Attention Don Ellis
Doc Tavish
>What was that about no one at HateWatch.com using fake names?
>
>How about Doc Tavish? It's been proven that his name is Scott Bradbury.
What concern is it of yours what my name is? You have "sock puppets"
such as Marc Kaufman and no one has made that a major issue! The
actual truth is you can't stand to have my research accessible to so
many people. You know down deep that all of my material is irrefutable
and you know that what I've found at Jewish websites distinctly shows
their hypocrisy and racism toward all of mankind.
The primary reason that I am now distributing a CD is to insure that
all of this material is spread to as many peoiple as possible- sort of
like casting one's bread upon the waters Andrew! My CD has all of my
research links, all of the critical Jewish sites to monitor, how to
access foreign servers (they really love my material) etc. and I am
paving the way for others to do likewise.
I could care less that I make you and your deceptive brethren
miserable. I indeed hope that every time you see my material that you
will wince just as if another whiplash struck you across your insolent
back. If your horde can post material that condemns Nazis then more
power to you- go ahead, that is your right- I'm no Nazi so you don't
hurt my feelings. I however don't see those that profess being Nazis
acting like your crowd.
Expect to see more Doc Tavish outlets in the future. I'm already
supplying overseas news servers with the same material and will have
Doc Tavish Libraries in Europe and Ukraine as well.
>Any other lies you wanna tell?
>Andrew Mathis
All you can do is make personal attacks Andrew and believe me from the
volumes of my e-mail many people are getting turned off to your
methods. I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
of refuting the following truth:
Forefathers of the Soviet State (Short Compilation)
EVIDENCE #1
http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=288129033
Subject: The Russian Revolution: Still inspiring after 80 years
(Reprinted from the November 8, 1997 issue of the People's
Weekly World. May be reprinted or reposted with PWW credit.
For subscription information see below)
"The Bolshevik Party (later the Communist Party) was the
party of the industrial workers in Russia.... After the revolution,
all legal restrictions were abolished, and the first Soviet President
was a Jew, Yakov Sverdlov."
************************************************************
Tired of the same old system: Join the Communist Party, USA
Info: CP...@rednet.org; or (212) 989-4994; or
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/cp-usa
************************************************************
EVIDENCE #2
[Communist Party organ declares first President of Soviet Union was a
Jew! The first Chairman appointed to the Soviet State was a Jew, a
Jew with an alias of Trotsky. Tavish]
http://www.idbsu.edu/surveyrc/Staff/jaynes/marxism/bios/trotsky.htm
Originally named Lev Davidovich Bronstein, Trotsky was born on
November 7, 1879, in Kherson Province in Ukraine, the son of Russified
Jews....
The March Revolution of 1917 caught him by surprise in New York City,
where he wrote for a Russian newspaper. Trotsky reached Russia in May,
quickly assumed leadership of the independent left Social-Democratic
Interdistrict Group, and joined the Petrograd (as St. Petersburg was
renamed) Soviet. Within weeks, he had gained enormous popularity as
the most eloquent agitator of the Soviet left. In July, after being
courted by Lenin, he joined the Bolshevik party and was elected to its
Central Committee.
As a Bolshevik, Trotsky was elected chairman of the Soviet in
September. He sided with Lenin on the need to overthrow the
provisional government and devoted all his energies to marshaling
support for the armed uprising of the Bolsheviks. With Lenin in
hiding, Trotsky was the general in charge, and he successfully
directed the masses of workers and soldiers in the November
revolution......
[How many of you think that Jew Trotsky's revolution was bloodless and
was a debate of ideas? Notice the first Chairman of the Soviet was a
Jew named Trotsky. Trotsky was also the first General and commander of
the Red "Bolshevik" Army! Tavish]
http://csf.Colorado.EDU/psn/marx/Other/Trotsky/
states:
"Lev Davidovich Bronstein. Leader of the Russian Revolution. Architect
of the Red Army. Commissar of foreign affairs between 1917-1924."
Let's see ol' Bronstein was the Leader of the Revolution and the
Architect of the Red Army too!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EVIDENCE #3
http://www.aish.org/dt-liber.htm
Society:
Where Judaism and Liberalism Part
by Rabbi Nachum Braverman
Aish HaTorah Los Angeles
It’s often considered axiomatic that Jews are politically liberal.
This impression has some basis in fact. In 1991, the National Jewish
Community Relations Council (NJCRC) identified the public agenda of
the Jewish community as activism on behalf of Israel, and Soviet and
Ethiopian Jewry, as well as "social and economic justice." ...
[ ... ]
Though many Jews are liberal this no more makes liberalism the Jewish
agenda than the prominence of Jews among Bolsheviks made Bolshevism
the Jewish agenda.
[Notice the Rabbi used the word "prominenence." Tavish]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EVIDENCE #4
http://www.jewishamerica.com/TimeLine/haskala.htm
[...]
The Czar exploits the break-offs. In their struggle against
traditional Judaism, Haskala Jews are given some privileges and
assistance, sometimes clandestinely. Some get influence in the Bureau
of Jewish Affairs and interfere with religious matters.....
A lot of Haskala Jews are ready to give up on Russia. Many channel
their energy into creating a home land of their own.
Some Haskala Jews turn to political revolution. The Russian Revolution
of the early 20th century will overthrow the Czarist government and it
will be led by a disproportionate number of Jews. The Czar that used
civil unrest against the Jews will be destroyed by it.
[Notice the "Russian Revolution... will be led by a disproportionate
number of Jews..." Tavish]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MORE EVIDENCE:
Among the Jews who remained in Russia, which then included Lithuania,
Ukraine (A History of Ukraine, Michael Hrushevsky, Yale University
Press, 1941, passim), and much of Poland, were the founders of the
Russian Bolshevik party.
In 1897 was founded the Bund, the union of Jewish workers in Poland
and Lithuania. . . They engaged in revolutionary activity upon a large
scale, and their energy made them the spearhead of the Party (Article
on "Communism" by Harold J. Laski, Encyc. Brit., Vol. III, pp
824-827).
"Individual revolutionary leaders and Sverdlov -- played a conspicuous
part in the revolution of November, 1917, which enabled the
Bolshevists to take possession of the state apparatus" (Univ. Jew.
Encyd., Vol. IX, p.668). Here and there in the Universal Jewish
Encyclopedia other Jews are named as co-founders of Russian
Communism, but not Lenin and Stalin. Both of these, however,
are said by some writers to be half-Jewish. Whatever the racial
antecedents of their top man, the first Soviet commissariats were
largely staffed with Jews. The Jewish position in the Communist
movement was well understood in Russia. "The White Armies which
opposed the Bolshevik government linked Jews and Bolsheviks
as common enemies" (Univ. Jewish Encyc., Vol. I, p. 336).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My sources said of the Jewish presence: "..the first Soviet President
was a Jew, Yakov Sverdlov." , "Lev Davidovich Bronstein, Trotsky...
the son of Russified Jews...." , "As a Bolshevik, Trotsky was elected
chairman of the Soviet... and devoted all his energies to marshaling
support for the armed uprising of the Bolsheviks" , "Lev Davidovich
Bronstein. Leader of the Russian Revolution. Architect of the Red
Army. Commissar of foreign affairs between 1917-1924." ,
"...prominence of Jews among Bolsheviks..." , "Russian Revolution...
will be led by a disproportionate number of Jews..." , and "Among the
Jews who remained in Russia, ... were the founders of the Russian
Bolshevik party."
Xrefs:
http://x2.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=364835925
http://x2.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=364606871
http://x2.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=364603566
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More whiplashes for the backs of thew wicked ones. Oh how they shall
bleed.
Doc Tavish
----
Visit the Official Doc Tavish Libraries at:
http://www.crusader.net/texts/cng/doc
http://www.hatewatch.com/tavish1.html
http://???? number 3 under construction!
Fourth Branch Being Considered!!
aem...@is2.nyu.edu
doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 1998 21:56:24 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>
> >What was that about no one at HateWatch.com using fake names?
> >
> >How about Doc Tavish? It's been proven that his name is Scott Bradbury.
>
> What concern is it of yours what my name is? You have "sock puppets"
> such as Marc Kaufman and no one has made that a major issue! The
> actual truth is you can't stand to have my research accessible to so
> many people. You know down deep that all of my material is irrefutable
> and you know that what I've found at Jewish websites distinctly shows
> their hypocrisy and racism toward all of mankind.
No. You're simply some filthy trash that gets his kicks from posting
"research" that is little but quotes taken from context and presented to fool
people. I'm not impressed. Nor do I find your "work" threatening.
>
> I could care less that I make you and your deceptive brethren
> miserable.
You don't make me miserable, but I have to wonder why you respond to me...
> I indeed hope that every time you see my material that you
> will wince just as if another whiplash struck you across your insolent
> back. If your horde can post material that condemns Nazis then more
> power to you- go ahead, that is your right- I'm no Nazi so you don't
> hurt my feelings.
If you're not a Nazi, I frankly don't know what is.
> I however don't see those that profess being Nazis
> acting like your crowd.
That's correct. My "crowd" is generally polite and judges people not on their
race or religion. Unlike you...
>
> Expect to see more Doc Tavish outlets in the future. I'm already
> supplying overseas news servers with the same material and will have
> Doc Tavish Libraries in Europe and Ukraine as well.
Bully for you.
>
> >Any other lies you wanna tell?
>
> >Andrew Mathis
>
> All you can do is make personal attacks Andrew and believe me from the
> volumes of my e-mail many people are getting turned off to your
> methods.
Get this: I don't give a rat's ass about your e-mail. It's laughable that you
accuse me of personal attacks, when that's all you *ever* do.
> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
> of refuting the following truth:
Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
[Tavish's spam snipped]
Andrew Mathis
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Doc Tavish
>In article <35f7e07b...@news.tavish-central.net>,
> doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
<snip>
>> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
>> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
>> of refuting the following truth:
>Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
No, I'm choosy about whom I associate with.
D.T.
>
>[Tavish's spam snipped]
>
>Andrew Mathis
----
Jeffrey G. Brown
Scottie (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:20:05 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>>Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
>
>No, I'm choosy about whom I associate with.
You're a gutless coward, Bradbury. _That's_ why you won't meet with Mr. Mathis.
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
Jeffrey G. Brown
a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
wrote:
>On Wed, 09 Sep 1998 21:56:24 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>
>>What was that about no one at HateWatch.com using fake names?
>>
>>How about Doc Tavish? It's been proven that his name is Scott Bradbury.
>
>What concern is it of yours what my name is?
What is important isn't your real name, per se, but the fact that you've
lied dozens of times about who you are, Gutless. That's how you got your
well-deserved nickname, after all.
And, of course, by continuing to use it, you've made a liar of your buddy
Don Ellis. Nice work, Cockroach.
>You have "sock puppets"
>such as Marc Kaufman and no one has made that a major issue!
That's because there's no evidence that Mr. Mathis uses 'Mark Kaufman' as
a sock puppet. We _know_ who 'Doc Tavish' is a sock puppet for, Gutless.
> [...deletia...]
>I indeed hope that every time you see my material that you
>will wince...
You misspelled 'laugh', Scottie. It doesn't start with a W.
> [...deletia...]
>More whiplashes for the backs of thew wicked ones. Oh how they shall
>bleed.
Dream on, Gutless. You won't even sit down with Mr. Mathis for a drink.
You lack any capacity whatsoever to raise your hand against him.
Dance, Cockroach, dance...
Doc Tavish
Brown) wrote:
>In article <35f7e07b...@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you to
>a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
>wrote:
<snip>
>>You have "sock puppets"
>>such as Marc Kaufman and no one has made that a major issue!
>That's because there's no evidence that Mr. Mathis uses 'Mark Kaufman' as
>a sock puppet. We _know_ who 'Doc Tavish' is a sock puppet for, Gutless.
Is that so? Here is the evidence and I hope you choke on it:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=385146374
From: mat...@hatewatch.org
Subject: Re: Did Marc Kaufman quit hatewatch.org like he promised?
Date: 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <6s2m5h$4tn$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
References: <35E44143...@hotmail.com>
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Aug 27 04:09:21 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/3.01Gold (Win95; I)
In article <35E44143...@hotmail.com>,
The Truth of HateWatchWatch <thetot...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Marc Kaufman, swore that he would quit hatewatch.org if Don Ellis had
> any influence whatsoever over hatewatch.org...
<snip>
> or is he like his boss, the lying homosexual David Goldman, who just
> recently took most of the money from donations to buy himself a new
> computer.
(Andrew Mathis now speaking. Tavish comment):
And you have some proof of this?
OK, here's what's what.
I'm Marc Kaufman. I've always been Marc Kaufman. I took the pseudonym
Marc Kaufman because some contract work I was under until very
recently forbid me to work for more than one web organization at a
time.
Well, now I'm back. I've sent Marc out to pasture.
Hit me with your questions, oh wise one, I'm all ears.
Andrew Mathis
Director of Research
HateWatch
http://www.hatewatch.org/
~~~End of DejaNews Archival Posting~~~
Anymore dumbass statements from a dumbass named Jeffrey G. Brown?
Don't quibble about past or present tense either Jeffrey- Mathis
is/was Kaufman! His own words too! Now you know what you can eat and
choke on too and hopefully die! :-)
>>I indeed hope that every time you see my material that you
>>will wince...
>You misspelled 'laugh', Scottie. It doesn't start with a W.
I know good and well that my posts are just like whiplashes that cut
to the bone for people such as you Jeffrey G. Brown. When I'm finished
flaying you, you won't be so cocky and obstinate. More whiplash posts
are in the offing too! You are most deserving of being consigned to
the ash heap of history along with the rest of your fellow human
debris.
Dan Parker
aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6t91o5$cjh$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>>
>> >What was that about no one at HateWatch.com using fake names?
>> >
>> >How about Doc Tavish? It's been proven that his name is Scott Bradbury.
>>
>> What concern is it of yours what my name is? You have "sock puppets"
>> such as Marc Kaufman and no one has made that a major issue! The
>> actual truth is you can't stand to have my research accessible to so
>> many people. You know down deep that all of my material is irrefutable
>> and you know that what I've found at Jewish websites distinctly shows
>> their hypocrisy and racism toward all of mankind.
>
>"research" that is little but quotes taken from context and presented to
fool
>people. I'm not impressed. Nor do I find your "work" threatening.
>
>>
>> miserable.
>
>
>> will wince just as if another whiplash struck you across your insolent
>> back. If your horde can post material that condemns Nazis then more
>> power to you- go ahead, that is your right- I'm no Nazi so you don't
>> hurt my feelings.
>
>
>> acting like your crowd.
>
their
>race or religion. Unlike you...
>
Horse manure! That's precisely what Jews do. In fact, it's interesting to
note that in whatever society the Jews gather in significant numbers, race
becomes a very important issue, even if it hadn't been before. Hitler said
he admired the Jews for their views on race.
>> Expect to see more Doc Tavish outlets in the future. I'm already
>> supplying overseas news servers with the same material and will have
>> Doc Tavish Libraries in Europe and Ukraine as well.
>
>Bully for you.
>>
>> >Any other lies you wanna tell?
>>
>> >Andrew Mathis
>>
>> All you can do is make personal attacks Andrew and believe me from the
>> volumes of my e-mail many people are getting turned off to your
>> methods.
>
>Get this: I don't give a rat's ass about your e-mail. It's laughable that
you
>accuse me of personal attacks, when that's all you *ever* do.
HA! The Jews and you wannabes do nothing but cut & paste Nikook propaganda
and make dispicable personal attacks on revisionists--or anyone who fails to
prostrate himself and bang his forehead on the ground the requisite number
of times.
>
>> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
>> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
>> of refuting the following truth:
>
>Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
Sounds like you've got something you're just dying to say.
Dan Parker
>[Tavish's spam snipped]
>
>Andrew Mathis
>
Ed Kadach
>
> In article <35f83f11....@news.tavish-central.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless
> Scottie (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:20:05 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>
> > [...deletia...]
>
> >
>
> You're a gutless coward, Bradbury. _That's_ why you won't meet with Mr. Mathis.
>
> JGB
Don't you mean the jew wannabe Marc Kaufman?
Ed kadach
Jeffrey G. Brown
doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
>Don't quibble about past or present tense either Jeffrey- Mathis
>is/was Kaufman! His own words too!
I stand corrected. Of course, there's still the little matter of your
posting _only_ under the bogus names of dozens of sock puppets...
> [...deletia...]
>I know good and well that my posts are just like whiplashes that cut
>to the bone for people such as you Jeffrey G. Brown. When I'm finished
>flaying you, you won't be so cocky and obstinate.
You utterly lack the courage to take physical action against anyone,
Gutless. By now, your ineffectual threats merit only a mild chuckle.
Jeffrey G. Brown
>In article <35f83f11....@news.tavish-central.net>,
> doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:20:05 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>> >Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
>>
>> No, I'm choosy about whom I associate with.
>
>I believe the word is "chicken-shit."
>
>What's the matter, Scott? I'm not going to *hurt* you.
Well, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie is probably afraid that some of his
homoerotic whips-and-chains fantasies are going to come true.
Either that, or he's afraid they _won't_.
Of course, Scottie has taught us that if one doesn't immediately deny X,
one must be X. Scottie didn't immediately deny being scared shitless at
actually meeting you face-to-face. Therefore, he must be scared shitless
at actually meeting you face-to-face.
Isn't that how it works, O Gutless One?
aem...@is2.nyu.edu
doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:20:05 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>
>
> >> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
> >> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
> >> of refuting the following truth:
>
>
> No, I'm choosy about whom I associate with.
I believe the word is "chicken-shit."
What's the matter, Scott? I'm not going to *hurt* you.
Andrew Mathis
HyperReal-Anon
>Path: pln!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!
>newshub.northeast.verio.net!europa.clark.net!209.69.36.218!
>news1.ispnews.com!news11.ispnews.com!
>news14.ispnews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
>From: "Dan Parker" <dpa...@intrstar.net>
>Subject: Re: Attention Don Ellis
> aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6t91o5$cjh$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
> >In article <35f7e07b...@news.tavish-central.net>,
> > doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
> >> On Wed, 09 Sep 1998 21:56:24 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>>>>CUT<<<<
> >> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
> >> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
> >> of refuting the following truth:
> >Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
> Sounds like you've got something you're just dying to say.
Andrew either desires to perform homosexual acts on Doc Tavish or else he is
planning to have him assassinated. Both outcomes are typical of Jews. Notice
Andrew did say: "You're simply some filthy trash that gets his kicks from
posting "research" that is little but quotes taken from context and
presented to fool people. I'm not impressed." I'd hardly say that his
invitation is exactly offered in order to be sociable would you?
Judging by Mathis' effeminate web site photo I'd say it's probably the first
option.
aem...@is2.nyu.edu
"Dan Parker" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>
> aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6t91o5$cjh$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
> >> I however don't see those that profess being Nazis
> >> acting like your crowd.
> >
> >That's correct. My "crowd" is generally polite and judges people not on
> their
> >race or religion. Unlike you...
> >
>
> Horse manure! That's precisely what Jews do. In fact, it's interesting to
> note that in whatever society the Jews gather in significant numbers, race
> becomes a very important issue, even if it hadn't been before. Hitler said
> he admired the Jews for their views on race.
Please provide this source on Hitler. While I await that, I'll remind you
that race is only an important issue to pinheads, the presence of Jews
notwithstanding. But then, perhaps you can offer three examples of Jews
"gathering in significant numbers" causing race to "become a very important
issue."
>
> >> All you can do is make personal attacks Andrew and believe me from the
> >> volumes of my e-mail many people are getting turned off to your
> >> methods.
> >
> >Get this: I don't give a rat's ass about your e-mail. It's laughable that
> you
> >accuse me of personal attacks, when that's all you *ever* do.
>
> HA! The Jews and you wannabes do nothing but cut & paste Nikook propaganda
> and make dispicable personal attacks on revisionists--or anyone who fails to
> prostrate himself and bang his forehead on the ground the requisite number
> of times.
Scott Bradbury is the cut & paste *king*. All he *ever* does is repost old
posts of his own....some of them are absolutely huge. He gets constant
complaints to stop spamming his garbage all over Usenet, but he's either too
young and stupid or too old and ignorant to stop.
>
> >
> >> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
> >> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
> >> of refuting the following truth:
> >
> >Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
>
> Sounds like you've got something you're just dying to say.
That some kind of threat?
Dan Parker
aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6t9tn5$nhr$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>In article <35f83f11....@news.tavish-central.net>,
> doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:20:05 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
>> >> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
>> >> of refuting the following truth:
>>
>>
>
>I believe the word is "chicken-shit."
>
>What's the matter, Scott? I'm not going to *hurt* you.
>
>Andrew Mathis
But there's no reliable way for him to know what communicable social
diseases you might be carrying. You're going to want to shake hands and who
knows where your hands have been, or what kinds of oozing lesions you might
have on you?
You might pick your nose and eat it. It would be embarrasing as hell to be
in public with someone who had some bizzare, repugnant habit. Your mental
flatulence exhibited on USENET might have its genesis in a real physical
flatulence. You might have a very bad odor about you; maybe you're
incontinent. Could you release your medical records and a full psychological
evaluation first?
There are any number of good reasons for not wanting to meet you in public,
and I'm sure a private meeting would just be out of the question.
Dan Parker
Dan Parker
aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6ta4m1$ml$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>> >
>> >Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
>>
>
>That some kind of threat?
>
>Andrew Mathis
>
No. But you can't seem to understand why someone might have a revulsion to
meeting with a known homosexual. And after
several polite hints that meeting you would be undesirable, you're
unrelenting in your pursuit of the matter. It seems to be a matter of life
and death urgency with you. That's all I was saying.
Dan Parker
Jeffrey G. Brown
i...@global.plantation.org (ZOG) wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:36:09 GMT, Doc Tavish
<doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>The primary reason that I am now distributing a CD is to insure that
>>all of this material is spread to as many peoiple as possible- sort of
>
>Will you also be distributing the many articles which have revealed
>your flawed "reasoning," lies, distortions, and complete and utter
>hyprocrisy?
Good question.
Hey, Gutless, here's another: Are you planning to include your 'Mark
Rosenberg' forgeries and subsequent expose of same?
Thought not.
Dance, cockroach, dance!
Anonymous
> Path: spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!jeff_brown
> From: jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
>
> In article <slrn6vi4i...@unix3.netaxs.com>,
> i...@global.plantation.org (ZOG) wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:36:09 GMT, Doc Tavish
> <doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com> wrote:
> >>The primary reason that I am now distributing a CD is to insure that
> >>all of this material is spread to as many peoiple as possible- sort of
> >
> >Will you also be distributing the many articles which have revealed
> >your flawed "reasoning," lies, distortions, and complete and utter
> >hyprocrisy?
>
> Good question.
>
> Hey, Gutless, here's another: Are you planning to include your 'Mark
> Rosenberg' forgeries and subsequent expose of same?
You never proved that Doc posted what you accuse him of. Do you have
access to ISP logs which prove that he did it or are you making charges
that you can't support with legal evidence that would stand up in a
court of law. If you can't provide evidence of your charges then I'd
say that you are slandering Doc.
>
> Thought not.
>
> Dance, cockroach, dance!
That CD seems to have all of you bastards upset. Why is this so?
Do you fear what Doc offers is another nail in the coffin of the
Jewish Bolshevik stranglehold over the minds of the masses with
their propaganda? If Doc's CD were of no threat then you and your
brothers wouldn't be wailing so much. You only reveal much about
yourself cock sucker!
lcs Mixmaster Remailer
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 20:55:35 -0400
> Organization: none
> Lines: 23
> Message-ID: <jeff_brown-10...@38.27.216.252>
> References: <6t6ti8$gvj$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com> >
<35f7e07b...@news.tavish-central.net> >
<jeff_brown-10...@38.27.217.96> >
<35f86057....@news.tavish-central.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-423.newsdawg.com
> X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4
> In article <35f86057....@news.tavish-central.net>,
> doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
>
> >Don't quibble about past or present tense either Jeffrey- Mathis
> >is/was Kaufman! His own words too!
>
> I stand corrected.
This is a first. The old pedophile admits that he's been bested!
This day should be declared a holiday! Doc bested you nitwit and
now you need to apologize to him for acting like a dork. Are you
man enough to apologize or will you always be a gutless cock
sucking dork?
Brian Blank
Tavish) wrote:
>
>I know good and well that my posts are just like whiplashes that cut
>to the bone for people such as you Jeffrey G. Brown. When I'm finished
>flaying you, you won't be so cocky and obstinate. More whiplash posts
>are in the offing too! You are most deserving of being consigned to
>the ash heap of history along with the rest of your fellow human
>debris.
>
> Doc Tavish
Quite apart from your obvious ill knowledge of the English language,
the only conclusion that can be reached from this post is that you do
not consider yourself human.
I am sure that is a majority opinion amongst those who read this.
Regards,
Brian Blank
Anonymous
> From: aem...@is2.nyu.edu
> Subject: Re: Attention Don Ellis
>
> In article <35f83f11....@news.tavish-central.net>,
> doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:20:05 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
> >
> > >In article <35f7e07b...@news.tavish-central.net>,
> > > doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > >> I'd say that what is happening is sort of a geometric
> > >> progression. Now make your usual personal attacks against me instead
> > >> of refuting the following truth:
> >
> >
> I believe the word is "chicken-shit."
>
> What's the matter, Scott? I'm not going to *hurt* you.
>
> Andrew Mathis
All you want to do is suck his cock right? Why else would you be
asking him to have a drink other than you are out cruising?
You are a sneaky little shit.
aem...@is2.nyu.edu
"Dan Parker" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>
> aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6ta4m1$ml$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >That some kind of threat?
> >
> >Andrew Mathis
> >
>
> No. But you can't seem to understand why someone might have a revulsion to
> meeting with a known homosexual.
I don't. That's why I'm willing to meet with Scott Bradbury.
> And after
> several polite hints that meeting you would be undesirable, you're
> unrelenting in your pursuit of the matter.
Nah, just eager.
> It seems to be a matter of life
> and death urgency with you. That's all I was saying.
Which didn't amount to much.
Andrew Mathis
Anonymous
Subject: Re: What Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie won't tell you
Message-ID: <MPG.10635a364...@news.shore.net>
References: <6t6ti8$gvj$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
<7714b7ca589abe6c...@anonymous.poster>
Organization: General Products
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.10
> In article <7714b7ca589abe6c...@anonymous.poster>,
> an...@squirrel.owl.de says...
> > > From: jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
> > >
> > > In article <slrn6vi4i...@unix3.netaxs.com>,
> > > i...@global.plantation.org (ZOG) wrote:
> > >
> > > <doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com> wrote:
> > > >>The primary reason that I am now distributing a CD is to insure
that
> > > >>all of this material is spread to as many peoiple as possible-
> > > >Will you also be distributing the many articles which have revealed
> > > >your flawed "reasoning," lies, distortions, and complete and utter
> > > >hyprocrisy?
> > > Good question.
> > > Hey, Gutless, here's another: Are you planning to include your 'Mark
> > > Rosenberg' forgeries and subsequent expose of same?
> >You never proved that Doc posted what you accuse him of.
> That's a blatant lie. The proof that "Sieg Heil" Scottie was "Mark
> Rosenblatt" and posted S&M pics to discussion NGs as "proof" of "Israeli
> attrocities" has been posted repeatedly and is compelling. "Sieg Heil"
> Scottie, of course, has never been man enough to comment on it.
Let us all see your proof. You only make accusation yet you offer no proof.
Now you back pedal when you are challenged to present the proof that would
be admissable in a court of law. Are you up to it? Your saying so is not
credible evidence.
> >Do you have
> >access to ISP logs which prove that he did it or are you making charges
> >that you can't support with legal evidence that would stand up in a
> >court of law. If you can't provide evidence of your charges then I'd
> >say that you are slandering
> Proof has been posted to this NG many times.
I haven't seen it.
> > Doc.
> Why are you talking about yourself in third person, Scottie?
I am not your Scottie.
> ["Sieg Heil" Scottie's remaining silliness snipped]
>
> BTW, Scottie, are you ever going to tell us why you saw the need to fake
> your own death?
You'll have to ask him. Now let us see your solid proof of your accusations.
I want to see entries from the issuing ISP's logs which would substantiate
your accusations. Do you have such proof?
> allan
Jeffrey G. Brown
>aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6ta4m1$ml$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>>> >
>>> >Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
>>>
>>> Sounds like you've got something you're just dying to say.
>>
>>That some kind of threat?
>>
>>Andrew Mathis
>
>No. But you can't seem to understand why someone might have a revulsion to
>meeting with a known homosexual.
And your evidence that Mr. Mathis is a 'known homosexual' is... what, exactly?
Jeffrey G. Brown
>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>matter that I'm under age either!
False. Mr. Mathis hasn't stated that he wants to "date" Poor Ol' Gutless
Scottie. Nor did he state that "it doesn't matter that [Scottie is] under
age either". Both lies are inventions of the homosexually-obsessed mind of
Scott Bradbury.
Jeffrey G. Brown
>If Andrew thinks I have a penis fetish then why is he so interested in
>me to the point he wants me to meet him for a drink? Think about it
>now!
Simple: To demonstrate that you lack the nerve to meet one of your
detractors face-to-face. Your cowardice has been once more confirmed.
Dance, Cockroach, dance!
Jeffrey G. Brown
>On Sat, 12 Sep 1998 18:54:15 -0400, jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G.
>Brown) wrote:
>
>>In article <35faf25f....@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you
>>to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>>>matter that I'm under age either!
>>
>>False. Mr. Mathis hasn't stated that he wants to "date" Poor Ol' Gutless
>>Scottie. Nor did he state that "it doesn't matter that [Scottie is] under
>>age either". Both lies are inventions of the homosexually-obsessed mind of
>>Scott Bradbury.
>>
>>JGB
>
>Let the lurkers decide Jeffrey! Why did you delete critical parts of
>the post? Here is what was said and let the lurkers decide who is homo
>and who is lying!
Everyone but you knows how to follow a thread, Scottie. If you repost the
same dreck twice in under thirty minutes, it's still dreck.
The simple facts are these: You accuse Mr. Mathis of 'wanting to "date"'
you. He didn't ask for a "date".
You accuse Mr. Mathis of saying that "it doesn't matter that [you are]
under age either". He never made any such statement.
You're lying, Scottie, and transparently so.
> [...deletia...]
>"I belong to NAMBLA and I am gay; I can butt fuck
>little boys all day." -- attrib Jeffrey G. Brown
"Where is your proof? Can you present ISP logs which prove your
accusation? I think not loud mouth imbecile."
-- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
-- Subject: Re: Jeffrey G Brown - What have you done with *.Tavish?
-- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 16:46:19 GMT
-- Message-ID: <35f6a419...@news.tavish-central.net>
"Do you have access to ISP logs which prove that he did it or are
you making charges that you can't support with legal evidence that
would stand up in a court of law. If you can't provide evidence of
your charges then I'd say that you are slandering..."
-- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
-- Subject: Re: What Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie won't tell you
-- Date: 11 Sep 1998 17:20:44 -0000
-- Message-ID: <1998091117204...@hades.rpini.com>
"I want to see entries from the issuing ISP's logs which would
substantiate your accusations. Do you have such proof?"
-- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
-- Subject: Re: What Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie won't tell you
-- Date: 11 Sep 1998 23:40:02 -0000
-- Message-ID: <1998091123400...@nym.alias.net>
"There is no debating people like you. You only seek to libel,
slander and smear."
-- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
-- Subject: Re: Jeffrey G Brown - What have you done with *.Tavish?
-- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 16:46:19 GMT
-- Message-ID: <35f6a419...@news.tavish-central.net>
Jeffrey G. Brown
>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>matter that I'm under age either! Are you paying attention FBI?
The simple facts are these: You accuse Mr. Mathis of 'wanting to "date"'
you. He didn't ask for a "date".
You accuse Mr. Mathis of saying that "it doesn't matter that [you are]
under age either". He never made any such statement.
You're lying, Scottie, and transparently so.
JGB
Jeffrey G. Brown
Dan Parker
Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>In article <35fb1a76....@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you
>to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
>wrote:
>
>>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>>matter that I'm under age either! Are you paying attention FBI?
>
>The simple facts are these: You accuse Mr. Mathis of 'wanting to "date"'
>you. He didn't ask for a "date".
>
>You accuse Mr. Mathis of saying that "it doesn't matter that [you are]
>under age either". He never made any such statement.
>
>You're lying, Scottie, and transparently so.
>
>JGB
>
Doc's assessment of Mathis' sexual orientation is well founded, Brown. Take
a look at Mathis' comments to one of my older posts:
Dan Parker wrote :
> All too readily they resort to threats of physical violence--even while
> they are denying that they do that sort of thing. Yet, I dare say a
> single one of them actually has the courage to carry through on his
> threat unless he can get a gang of street hooligans to stand in for
> him or unless a gang of his denier comrades can corner an old man
> (Robert Faurisson) or an old woman (Lady Jane Birdwood of England;
> 84 years old) and then they try their utmost to bludgeon them to death.
> Not a one of these who've made their threats, either on the internet or
> by getting someone's phone number and calling their house (!) has the
> intestinal fortitude to take a virile man on, one-on-one.
Andrew Mathis responed:
Wanna dance?
Dan Parker continued:
> Deniers! You rabid dingos are just a bunch of deniers--that vile and hated
> creature whose deaths you've all wished for. You are what you hate most,
> you deniers, you.
To which, Andrew Mathis then wrote:
Oh, you big man.
Mathis continued soliciting definitions for the words "communist,"
"Zionist," etc.:
Tell you what: If you can define the terms above, please do. Then we'll
talk.
Andrew Mathis
When one man asks another if he wants to dance, and makes comments like "oh,
you big man," he's a fag, plain and simple. Real
men just don't talk like that. Those kinds of sentences won't even enter
their mind. Mathis is obssessively insistent upon meeting Doc for a drink.
Asking a man to meet you for a drink is not queer in and of itself, but
Mathis has a very feminine way of pressing the issue after his invitation
has been declined. No self-respecting heterosexual man is going to meet a
strange faggot for a drink.
Brown, you and Mathis can continue with your desperate attempts to twist and
distort and make a lie seem the truth--after all, that is your stock in
trade--but that dog ain't going to hunt. There are too many people here
witness to the whole business and they're not as stupid as you Nizkooks and
HateWatchers wish they were.
Dan Parker
Jeffrey G. Brown
<dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>>In article <35fb1a76....@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you
>>to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>>>matter that I'm under age either! Are you paying attention FBI?
>>
>>The simple facts are these: You accuse Mr. Mathis of 'wanting to "date"'
>>you. He didn't ask for a "date".
>>
>>You accuse Mr. Mathis of saying that "it doesn't matter that [you are]
>>under age either". He never made any such statement.
>>
>>You're lying, Scottie, and transparently so.
>>
>>JGB
>>
>
>Doc's assessment of Mathis' sexual orientation is well founded, Brown.
Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie's assessment of Mr. Mathis' sexual orientation is
predicated upon lies that Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie has himself
promulgated.
Doc Tavish
Brown) wrote:
>In article <35faf25f....@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you
>to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
>wrote:
>
>>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>>matter that I'm under age either!
>
>False. Mr. Mathis hasn't stated that he wants to "date" Poor Ol' Gutless
>Scottie. Nor did he state that "it doesn't matter that [Scottie is] under
>age either". Both lies are inventions of the homosexually-obsessed mind of
>Scott Bradbury.
>
>JGB
Let the lurkers decide Jeffrey! Why did you delete critical parts of
the post? Here is what was said and let the lurkers decide who is homo
and who is lying!
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998 22:34:30 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>In article <LV8K1.50$JO2.1...@news14.ispnews.com>,
> "Dan Parker" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>> aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote in message <6ta4m1$ml$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>> >> >
>> >> >Can we do this over a drink next weekend?
Andrew above trying to make a "date."
Dan Parker makes an honest observation:
>> >> Sounds like you've got something you're just dying to say.
>> >That some kind of threat?
Andrew acting typically feminine and reacting to a simple question as
if it is a threat.
>> >Andrew Mathis
Dan Parker again makes an honest observation:
>> No. But you can't seem to understand why someone might have a revulsion to
>> meeting with a known homosexual.
Andrew Mathis making false implications:
>I don't. That's why I'm willing to meet with Scott Bradbury.
YOU are the one asking a male out to have drinks Andrew and I
declined. Now you are ACTing UP because I declined you. I don't have
dealings with homosexuals but yet you accuse me of being one and then
ask me to have a drink with you! Anyone reading this will say that you
are the one making advances to another male and it is not me.
Dan Parker again with wisdom said:
>> And after
>> several polite hints that meeting you would be undesirable, you're
>> unrelenting in your pursuit of the matter.
Andrew's female hormones fire his cravings for another male:
>Nah, just eager.
Here you are admitting that you are "eager" too! You are eager to have
a drink with another male that you have accused of being homosexual.
This speaks volumes of you Andrew! I mean it really does! You have
definitely outed yourself on this I guarantee! Is this why you and
Jeffrey G. Brown get along so well? Anyone doubting Andrew Mathis
being effeminate need only look at his mug shot at his web site!
http://pages.nyu.edu/~aem0608/
Doc Tavish Declining ACT UP & The Homosexual Community Daily
<snip>
>Andrew Mathis
BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
matter that I'm under age either! Are you paying attention FBI? Does
not the agency have a distinct policy on pedophile Chicken Hawks
seeking under aged minors as prey?
From: aem...@is2.nyu.edu
Subject: Re: Jeffrey G. Brown Accuses BUT Can't Back His Charges With
Evidence! aka Re: Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie again shows us what's
always on his 'mind'
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 01:25:30 GMT
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
Message-ID: <6t9u6a$o7u$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
References: <35F5BC...@earthlink.net>
<199809091940...@nym.alias.net>
<jeff_brown-09...@38.27.216.25>
<35f846fc....@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
<snip>
Scott, your postured indignation impresses no one. With your obvious
penis fetish, you're quite obviously either: a) a teenager who needs a
girlfriend; b) impotent; or my favorite, c) both.
Andrew Mathis
P.S. If you *are* underaged, by the way, I'd be more than happy to
meet you in a coffee shop as opposed to a place that serves alcohol.
---== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
My reply to Andrew's offer:
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: Re: Jeffrey G. Brown Accuses BUT Can't Back His Charges With
Evidence! aka Re: Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie again shows us what's
always on his 'mind'
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 22:10:08 GMT
Organization: McTavish Informational Services Worldwide
Message-ID: <35faf097....@news.tavish-central.net>
References: <35F5BC...@earthlink.net>
<199809091940...@nym.alias.net>
<jeff_brown-09...@38.27.216.25>
<35f846fc....@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
<6t9u6a$o7u$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
<snip>
>Andrew Mathis
>
>P.S. If you *are* underaged, by the way, I'd be more than happy to meet you
>in a coffee shop as opposed to a place that serves alcohol.
So is this a back door admission that you are a child molester? You'd
still want to meet me (or is it meat me) after finding out that I'm
underage? No wonder you and Jeffrey G. Brown have hit it off so
well. Birds of a feather flock together as all should know!
D.T.
~~ End ~~
Now I ask folks, who is after who? Also did you all notice that Andrew
had stated: "With your obvious penis fetish, you're quite obviously
either: a) a teenager who needs a girlfriend; b) impotent; or my
favorite, c) both." and then says: "P.S. If you *are* underaged, by
the way, I'd be more than happy to meet you in a coffee shop as
opposed to a place that serves alcohol."? Now does Andrew or does
Andrew not have all the makings of a faggot? Be honest now!
If Andrew thinks I have a penis fetish then why is he so interested in
me to the point he wants me to meet him for a drink? Think about it
now!
Hear is more revealing info about Andrew and it supports what my own
dad told me about "Commie Fags."
http://x10.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=346045811.2
http://pages.nyu.edu/clubs/socialists/guide.html
Introduction to Socialists at NYU
Socialists at NYU is an all-campus club involved in political action
from a democratic socialist perspective. This club is for students and
faculty at NYU who want to participate in our educational and activist
work.
Notice again: "This club is for students and faculty at NYU who want
to participate in our educational and activist work."
[The faculty is involved! What else needs to be said!?!?! Tavish]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comrade Andrew telling us that he attends "Socialist" NYU:
http://x10.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=174466965
Subject: Re: Sign up for the WORLD famous Zgrams,more of a reason
to sign on.
From: fr...@panix.com (Andrew Mathis)
Date: 1996/08/16
[...]
"Perhaps it didn't occur to you that I may be faculty or staff at NYU.
As it happens, I'm a grad student, and I also hold down a full-time
job and a part-time job."
~~~~~~~~~ End ~~~~~~~~~
Here is Andrew Mathis admitting to Marxist influemce right on campus!
Thank you Andrew for not being as hard headed as Allan Matthews! He
denies Marxist indoctrination in American universities.
http://x6.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=349918598
Subject: Tavish Idiocy for April
From: aem...@is2.nyu.edu
Date: 1998/05/03
Message-ID: <6iiqfp$ok0$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Tavish has only introduced one new piece of idiocy this month worth
addressing: That NYU is a "Marxist" university because there is a
Marxist on the faculty.
First, most schools have Marxists on the faculty: either in the
Economics dept., the Philosophy dept. or both.
Second, NYU has one of the finest business schools in the country, the
Leonard N. Stern School of Business, endowed by the CEO of the Hartz
Corporation (manufacturer of pet products), who is a graduate of this
school. Stern sends hundreds of students each year to Wall Street, and
its finance dept. is considered the fifth best in the nation. It is a
bastion of capitalism. The Law School is also primarily concerned with
corporate law given its proximity to the World Financial Center.
Get a clue, Doc.
Andrew Mathis
[Isn't Stern a Jewish name Andrew? Tavish]
-----== Posted via Deja News ==-----
Be sure to read these links as well:
http://x6.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=343776554
Subject: >>Did Andrew Mathis Pickup His "Socialism" at NYU?<<
Dedicated to Yale Edeiken and His Fellow Socialists\Communists
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish)
Date: 1998/04/14
Message-ID: <3532bbcd....@news.tavish-central.net>
http://x6.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=346429660
Subject: Product of American University System in Denial (was
Soviet style smear Re: "Sieg Heil" Scottie once more parades his
ignorance and libels for all to see)
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish)
Date: 1998/04/21
Message-ID: <353d1236....@news.tavish-central.net>
Doc Tavish
>> >Andrew Mathis
<snip>
>Andrew Mathis
<snip>
Andrew Mathis
<snip>
D.T.
~~ End ~~
Here is more revealing info about Andrew and it supports what my own
aem...@is2.nyu.edu
"Dan Parker" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
> Doc's assessment of Mathis' sexual orientation is well founded, Brown. Take
> a look at Mathis' comments to one of my older posts:
>
> Dan Parker wrote :
> > All too readily they resort to threats of physical violence--even while
> > they are denying that they do that sort of thing. Yet, I dare say a
> > single one of them actually has the courage to carry through on his
> > threat unless he can get a gang of street hooligans to stand in for
> > him or unless a gang of his denier comrades can corner an old man
> > (Robert Faurisson) or an old woman (Lady Jane Birdwood of England;
> > 84 years old) and then they try their utmost to bludgeon them to death.
> > Not a one of these who've made their threats, either on the internet or
> > by getting someone's phone number and calling their house (!) has the
> > intestinal fortitude to take a virile man on, one-on-one.
>
> Andrew Mathis responed:
> Wanna dance?
>
> Dan Parker continued:
> > Deniers! You rabid dingos are just a bunch of deniers--that vile and hated
> > creature whose deaths you've all wished for. You are what you hate most,
> > you deniers, you.
>
> To which, Andrew Mathis then wrote:
> Oh, you big man.
>
> Mathis continued soliciting definitions for the words "communist,"
> "Zionist," etc.:
Which, of course, you're unable to do.
>
> Tell you what: If you can define the terms above, please do. Then we'll
> talk.
> Andrew Mathis
>
> When one man asks another if he wants to dance, and makes comments like "oh,
> you big man," he's a fag, plain and simple.
Actually, where I come from (New York), asking another man to dance is an
invitation to fistfight. Calling someone, a "big man" implies they are
anything but.
> Real
> men just don't talk like that. Those kinds of sentences won't even enter
> their mind.
Depends where you come from, I guess...
> Mathis is obssessively insistent upon meeting Doc for a drink.
> Asking a man to meet you for a drink is not queer in and of itself,
Really? You've never had a beer w/a friend in a bar? Many you have no friends?
> but
> Mathis has a very feminine way of pressing the issue after his invitation
> has been declined. No self-respecting heterosexual man is going to meet a
> strange faggot for a drink.
Unless, of course, that man is a closet homosexual himself in the midst of a
deep panic, or a homophobe prone to violence.
>
> Brown, you and Mathis can continue with your desperate attempts to twist and
> distort and make a lie seem the truth--after all, that is your stock in
> trade--but that dog ain't going to hunt.
See, now this statement means little or nothing to me. "Local color" I guess.
> There are too many people here
> witness to the whole business and they're not as stupid as you Nizkooks and
> HateWatchers wish they were.
Really. From what I've seen on three or so years of debating filth like you,
you make a stupid statement, get disproved, and then hurl insults. Really
impressive.
Now, are you going to define those terms?
Doc Tavish
Brown) wrote:
I, Doc Tavish, did write:
>>>>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>>>>matter that I'm under age either!
Jeffrey G. Brown perpetuates the lie that Andrew hadn't outed himself:
>>>False. Mr. Mathis hasn't stated that he wants to "date" Poor Ol' Gutless
>>>Scottie. Nor did he state that "it doesn't matter that [Scottie is] under
>>>age either". Both lies are inventions of the homosexually-obsessed mind of
>>>Scott Bradbury.
>>>
>>>JGB
>>Let the lurkers decide Jeffrey! Why did you delete critical parts of
>>the post? Here is what was said and let the lurkers decide who is homo
>>and who is lying!
Jeffrey now loses his mind and pukes:
>Everyone but you knows how to follow a thread, Scottie. If you repost the
>same dreck twice in under thirty minutes, it's still dreck.
You're a fine one to allude that another person capable of following a
thread! Lookey here:
>> [...deletia...]
>
>>"I belong to NAMBLA and I am gay; I can butt fuck
>>little boys all day." -- attrib Jeffrey G. Brown
Where did I bring that up? Does any lurker see me mentioning Jeffrey
being a butt fucker in the post that he is supposedly replying to? Who
can't follow a thread? Jeffrey, I'd bet if someone were to cut your
head open a bunch of little dicks would fall out because that is all
you seem to have on your mind.
> "Where is your proof? Can you present ISP logs which prove your
> accusation? I think not loud mouth imbecile."
The words you posted above had "attrib" in them which means attributed
to NOT that you factually posted it! You had better get some help for
your pedophilia because it is making you see things that aren't there!
>
> -- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
> -- Subject: Re: Jeffrey G Brown - What have you done with *.Tavish?
> -- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 16:46:19 GMT
> -- Message-ID: <35f6a419...@news.tavish-central.net>
>
> "Do you have access to ISP logs which prove that he did it or are
> you making charges that you can't support with legal evidence that
> would stand up in a court of law. If you can't provide evidence of
> your charges then I'd say that you are slandering..."
>
> -- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
> -- Subject: Re: What Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie won't tell you
> -- Date: 11 Sep 1998 17:20:44 -0000
> -- Message-ID: <1998091117204...@hades.rpini.com>
>
> "I want to see entries from the issuing ISP's logs which would
> substantiate your accusations. Do you have such proof?"
>
> -- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
> -- Subject: Re: What Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie won't tell you
> -- Date: 11 Sep 1998 23:40:02 -0000
> -- Message-ID: <1998091123400...@nym.alias.net>
>
> "There is no debating people like you. You only seek to libel,
> slander and smear."
>
> -- From: Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com)
> -- Subject: Re: Jeffrey G Brown - What have you done with *.Tavish?
> -- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 16:46:19 GMT
> -- Message-ID: <35f6a419...@news.tavish-central.net>
What oh what is Jeffrey gnashing his teeth about? Where in my post did
I mention Jeffrey being a member of NAMBLA? Do you now finally have a
guilty conscience? Are you now trying to fabricate material to assault
me with? What is your problem Jeffrey?
>
>JGB
>
>=====================================================================
>Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
> "What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
---
"I am the "person who is consistently stalking and mailing and posting
about persons" that "Paul Brendon" complains of." --- Jeffrey G. Brown
http://x7.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=190709942
<jgb...@earthlink.net>
Doc Tavish
Brown) wrote:
>In article <V1HK1.150$_06.6...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker"
><dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>
>>Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>>>In article <35fb1a76....@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you
>>>to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
>>>>matter that I'm under age either! Are you paying attention FBI?
>>>
>>>The simple facts are these: You accuse Mr. Mathis of 'wanting to "date"'
>>>you. He didn't ask for a "date".
>>>
>>>You accuse Mr. Mathis of saying that "it doesn't matter that [you are]
>>>under age either". He never made any such statement.
>>>
>>>You're lying, Scottie, and transparently so.
>>>
>>>JGB
>>>
>>
>>Doc's assessment of Mathis' sexual orientation is well founded, Brown.
>
>Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie's assessment of Mr. Mathis' sexual orientation is
>predicated upon lies that Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie has himself
>promulgated.
What lies? Andrew Mathis is documented as asking men out to have a
drink and to dance! If that isn't homo then what is? I actually think
that you have taken quite a liking to Andrew! Why else would you be so
eager to get involved and defend him? Is he not capable of taking
responsibity for his own words?
Did Andrew or did Andrew not ask of men:
"Can we do this over a drink next weekend?" ; "Wanna dance?" or
"Oh, you big man."
Andrew Mathis <aem...@is2.nyu.edu>
<6ta4m1$ml$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
http://x12.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=390566739
Andrew Mathis <aem...@is2.nyu.edu>
<6sn6f4$llo$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=387622389
Looks pretty fagatial to me Jeffrey! Why are you so defensive for
Andrew? Is there some sort of relationship 'twixt you two that we
should know about?
Doc Tavish
>JGB
---
"Among the Jews who remained in Russia, which then included
Lithuania, Ukraine, and much of Poland, were the founders of
the Russian Bolshevik party." (A History of Ukraine, Michael
Hrushevsky, Yale University Press, 1941, passim)
Doc Tavish
>In article <V1HK1.150$_06.6...@news6.ispnews.com>,
> "Dan Parker" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>
>> Doc's assessment of Mathis' sexual orientation is well founded, Brown. Take
>> a look at Mathis' comments to one of my older posts:
>>
>> Dan Parker wrote :
>> > All too readily they resort to threats of physical violence--even while
>> > they are denying that they do that sort of thing. Yet, I dare say a
>> > single one of them actually has the courage to carry through on his
>> > threat unless he can get a gang of street hooligans to stand in for
>> > him or unless a gang of his denier comrades can corner an old man
>> > (Robert Faurisson) or an old woman (Lady Jane Birdwood of England;
>> > 84 years old) and then they try their utmost to bludgeon them to death.
>> > Not a one of these who've made their threats, either on the internet or
>> > by getting someone's phone number and calling their house (!) has the
>> > intestinal fortitude to take a virile man on, one-on-one.
>>
>> Andrew Mathis responded:
>> Wanna dance?
>>
>> Dan Parker continued:
>> > Deniers! You rabid dingos are just a bunch of deniers--that vile and hated
>> > creature whose deaths you've all wished for. You are what you hate most,
>> > you deniers, you.
>>
>> To which, Andrew Mathis then wrote:
>> Oh, you big man.
>>
>> Mathis continued soliciting definitions for the words "communist,"
>> "Zionist," etc.:
>Which, of course, you're unable to do.
>> Tell you what: If you can define the terms above, please do. Then we'll
>> talk.
>> Andrew Mathis
>> When one man asks another if he wants to dance, and makes comments like "oh,
>> you big man," he's a fag, plain and simple.
>Actually, where I come from (New York), asking another man to dance is an
>invitation to fistfight. Calling someone, a "big man" implies they are
>anything but.
Yes Andrew has threatened to beat others up too! Look:
http://x4.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=210478515
From: Doc Tavish <tav...@phoenix.net>
Subject: I Wasn't Called Lurch for Nothing!
Date: 18 Jan 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <32E111...@phoenix.net>
references: <5bkdoe$esq$3...@news.nyu.edu>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Phoenix DataNet
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: tav...@phoenix.net
newsgroups:
alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.white-power
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win16; U)
Xref: http://x7.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=210335559
Andrew Mathis wrote:
>
> Oh, and a word to Doc: If you have any balls at all, you'd call me a
> Nazi to my face (I'm not that hard to find); then I'd beat you like a
> red-headed step child.
>
> Note that since this is conditionally stated, it is not a threat.
[Going by the standards that Jeffrey G. Brown uses you have threatened
to beat me up. You made a threat of violence and that is all I see!
Tavish Sept. 13, 1998 (You're a real meanie Andrew!)]
> A.M.
Andrew, I promise you, you are the least threatening of all. I can't
believe that you would offer to beat me like a red-headed step child
when you have never seen me! Andrew if I were to "charge" you- you
would defecate in your pants and keel over. I wasn't called Lurch in
Junior High for nothing! Now be a good boy and stop being such a
little squid and pest.
Doc Tavish
~~End of DejaNews Archival Postsing~~
Dan Parker once again wisely observes:
>> Real men just don't talk like that. Those kinds of sentences won't even enter
>> their mind.
>Depends where you come from, I guess...
Dan and I aren't from the Gay Community if that's what you mean.
>> Mathis is obssessively insistent upon meeting Doc for a drink.
I'd bet he'd try to slip me a "date rape" drug and then try to have
his way with me!
>> Asking a man to meet you for a drink is not queer in and of itself,
>Really? You've never had a beer w/a friend in a bar? Many you have no friends?
You've already reliably indicated that you're no friend Andrew!
>> but Mathis has a very feminine way of pressing the issue after his invitation
>> has been declined. No self-respecting heterosexual man is going to meet a
>> strange faggot for a drink.
>Unless, of course, that man is a closet homosexual himself in the midst of a
>deep panic, or a homophobe prone to violence.
You are seeking to transfer your own lusts and desires to others
Andrew.
>> Brown, you and Mathis can continue with your desperate attempts to twist and
>> distort and make a lie seem the truth--after all, that is your stock in
>> trade--but that dog ain't going to hunt.
>
>See, now this statement means little or nothing to me. "Local color" I guess.
>
>> There are too many people here
>> witness to the whole business and they're not as stupid as you Nizkooks and
>> HateWatchers wish they were.
>
>Really. From what I've seen on three or so years of debating filth like you,
>you make a stupid statement, get disproved, and then hurl insults. Really
>impressive.
>
>Now, are you going to define those terms?
You're a fag Andrew and a sissified one at that!
Doc Tavish
>Andrew Mathis
Gord McFee
GMT, doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 1998 18:54:15 -0400, jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G.
> Brown) wrote:
>
> >In article <35faf25f....@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you
> >to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>BTW Here is Andrew again wanting to "date" me and he says it doesn't
> >>matter that I'm under age either!
> >
> >False. Mr. Mathis hasn't stated that he wants to "date" Poor Ol' Gutless
> >Scottie. Nor did he state that "it doesn't matter that [Scottie is] under
> >age either". Both lies are inventions of the homosexually-obsessed mind of
> >Scott Bradbury.
> >
> >JGB
>
> Let the lurkers decide Jeffrey! Why did you delete critical parts of
> the post? Here is what was said and let the lurkers decide who is homo
> and who is lying!
Scott, most people have decided long ago that you are obsessed with
pornography and homosexuality. Whether or not you are homosexual as
well is not clear. But you certainly display all the symptoms of a very
disturbed person.
[deleted]
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org
Richard G. Philllips
>
> On Sat, 12 Sep 1998 23:44:58 -0400, jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G.
> Brown) wrote:
>
> >In article <V1HK1.150$_06.6...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker"> >>>In article <35fb1a76....@news.tavish-central.net>, Scott "beat you
> >>>>matter that I'm under age either! Are you paying attention FBI?
> >>>
> >>>you. He didn't ask for a "date".
> >>>
> >>>You accuse Mr. Mathis of saying that "it doesn't matter that [you are]
> >>>under age either". He never made any such statement.
> >>>
> >>>You're lying, Scottie, and transparently so.
> >>>
> >>>JGB
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >predicated upon lies that Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie has himself
> >promulgated.
>
> What lies? Andrew Mathis is documented as asking men out to have a
> drink and to dance! If that isn't homo then what is? I actually think
> that you have taken quite a liking to Andrew! Why else would you be so
> eager to get involved and defend him? Is he not capable of taking
> responsibity for his own words?
>
> Did Andrew or did Andrew not ask of men:
>
> "Can we do this over a drink next weekend?" ; "Wanna dance?" or
> "Oh, you big man."
>
> Andrew Mathis <aem...@is2.nyu.edu>
> <6ta4m1$ml$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
> http://x12.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=390566739
>
> Andrew Mathis <aem...@is2.nyu.edu>
> <6sn6f4$llo$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
> http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=387622389
>
> Looks pretty fagatial to me Jeffrey! Why are you so defensive for
> Andrew? Is there some sort of relationship 'twixt you two that we
> should know about?
>
> Doc Tavish
>
> >JGB
>
> "Among the Jews who remained in Russia, which then included
> Lithuania, Ukraine, and much of Poland, were the founders of
> the Russian Bolshevik party." (A History of Ukraine, Michael
> Hrushevsky, Yale University Press, 1941, passim)
Phillips
Doc:
I think you and I might have a lot to talk about on matters which it
would be premature to broadcast to the entire NG.
I tried to post a reply to your message privately but it didn't fly.
Please send your private e-mail address to rgp...@earthlink.net.
============
Jeffrey G. Brown
>On Sat, 12 Sep 1998 21:23:16 -0400, jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G.
>Brown) wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>>Everyone but you knows how to follow a thread, Scottie. If you repost the
>>same dreck twice in under thirty minutes, it's still dreck.
>
>You're a fine one to allude that another person capable of following a
>thread! Lookey here:
>
>>> [...deletia...]
>>
>>>"I belong to NAMBLA and I am gay; I can butt fuck
>>>little boys all day." -- attrib Jeffrey G. Brown
>
>Where did I bring that up?
In your .signature, O Gutless One. See
>Does any lurker see me mentioning Jeffrey
>being a butt fucker in the post that he is supposedly replying to?
Everyone sees it -- in your .signature, O Gutless One.
>Who can't follow a thread?
Obviously you can't Scottie -- because you don't know which of your
messages I replied to.
>Jeffrey, I'd bet if someone were to cut your
>head open a bunch of little dicks would fall out because that is all
>you seem to have on your mind.
Strange that you should say so, Scottie, since _you_ are the one who
always brings up the subject of male genitalia -- as you did just now.
>> "Where is your proof? Can you present ISP logs which prove your
>> accusation? I think not loud mouth imbecile."
>
>The words you posted above had "attrib" in them which means attributed
>to NOT that you factually posted it!
The only person who has "attributed" those words to me is you, Scottie.
The post has long been proven a forgery. We're still waiting for your
explanation: Why does a self-proclaimed "truth teller" need to repost
forgeries?
> [...deletia...]
>Where in my post did I mention Jeffrey being a member of NAMBLA?
In your .signature, O Gutless One.
>Do you now finally have a guilty conscience?
I'm not the one reposting forgeries, Cockroach.
>Are you now trying to fabricate material to assault me with?
Cite the post in which I do so, Gutless.
>What is your problem Jeffrey?
I don't seem to have one, Gutless. I know which of your posts I was
responding to. You don't.
Jeffrey G. Brown
>On Sat, 12 Sep 1998 23:44:58 -0400, jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G.
>Brown) wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>>Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie's assessment of Mr. Mathis' sexual orientation is
>>predicated upon lies that Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie has himself
>>promulgated.
>
>What lies?
1) The lie that Andrew Matis asked you out for a "date".
2) The lie that Andrew Mathis said that "it doesn't matter that [you are]
under age either".
JGB
Jeffrey G. Brown
> [...deletia...]
Still waiting, Scottie:
In which post did Mr. Mathis specifically ask you for a "date"?
Gord McFee
23:32:37 -0400, "Dan Parker" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
[deleted]
> When one man asks another if he wants to dance, and makes comments like "oh,
> you big man," he's a fag, plain and simple. Real
> men just don't talk like that. Those kinds of sentences won't even enter
> their mind. Mathis is obssessively insistent upon meeting Doc for a drink.
> Asking a man to meet you for a drink is not queer in and of itself, but
> Mathis has a very feminine way of pressing the issue after his invitation
> has been declined. No self-respecting heterosexual man is going to meet a
> strange faggot for a drink.
Danny-boy, I think you and Bradbury had better get some help. You seem
to see "faggots" behind every tree. Failing that, you see Jews behind
every tree. Try to get out and get some exercise. Meet girls. Try to
date one. Scottie's beyond help, but you may still be saved.