Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: US Army more selective on recruits, re-enlistments

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Buckwheat

unread,
May 22, 2012, 9:42:37 PM5/22/12
to
In article <jphdqu$sgp$1...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> In order to provide enough cannon fodder for Clinton's trumped up wars, the
> military drastically lowered their recruiting standards. Since President
> Obama has not ended the Iraq war and is now a homosexual.

Was this before or after Obama did away with DOMA and mentally
unstable homosexual traitor Bradley Manning gave away more
secrets in one shot than all other U.S. traitors combined?



Buckwheat

unread,
May 23, 2012, 1:16:34 PM5/23/12
to
In article <jphkvo$tcr$1...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> No. You can thank George W. Bush's low standards for keeping Bradley
> Manning in the military despite his instability.

Bush didn't have anything to do with Bradley Manning the
homosexual traitor. Your beloved Democrats and their assault on
DADT and DOMA did though.

They own it 100%, free and clear.

> -----------
> In October 2007, he decided to enlist in the army.

Lying about his homosexuality in clear violation of federal law
and the UCMJ.

Bradley Manning went on to become the worst traitor in American
history.

A traitor who sold out his own country during a queer quarrel.



Sid9

unread,
May 23, 2012, 1:44:11 PM5/23/12
to

"Buckwheat" <buck...@myghetto.org> wrote in message
news:4MM6WO984105...@reece.net.au...
Are you denying that army standards were lowered during the bush,jr/Cheney
regime?

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2008/01/dumb_and_dumber.html

Buckwheat

unread,
May 24, 2012, 1:05:08 PM5/24/12
to
In article <jpj7le$gsl$1...@dont-email.me>
Army standards are lowered every time there is a protracted war,
numbnuts. This isn't news. It happened in WWI, WWII, Korea,
Vietnam, and Desert Storm.

Qualified people get killed and have to be replaced with who is
available. It's called attrition.

> http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2008/01/dumb_and_dumber.html

What the article fails to mention is,

Every time Democrats control Congress and need more money they
cut education funding and fire teachers.

That same statement is true of state assemblies. See
California, formerly the most envied state in the world because
of their education programs K-12 until Democrats destroyed it.

Thanks to Democrats, large city school districts nation wide
have a graduation rate of barely 60%.

While a liberal may go to college, they don't learn anything of
value, and their pansy liberal arts degree qualifies them to do
exactly nothing without further graduate work.

If you knew anything at all of American history, you wouldn't
base your argument on petty crap that you should already know
the answer to, and you'd laugh and point fingers at a really
dumb article along with everyone else.














Sid9

unread,
May 24, 2012, 1:36:42 PM5/24/12
to

"Buckwheat" <buck...@myghetto.org> wrote in message
news:XOWFUIHJ4105...@reece.net.au...
.
.
Who did this to you?
You are badly fucked up!
I never saw an RRR delusion case this bad!

emoneyjoe

unread,
May 24, 2012, 7:46:09 PM5/24/12
to
Want to see worse, look in the mirror.


If you want to improve your image, cut
back on the four letter words, it is easy to
tell which posts are by liberal socialist atheists
by the number of four letter words used.

Only biased bigoted jerks focus on one
political party, there are good men in both
parties, but according to you, the party is
all that counts, taking away more freedom
and causing job losses.






0 new messages