The following is the same list I posted earier, that Rick sent to me:
7/85 SEA magazine - technical article about sailing at night
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0785.jpg
8/85 SEA - West Coast sailboat racing article
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0885.jpg
8/85 SEA - technical review of specific boat
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0885b.jpg
9/85 SEA - powerboat racing article and photos
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0985.jpg
9/85 SEA - feature article on John Davidson's yacht
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0985b.jpg
10/85 SEA - major technical article, Buyer's Guide To Outboard Motors
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_1085.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_1085b.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_1085c.jpg
10/85 SEA - technical reviews of two specific boats
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_1085d.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_1085e.jpg
5/88 SAIL - Manzanillo (Mexico) race article and photos
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sail_0588.jpg
6/88 WESTERN BOATMAN - Manazanillo race article
http://aloha.net/~westfal/westernboatman_0688.jpg
7/88 SAIL - Ensenada (Mexico) race article and photos
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sail_0788.jpg
8/88 SAIL technical review of specific boat
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sail_0888.jpg
9/88 SAIL - Cal Cup sailboat race article and photos
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sail_0988.jpg
4/91 SANTANA - article and photo about myself winning a regatta
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0491.jpg
7/91 SANTANA - technical article and photos about boat canvas
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0791.jpg
3/92 SAIL - galley proof of technical article about Man Overboard rescue
procedures
http://aloha.net/~westfal/manoverboard.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/manoverboardb.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/manoverboardc.jpg
3/92 ARGONAUT - article about my being re-elected as Vice-President of
the California Yacht Brokers Association
http://aloha.net/~westfal/argonaut_0392.jpg
7/92 H2O - major feature article and photos about Catalina Island
http://aloha.net/~westfal/h2o_0792.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/h2o_0792b.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/h2o_0792c.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/h2o_0792d.jpg
10/92 CALIFORNIA YACHT CLUB - letter re a slide show I gave there
http://aloha.net/~westfal/californiayachtclub_1092.jpg
2/93 MARINA FOUNDATION - letter of thanks for $1,000 cash donation
http://aloha.net/~westfal/marinafoundation_0293.jpg
7/94 WINDJAMMERS YACHT CLUB - letter of thanks for donation of 20-foot
sailboat to Boys & Girls Club
http://aloha.net/~westfal/windjammersyachtclub_0794.jpg
10/94 CALIFORNIA YACHT CLUB - two letters from officials re my serving as
Escort & Safety Director for long-distance race
http://aloha.net/~westfal/californiayachtclub_1094.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/californiayachtclub_1094b.jpg
11/94 BREEZE - article about myself and that same event
http://aloha.net/~westfal/breeze_1194.jpg
11/95 WINDJAMMERS YACHT CLUB - reference letter from founder and Senior
Staff Commodore
http://aloha.net/~westfal/windjammersyachtclub_1195.jpg
4/96 SAILING WORLD - copy of letter re an assignment for me to cover the
Pacific Cup (same as article I posted in SCH)
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sailingworld_0496.jpg
----------
These are additional photocopies Rick sent me the next day:
2/92 Thank you letter from California Yacht Club
http://aloha.net/~westfal/californiayachtclub_0292.jpg
5/89 Photo from Argonaut
http://aloha.net/~westfal/argonaut_0589.jpg
2/92 Thank you letter from Women's Sailing Association
http://aloha.net/~westfal/womenssailingassoc_0292.jpg
---------
This the TransPac '97 article in Santana Magazine, mailed to me directly
from Santana Magazine.
Cover
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0897.jpg
Table of Contents w/cover photo credit
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0897b.jpg
Transpac Article
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0897c.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0897d.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0897e.jpg
http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0897f.jpg
To me, one rotten apple spoils the whole basket.
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0885.jpg is all it takes for me.
Look at the horizontal alignment of "-Rick Ermshar", and how it floats up
higher than the rest of the text on the very same line.
Look at the difference in the coloration immediately surrounding "-Rick
Ermshar" as compared to the rest of the scanned area -- it's considerably
darker in tint.
To me, this is an alteration of the actual printed material -- a scizzors-type
cut and paste job -- thereby rendering all other evidence offered in this post
ZERO credibility -- just like the "author".
Yoda
Yoda wrote:
> Look at the horizontal alignment of "-Rick Ermshar", and how it floats up
> higher than the rest of the text on the very same line.
>
> Look at the difference in the coloration immediately surrounding "-Rick
> Ermshar" as compared to the rest of the scanned area -- it's considerably
> darker in tint.
>
> To me, this is an alteration of the actual printed material -- a scizzors-type
> cut and paste job -- thereby rendering all other evidence offered in this post
> ZERO credibility -- just like the "author".
>
> Yoda
Yes, there definitely is a darker shade surrounding his name. Actually
it's a lousey job,
done by a lazy oaf. Good eyes Yoda.
RK
>7/85 SEA magazine - technical article about sailing at night
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0785.jpg
Looks good, unfortunately I am not aware of the magazine SEA. It seems to me
that SEA is a regional magazine and not a major national publication.
>5/88 SAIL - Manzanillo (Mexico) race article and photos
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/sail_0588.jpg
Finally, a magazine that I am familiar with. Unfortunately, all the scans for
SAIL magazine are too blurry to read.
>3/92 SAIL - galley proof of technical article about Man Overboard rescue
>procedures
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/manoverboard.jpg
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/manoverboardb.jpg
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/manoverboardc.jpg
It seems rather ridiculous to me that Ermshar would include this to support his
statements. This galley proof proves nothing except that he wrote an article
on man overboard. It's a shame that he chose to include this.
>3/92 ARGONAUT - article about my being re-elected as Vice-President of
>the California Yacht Brokers Association
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/argonaut_0392.jpg
This tiny article, which is too blurry to read again, makes me wonder why it's
included here. Did Ermshar write this article? Or is this more "patting
himself on the back"?
>10/92 CALIFORNIA YACHT CLUB - letter re a slide show I gave there
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/californiayachtclub_1092.jpg
Rick Ermshar Yacht Sales?
Brings back to the frontlight why Ermshar would "voluntarily" give up his
broker's license - especially if it was a means of livelihood.
>
>2/93 MARINA FOUNDATION - letter of thanks for $1,000 cash donation
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/marinafoundation_0293.jpg
>
>7/94 WINDJAMMERS YACHT CLUB - letter of thanks for donation of 20-foot
>sailboat to Boys & Girls Club
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/windjammersyachtclub_0794.jpg
>
>10/94 CALIFORNIA YACHT CLUB - two letters from officials re my serving as
>Escort & Safety Director for long-distance race
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/californiayachtclub_1094.jpg
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/californiayachtclub_1094b.jpg
More articles that I just don't understand their inclusion in this "evidence".
These are letters and have nothing to do with publication and take away from
the viability of Ermshar.
>4/96 SAILING WORLD - copy of letter re an assignment for me to cover the
>Pacific Cup (same as article I posted in SCH)
>http://aloha.net/~westfal/sailingworld_0496.jpg
Now, this is truly interesting. Here's a letter from one of my favorite
sailing mags asking Ermshar to do a story covering the 1996 Pacific Cup. Who
cares? I don't. Where's the published article?
So, now that the articles are out and have been posted for the interested to
see, what kind of conclusions can be drawn?
These articles show that Ermshar has had articles and photographs written by
himself published in a variety of publications, ranging from the small and
regional to the national level publications.
However, there is nothing here to support Ermshar's assurances that he was
editor-in-chief or Associate Editor of any publication.
Also, most detracting from this "evidence" is the judicious use of letters and
such that have no bearing whatsoever on the matters at hand. The letters from
California YC, Windjammer YC, Women's SA, Marina Foundation and Sailing World
bring Ermshar suspect. These are not publications and cannot in any way be
construed as publications or evidence of being published. The inclusion of
these letters leads one to believe that the judicious claims made by Ermshar
are indeed false.
It makes one wonder why he would include them at all.
Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227, any and all
unsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address
is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500
US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms.
Interesting.
After reading Yoda's comments, I downloaded the file "sea_0885.jpg" to review
the image more closely. I attempted to use Adobe Photoshop 5.0 to review the
picture. It would not open the picture due to an "unkown error in jpeg file".
How about e-mailing me a copy of this image for further investigation?
Yoda <bla...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
<7s81hb$qkv$1...@ash.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
> Look at the horizontal alignment of "-Rick Ermshar", and how it
floats up
> higher than the rest of the text on the very same line.
>
> Look at the difference in the coloration immediately surrounding
"-Rick
> Ermshar" as compared to the rest of the scanned area -- it's
considerably
> darker in tint.
>
RK <trac...@pacbell.net> wrote in article
<37E722BB...@pacbell.net>...
AC21209 <ac2...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921103021...@ng-fi1.aol.com>...
They accept freelance contributions and in their writers' guidelines
say:
Sea Magazine Freelance Writer's [sic]
Guidelines
ABOUT SEA:
Sea is four-color, monthly publication for active
West Coast boat
owners. It was founded in 1908, and is published
by the Duncan
McIntosh Co. Circulation is approximately 50,000.
Sea is read by power boaters and sportfishing
enthusiasts from
Alaska to Mexico, and across the Pacific to
Hawaii. Sea contains
articles on Western cruising and fishing
destinations, new boats
and marine electronics, safety, navigation,
seamanship,
maintenance how-tos, consumer guides to boating
services,
marine news and product buyer's guides.
Their Editorial focus is:
Feature articles generally are between 1,000 and 1,200 words.
Other articles range between 250 and 750 words.
First-time
contributors are encouraged to pitch articles on:
West Coast cruising destinations --
especially those in Baja
California, Southern California, Puget Sound
and British
Columbia.
Boating news from your Western home port.
Western boating trends and issues.
Seamanship (power boating only).
Boat maintenance and repair.
Another good avenue for free-lancers is Sea's
West Coast Focus
section. It is comprised of brief news stories or
isolated bits of
information about Western boating and
sportfishing. Focus stories
are about 250 words each, and stand the best
chance of running
if they are accompanied by a color slide.
Focus story topics include: new marinas and
boating projects;
new fishing regulations; boat parades, festivals
or owner
rendezvous; and boating legislation updates.
Preview stories are
preferred over post-event reports, so readers who
wish to
participate may do so.
Submit written queries to: Sea Magazine, Editorial Department,
17782 Cowan, Suite C, Irvine, CA 92614.
They have archived issues back to July of 1998. They do not list a
contact e-mail address on their website. The magazine appears to be an
8 1/2 x 11 slick 4 color publication. KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website there are 3000 live cameras or
visit NASA, play games, read jokes, send greeting cards & connect
to CNN news, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards or learn all
about Hawaii, Israel and more: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/
AC21209 <ac2...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921102327...@ng-fi1.aol.com>...
P.S. To double agent JuBar@HuLu`Po - meet me in the DjNz secret
chatroom at fisherman's time code A - Be sure to use your
crypto-handshake and eakspay igpay atinlay and on'tday elltay Odaya!
Ogerray? (Igbay Ogday inkthays ehay's ettypray icklslay!) --
FINGoldbergINGER, agent 004.2 - retail 007 <wink><wink> MK
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website there are 3000 live cameras or
visit NASA, play games, read jokes, send greeting cards & connect
to CNN news, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards or learn all
about Hawaii, Israel and more: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/
RK <trac...@pacbell.net> wrote in article
<37E722BB...@pacbell.net>...
>
> Yoda wrote:
>
> > Look at the horizontal alignment of "-Rick Ermshar", and how it
floats up
> > higher than the rest of the text on the very same line.
> >
> > Look at the difference in the coloration immediately surrounding
"-Rick
> > Ermshar" as compared to the rest of the scanned area -- it's
considerably
> > darker in tint.
> >
> > To me, this is an alteration of the actual printed material -- a
scizzors-type
> > cut and paste job -- thereby rendering all other evidence offered
in this post
> > ZERO credibility -- just like the "author".
> >
> > Yoda
And then brain sturgeon TrackRat wrote:
>> Yes, there definitely is a darker shade surrounding his name. Actually
it's a lousey job, done by a lazy oaf. Good eyes Yoda. <<
Yoda's eyes need checking. And if you folks have a complaint, take it up with
the Art Director of the magazine.
The name is in italics, which is the style they use throught the magazine and
which is why it appears to "float". And the "difference in coloration" is a
shaded box they put around the author's names, as Sharon can easily confirm
from looking at the original... or as you detectives can also see by getting an
original issue.
And why would I attempt to fake *one* article when there were soooo many
others?
Wanna try again?
Sheesh.
I'll rescan this one in color and not compress it.
Sharon Westfall <wes...@lava.net> wrote in article
<MPG.12513502f...@news.lava.net>...
> In article <7s81hb$qkv$1...@ash.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
bla...@yahoo.com
>
> It's from a yellow highlighter. Rick highlighted his name and the
> trying to keep the size of the jpgs down.
It's from a yellow highlighter. Rick highlighted his name and the
magazine names on the photocopies. I scanned them in greyscale, except
for the Santana Mangazine, since that one wasn't a photocopy. I can
rescan some in color so you can see the highlight if you like. I was
RErmshar <rerm...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921123020...@ng-fz1.aol.com>...
> Wanna try again?
> Sheesh.
Where are you from, AC? Siberia?
SEA magazine is one of the oldest boating magazines in the world, along with
YACHTING. Both were started somewhere back around the turn of the century.
SEA was originally called SEA & PACIFIC SKIPPER. It covers the entire West
Coast of the U.S., and Hawaii. When I was working for them, the paid
circulation was well over 100,000, and the newsstand sales pushed that number
far higher.
Why don't you ask all your hot-shot "contacts" about SEA?
And I'm curious to see what Hugh Dickson has to say about SEA.
>> Finally, a magazine that I am familiar with. Unfortunately, all the scans
for
SAIL magazine are too blurry to read. <<
Sharon gave the dates of each issue -- you can find 'em if you want 'em.
>> It seems rather ridiculous to me that Ermshar would include this to support
his
statements. This galley proof proves nothing except that he wrote an article
on man overboard. It's a shame that he chose to include this. <<
As I told Sharon and as I wrote here before, what I sent Sharon was stuff that
lying around the house. Most of the magazines and other material are in
storage.
Sue me.
The galley proof is the copy I got for final proofreading before the issue went
to press.
I don't recall if there's a date on that galley proof, but it would easy for
you detectives to call the magazine and get the issue.
>> This tiny article, which is too blurry to read again, makes me wonder why
it's
included here. Did Ermshar write this article? <<
It's from a newspaper, and no, I didn't write it, nor did I ever say that I
wrote it.
>> Rick Ermshar Yacht Sales?
Brings back to the frontlight why Ermshar would "voluntarily" give up his
broker's license - especially if it was a means of livelihood. <<
Because a California license does no good in Hawaii.
Duh.
>> More articles that I just don't understand their inclusion in this
"evidence".
These are letters and have nothing to do with publication and take away from
the viability of Ermshar. <<
The late Hui Lupo has always sworn that I was involved in boating at all, in
any way shape or form. Sharon questioned the same thing. Hence, the letters
were included to disprove more of Hui Lupo's claims and to show a *variety* of
involvement.
>> These articles show that Ermshar has had articles and photographs written
by
himself published in a variety of publications, ranging from the small and
regional to the national level publications. <<
Doom on Hui Lupo.
>> However, there is nothing here to support Ermshar's assurances that he was
editor-in-chief or Associate Editor of any publication. <<
Hold on to yer britches. I already said I'd send that info to Sharon to
include.
Too busy flaming to remember that?
>> The letters from California YC, Windjammer YC, Women's SA, Marina
Foundation and Sailing World bring Ermshar suspect. <<
AC, all you've done is prove that you flamers will *never* be satisfied and
cease to attack me, no matter how much hard proof is laid in front of you.
>> The inclusion of these letters leads one to believe that the judicious
claims made by Ermshar are indeed false. <<
Oh sure, because there are letters that are <gasp!> complimentary, you then
feel that everything *else* is false.
Typical Hui Lupo pretzel-logic.
Proof again why Hui Lupo is dead.
RErmshar <rerm...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921124804...@ng-fz1.aol.com>...
RErmshar <rerm...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921124804...@ng-fz1.aol.com>...
>
RErmshar <rerm...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921124804...@ng-fz1.aol.com>...
RErmshar <rerm...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921124804...@ng-fz1.aol.com>...
>
>Look at the horizontal alignment of "-Rick Ermshar", and how it floats up
>higher than the rest of the text on the very same line.
The same technique was used to cut and paste "Sea August 1985 41"
under the photo on the right.
>Look at the difference in the coloration immediately surrounding "-Rick
>Ermshar" as compared to the rest of the scanned area -- it's considerably
>darker in tint.
If squirmy had used a certain tool while using Adobe Photoshop he could
have
gotten it perfect. But his effort isn't even close.
>To me, this is an alteration of the actual printed material -- a scizzors-type
>cut and paste job -- thereby rendering all other evidence offered in this post
>ZERO credibility -- just like the "author".
I agree. I have been in Graphic Design since 1973 and it really doesn't
take a
trained eye to spot the bungled job on this one. All Ermshar has
demonstrated is
that he is a loser, a pathetic loser.
Keoni
>Yoda's eyes need checking. And if you folks have a complaint, take it up with
>the Art Director of the magazine.
No complaint here, just exposing you for what you really are. A pathetic
loser.
Next he will be telling us that he is the art director of the magazine.
>The name is in italics, which is the style they use throught the magazine and
>which is why it appears to "float". And the "difference in coloration" is a
>shaded box they put around the author's names, as Sharon can easily confirm
>from looking at the original... or as you detectives can also see by getting an
>original issue.
These so-called shaded boxes would show a hard line and not sloppy fuzzy
edges.
Nice try squirmy, but you are not fooling anyone.
Keoni
Don't hold your breath.
>Mahalo for your time and effort, Sharon.
>I've gotta run and will be gone all day, but will make a few comments tomorrow,
>perhaps.
We can hardly wait.
Keoni
It's from a yellow highlighter. Rick highlighted his name and the
magazine names on the photocopies. I scanned them in greyscale, except
for the Santana Mangazine, since that one wasn't a photocopy. I can
rescan some in color so you can see the highlight if you like. I was
trying to keep the size of the jpgs down.
If this is a yellow highlighter then why did squirmy try to tell us that
it was a shaded box around his name and to take it up with the Art
Director. Caught in another lie.
Geeze, is there no end to his lying?
Keoni
if you scan them in and convert them to bitmapped, indexed color, you should be
able to save them as .gif files which are smaller than .jpg files.
Sherlock Yoda wrote:
>> Look at the horizontal alignment of "-Rick Ermshar", and how it floats up
higher than the rest of the text on the very same line.
Look at the difference in the coloration immediately surrounding "-Rick
Ermshar" as compared to the rest of the scanned area -- it's
considerably
darker in tint.
To me, this is an alteration of the actual printed material -- a
scizzors-type
cut and paste job -- thereby rendering all other evidence offered in
this post
ZERO credibility -- just like the "author". <<
And then brain sturgeon TrackRat wrote:
>> Yes, there definitely is a darker shade surrounding his name. Actually
it's a lousey job, done by a lazy oaf. Good eyes Yoda. <<
Yoda's eyes need checking. And if you folks have a complaint, take it up
with
the Art Director of the magazine.
The name is in italics, which is the style they use throught the
magazine and
which is why it appears to "float". And the "difference in coloration"
is a
shaded box they put around the author's names, as Sharon can easily
confirm
from looking at the original... or as you detectives can also see by
getting an
original issue.
And why would I attempt to fake *one* article when there were soooo many
others?
Wanna try again?
Sheesh.
So Ermsquat says that it is a "shaded box they put around the aughor's
name".
Well, I'll be damned. I presume that "they" is the art department and
that it
was approved by the Art Director.
Now comes the good part written by Sharon:
It's from a yellow highlighter. Rick highlighted his name and the
magazine names on the photocopies. I scanned them in greyscale, except
for the Santana Mangazine, since that one wasn't a photocopy. I can
rescan some in color so you can see the highlight if you like. I was
trying to keep the size of the jpgs down.
I just yellow highlighted a magazine page, a newspaper page, and a
20 lb bond typwritten page.
I scanned them in greyscale and in all three cases the yellow
highlighted
parts came out lighter than the rest of the page.
I can't wait for Ermshars justification concerning his lie about them
putting a shaded box around the authors name. Caught with your pants
down
once again eh wormshar.
Keoni
RErmshar <rerm...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19990921122310...@ng-fz1.aol.com>...
>
> Mahalo for your time and effort, Sharon.
> I've gotta run and will be gone all day, but will make a few comments
tomorrow,
> perhaps.
Perhaps.
>SEA magazine is one of the oldest boating magazines in the world, along
>with
>YACHTING. Both were started somewhere back around the turn of the century.
Very nice. However, I didn't exist at the turn of the century. But, it does
seem that you are in err. Martin has reported that Sea has been published in
Orange County since 1908. Not quite the "turn of the century" that you assured
us.
>SEA was originally called SEA & PACIFIC SKIPPER. It covers the entire West
>Coast of the U.S., and Hawaii. When I was working for them, the paid
>circulation was well over 100,000, and the newsstand sales pushed that number
>far higher.
With a circulation of "well over 100,000" you would think that I would be able
to find one or two copies in Annapolis.
Then again, Martin has reviewed the material at the magazine's website and has
reported that "Sea has a circulation of 50,000 INCLUDING newstand sales..."
Perhaps it's just me (being from Siberia), but 50,000 sounds way less than "way
over 100,000".
>Why don't you ask all your hot-shot "contacts" about SEA?
I could. Considering that some of them are from the West Coast, perhaps they
read Sea as well.
>And I'm curious to see what Hugh Dickson has to say about SEA.
If I recall, Hugh has already stated that Sea is a West Coast publication.
>Sharon gave the dates of each issue -- you can find 'em if you want 'em.
While that may be so, the scans still are too blurry to read.
>As I told Sharon and as I wrote here before, what I sent Sharon was stuff
>that
>lying around the house. Most of the magazines and other material are in
>storage.
Storage or not, you chose poorly in the material that you chose to support you.
>Sue me.
I'll leave that to those who take you seriously.
>The galley proof is the copy I got for final proofreading before the issue
>went
>to press.
Very nice. However, it's not the printed page of the magazine that it's
supposedly published in. Anyone that interested can create a "galley proof" at
home on their computer.
>I don't recall if there's a date on that galley proof, but it would easy
>for
>you detectives to call the magazine and get the issue.
Probably as easy as it was to call the Kenwood Cup.
>It's from a newspaper, and no, I didn't write it, nor did I ever say that
>I
>wrote it.
However, you include it amongst material that is supposed to prove that you
write for "major" sailing publications? It is this kind of lackey evidence
that robs your credibility.
>Because a California license does no good in Hawaii.
>Duh.
Such a friendly attitude. It's always interesting to see your change in
demeanor from the AOL Boards. However, it doesn't help your case any.
>The late Hui Lupo has always sworn that I was involved in boating at all,
>in
>any way shape or form.
Are you trying to disprove that you are involved in boating then?
>Sharon questioned the same thing. Hence, the letters
>were included to disprove more of Hui Lupo's claims and to show a *variety*
>of
>involvement.
I see.
>Doom on Hui Lupo.
Please refrain from using profanity on the newsgroup.
As Mr. Marcinko said, Mr. Murphy will always show his face at the most
inopportune times.
>Hold on to yer britches. I already said I'd send that info to Sharon to
>include.
>Too busy flaming to remember that?
I see that you find questioning and examination of your credibility to be
flaming. In that case, I recommend that you remain in the AOL Travel Board.
>AC, all you've done is prove that you flamers will *never* be satisfied
>and
>cease to attack me, no matter how much hard proof is laid in front of you.
Hard proof? Do tell me what "hard proof" you have provided. Don't bother
with claiming that you provided these scans, because we all have seen that it
was through the efforts of Ms. Westfall (not yours) that these materials have
come to surface.
If I was interested in "attacking" you, I would have done so in a much
different manner than I have approached the subject here. Please review my
discourse with Sehanda and Martin in previous threads for a better sense of
this.
What you have relied upon is others to provide proof for you. Sharon Westfall
is your most recent courtier.
>Oh sure, because there are letters that are <gasp!> complimentary, you then
>feel that everything *else* is false.
>Typical Hui Lupo pretzel-logic.
>Proof again why Hui Lupo is dead.
The letters could have been disparaging you for stealing the pfd off a child
overboard. I couldn't care less of their content. What does come into scrutiny
is your choice to include that material as support for your publication
experience. It is immaterial.
What is truly noteworthy is that you prefer not to have your material
scrutinized and want everyone to simply believe that you are the popular and
likeable person that you shout you are. That time has passed.
You are adept at alienating any person that may be open to your argument by
your mannerisms and attitude. That is truly a shame.
With your claimed 35 years experience in Hawaii, you have learned nothing about
being ha'aha'a.
> I don't recall if there's a date on that galley proof, but it would easy for
> you detectives to call the magazine and get the issue.
WOT?????????? And be accused of HARASSING your employers?
>
> >> Rick Ermshar Yacht Sales?
> Brings back to the frontlight why Ermshar would "voluntarily" give up his
> broker's license - especially if it was a means of livelihood. <<
>
> Because a California license does no good in Hawaii.
> Duh.
>
And because it does no good, everybody else who leaves the state just forgets about
the license and leaves.
Nurses, Real Estate Agents, Teachers, Doctors....NOBODY is required to TURN IN a
license..... unless they have been accused and determined to be GUILTY of some
wrongdoing involving that license, in which case the license is either revoked OR
the criminal surrenders it TO AVOID PROSECUTION.
Ringing any bells now????
> The late Hui Lupo has always sworn that I was involved in boating at all, in
> any way shape or form. Sharon questioned the same thing. Hence, the letters
> were included to disprove more of Hui Lupo's claims and to show a *variety* of
> involvement.
HAH? You can't even edit yourself when you get this worked up.
You don't have enough published articles to paper a bird cage so you threw in some
other bull to make yourself look like a big shot. And there is STILL no evidence
that you "edited" anything except your own fraudulent resume.
And no evidence that that 1996 Kenwood article ever ran ANYWHERE. Like you ran
THAT one off to "storage"? SO believable. If you were published.....photos and
all......you'd have them blown up and framed for your "wife" to admire.
And all this smoke STILL doesn't create a big enough screen to obfuscate your
having been NAILED by Sherry.
Your story is one pack of lies after another peppered with large doses of
self-congratulation for deeds others perform DAILY and think it's just so normal
it's not even worth mentioning.
> Oh sure, because there are letters that are <gasp!> complimentary, you then
> feel that everything *else* is false.
No, the logic is that anyone who feels SUCH a great need to beat his own drum must
be trying to drown out something else.
And I'd still like to know how much you charged for that "gift" boat.
........Sigh.......worse than a 50-year-old former high school football player
still reliving The Big Game....to be 47 years old and still wallowing in the glory
of a few magazine articles he wrote at 30. Pathetic. And worse.....calling
attention to 15-year-old thank you notes! Ayeeeeeeee! But then you'd expect that
from one who feels compelled to report...TWICE...that he bought a couple of $3
leis.
Jaheez, Ermshar......I was published at 16 in a newspaper of considerably larger
circulation that "SEA." But I haven't used that as a credential since I was 19.
Sharon Westfall wrote:
> 7/85 SEA
> 8/85 SEA
> 8/85 SEA
> 9/85 SEA
> 9/85 SEA
> 10/85 SEA
> 10/85 SEA
> 5/88 SAIL -
> 6/88 WESTERN BOATMAN
> 7/88 SAIL
> 8/88 SAIL
> 9/88 SAIL
> 4/91 SANTANA
> 7/91 SANTANA
> 3/92 SAIL
> 7/92 H2O - major feature article and photos about Catalina Island
>
So let me understand.....all of these articles and letters that were written
from 3 to 10 YEARS before Ermshar's November 1995 move to Hawaii were "laying
around the house" but the ONE AND ONLY article he claims to have had
published since he got here....the juicy Transpac "assignment".....is in
STORAGE??
Oh, yeah.
>
> 7/91 SANTANA - technical article and photos about boat canvas
> http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0791.jpg
>
"One of the advantages of being a boating magazine editor in a former life is
that I have had the opportunity of boarding and/or test sailing hundreds and
hundreds of boats and............"
Still no evidence!
Judy Barrett <j-ba...@att.net> wrote in article
<37E7DCFF...@att.net>...
Judy Barrett <j-ba...@att.net> wrote in article
<37E7DB19...@att.net>...
> You don't have enough published articles to paper a bird cage so you
threw in some
> other bull to make yourself look like a big shot. And there is STILL
no evidence
> that you "edited" anything except your own fraudulent resume.
Best proof he wrote this one.......it's a 2-page Ode to pRick! Written and
photographed by pRick! Tells how to keep "prying eyes from seeing everything
that goes on below." How brilliant "we" are!
And he didn't forget to toss in the gratuitous back pat, either...... "I use
her all the time for day sails, (undecipherable), and a fair number of
search and rescue operations."
WwuuuuuUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuu!
Got an odd transition to that "royal we," too.....
"I can be ready to cast off in less than two minutes.
Let's make a long story short and look at what we've just added."
(Must've been the FIRST wife!)
>
> 7/94 WINDJAMMERS YACHT CLUB - letter of thanks for donation of 20-foot
> sailboat to Boys & Girls Club
> http://aloha.net/~westfal/windjammersyachtclub_0794.jpg
>
I am unfamiliar with a Cal 20 sailboat, but if the "anticipated total
proceeds of the race, raffle, silent auction and other events is about
$7,500" then it can't be near as big a deal as "we" would like you to
believe, eh?
> 11/95 WINDJAMMERS YACHT CLUB - reference letter from founder and Senior
> Staff Commodore
> http://aloha.net/~westfal/windjammersyachtclub_1195.jpg
>
This is just flat pitiful.
Days before Ermshar leaves California he gets an UNSIGNED, hand-dated letter
MAYBE from the Senior Staff Commodore or MAYBE just typed on his stationery.
No other references from his glory days as a DJ/News Director at KROQ?? No
laudatory letter of reference from the MAJOR magazines where he was
Editor-In-Chief?? No copy of those awards from the Yachting Association??
Pitiful.
Judy Barrett <j-ba...@att.net> wrote in article
<37E7E8BD...@att.net>...
>
> So, what........they didn't buy the story?
Judy Barrett <j-ba...@att.net> wrote in article
<37E7E030...@att.net>...
> From 3rd paragraph...
>
> >
> > 7/91 SANTANA - technical article and photos about boat canvas
> > http://aloha.net/~westfal/santana_0791.jpg
> >
>
> 4/96 SAILING WORLD - copy of letter re an assignment for me to cover the
> Pacific Cup (same as article I posted in SCH)
> http://aloha.net/~westfal/sailingworld_0496.jpg
>
This is a letter. It is not a contract. It is not an article. Posting the
article in SCH does not constitute "publication in a major sailing magazine."
John Born <j...@lava.net> wrote in article <37E74A...@lava.net>...
> ROTFLMAO! Comon, Jude, don't you have the articles you wrote 10 years
> ago laying around the house?
If pressed, I could go find a slightly mildewed copy of a piece I wrote in
1965 that made some embarrasingly silly comparison of high school to the
"Batman" TV show. It was "picked up" by the Oakland Tribune. I didn't
save the letter asking permission to run it.
I DO have a couple of my pay stubs from the Daily Review, which paid me the
amazing sum of 15-cents a column inch between 1994 and 1996 for a bi-weekly
column during my Junior and Senior years.
My "archives" are a 9 x 12 x 4 Tupperware box in the garage.
Also contained therein is a piece of black licorice with Al Jardine's tooth
prints. Eat your heart out! <g>
Y'know, even at "Uncle's Nest" up in Wilhelmina Rise, little teeny place,
he had a WALL of file cabinets. He made quite a deal out of how LITTLE he
had to move, having been accustomed to living on a boat.
We know he's too damned cheap to be renting storage space, so that whole BS
about THE most credible and THE most recent credits being "buried in
storage" are as laughable as they are predictable.
> Aha! But, Judy, were you the EDITOR-IN-CHIEF of that publication? KM
Thought you had me there, didn't you?! Welllll........HA!
I'll have you know I was Editor In Chief of a MAJOR high school yearbook!
And I have hundreds and hundreds of thank you letters from grateful fellow
students who encouraged me, among other things, to "stay as sweat as you
are." Lord knows, I try to live up to that.
Furthermore, I was an Associate Editor of a MAJOR high school magazine
(okay, it was on newsprint and looked like a tabloid, but......) and even
had my OWN MONTHLY COLUMN!!!! HA!
"Grin And Barrett!"
And if you don't believe THAT, a quick run through my old tax files will
yield *IRREFUTABLE PROOF* that I am a FABULOUS editor and wonderful human
being. I will start by faxing you copies of receipts for every load I
ever hauled over to Goodwill and Salvation Army. Why, some of those loads
were SO BIG they sent a TRUCK over to MY HOUSE! (And I'm not talking used
underwear like SOME presidents we know. <Eeyeeew>)
Why, if you give me a day or two, I will produce, ON COMPANY STATIONERY, an
unsigned, unsolicited, hand dated, typewritten letter from Bernice Pauahi
Bishop saying what a swell person I am, asking where I get my hair cut, and
declaring that I was the best docent her Museum ever hired.
There you have it! All the *PROOF* you need, signed, sealed and delivered.
I rest my case!
Judy Barrett <j-ba...@att.net> wrote in article
<37E7ED8E...@att.net>...
Ermsquat's so called magazine articles have more holes than the Titanic.
Ogerray-Odgerday! Et'slay ynchronizesay dourhay ecoderday atchesway ownay!
Ouyay arhay illingkay emay, MK!
Ammayray-ammalay-ingday-ongday.
(PS: Ihay dancay etgay dithay orfay ouyay orfay 004 devenhay!)
John Born <j...@lava.net> wrote in article <37E731...@lava.net>...
> >To me, this is an alteration of the actual printed material -- a
scizzors-type
> >cut and paste job -- thereby rendering all other evidence offered in
this post
> >ZERO credibility -- just like the "author".
>
> I agree. I have been in Graphic Design since 1973 and it really
doesn't
> take a
> trained eye to spot the bungled job on this one. All Ermshar has
> demonstrated is
> that he is a loser, a pathetic loser.
>
> Keoni
John Born <j...@lava.net> wrote in article <37E74A...@lava.net>...
> Ermshar is caught once again in a pack of lies to try and cover his .
Hahahahah! It is pretty obvious that Sharon is taking Ermshars doctored
photocopys for the gospel truth. You can fool some of the people . . .
Keoni
alohacyberian wrote:
> Well, Judy, I won first prize in an American Legion Writing contest
> when I was in the 8th grade and got $35.00 and a plaque.
OH MY GAWD!!!!! I know this competition! Was the theme "The Home Is The
Heart And The Hope Of The Nation"???????????
YOU won??????????
HUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!! BOOM shakalakalaka!
I on'y got an honorable mention!
Judy Barrett <j-ba...@att.net> wrote in article
<37E7F92A...@att.net>...
> > Well, Judy, I won first prize in an American Legion Writing contest
> > when I was in the 8th grade and got $35.00 and a plaque. KM
Judy Barrett <j-ba...@att.net> wrote in article
<37E7F862...@att.net>...
Still Unforgiving,
DENNIS KAMAKAHI
AC21209 wrote:
<snip>
As I've posted repeatedly time and time again in ACH & AMH that SQUIRMY or "Iloilo" is a WANNABE HAWAIIAN who has no intent to promote the values of the Hawaiian Culture. This has been shown and revealed to many by his consistent lying and through his modified aloha spirit of TAKING instead of giving. His actions show that if you fall prey to his con, as Sherry and Clint innocently did, you will be taken too. That's why he has become an INSULT to my ancestors and the Kanaka Maoli of these Islands by representing his actions as being the spirit of aloha.
'Owau ka,
DENNIS KAMAKAHI
Â
AC21209 wrote:
<snip>
With your claimed 35 years experience in Hawaii, you have learned nothing about
alohacyberian wrote:
> Don't think I've ever met anyone who is as hard to shame! KM
That's one of the clinical definitions of "sociopath."
aloh...@pacbell.net wrote:
> May I recommend an ipu or an ipu heke?
> Anne
(Insert rimshot here!) Good one, Anne! <g>
>The following jpgs were scanned and uploaded with permission. The names
>on the letters have been painted out per Rick's request.
Letters and some articles??? That's it???? Where's the PROOF that he was
Editor in Chief of a MAJOR sailing magazine???
The rest is nothing but fluff... I want the PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
gi...@lava.net
What evil lurks in the hearts of men???
The SHADOW knows...
-----------------------------------------------------------
>As I told Sharon and as I wrote here before, what I sent Sharon was stuff
>that lying around the house. Most of the magazines and other material are
>in storage.
>Sue me.
But it has been nearly a year since Ermsquat said he would send proof...
Certainly enough time to go to a storage locker... Why would he keep junk
around that proves nothing and not keep proof of his being an editor???
>>> Rick Ermshar Yacht Sales?
>Brings back to the frontlight why Ermshar would "voluntarily" give up his
>broker's license - especially if it was a means of livelihood. <<
>Because a California license does no good in Hawaii.
Yacht Broker's licenses do not have to be "voluntarily given up" when one
moves. They just expire or become inactive... Usually when one "gives up"
a license is to avoid having the license revoked...
>>> More articles that I just don't understand their inclusion in this
>"evidence".
>These are letters and have nothing to do with publication and take away
>from the viability of Ermshar. <<
>The late Hui Lupo has always sworn that I was involved in boating at all,
>in any way shape or form.
I would like Ermshar to provide even ONE SINGLE post where ANY Hui Lupo
member made this claim that he never had anything to do with boating. Es-
pecially since it has been noted for years that he had a yacht brokers
license that had to be returned... Hui Lupo's position has always been
that he was NOT an Editor in Chief of any MAJOR sailing magazine... I
always figured he wrote for some newsletter or other....
>Sharon questioned the same thing. Hence, the
>letters were included to disprove more of Hui Lupo's claims and to show a
>*variety* of involvement.
I think Ermshar should provide PROOF that Sharon questioned the same
thing... It is my belief that the letters were included to influence
people to think that he's a great guy getting thanks from some
organizations...
>>> However, there is nothing here to support Ermshar's assurances that he was
>editor-in-chief or Associate Editor of any publication. <<
>Hold on to yer britches. I already said I'd send that info to Sharon to
>include.
>Too busy flaming to remember that?
Probably too tired of waiting... Hui Lupo has been asking for that proof
for nearly TWO YEARS....
>>> The letters from California YC, Windjammer YC, Women's SA, Marina
>Foundation and Sailing World bring Ermshar suspect. <<
>AC, all you've done is prove that you flamers will *never* be satisfied
>and cease to attack me, no matter how much hard proof is laid in front of
>you.
AC has merely pointed out a fact. Letters from yacht clubs are not proof
that someone is an editor in chief...
>>> The inclusion of these letters leads one to believe that the judicious
>claims made by Ermshar are indeed false. <<
>Oh sure, because there are letters that are <gasp!> complimentary, you
>then feel that everything *else* is false.
>Typical Hui Lupo pretzel-logic.
>Proof again why Hui Lupo is dead.
AC, to my knowledge has never included himself as a member of Hui Lupo...
I randomly checked out a couple of the 'official' articles...First
thought that came to mind was that the thread was mispelled and it was
suppose to read "Rick's Boat Article ScaMs" ...
second thought? the only thing they articles proved was that he should
have spend less time in the newsgroups and more time learning
Photoshop.(or Corel or whatever graphics program he tried).
Next time ask for help....I could have made it look soooo much cleaner.
c:\eudora\attach\BRZ-FX.jpg
(uhmmmm, better read it closely before you actually try to use it
though)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
I'm sorry... I must interject something here in trying to be fair and
unbiased to all sides...I know for a fact that he did edit something.
TRUE, it was NOT a big time magazine (national or otherwise) but it was
important to me. Back in 1997, he convinced me that he had once been an
editor for a national magazine...he had offered to go over the "thank
you's" for the LIVE AND KICKIN' CD of BB Shawn's. Doing the whole
project by myself I was grateful for another pair of eyes. He only
made one correction ... and this, of course, is how we ended up spelling
Chillingworth; ChillingSworth! Something that took a LOT of apologies to
that wonderful family to make amends. Thank goodness his relatives are
wonderful people and are great supporters of Shawn and his music.
--
FLYING SOLO MUSIC - contact Nancy for:
BB Shawn, Bobby Ingano Guy Cruz
Phone/Fax: (808) 423-8489 Voice: (808) 371-5178
www.nahenahe.net/bb_shawn/ www.nahenahe.net/bobby/
>Yoda's eyes need checking. And if you folks have a complaint, take it up with
>the Art Director of the magazine.
Smokescreen. Or was that you with the yellow highlighter? Which personality
is doing the talking now?
>The name is in italics, which is the style they use throught the magazine and
>which is why it appears to "float".
Bullcrap. I know italics. I do desktop publishing, word processing, on a
daily basis. Italics slant letters to the right. Sloppy cutting and pasting
causes them to float. You need to pay more attention to detail, Squirmy, or
you'll get busted every time.
>And the "difference in coloration" is a
>shaded box they put around the author's names, as Sharon can easily confirm
>from looking at the original... or as you detectives can also see by getting an
>original issue.
Don't WANT the original issue. We have your forgery right here...in our
collective Hui Lupo face. The evidence that YOU provided.
That shaded area has an irregular outline(freehand, perhaps) that spills over
past the third columnal margin -- the same columnal margin that would prevent
a text box's contents from spilling over into that area. Also, why insert a
graphical signature at all when there is nothing fancy there -- just plain
italicized text? Bullcrap, Squirmy. You altered it.
Sharon said the difference in coloration was caused by a yellow highlighter.
Certain types of yellow highlighters cause ink to run...which could result in
having an effect similar to using the "Smudge" tool in PhotoShop to blur over
any edges. You didn't do that with that highlighter, did you? 8^O
>And why would I attempt to fake *one* article when there were soooo many
>others?
Because it's so consistent with your modus operandi.
Why do you keep posting shameless self-aggrandizements in your AOL cesspool?
Because, although there are quite a few pesky Hui Lupo piranha nipping at your
pilau toejams, there are "soooo many others" who WANT to believe your Mr.
Roarke persona.
One forgery is enough for me. The rest of your evidence is as tainted as you
are.
>Wanna try again?
Yoda
>Mahalo for your time and effort, Sharon.
>I've gotta run and will be gone all day, but will make a few comments tomorrow,
>perhaps.
>Appreciate your attempt to help...
Try wait. Don't be in such a hurry.
Have some salt before you go...slug.
<http://members.tripod.com/blahlah/graphics/squirmy.gif>
<http://members.tripod.com/blahlah/graphics/Enema-toda.gif>
Now go hide and shrivel away...
Yoda
He just did and you're busted again:
>
> One forgery is enough for me. The rest of your evidence is as
tainted as you
> are.
>
> Yoda
Yoda <bla...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
<7s9dlb$9mn$1...@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
> In article <19990921123020...@ng-fz1.aol.com>,
rerm...@aol.com (RErmshar) wrote:
In article <7s9dlb$9mn$1...@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
bla...@yahoo.com (Yoda) wrote:
> In article <19990921123020...@ng-fz1.aol.com>,
rerm...@aol.com (RErmshar) wrote:
>
> >Yoda's eyes need checking. And if you folks have a complaint, take
it up with
> >the Art Director of the magazine.
>
> Smokescreen. Or was that you with the yellow highlighter? Which
personality
> is doing the talking now?
>
> >And why would I attempt to fake *one* article when there were soooo
many
> >others?
>
> Because it's so consistent with your modus operandi.
>
> Why do you keep posting shameless self-aggrandizements in your AOL
cesspool?
> Because, although there are quite a few pesky Hui Lupo piranha
nipping at your
> pilau toejams, there are "soooo many others" who WANT to believe your
Mr.
> Roarke persona.
>
> One forgery is enough for me. The rest of your evidence is as
tainted as you
> are.
>
> >Wanna try again?
>
> Yoda
Yoda <bla...@yahoo.com> wrote in article
<7s9dlb$9mn$1...@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
gi...@lava.net wrote in article
<37e897e1$3$tvab$mr2...@news.lava.net>...
gi...@lava.net wrote in article
<37e89292$2$tvab$mr2...@news.lava.net>...
> In <MPG.1250dd453...@news.lava.net>, on 09/21/99
>
AC, I've rescanned sea_0885, in color and saved it as a 256 color .gif.
It's also bigger in pixels (845x1095) and bigger in size (318kb). (The
256 color greyscale .jpg is 600x778 pixels and 114kb.) If I reduce the
size of the .gif, the picture degrades badly. (A 16 million color
845x1095 pixel .jpg was 1,068kb!!!)
Here's the new one:
http//aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0885.gif
This is still the old one:
http//aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0885.jpg
I don't have enough personal space to do both for all of them. I think
the .jpgs alone took about 3MB, so adding the .gifs would probably
require 12MB.
Sorry, I did the best I could to fit everything in the space I'm
allotted.
Oops! Sorry, I forgot the :'s
Here's the new one:
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0885.gif
This is still the old one:
http://aloha.net/~westfal/sea_0885.jpg
:I don't have enough personal space to do both for all of them. I think
Thank you Mr. Lancette for confirming that I am not a part of the Hui Lupo
organization.
> >And the "difference in coloration" is a
> >shaded box they put around the author's names, as Sharon can easily
> confirm
Wrong!!! What Sharon confirmed was the use of a yellow highlighter with
no mention of a "shaded box".
Try to get out of this one big hog!
Keoni
Hogs . . . dang it!
calli...@my-deja.com wrote in article
<7sapbb$ana$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
John Born <j...@lava.net> wrote in article <37E880...@lava.net>...
alex <al...@cisco.com> wrote in article
<37E8FF92...@cisco.com>...
> calli...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> Also of help, RErmshar has come out with the info that he was
> Associate Editor of Petersen's Photographic and Editor-In-Chief
> of Sea Magazine. Only thing missing is time frame for these. I
> think that for Photographic is must have been around 1987 but
> that is a guess based on his single article published in Aug 87.
> For Sea I guess around 1985 since that is when all of the articles
> were published.
That's right, that's right - it should be obvious with someone as
pig-headed as that. KM
Thanks, I'll take a look at them shortly.
Sue
Susan Anderson <loga...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in article
<7sirq5$eeb$1...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>...