Last Post
Y6g11
membership. As you may recall, they extended it last month but only for a month
this time. That was the fourth extension so I doubt there will be five although
they have surprised me the last 3 times by extending it.
Rick
news:20030710052218...@mb-m12.aol.com...
Why don't you just stop being a cheapskate and shell out $20/ month? Or go
to Juno and shell out $9.95/ month ;)
If this truly is your last post, you're going to make at least 3 kooks very
sad (Kent, Todd, greggie)
thursday, july 10, 2003
> "Y6g11" wrote in message
> news:20030710052218...@mb-m12.aol.com...
>
> Why don't you just stop being a cheapskate and shell out $20/ month?
she already pays AOL (or someone pays for her)
> Or go to Juno and shell out $9.95/ month ;)
>
> If this truly is your last post, you're going to make at least 3
kooks very
> sad (Kent, Todd, greggie)
>
>
rule # 1 of spammers: spammers always lie
rule # 1 of kiddie pornographers: the kids are never too young
rule #1 of acfs: always abuse the spammers and pornographers.
--
this year practice reverse trick or treat: make the little kiddies give
YOU candy.
GregR
> If this truly is your last post, you're going to make at least 3 kooks very
> sad (Kent, Todd, greggie)
Sigh...
Like DNA markers...
"Rick":
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.81.104.208 [Earthlink Pomona dial-up IP pool]
"Ron":
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.81.247.135 [Earthlink Pomona dial-up IP pool]
--
GregR - Another Beemer Biker ...o&o>
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
Proud to be 'anmother Internet terrorist'
(e-mail from Tommy Brock at Removeyou.org 5/24/02).
Compuelf
"Rick" <bl...@block.block> wrote in message
news:nodPa.39522$C83.3...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> "Y6g11" <y6...@aol.comnospammm> wrote in message
> news:20030710052218...@mb-m12.aol.com...
> > Well it's that time again. Time to call AOL to cancel my free trial
> > membership. As you may recall, they extended it last month but only for
a
> month
> > this time. That was the fourth extension so I doubt there will be five
> although
> > they have surprised me the last 3 times by extending it.
>
> Why don't you just stop being a cheapskate and shell out $20/ month? Or go
> to Juno and shell out $9.95/ month ;)
Someone is paying for his AOL. The sole question is if it's Dentice or
someone else.
>
> If this truly is your last post, you're going to make at least 3 kooks
very
> sad (Kent, Todd, greggie)
>
He'll be back claiming that AOL extended his free trial for another
month or two.
Regardless, I find it interesting that your post traces to
host-66-81-104-208.rev.o1.com. Gee, who else uses that modem pool?
Kent
--
Charter member of the ACFS Taliban.
Compuelf
"GregR" <spama...@suespammers.org.NULL> wrote in message
news:3F0DC098...@suespammers.org.NULL...
> Rhonda posing as "Rick' wrote:
>
> > If this truly is your last post, you're going to make at least 3 kooks
very
> > sad (Kent, Todd, greggie)
>
> Sigh...
>
> Like DNA markers...
>
> "Rick":
>
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.81.104.208 [Earthlink Pomona dial-up IP pool]
>
> "Ron":
>
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.81.247.135 [Earthlink Pomona dial-up IP pool]
>
Amazing, isn't it?
Kent
--
Proof that Scott "Ron" Thomas is a coward:
http://snurl.com/1qcm
GregR
> Yes, this way we can abuse Ron's new sockie as well.
Good to see that Rhonda changes her socks regularly.
Wonder if s/he bathes as often too? :-)
GregR
> Amazing, isn't it?
To RtS (Rhonda the St00pid), maybe... :-)
Y6g11
>Why don't you just stop being a cheapskate and shell out $20/ month? Or go
>to Juno and shell out $9.95/ month ;)
Well they extended the free trial again. The first woman tried to cancel the
account but said she couldn't access it so transfered me to someone else. I
heard some touch tones in the ear piece of the phone and then got a busy
signal.
I called back and got someone else. He said he would give me 2 free months and
then said he was forwarding me to someone. I didn't hear why but rather than
giving me the 2 free months outright he gave me 2 award points. Within 48 hours
of your billing date you go to Keyword "Award Center" and cash in one point for
one month of free service. I assumed he was forwarding me to activate the
points as this is something I hadn't heard about before. Anyway, he forwarded
me and it said the voicemail box was full and it would be transfering me back
to an account representative. Then it said "no valid representative has been
programmed". I then hung up and called back a third time.
I talked to the next guy and asked to speak to the previous guy. He said he
did not know anyone buy that name. Apparently your call goes to anyone at
several different places. I told him what happened, that I have been on the
phone nearly 30 minutes with this, and that I just wanted the account
cancelled. He said he would credit me two months with the award points. I asked
for an explanation of this and he told me how it works and that I now have 4
award points giving me 4 free months. When I got off the phone I went to the
Award Center and sure enough had 4 points. I used one to continue my free trial
and have 3 left.
GregR
[snip bullshit]
Liar.
Y6g11
> Someone is paying for his AOL. The sole question is if it's Dentice or
>someone else.
No one is paying for it. It is still a free trial. The interesting thing is
whan I called to cancel and spoke to the first person, she said "you have been
a member a long time". I always figured it showed that I was given a free
trial extension so they knew not to do it too many times but apparently it
doesn't.
> He'll be back claiming that AOL extended his free trial for another
>month or two.
Actually it was extended 4 months.
Y6g11
>
>[snip bullshit]
>
>Liar.
Here is one of the emails.
Thank you for calling Member Services to discuss your America Online account.
This e-mail is a confirmation you have been issued 2 AOL Service Award(s) into
the AOL Award Center redeemable towards your basic dial-up monthly membership
fees! Service Awards appear in the AOL Award Center within 48 hours of
issuance.
It`s easy to redeem your AOL Service Award, visit Keyword: Award Center.
All you do is redeem your Service Award at least 48 hours before the start of
your next billing cycle. Your Service Award keeps your AOL account active
without being billed for next month`s basic dial-up membership fees. Visit
Keyword: Award Center for information about your AOL Service Award.
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
> >Y6g11 wrote:
> >
> >[snip bullshit]
> >
> >Liar.
>
>
[yawn] no headers once again. time to start reporting you for spam and
kiddie porn.
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
> > Someone is paying for his AOL. The sole question is if it's
> Dentice or
> >someone else.
>
>
> No one is paying for it. It is still a free trial. The interesting
> thing is
> whan I called to cancel and spoke to the first person, she said "you
> have been
> a member a long time". I always figured it showed that I was given a free
> trial extension so they knew not to do it too many times but apparently it
> doesn't.
>
>
> > He'll be back claiming that AOL extended his free trial for another
> >month or two.
>
>
> Actually it was extended 4 months.
so you're mom got her social security check on time this month?
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
> >Y6g11 wrote:
> >
> >[snip bullshit]
> >
> >Liar.
>
>
What a coincindence, I just received this email:
Thank you for calling Inreach Member Services to discuss your Inreach
account.
This e-mail is to confirm that you have been issued 4 Inreach Preferred
Customer Service Award’s into the Inreach Preferred Customer Award
Center each of which are redeemable towards your basic dial-up monthly
fees! Preferred Customer Service Awards appear in the Inreach Preferred
Customer Award Center within 24 hours of issuance.
It’s easy to redeem your Inreach Preferred Customer Service Awards, Just
select the Link Titled Inreach Preferred Customer Award Center on your
personal web page. All you do is redeem your Inreach Preferred Customer
Service Award at least 48 hours before the start of your next billing
cycle. Each Inreach Preferred Customer Service Award keeps your Inreach
account active for one month without being billed for your basic dial-up
fees. Visit the Inreach Preferred Customer Award Center for more
information about your Inreach Preferred Customer Service Award.
Thank You for choosing Inreach.
Daniel Erat
GregR
> Here is one of the emails.
[snip bullshit]
Liar.
And big surprise, no headers on that supposed e-mail.
suzn
"Y6g11" <y6...@aol.comnospammm> wrote in message
news:20030710052218...@mb-m12.aol.com...
WOW....Has it been a month already? Gee time flies doesn't it...
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
> On 12 Jul 2003 22:21:21 GMT I replied to y6...@aol.comnospammm
> (Y6g11) on a piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and
> phone number on the bathroom wall in alt.consumers.free-stuff
>
>
> >>Y6g11 wrote:
> >>
> >>[snip bullshit]
> >>
> >>Liar.
> >
> Where are the headers? This email is not legit without them.
>
the spamnographers emails are never legit period. it's genetic
Compuelf
"for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date"
<alt.consumer...@newsgroup.to> wrote in message
news:nU%Pa.395$OH4...@news.inreach.com...
If it's his mom who's paying.
Kent
--
>I post, therefore I am
a spammer.
-- Scott Dentice (posting as Y6...@aol.com)
Message ID: 20030606202038...@mb-m18.aol.com
Compuelf
"Just Plain Insane" <3...@123098.net> wrote in message
news:beq7kf$jih$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On 12 Jul 2003 22:21:21 GMT I replied to y6...@aol.comnospammm
> (Y6g11) on a piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and
> phone number on the bathroom wall in alt.consumers.free-stuff
>
>
Dentice NEVER includes headers. It's hard to do when the E-mail is
bogus.
Kent
Compuelf
"suzn" <donteve...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:JT1Qa.44380$GL4.12082@rwcrnsc53...
And as predicted, Dentice has claimed ANOTHER free trial extension.
It's a lie, of course. It's already been proven that he uses a paid
account.
suzn
"Compuelf" <COMP...@YAH0O.C0M> wrote in message
news:beqiqc$8ud$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>
> And as predicted, Dentice has claimed ANOTHER free trial extension.
> It's a lie, of course. It's already been proven that he uses a paid
> account.
>
> Kent
Of course he's lying.....he has been saying this for a few years now. AOL
isn't THAT stupid that they would allow him free use this long.
Y6g11
>Where are the headers? This email is not legit without them.
The email is legit. The headers are not important to the message. I received
two of these emails and got 4 award credits.
Y6g11
Sure it's generic and I recieved two of them but from different people. I
received a total of 4 award credits which can be used for 4 free months.
Y6g11
>isn't THAT stupid that they would allow him free use this long.
>
Wanna bet? August will be one year of free AOL and with the 4 award credits
they gave me it will be Nov before the trial runs out.
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
> >Of course he's lying.....he has been saying this for a few years now. AOL
> >isn't THAT stupid that they would allow him free use this long.
> >
>
>
> Wanna bet? August will be one year of free AOL and with the 4 award
> credits
> they gave me it will be Nov before the trial runs out.
and you can't provide one legitimate piece of proof that AOL has given
you anything free.
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
of course it's legit, as legit as spamming. and the headers aren't
important because there aren't any.
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
> On 14 Jul 2003 20:58:50 GMT I replied to y6...@aol.comnospammm
> (Y6g11) on a piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and
> phone number on the bathroom wall in alt.consumers.free-stuff
>
>
> But we have to see if you faked the message ID moron.
not if, how.
>
>
> Your email is NOT legitimate, that is why you don't post headers
>
Y6g11
> Bullshit. I just got off the phone with Sammy. She indicates that
>you are on a paid account in good standing. In other words, you've paid
>your AOL bill on time each month.
> If you're going to lie, don't lie about something that's so
>easy to
>check.
You're a liar. As I mentioned in a previous post, it appears the Aol people do
not know if you are on a free trial, only that you have been a member for a
certain amount of time. Call back and ask Sammy how they know if it is a paid
account or a free trial extension.
Y6g11
How would you know?
>
>Your email is NOT legitimate, that is why you don't post headers
I have posted headers before and people claimed they were fake so why should I
bother? The important thing is the email is legit, my trial has been extended
another 4 months, and you are a sucker paying for something I get free.
JZ
the following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
Well...maybe you should alert all the AOL users so they can quit paying
their bills. After all, the AOL people can't tell who is a Paying customer
or a Trial account user.
If your going to be a compulsive liar, at least try to be a convincing
one.
--
(บท.ธ(จ*ท.ธ ธ.ท*จ)ธ.ทบ)
ซ.ทฐJZฐท.ป
(ธ.ทบ(ธ.ทจ* *จท.ธ)บท.ธ)
for ronnie the capon who is afraid of todays date
> On 15 Jul 2003 03:11:57 GMT I replied to y6...@aol.comnospammm
> (Y6g11) on a piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and
> phone number on the bathroom wall in alt.consumers.free-stuff
>
>
> Who wants to slam dunk him this time? Maybe rb can.
>
it's easy enough, just call and ask them if they can tell it's a free
trial. and the answer is "of course we can tell, otherwise how would we
know if someone wasn't paying at all?"
in simple english, they have a database of all the people who have free
memberships. I can download and post it for you as proof that you aren't
in it.
Y6g11
Return-Path: <aolawar...@aol.com>
Received: from aol.com (cliff.ops.aol.com [172.18.138.167]) by
air-id06.mx.aol.com (v94.1) with ESMTP id MAILINID61-3df63f0dfb3f2ea; Thu, 10
Jul 2003 19:48:15 -0400
To: Y6...@aol.com
From: aolawar...@aol.com
Subject: Confirmation of AOL Service Award
Content-type: text/html
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:48:15 EDT
Message-ID: <3a.3bc5590...@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
GregR
> Now all you need to do is make up the text to go along with it. Get
> to it, Dentice.
He won't do it because the forgeries are too easy to spot. :-)
Y6g11
> They do know. If not, they wouldn't know when to start charging
>someone after the free 45 days.
You stupid moron. The billing people know but the customer service reps don't.
When they give you free months the billing people see it but the cs reps don't.
Y6g11
>> to it, Dentice.
>
>He won't do it because the forgeries are too easy to spot. :-)
The message they sent was already posted prior to this. Where were you?
Y6g11
Headers were completely legit without anything left out or edited. See what I
mean. Many people are jealous of my free internet so make up lies about fake
headers.
Y6g11
>are no headers included. And yes, I know this to be true as my wife uses
>AOL and has for years.
>
I noticed this too. That's why I forwarded the email to another account and
low and behold, it forwarded the header info also. Duh.
Y6g11
>exist. See below for Dentice's IP trace to Vegas
So I got an email from a server that doesn't exist? Wow.>Now
air-id06.mx.aol.com resolves to 205.188.159.131 which is a Las
>Vegas, NV IP address for AOL's systems.
This being claimed by someone who said you can receive email from non-existant
servers. Funny air-id06.mx.aol.com resolves to 205.188.159.13 which is a
Dallas, TX IP address for AOL. Caught your ass lying again.
Y6g11
>changed a few items. AOL doens't include headers in mail from one account
>to another.
I didn't change anything. I forwarded the email to another account and it
forwards the headers you dumb ass.
>Niether Kent nor I care enough to even
>ask Sammy which is the case, and I doubt she could ethically tell us. I'm
>sure she couldn't tell us legaly, regardless of ethics.
Busted! You can't get proof and I made an ass out of you. The CS reps do not
know whether the account is free trial or paid. Hell as far as they know, it
is a paid account that has never been billed because of the free months given.
FInd someone in billing and ask how many payments they have received from that
account.
Y6g11
>
Perhaps he is. I don't know him so don't know where he lives nor do I care.
JZ
the following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>> Too easy. When E-mail is sent from one AOL account to another,
Dig the hole a little deeper, Scott.
<Snicker>
GregR
> The message they sent was already posted prior to this. Where were you?
Where were the headers?
GregR
> That's why I made the comment. "make up"
Sorry, even with all that "make up" the XYTard is still one *ugly* troll...
GregR
> Many people are jealous of my free internet so make up lies about fake
> headers.
So you admit they're fake headers?
GregR
> >Received: from aol.com (cliff.ops.aol.com [172.18.138.167]) by
> Now this is funny, the server that sent him the email does NOT
> exist. See below for Dentice's IP trace to Vegas.
>
> 07/15/03 09:37:59 IP block 172.18.138.167
> Trying 172.18.138.167 at ARIN
> Trying 172.18.138 at ARIN
[snippage]
> NetRange: 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
> CIDR: 172.16.0.0/12
> NetName: IANA-BBLK-RESERVED
> NetHandle: NET-172-16-0-0-1
> Parent: NET-172-0-0-0-0
> NetType: IANA Special Use
> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG
> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
> Comment: This block is reserved for special purposes.
> Comment: Please see RFC 1918 for additional information.
Absolutely correct.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1918.txt
3. Private Address Space
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the
following three blocks of the IP address space for private internets:
10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix)
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix)
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Y6g11
>tried to claim here, AOL's people. Since there were no headers in the
>original, there were no headers to foward. Duh.
> Oh well, I shouldn't expect much from a felon.
So when spammers from AOL send you spam and you forward it, there are no
headers? get yourself a free trial AOL account and do as I have suggested. You
will see the headers.
Y6g11
>term) mail. If I were to E-mail you from my AOL account, you wouldn't get
>any headers. Same would apply if you E-mailed me at my AOL account.
>
Oh yeah you liar? Try emailing me and I will post the headers. Just because
you are too dumb to know how to get them doesn't mean everyone is.
Y6g11
>Sammy does. She tells me it's a Vegas IP. She also said I learn how to do
>traces, but that's not really relevant here :-)
>
>
>Bill
She also said I have a paid account yet haven't paid a dime to AOL going on a
year now,
Y6g11
>there were no headers to forward. Damn, you are a stupid felon.
The headers can be forwarded if you aren't a moron, so of course you wouldn't
know how to do it.
> She can not tell us, as far as we know,
>if you or someone else pays for the account. This has been said from the
>begining.
My point exactly. No one has ever paid a dime to AOL for this account. Only
billing could tell you that and as you stated, even Sammy doesn'ty know.
>CS gets the exact same information as billing. Now, do tell, are you
>paying for AOL or is someone else allowing you a user name under their
>account?
>
You are wrong, CS does not get the same info as billing. Ask your friend
Sammy. Better yet, call AOL and get a CS name. Then hang up, call back and say
you lost your connection and want to speak to the person you just called
previously. The CS will tell you they don't know anyone by that name.
JZ
the following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>There are no headers included with inter-account (I think that's the
"Lines: 7
X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
From: y6...@aol.comnospammm (Y6g11)
Newsgroups: alt.consumers.free-stuff
Date: 15 Jul 2003 21:05:39 GMT
References: <Xns93B94C6F3...@207.225.159.7>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: Last Post
Message-ID: <20030715170539...@mb-m17.aol.com>
> Too easy. When E-mail is sent from one AOL account to another,
> there
>are no headers included. And yes, I know this to be true as my wife uses
>AOL and has for years.
>
I noticed this too. That's why I forwarded the email to another account
and low and behold, it forwarded the header info also. Duh."
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030715170539.25812.00000511%40mb-m17.ao
l.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
Shorter URL:
http://snurl.com/1tyb
First you agree with Bill saying, "I noticed this too.", in the post
above. Now you're calling him a liar.
So which is it, Xtard?
Maybe you should start keeping a journal of your lies so you don't get so
mixed up.
RipCurl
>
>
> Hmmmmm?
> I seem to recall you're stating something agreeing with the fact that
> headers are no included with E-mail from one AOL account to another. Now
> you state that they are. The truth is, they aren't, but you have to try
> and explain away your fake E-mail (Scott (Ron) did a better job, BTW).
>
>
> Bill
You dont need Xtard's confirmation on that; the Aol Users who fight spam
in NANAE (news.admin.net-abuse.email) have proven that AOL member to AOL
member email within their application do not include headers. Why should
it? They already have it logged on their system so they know who sent
what at what time.
JZ
>
>>
>>
Exactly :)
Here are just a "couple" of "many" examples:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=19991010162747.06503.00000514%40ng-bd1.ao
l.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
Snipped URL:http://snurl.com/1u0v
<Quote>
"Sigh.
ONE MORE TIME.
This is an AOL TO AOL INTERNAL SPAM. There are NO HEADERS."
</Quote>
And..
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=19990307105434.23495.00004666%40ng-fu1.ao
l.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
Snipped URL: http://snurl.com/1u0w
<Quote>
"Normally I write "AOL to AOL internal spam - no headers" on the abuse
report. But even when I have done so, I STILL sometimes get clueless
"where are the headers?" reports."
So, what does the Xtard come back with?
"I noticed this too. That's why I forwarded the email to another account
and low and behold, it forwarded the header info also. Duh."
If forwarded to another "Non-AOL" account, the Headers would be *Yours*
Scotty.
<Keep on digging that hole>
Y6g11
> I seem to recall you're stating something agreeing with the fact that
>headers are no included with E-mail from one AOL account to another. Now
>you state that they are. The truth is, they aren't, but you have to try
>and explain away your fake E-mail (Scott (Ron) did a better job, BTW).
They aren't visible but they are included. You simply forward the email and
the headers will appear. So far not one person has emailed me from an AOL
account so I could prove this.
Y6g11
>in NANAE (news.admin.net-abuse.email) have proven that AOL member to AOL
>member email within their application do not include headers. Why should
>it? They already have it logged on their system so they know who sent
>what at what time.
I have explained how to get the headers but you are still too stupid to figure
it out. You never went to E3 either liar. You asked questions and said if I
answered them it would prove I was there. Then when I made an ass out of you,
you continued to ask questions. Anyone can ask questions that those attending
would not know the answers to. Unfortunately for you, I answered your original
questions and as you said, proved I was there.
Y6g11
The headers would be mine but within the text of the message would be the
headers from the forwarded message. Duh! I can't believe how stupid people are
and then even more stupid people like you believe them.
Y6g11
>for it, or if someone is letting you use a screen name on thier account.
Wouldn't she be able to tell you that? Of course she would but since you are
lying, you forgot that point.
Y6g11
> What are you talking about? Sammy (her real name is Samantha) is a
>real person. Are you implying she's not, or that Sammy isn't her name?
Are you that dumb? That's not what I said at all. Re-read what I wrote. about
calling AOL. No where did I say anything about Sammy (the liar).
Y6g11
>m17.aol.com> that there were no headers.
They aren't visible but can be obtained by forwarding the email.
>Only billing could tell you that and as you stated, even
>> Sammy doesn'ty know.
>
> I stated she couldn't tell me.
What a lame excuse. I bet she can't tell you anything. Nice way to cover your
lies.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
poor lonely spammer. imagine the only person in the world to not receive
spam from AOL. that's gotta be a Guinness Book of Records type thing.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >You dont need Xtard's confirmation on that; the Aol Users who fight spam
> >in NANAE (news.admin.net-abuse.email) have proven that AOL member to AOL
> >member email within their application do not include headers. Why should
> >it? They already have it logged on their system so they know who sent
> >what at what time.
>
>
> I have explained how to get the headers but you are still too stupid
> to figure
> it out. You never went to E3 either liar. You asked questions and
> said if I
> answered them it would prove I was there. Then when I made an ass out
> of you,
> you continued to ask questions. Anyone can ask questions that those
> attending
> would not know the answers to. Unfortunately for you, I answered your
> original
> questions and as you said, proved I was there.
>
so where is the Iowa Database of Teachers that you were going to post?
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >If forwarded to another "Non-AOL" account, the Headers would be *Yours*
>
>
> The headers would be mine but within the text of the message would be the
> headers from the forwarded message. Duh! I can't believe how stupid
> people are
> and then even more stupid people like you believe them.
>
experience shows that most AOLers are incapable of understanding how
stupid they are.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
speaking of lies, how come you aren't expressing any outrage at ronnie
the christian capon for her statements about creating kiddie porn from
pictures of jpi's daughter.
Y6g11
Right here:
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >so where is the Iowa Database of Teachers that you were going to post?
>
>
> Right here:
>
> http://www.des-moines.k12.ia.us/contactdir/3staff.htm
wrong pornographer. it's only the des-moines database. you promised the
Iowa Database. made an ass out of yourself once again
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> On 19 Jul 2003 05:50:34 GMT I replied to y6...@aol.comnospammm
> (Y6g11) on a piece of toilet paper while scribbling their name and
> phone number on the bathroom wall in alt.consumers.free-stuff
>
>
> >>so where is the Iowa Database of Teachers that you were going to post?
> >
> >Right here:
> >
> >http://www.des-moines.k12.ia.us/contactdir/3staff.htm
>
>
> Where's the whole state of Iowa? This is only one city out of the
> whole state.
>
she thinks I asked for the database for the state of des-moines. who
ever thought she would so thoroughly document how stupid she is.
Y6g11
>Iowa Database.
I have that too but since Kent is in Des Moines, there is no need to post the
other databases. You can see Kent is not a teacher.
Y6g11
>Where's the whole state of Iowa? This is only one city out of the
>whole state.
>
I haven't posted the rest as this proves Kent is not a teacher.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >it's only the des-moines database. you promised the
> >Iowa Database.
>
>
> I have that too but since Kent is in Des Moines, there is no need to
> post the
> other databases. You can see Kent is not a teacher.
what I see is that you are admitting that you can't find and post a link
for the Iowa Database of Teachers.
KABOOM!!!!
--
this year practice reverse trick or treat: make the little kiddies give
YOU candy.
RipCurl
It only proves that you posted for des-moines.
Last i looked there is more than one city in Iowa.
Post ALL Iowa Db's
My cousin is a teacher in Tampa, yet she lives in Ybor city. So
naturally, Ybor City's Database wont show that she is a teacher there.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
the 'tard can't post the database for Iowa because it doesn't exist.
or alternatively it does exist and clearly shows Kent in it.
either way she is just intent on proving what a merkin she is.
Y6g11
>what I see is that you are admitting that you can't find and post a link
>for the Iowa Database of Teachers
from my post
>> I have that too but since Kent is in Des Moines, there is no need to
>> post the
>> other databases.
Made an ass out of you.
Y6g11
>naturally, Ybor City's Database wont show that she is a teacher there.
But Kent lives in Des Moines. I have proved he is not a teacher.
JZ
following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>My cousin is a teacher in Tampa, yet she lives in Ybor city. So
>>naturally, Ybor City's Database wont show that she is a teacher there.
>
> But Kent lives in Des Moines. I have proved he is not a teacher.
>
So? Please show us, (tinu), the law that states that a teacher must live in
the city they teach.
Both my Sister and Niece are school teachers. Nether one lives in the same
city that they teach in. As a matter of fact, my Sister teaches in a city
that is in the next county.
Your "proof" is worth as much as the *paper* you posted it on.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >My cousin is a teacher in Tampa, yet she lives in Ybor city. So
> >naturally, Ybor City's Database wont show that she is a teacher there.
>
>
> But Kent lives in Des Moines. I have proved he is not a teacher.
so you cannot post the Iowa Database of Teachers just like we've said
all along. thank you for confirming our claims.
JZ
the following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>it's only the des-moines database. you promised the
Either supply a link to the "Iowa Database" that you claimed you had. Or,
STFU!
Trust me, you are digging a hole you'll never be able to crawl out of.
JZ
the following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>If forwarded to another "Non-AOL" account, the Headers would be *Yours*
So....
Headers that were *Never inserted by the AOL mail server*, magically show
up when a message is forwarded to a Non-AOL account?
Let me guess.....The forwarded message to your Non-AOL account was
from............AOL? <Surprise!>
By the way, I thought you only had your *Free* AOL account.
<Dig...Dig...Dig...Dig...>
Y6g11
Peoiple said you can't download a database yet I proved you can. I also proved
that Kent is not a teacher as he has claimed.
JZ
the following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>Either supply a link to the "Iowa Database" that you claimed you had.
>
> Peoiple said you can't download a database yet I proved you can.
For "One" city in Iowa.
You claimed you had the Database for the whole "STATE".
>I also proved
> that Kent is not a teacher as he has claimed.
All you have proven, is that you are a disional *Imp* that lives
vicariously through Usenet.
<Dig.........Dig............Dig...........>
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >Either supply a link to the "Iowa Database" that you claimed you had.
>
>
> Peoiple said you can't download a database yet I proved you can.
where is this database that you downloaded? Post the database for us to
see just like you claimed you could.
JZ
afraid of todays date [alt.consumer...@newsgroup.to] Posted the
following to alt.consumers.free-stuff:
> Y6g11 wrote:
>
>> >Either supply a link to the "Iowa Database" that you claimed you had.
>>
>>
>> Peoiple said you can't download a database yet I proved you can.
>
>
> where is this database that you downloaded? Post the database for us to
> see just like you claimed you could.
It's amazing how the "Weak Minded" posters like, The Xtard & Scott Thomas,
claim some sort of "Victory" in this Newsgroup. When in all actualallity,
their information is either: forged, made-up, or is a total fabrication.
To: JPI, Greggi, GregR, Kent, Bill (Yes that is his is real name), and any
others I missed.
Keep up what your doing!
Cheers!
JZ.
(ACFS Cabal in traning).
:)
GregR
> To: JPI, Greggi, GregR, Kent, Bill (Yes that is his is real name), and any
> others I missed.
>
> Keep up what your doing!
Heh - like we need any encouragement? :-)
> (ACFS Cabal in traning).
Check your mailbox for your ACFS membership information kit.
Tactical WMD's will be shipped shortly under separate cover. :-)
--
GregR - Another Beemer Biker ...o&o>
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
Proud to be 'anmother Internet terrorist'
(e-mail from Tommy Brock at Removeyou.org 5/24/02).
Y6g11
>Headers that were *Never inserted by the AOL mail server*, magically show
>up when a message is forwarded to a Non-AOL account?
They are inserted but stripped by the email program at the receiver. I have
proved this by posting headers from an AOL message.
>
>Let me guess.....The forwarded message to your Non-AOL account was
>from............AOL? <Surprise!>
But said the message was TO y6g11 not From. Duh!
>By the way, I thought you only had your *Free* AOL account.
I do have a free Juno account I use to use to sign up for other free trial when
I cancel the one I am using. Other than that
I don't have any other ISP accounts.
Y6g11
>For "One" city in Iowa.
>
>You claimed you had the Database for the whole "STATE".
>
Which is located elsewhere. You and others are missing the big picture in
order to avoid the fact I have proven Kent to be a liar.
Y6g11
>where is this database that you downloaded? Post the database for us to
>see just like you claimed you could.
I already posted the link dumb ass.
Y6g11
>claim some sort of "Victory" in this Newsgroup. When in all actualallity,
>their information is either: forged, made-up, or is a total fabrication.
Coming from a liar. I post proof while as other post lies.
Y6g11
>
The way one person (me) whips so many other people, you need all the
encourgaement you can get.
Ryan Lankford
this onto the bathroom floor of alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>so where is the Iowa Database of Teachers that you were going to post?
>
>Right here:
>
>http://www.des-moines.k12.ia.us/contactdir/3staff.htm
Psst...that's only for the DMPS system...not the state.
Ryan Lankford
http://www.ryan-lankford.com
Got time to kill? Try these links to read about net.sorryasses:
Richard Bullis, net.pedophile: http://www.ryan-lankford.com/cenkoc
Brad Jesness, net.stalker and net.coward: http://www.ryan-lankford.com/bj_faq
Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases:
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving,
subsidize it. -- Ronald Reagan
Ryan Lankford
this onto the bathroom floor of alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>it's only the des-moines database. you promised the
There are over 30 districts in the Polk County area. Kent, if you're
in DM, drop me a line, and we'll get a beer.
Ryan Lankford
this onto the bathroom floor of alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>My cousin is a teacher in Tampa, yet she lives in Ybor city. So
>>naturally, Ybor City's Database wont show that she is a teacher there.
>
>But Kent lives in Des Moines. I have proved he is not a teacher.
Most of Southeast Polk's teachers live in Des Moines, yet they teach
at Southeast Polk, in Runnells.
How's that for a hint? Do you need a listing of all the school
districts within 30 miles of Des Moines? LOL
GregR
> Which is located elsewhere.
So where is it? Post it, moron.
> You and others are missing the big picture in
> order to avoid the fact I have proven Kent to be a liar.
So far all you've proven is how well you can dance on command.
GregR
> I post proof while as other post lies.
"I post proof while as other post lies".
Anyone got a clue as to what that sentence means? My 6-year old nephew can
speak English better than that.
Ryan Lankford
this onto the bathroom floor of alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>>
All you've proven is that Kent doesn't have an E-mail address with the
Des Moines Public School System. There are many school districts in
the greater Des Moines Area.
BTW, Iowa does have an Educator's database, but it's not Internet
connected. You have to call the state, tell them who you are, and
deal with them RL style.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >Heh - like we need any encouragement? :-)
> >
>
>
> The way one person (me) whips so many other people, you need all the
> encourgaement you can get.
into kiddie porn and whips, is anyone surprised?
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >It's amazing how the "Weak Minded" posters like, The Xtard & Scott
> Thomas,
> >claim some sort of "Victory" in this Newsgroup. When in all
> actualallity,
> >their information is either: forged, made-up, or is a total fabrication.
>
>
> Coming from a liar. I post proof while as other post lies.
that looked like english...I suppose I've seen worse confessions that
the spamographer lied
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >where is this database that you downloaded? Post the database for us to
> >see just like you claimed you could.
>
>
> I already posted the link dumb ass.
post proof that you posted a link for the Iowa Database of Teachers.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> >For "One" city in Iowa.
> >
> >You claimed you had the Database for the whole "STATE".
> >
>
>
> Which is located elsewhere.
meaning that you never had it. KABOOM!!!! it must really be in a strange
location that you can't post an URL for it.
> You and others are missing the big picture in
> order to avoid the fact I have proven Kent to be a liar.
the big picture is that you don't have the database, you never had the
database and once again we've proven you to be a liar.
RipCurl
You proved nothing. The only thing you proved is that Kent "may" not be
a teacher in the Des Moines area. If you want to prove he's not a
teacher, you have to list that he's not a teacher in the state of Iowa,
his state of residence.
You an be a techer in a city you do not live in, moron.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
I personally would like pictures of her when she goes on point, either
as a hunting dog or ballerina.
for ronnie the christian capon who is afraid of todays date
> On 20 Jul 2003 08:49:14 GMT, y6...@aol.comnospammm (Y6g11) squirted
> this onto the bathroom floor of alt.consumers.free-stuff:
>
>
> >>For "One" city in Iowa.
> >>
> >>You claimed you had the Database for the whole "STATE".
> >>
> >
> >Which is located elsewhere. You and others are missing the big
> picture in
> >order to avoid the fact I have proven Kent to be a liar.
>
>
> All you've proven is that Kent doesn't have an E-mail address with the
> Des Moines Public School System. There are many school districts in
> the greater Des Moines Area.
>
> BTW, Iowa does have an Educator's database, but it's not Internet
> connected. You have to call the state, tell them who you are, and
> deal with them RL style.
>
>
> Ryan Lankford
> http://www.ryan-lankford.com
>
> Got time to kill? Try these links to read about net.sorryasses:
> Richard Bullis, net.pedophile: http://www.ryan-lankford.com/cenkoc
> Brad Jesness, net.stalker and net.coward:
> http://www.ryan-lankford.com/bj_faq
>
> Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short
> phrases:
> If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops
> moving,
> subsidize it. -- Ronald Reagan
I sure hope Kent informs them that he is being stalked by a kiddie
pornographer and if anyone inquires about his "listing" he is to be
informed.
OTOH the spamnographer has as much regard for copyright as ronnie the
christian capon so maybe Iowa should be informed to expect a
hacker/cracker attack...just reread this and to think that the
spamnographer could crack anything but a fart is too laughable to consider.