Re: Stop Spamming!

[david hillstrom]

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:10:39 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:04:06 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:12:28 GMT, "Killer Kane" <monkey...@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> <nugen...@gmail.com> wrote :
>>>
>>>> Thank you for your answer, but after looking at some of the messages I
>>>> was talking about, most of them have "alt.horror" listed as the
>>>> *first* newsgroup, so that means they must have come from there.
>>>> That's what the Google Groups FAQ says to look for. Maybe you are
>>>> mistaken about who some of these people are?
>>>
>>> alt.flame declared "war" on alt.horror and flooded us with those
>>> pathetic cascades. They will have changed the newsgroup order in an
>>> attempt to drag other innocent groups, such as your own, into joining
>>> their childish attack. Any complaints should be forwarded to alt.flame.
>>
>> d'you know what. trolling through these old, for whatever reason saved,
>> posts is so damn funny. here we have an aol idiot, like they all are and
>> this one proves it, not that it needed proving, saying any complaints
>> should be sent to alt.flame. if i hadn't have read it, i'd not have
>> believed it. way to ask to get a flame war going, get flamed or fan the
>> flames.
>
>I always wondered where complaints about Usenet should be sent.
>
>I myself think Quality Control has deteriorated tremendously lately.

id send them to alt.control meself...

--
dave hillstrom xrbj

[Aratzio]

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:01:42 -0500, in the land of
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, david hillstrom <da...@meow.org>
got double secret probation for writing:

Big-8 Management Board

[david hillstrom]

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:45:53 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

i thought that, but thats simply too heinous.

--
dave hillstrom xrbj

[Aratzio]

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:04:37 -0500, in the land of

Well, it would turn circular rather quickly with the complaints.

[mimus]

Well, they're heinies, right?

Or at least, in the Freudian jargon, "anal-retentives"?

(I've got to admit that doesn't seem much worse than the "anal-expulsives"
I see . . . running . . . all over the place on Usenet.)

--
tinmi...@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

"You are either insane or a fool."
"I am a sanitary inspector."

< _Maske: Thaery_

[metro-golden-meower]

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:01:42 -0500, david hillstrom <da...@meow.org>
wrote:

it kinda makes sence. people who don't like what they're reading and
who cannot use a killfile (why do these fuckheads have to netKKKop
when the have killfiles and should learn to use them?) and are
obviously control freaks.

[metro-golden-meower]

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:45:53 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>

wrote:

isn't that the new collective noun for a bunch of fuckheads?

[Aratzio]

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:23:50 +0000, in the land of
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, metro-golden-meower
<metro-gol...@meowdot.org> got double secret probation for
writing:

Whiney fuckheads.

[metro-golden-meower]

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:25:45 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

my mistake.

isn't that the collective noun for a bunch of whiney fuckheads?