, but it is by using for example the following way using the supply of money and by interest rates: I think i am highly smart, and i think that the Federal Reserve policymakers of USA are trying to slow down the economy and subdue inflation by highering interest rates, and highering interest rates make money costlier and borrowing less appealing and that, in turn, slows demand to catch up with supply, which has lagged badly throughout the pandemic, but that's the macroeconomics of it, and its potential effects include lower wages, a halt or even a drop in home prices and a decline in stock market valuations etc., but notice that the highering of interest rates reduces the demand, so i think it has a macroeconomic effects of balancing by creating lower prices in one side and part of the economy and this compensate much more for the higher prices in the other side and part of the economy, but notice that it doesn't mean that the highering of interest rates solves all the problems.


More of my philosophy about the responsable economics and more of thoughts..


I have just looked at the following video where a professor in economics that is a democrat and that has worked for the democrats is speaking and she is saying something irresponsible in economics and it is the following:


She is saying that the government can not has a debt problem because it pays its debt by printing more and more money, but i think she is irresponsible by saying so, since the US dollar has a price and value
that also follows globally the supply and demand rule, so for example if you are this irresponsibility, so the demand on the the US Dollar can lower and it can cause problems. So here is the video and look at it carefully so that you notice the irresponsibility:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmuysv17T9M



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.