Re: pee@sent.net is a transphobe.

[KWills]

On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 00:11:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/5/22 10:34 PM, KWills wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 21:26:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/5/22 9:12 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:21:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/5/22 7:37 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:20:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:15 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 1:13 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:45 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:32 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake % impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> only because i don't care
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lucky to see that you don't label people by their gender.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> why bother i'm not going to be intimate with them no matter what they are
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KWills is a bigot, just like your fake impersonator is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not a bigot. I simply expose delusional gender appropriators
>>>>>> like you for what you are.
>>>>> Calling trans people "delusional gender appropriators" is not a good way
>>>>> to win our trust.
>>>>
>>>> Why would we want that?
>>>>
>>> Are you a trans person?
>>
>> No such thing has ever existed.
>
>KWills is bigoted - again!

Scientific (he/him) is delusional - always!
--
KWills
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

Honestly, if you're going to be so transphobic, go report your Usenet
posts to your police station.

[KWills]

On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:39:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

Honestly, if you're going to be so delusional and out of touch with
reality, go report your Usenet posts to your local Mental Health
people. They will have secure accommodation for the likes of you.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

And they will be glad for things I do here.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:00:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

What do you actually do here other than spread your delusions?

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:01:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/5/22 9:29 PM, KWills wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:21:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/5/22 7:37 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:20:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:15 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 1:13 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:45 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:32 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake % impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> only because i don't care
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lucky to see that you don't label people by their gender.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> why bother i'm not going to be intimate with them no matter what they are
>>>>>
>>>>> KWills is a bigot, just like your fake impersonator is.
>>>>
>>>> I am not a bigot. I simply expose delusional gender appropriators
>>>> like you for what you are.
>>> Calling trans people "delusional gender appropriators" is not a good way
>>> to win our trust.
>>

>> Who needs your fucking trust? YOU 'trans' people need lobotomies.
>
>Are you still here ruining alt.transgendered and
>soc.support.transgendered for trans people?

I'm not ruining anything for 'trans people' because there are none.
NOBODY has EVER managed to 'trans' successfully.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:01:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/5/22 9:34 PM, Michael Christ wrote:

>> On 6/02/2022 3:20 am, Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>> On 2/4/22 8:15 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2022-02-04 1:13 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:45 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:32 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> only because i don't care
>>>>>
>>>>> Lucky to see that you don't label people by their gender.
>>>>
>>>> why bother i'm not going to be intimate with them no matter what they
>>>> are
>>>
>>> KWills is a bigot, just like your fake impersonator is.
>>

>> You're the bigot.  The rest of us just want to get on with reality.
>>
>Then get on transgender reality.

An oxymoron if ever there was one.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:04:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/6/22 2:11 PM, aaa wrote:
>> On 2022-02-06 8:42 a.m., KWills wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 23:14:46 -0500, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-02-05 7:55 p.m., KWills wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 19:00:44 -0500, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 4:27 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 8:52 PM, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 3:23 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 6:14 PM, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 12:40 p.m., % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 10:06 a.m., aaa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 11:19 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:57 PM, Michael Christ wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/02/2022 5:32 am, Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % and me, that's about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just believe a male is born male and a female is born a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> female. Biology is a powerful reality.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, just call me deluded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gender is not sex. Sex is not gender. Men and women are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> genders.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Male and female are sexes. While gender identity can be fluid,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is incredibly rare and no one knows why it can be. We
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to know anyway, all genders are valid as long as they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hurt anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Remove both gender and sex. Just use penis and vagina.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No more confusions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Christ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i usually call people by their given name
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No one needs to know the other person's gender or sex. The
>>>>>>>>>> authority
>>>>>>>>>> only needs to know the person's anatomy for public safety and
>>>>>>>>>> decency.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> End of story.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What with people that have changed their sex?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If they cut off their dicks, I'm sure they can be allowed to go to
>>>>>>>> women's bathroom given the fact they can't use man's urinal any
>>>>>>>> longer. If they still have their dicks attached, they have to use
>>>>>>>> man's urinal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Keep dicks away from women's bathrooms. Simple enough?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're calling surgery "cutting off dicks". An anti-transgender
>>>>>>> bigot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too bad. There is no dick urinal in women's bathroom. If they want
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>> women, they need to act like one. Getting castrated is the least they
>>>>>> can do.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's only a matter of time before they start INSISTING on urinals in
>>>>> women's bathrooms...first in California and then everywhere else!
>>>>
>>>> People with mental illness is expected to act in such way. Too bad they
>>>> don't want to realize their real problems.
>>>
>>> And the entire woke brigade panders to their delusions.  'Transgender'
>>> is the new black!
>>
>> They will get bored when no one even reacts to their effort.
>>
>
>Trans people are as real as black people. You just refuse to understand it.

'Trans people' don't even exist. Unfortunately, black people do.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:06:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/5/22 9:14 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:55:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/5/22 8:43 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2022-02-05 1:30 p.m., Scientific (she/her) ? wrote:
>>>>> On 2/5/22 7:38 PM, KWills wrote:

>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:19:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:57 PM, Michael Christ wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/02/2022 5:32 am, Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> % and me, that's about it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just believe a male is born male and a female is born a female.
>>>>>>>> Biology is a powerful reality.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey, just call me deluded.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gender is not sex. Sex is not gender.
>>>>>>

>>>>>> Finally, you get it.

>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Men and women are genders. Male
>>>>>>> and female are sexes.
>>>>>>

>>>>>> Wrong.  Masculine, feminine and neuter are genders.  Male and female
>>>>>> are sexes, as are men and women.
>>>>>
>>>>> If men and women are divided into cis and trans, then they have to be
>>>>> genders.

>>>>>
>>>>>>> While gender identity can be fluid,
>>>>>>

>>>>>> No, it can't.  A noun/pronoun is unchangeably one of the three.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can pick a pronoun you can be referred at any time. I put this
>>>>> sticker on my MacBook lid so that people know which pronouns should
>>>>> they use to me:
>>>>> https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fih0.redbubble.net%2Fimage.162026448.7634%2Fflat%2C800x800%2C075%2Cf.u10.jpg&f=1&nofb=1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, I didn't cover an Apple logo, because why? I don't want to
>>>>> show off, I just like it.

>>>>>
>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>> incredibly rare and no one knows why it can be. We don't need to know
>>>>>>> anyway, all genders are valid as long as they don't hurt anyone.
>>>>>>

>>>>>> All three grammatical genders are indeed valid and can't possibly hurt
>>>>>> anyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are so full of this woke shite!
>>>>>
>>>>> What about non-binary people?

>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> KWills
>>>>>> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
>>>>>> counselor.
>>>>>> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
>>>>>> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>> just have fun with these guys don't believe their answers
>>>
>>> I do not believe any answer from this subreddit.
>>>
>>> https://old.reddit.com/r/detrans/
>>>
>>> It's a place where delusional detransitioners deny that they are trans.
>>>
>>> Of course if you detransition to female you won't be allowed to have
>>> hysterectomy. It won't be affirming to you.
>>
>> Because a man can't have one.
>>
>A man absolutely can have one - a transgender one.

No such animal exists.

> If you make an effort
>to detransition back to female, it won't probably be affirming to you
>and no gender therapist will let you to do it.

What's wrong with dispelling your own delusions and 'transing' back?

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:10:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/5/22 10:34 PM, KWills wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:55:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/5/22 8:43 PM, % wrote:

>>>> just have fun with these guys don't believe their answers
>>>
>>> I do not believe any answer from this subreddit.
>>>
>>> https://old.reddit.com/r/detrans/
>>>
>>> It's a place where delusional detransitioners deny that they are trans.
>>

>> "Delusional"? Oh, the irony.
>
>Yes, it's that transphobic. Cisgender non-conformity is seen above any
>transness here, not equally.

What does that woke horseshit even MEAN?

> I'm a feminine trans woman, and what's
>wrong with that? Being a feminine man is not for me.

That is exactly what you are, though...and all you will ever be, dick
or no dick.

>>> Of course if you detransition to female you won't be allowed to have
>>> hysterectomy. It won't be affirming to you.
>>

>> You only qualify for a hysterectomy if you're born female. Try to
>> change sex as many times as you like, unless you were born female you
>> won't qualify.
>
>There is no point in providing hysterectomy to AMAB (assigned male at
>birth) people, simply because they don't have an uterus in first place.

Exactly so. And they won't get one when they try to 'trans'. Not
even a cheap Chinese made one.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:06:59 -0700, % <purse...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2022-02-10 6:37 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>> On 2/8/22 8:54 PM, KWills wrote:
>>> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:22:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/5/22 9:35 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 21:26:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/5/22 9:12 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:21:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 7:37 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:20:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:15 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 1:13 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:45 PM, % wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:32 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> only because i don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lucky to see that you don't label people by their gender.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> why bother i'm not going to be intimate with them no matter
>>>>>>>>>>> what they are
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> KWills is a bigot, just like your fake impersonator is.
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I am not a bigot.  I simply expose delusional gender appropriators
>>>>>>>>> like you for what you are.
>>>>>>>> Calling trans people "delusional gender appropriators" is not a
>>>>>>>> good way
>>>>>>>> to win our trust.
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Why would we want that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you a trans person?
>>>>>

>>>>> I am a man, I was born that way and no matter what I say or do I will
>>>>> always be a man.
>>>>>
>>>> Then be a cis man, nobody is forcing you to be trans.
>>>
>>> There's no such thing as a 'cis' man and nobody has ever successfully
>>> managed to 'trans'.  Nobody is forcing you to harbour your delusions.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>
>> No, you're a cis person (or at least a trans person that passes as cis).
>> A lot of people have transitioned successfully.
>
>notice no one elses judges peoples sex

Judging people's sex is pointless. It is what it is. It's a FACT.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

So is judging by their gender. Transgender people can be just about
everything, beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
one but those people themselves can understand it.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

Talking about politics and religion on alt.atheism.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

No wonder alt.transgendered is dead these days - Usenet is beyond it's
heyday and people like you will only lead to further demise of Usenet.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

On 2/10/22 4:07 PM, KWills wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:01:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2/5/22 9:34 PM, Michael Christ wrote:
>>> On 6/02/2022 3:20 am, Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>> On 2/4/22 8:15 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-02-04 1:13 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:45 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:32 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> only because i don't care
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lucky to see that you don't label people by their gender.
>>>>>
>>>>> why bother i'm not going to be intimate with them no matter what they
>>>>> are
>>>>
>>>> KWills is a bigot, just like your fake impersonator is.
>>>
>>> You're the bigot.  The rest of us just want to get on with reality.
>>>
>> Then get on transgender reality.
>
> An oxymoron if ever there was one.

Of course you are going to cite this website.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Transgender_Reality

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

On 2/10/22 4:07 PM, KWills wrote:

Trans people - people who identify as another gender than they wree
assigned as birth.

If you're XY but identify as a woman then you're a trans woman.
If you're XX but identify as a man then you're a trans man.

Nothing could be simpler than this.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

How transphobic of you.

>> If you make an effort
>> to detransition back to female, it won't probably be affirming to you
>> and no gender therapist will let you to do it.
>
> What's wrong with dispelling your own delusions and 'transing' back?

Nothing from with transitioning back to your gender, it's just that
/r/detrans is a TERF camp full of misinformation and k00kery.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:16:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

That's simply an incorrect word for 'sex'. There is only one M/F
distinction and that's sex.

> Transgender people can be just about everything

Except for the fact that none such actually exist.

>, beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>one but those people themselves can understand it.

Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
come up with? I last heard over a hundred.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:18:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

Do they know you're delusional over there?

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:19:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

It's far from dead. I and my fellow travellers are keeping it alive,
as you delusionals commit suicide and drop off.

> - Usenet is beyond it's
>heyday and people like you will only lead to further demise of Usenet.

It is as it has always been: uncensored apart from a handful of
moderated groups. And that's how it should be. People like you need
to be TOLD the hard realities of life.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:20:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

No, of course I'm not.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:21:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/5/22 10:34 PM, KWills wrote:

>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 21:27:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/5/22 8:52 PM, aaa wrote:
>>>> On 2022-02-05 3:23 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>> On 2/5/22 6:14 PM, aaa wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 12:40 p.m., % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 10:06 a.m., aaa wrote:

>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-05 11:19 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:57 PM, Michael Christ wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On 5/02/2022 5:32 am, Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> % and me, that's about it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I just believe a male is born male and a female is born a female.
>>>>>>>>>> Biology is a powerful reality.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hey, just call me deluded.
>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Gender is not sex. Sex is not gender. Men and women are genders.
>>>>>>>>> Male and female are sexes. While gender identity can be fluid,

>>>>>>>>> this is incredibly rare and no one knows why it can be. We don't
>>>>>>>>> need to know anyway, all genders are valid as long as they don't
>>>>>>>>> hurt anyone.
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Remove both gender and sex. Just use penis and vagina.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No more confusions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Michael Christ
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i usually call people by their given name
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No one needs to know the other person's gender or sex. The authority
>>>>>> only needs to know the person's anatomy for public safety and decency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> End of story.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What with people that have changed their sex?
>>>>
>>>> If they cut off their dicks, I'm sure they can be allowed to go to
>>>> women's bathroom given the fact they can't use man's urinal any longer.
>>>> If they still have their dicks attached, they have to use man's urinal.
>>>>
>>>> Keep dicks away from women's bathrooms. Simple enough?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're calling surgery "cutting off dicks". An anti-transgender bigot.
>>

>> Penectomy and castration: does that make you 'feel' any better?
>>
>> BTW why are you hanging on to yours? In case you want to 'trans'
>> back?
>
>Unlike hormone-induced changes, these surgeries are not for me.

Yes, but why? Have you finally realised that you'll never be a woman?

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:24:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

Delusional people such as yourself, you mean.

>If you're XY but identify as a woman then you're a trans woman.
>If you're XX but identify as a man then you're a trans man.

What you 'identify' as means jack shit. Your DNA does all the
identifying you'll ever need.

>Nothing could be simpler than this.

Or more delusional.

[KWills]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:31:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

How delusional of you.

>>> If you make an effort
>>> to detransition back to female, it won't probably be affirming to you
>>> and no gender therapist will let you to do it.
>>
>> What's wrong with dispelling your own delusions and 'transing' back?
>
>Nothing from with transitioning back to your gender, it's just that
>/r/detrans is a TERF camp full of misinformation and k00kery.

YOUR camp is full of woke horseshit and delusions. Reality check
desperately needed.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

There's also gender identity - which gender they identify as. You cannot
prove who you are, including gender identity, but at least there is
overwhelming research supporting current model of transgender care.

>> Transgender people can be just about everything
>
> Except for the fact that none such actually exist.
>
>> , beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>> one but those people themselves can understand it.
>
> Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
> come up with? I last heard over a hundred.

There are as many gender identities as there are people in the world -
except people who don't expreience it, and that's vaild too!

[aaa]

There are as many mental illnesses as there are people in the world -
except people who don't experience it, and that's valid too!

>
>> --
>> KWills
>> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
>> counselor.
>> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
>> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
>>
>

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!

[KWills]

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:39:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

No, there isn't. There's no NEED for you to 'identify' as any
'gender'. It's meaningless. Your DNA has already done that job for
you.

> You cannot
>prove who you are, including gender identity

Of course not, because it's all delusional.

>, but at least there is
>overwhelming research supporting current model of transgender care.

And it's all delusional woke horseshit.

>>> Transgender people can be just about everything
>>
>> Except for the fact that none such actually exist.
>>
>>> , beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>>> one but those people themselves can understand it.
>>
>> Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
>> come up with? I last heard over a hundred.
>
>There are as many gender identities as there are people in the world -
>except people who don't expreience it, and that's vaild too!

But the only thing that matters is what sex someone is, and there are
only two possibilities. The rest is, again, woke horseshit.

[El Kabong]

KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:04:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
> >On 2/6/22 2:11 PM, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-06 8:42 a.m., KWills wrote:

...

> >>> And the entire woke brigade panders to their delusions.  'Transgender'
> >>> is the new black!
> >>
> >> They will get bored when no one even reacts to their effort.
> >
> >Trans people are as real as black people. You just refuse to understand it.
>
> 'Trans people' don't even exist. Unfortunately, black people do.

So you think black people shouldn't exist and presumably
have no right to exist.

Thanks for revealing what you are. No further questions.

[KWills]

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 23:10:03 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle>
wrote:

Presumably they have a right to exist...but elsewhere.

>Thanks for revealing what you are. No further questions.

Thanks for revealing you're black. Dismissed.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

You cannot prove that you're KWills, either.

>> , but at least there is
>> overwhelming research supporting current model of transgender care.
>
> And it's all delusional woke horseshit.

No, current gender-affirming model of care is a result of the scientific
method. You can pick only those interventions you want to affirm your
gender identity. You aren't pushed to do anything, you are allowed to
pick what you want.

Don't get a penectomy if you aren't 101% sure. A gender therapist will
assess you and say you 'no' to penectomy for you.

>>>> Transgender people can be just about everything
>>>
>>> Except for the fact that none such actually exist.
>>>
>>>> , beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>>>> one but those people themselves can understand it.
>>>
>>> Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
>>> come up with? I last heard over a hundred.
>>
>> There are as many gender identities as there are people in the world -
>> except people who don't expreience it, and that's vaild too!
>
> But the only thing that matters is what sex someone is, and there are
> only two possibilities. The rest is, again, woke horseshit.

What about about intersex people?

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

Transgender Reality is a website (or more accurately, a webshite) which
cherry picks some threads on transgender forums to make them seem culty.

You can access it at https://transgenderreality.wordpress.com/.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

No, because I'm not delusional. I'm just being myself.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

And that's because of bigots like you.

>> - Usenet is beyond it's
>> heyday and people like you will only lead to further demise of Usenet.
>
> It is as it has always been: uncensored apart from a handful of
> moderated groups. And that's how it should be. People like you need
> to be TOLD the hard realities of life.

Usenet it a last place where you can speak your mind without the risk of
getting censored. It needs to be kept alive, along with modern books,
newsreaders and news servers. All coders here should start improving
Usenet before it fails.

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

On 2/10/22 19:02, Fred OInka wrote:

> That's our goal.
No!!

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

On 2/10/22 18:43, KWills wrote:

Because I prefer keeping my penis. Trans women come in all genital
preferences.

[KWills]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:34:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

Of course I can't, because I'm not.

>>> , but at least there is
>>> overwhelming research supporting current model of transgender care.
>>
>> And it's all delusional woke horseshit.
>
>No, current gender-affirming model of care is a result of the scientific
>method. You can pick only those interventions you want to affirm your
>gender identity. You aren't pushed to do anything, you are allowed to
>pick what you want.

The only 'scientific method' you need is DNA. Everything else in your
gender appropriating handbook is horseshit.

>Don't get a penectomy if you aren't 101% sure. A gender therapist will
>assess you and say you 'no' to penectomy for you.

Therefore you yourself aren't 101% sure. Wake up, smell the coffee,
and resume living as a man.

>>>>> Transgender people can be just about everything
>>>>
>>>> Except for the fact that none such actually exist.
>>>>
>>>>> , beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>>>>> one but those people themselves can understand it.
>>>>
>>>> Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
>>>> come up with? I last heard over a hundred.
>>>
>>> There are as many gender identities as there are people in the world -
>>> except people who don't expreience it, and that's vaild too!
>>
>> But the only thing that matters is what sex someone is, and there are
>> only two possibilities. The rest is, again, woke horseshit.
>
>What about about intersex people?

There are a small number of deformed freaks of nature, but less than
0.0000000000000000001% of delusional 'transgenders' fall into this
category.

[KWills]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:38:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

Why would I want to?

[KWills]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:00:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

You're being like totally delusional. A man somehow becoming a woman?
Get fucking real!

[KWills]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:03:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

No it's not. Your own delusions take you to the edge of suicide and
beyond.

>>> - Usenet is beyond it's
>>> heyday and people like you will only lead to further demise of Usenet.
>>
>> It is as it has always been: uncensored apart from a handful of
>> moderated groups. And that's how it should be. People like you need
>> to be TOLD the hard realities of life.
>
>Usenet it a last place where you can speak your mind without the risk of
>getting censored.

And yet you want to censor me.

> It needs to be kept alive, along with modern books,
>newsreaders and news servers. All coders here should start improving
>Usenet before it fails.

Yay.

[KWills]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:05:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

Yes but why? Because you KNOW you'll never get any jollies from a
cheap Chinese-made artifical clit!

>Trans women come in all genital
>preferences.

Genital configuration determines what you are and it's male/man.
There's no fucking way you can ever become a 'woman', even if you get
your genitalia cut off as a 'genital preference'.

[El Kabong]

Is it delusional to pretend you're kwills?

[aaa]

aaa is only a temporary illusion. Only God is real and everlasting.

[KWills]

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:02:52 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle>
wrote:

No, because I know I'm not KWills.

[KWills]

The whole Trinity or just Christ?

[aaa]

What's the difference?

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[KWills]

The Trinity has three of them, Christ is one.

[aaa]

Why does it call trinity if it's three instead of one?

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[KWills]

That's what "trinity" means! God the Father, God the Son (aka Christ)
and God the Holy Ghost.

[aaa]

United as one, yes. So what's the difference?

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[KWills]

Still three distinct entities. That's the difference.

[aaa]

Still united as one. There is no difference.

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[KWills]

If there was no difference there would be just one, not three.

[aaa]

Who are you to decide that?

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[El Kabong]

KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:02:52 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle> wrote:
> >KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:00:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

> >> >>>> What do you actually do here other than spread your delusions?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Talking about politics and religion on alt.atheism.
> >> >>
> >> >> Do they know you're delusional over there?
> >> >
> >> >No, because I'm not delusional. I'm just being myself.
> >>
> >> You're being like totally delusional. A man somehow becoming a woman?
> >> Get fucking real!
> >
> >Is it delusional to pretend you're kwills?
>
> No, because I know I'm not KWills.
> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

Does the real kwills know how to properly delimit his
.siggy?

[KWills]

No need, the definition of the word trinity does it for me.

[KWills]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 20:46:14 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle>

wrote:

>KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:02:52 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle> wrote:
>> >KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:00:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>
>> >> >>>> What do you actually do here other than spread your delusions?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Talking about politics and religion on alt.atheism.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Do they know you're delusional over there?
>> >> >
>> >> >No, because I'm not delusional. I'm just being myself.
>> >>
>> >> You're being like totally delusional. A man somehow becoming a woman?
>> >> Get fucking real!
>> >
>> >Is it delusional to pretend you're kwills?
>>
>> No, because I know I'm not KWills.
>

>Does the real kwills know how to properly delimit his
>.siggy?

No idea, but I do!

[aaa]

Your intentional misunderstanding has nothing to do with the word trinity.

>
> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[KWills]

There is no intentional misunderstanding and the 'tri' in 'trinity'
means three.

I'm beginning to think you're some kind of atheist troll. Are you?

[aaa]

United in one.

>
> I'm beginning to think you're some kind of atheist troll. Are you?

So says the atheist troll.

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[El Kabong]

KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 20:46:14 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle>
> wrote:
>
> >KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:02:52 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle> wrote:
> >> >KWills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:00:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
> >
> >> >> >>>> What do you actually do here other than spread your delusions?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Talking about politics and religion on alt.atheism.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Do they know you're delusional over there?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >No, because I'm not delusional. I'm just being myself.
> >> >>
> >> >> You're being like totally delusional. A man somehow becoming a woman?
> >> >> Get fucking real!
> >> >
> >> >Is it delusional to pretend you're kwills?
> >>
> >> No, because I know I'm not KWills.
> >
> >Does the real kwills know how to properly delimit his
> >.siggy?
>
> No idea, but I do!

Really? How?

[KWills]

THREE united in One.

>> I'm beginning to think you're some kind of atheist troll. Are you?
>
>So says the atheist troll.

Admisison noted, atheist troll.

[KWills]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:28:40 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle>

Simple. Use a sig delineator!

[aaa]

I'm glad you agree.

>
>>> I'm beginning to think you're some kind of atheist troll. Are you?
>>
>> So says the atheist troll.
>
> Admisison noted, atheist troll.

That would be you.

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[El Kabong]

It's your post. Isn't that your job?

[KWills]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 18:54:44 -0800, El Kabong <tw...@the.noodle>

It is and I do it. Copied directly from the signature of the 'real'
KWills.

[KWills]

I'm glad YOU do.

>>>> I'm beginning to think you're some kind of atheist troll. Are you?
>>>
>>> So says the atheist troll.
>>
>> Admisison noted, atheist troll.
>
>That would be you.

Thanks for admitting you're a troll. It was becoming increasingly
obvious.

[aaa]

So says the troll.

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[KWills]

Yes, you just did say so.

[aaa]

That is you.

> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[Scientific (she/her) ⚧]

On 2/13/22 21:45, KWills wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:34:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/22 17:46, KWills wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:39:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/10/22 5:59 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:16:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/10/22 4:10 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:06:59 -0700, % <purse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-10 6:37 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/22 8:54 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:22:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?

>>>>>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 9:35 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 21:26:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 9:12 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:21:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 7:37 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:20:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:15 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 1:13 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:45 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:32 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only because i don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lucky to see that you don't label people by their gender.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why bother i'm not going to be intimate with them no matter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KWills is a bigot, just like your fake impersonator is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not a bigot.  I simply expose delusional gender appropriators
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like you for what you are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Calling trans people "delusional gender appropriators" is not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to win our trust.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would we want that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you a trans person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I am a man, I was born that way and no matter what I say or do I will
>>>>>>>>>>>> always be a man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then be a cis man, nobody is forcing you to be trans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There's no such thing as a 'cis' man and nobody has ever successfully
>>>>>>>>>> managed to 'trans'.  Nobody is forcing you to harbour your delusions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HTH
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, you're a cis person (or at least a trans person that passes as cis).
>>>>>>>>> A lot of people have transitioned successfully.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> notice no one elses judges peoples sex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Judging people's sex is pointless. It is what it is. It's a FACT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So is judging by their gender.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's simply an incorrect word for 'sex'. There is only one M/F
>>>>> distinction and that's sex.
>>>>
>>>> There's also gender identity - which gender they identify as.
>>>
>>> No, there isn't. There's no NEED for you to 'identify' as any
>>> 'gender'. It's meaningless. Your DNA has already done that job for
>>> you.
>>>
>>>> You cannot
>>>> prove who you are, including gender identity
>>>
>>> Of course not, because it's all delusional.
>>
>> You cannot prove that you're KWills, either.
>
> Of course I can't, because I'm not.
>
>>>> , but at least there is
>>>> overwhelming research supporting current model of transgender care.
>>>
>>> And it's all delusional woke horseshit.
>>
>> No, current gender-affirming model of care is a result of the scientific
>> method. You can pick only those interventions you want to affirm your
>> gender identity. You aren't pushed to do anything, you are allowed to
>> pick what you want.
>
> The only 'scientific method' you need is DNA. Everything else in your
> gender appropriating handbook is horseshit.
>
>> Don't get a penectomy if you aren't 101% sure. A gender therapist will
>> assess you and say you 'no' to penectomy for you.
>
> Therefore you yourself aren't 101% sure. Wake up, smell the coffee,
> and resume living as a man.
>
>>>>>> Transgender people can be just about everything
>>>>>
>>>>> Except for the fact that none such actually exist.
>>>>>
>>>>>> , beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>>>>>> one but those people themselves can understand it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
>>>>> come up with? I last heard over a hundred.
>>>>
>>>> There are as many gender identities as there are people in the world -
>>>> except people who don't expreience it, and that's vaild too!
>>>
>>> But the only thing that matters is what sex someone is, and there are
>>> only two possibilities. The rest is, again, woke horseshit.
>>
>> What about about intersex people?
>
> There are a small number of deformed freaks of nature, but less than
> 0.0000000000000000001% of delusional 'transgenders' fall into this
> category.

That equals 0 (zero) trans people.

[KWills]

Right! 0 (zero) IS the number of 'trans people'!

[KWills]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:18:55 -0500, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:

>On 2022-02-17 12:36, KWills wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> United as one, yes. So what's the difference?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still three distinct entities. That's the difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still united as one. There is no difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was no difference there would be just one, not three.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who are you to decide that?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No need, the definition of the word trinity does it for me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your intentional misunderstanding has nothing to do with the word trinity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no intentional misunderstanding and the 'tri' in 'trinity'
>>>>>>>> means three.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> United in one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THREE united in One.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm glad you agree.
>>>>
>>>> I'm glad YOU do.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm beginning to think you're some kind of atheist troll. Are you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So says the atheist troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Admisison noted, atheist troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be you.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for admitting you're a troll. It was becoming increasingly
>>>> obvious.
>>>
>>> So says the troll.
>>
>> Yes, you just did say so.
>
>That is you.

No, it's you.