BUSH GUILTY OF TREASON AND SEDITION!
Secret Squirrel
no power to create law, and no emergency powers under the Con-
stitution. These actions violate the Separation of Powers of the
Constitution, and are designed to turn our Constitutional Republic
into a totalitarian Dictatorship called the Luciferian New World
Order.
REPOST
THE OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY IS A TROJAN HORSE!
It is in reality a national police force and is unconstitutional:
Executive Orders do not create law, that would be a violation of
the Separation of Powers of the Constitution. This also applies
to Bush's State of Emergency. There are no emergency powers granted
to the President in the Constitution.
BUSH BOMBS IRAQ, AGAIN!
It appears that Bush is trying to get Americans killed with his
illegal terrorist attacks against Iraq. It is just a question of
time before they retaliate against the American people.
DEFCON1! TO OUR MILITARY AND ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT!!!
Bush is planning to overthrow our Constitutional Republic, and
replace it with a dictatorial police state. This constitutes Treason
and Sedition. He intends to issue an Executive Order, either declaring
a State of Emergency or Martial Law. Both of these orders cannot be
found in the Constitution and are unconstitutional. This means that
they are illegal.
You took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution
against enemies both foreign and "DOMESTIC," not to obey unconsti-
tutional statutes or orders. Also, it was established at Nuremberg
that just following orders is no excuse for murder or mayhem.
The senior officer corps has been compromised by the Luciferian New
World Order, so it will be up to the junior grades and enlisted men
to defend our republic. I hope you choose not to follow satan, but
to follow in the footsteps of the brave men and women who have fought
to preserve freedom in our country. May God bless you, and America.
REPOST
An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution is not law. When the
Constitution and an act of Congress are in conflict, the Constitution must
govern the case to which both apply. Congress cannot confer on this court any
original jurisdiction. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited,
and those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten is the reason the
Constitution was written.
-- Marbury vs. Madison
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having
the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An
unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had
never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to
settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow
that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no
power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts
performed under it ....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An
unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.
Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land,
it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are
bound to enforce it.
-- American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Volume 16, Section 177
THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC:
THESIS, ANTITHESIS, and SYNTHESIS
THESIS: Create a problem.
ANTITHESIS: Generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria).
SYNTHESIS: Offer the solution to the problem created in step one; which
would invariably be a societal "change" or "shift" which would have been
impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological
conditioning achieved in stages one and two.
THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY, MARTIAL LAW CONSPIRACY
-> NATIONAL EMERGENCY: CLINTON EXTENDS REPRESSIVE POWER
-> The White House explained its move Nov. 8 in a public notice from the
-> president entitled "Continuation of Emergency Regarding Weapons of
-> Mass Destruction."
-> It says: "On Nov. 14, 1994, by Executive Order No. 12938, I declared
-> a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary
-> threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the
-> United States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and
-> chemical weapons and the means of delivering such weapons.
-> "Because the proliferation ... continues to pose an unusual and
-> extraordinary threat ... the national emergency must continue in
-> effect beyond Nov. 14, 1995. Therefore, in accordance with section
-> 202 (d) of the National Emergencies Act, I am continuing the national
-> emergency declared in Executive Order No. 12938."
-> IMMENSE POWERS FOR PRESIDENT
-> This declaration allows the president to wield immense powers to
-> limit free speech, free assembly and due process of law. It also
-> stipulates other powers, such as seizure of property, including
-> private industry, for government purposes.
-> President Franklin D. Roosevelt used similar measures when he issued
-> Executive Order 9066 in 1942, shortly after the U.S. entered World
-> War II. This order was used to round up and intern over 100,000
-> Japanese Americans and other
More Globalist propaganda! You can't amend or suspend the Constitution
with a simple act of Congress, or Executive Order. To amend or
suspend the Constitution you need a 2/3 vote of Congress, or a
Constitutional Convention. In both cases it has to be ratified by 3/4
of the States.
Both Lincoln and Roosevelt usurped the powers of Congress and su-
spended Habeas Corpus. This can only be done by "CONGRESS" in cases
of insurrection and invasion.
There is also disinformation being spread about a War Powers Act of
1917. There is no such law. There was a Trading With the Enemies
Act -- which applied to bankers -- passed that year. Roosevelt had
an Emergency Banking Act passed in 1933 -- which also applied only to
banking. In addition he had the National Recovery Act passed that
year, which was declared unconstitutional in 1935.
In addition, there is no such thing as Martial Law in the
Constitution. It is simply a device used by a military commander to
restore order, when civil authority has broken-down. Also, the
President cannot federalize the National Guard: it is the
Congress that raises armies.
Beware! Those traitors in Washington are guilty of Sedition. They
are planning to overthrow our Constitutional Republic, and replace
it with a totalitarian police-state.
Mike Adams -- Erwin Rommel School of Law -- had Dr. Gene Schroeder
admit there was no War Powers Act. This was done on a shortwave
talk-show. There is a reference to the War Powers Act in the
Congressional record, but this was a misnomer. It should have
said the War Powers Resolution (1973). This resolution specifically
states: that the President has to get statutory authority from
Congress before putting Americans in "harms-way." There is a
limited exception if America is attacked.
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
Article 1
Section 8. The Congress shall have Power.....
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules
concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use
shall be for a longer term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval
Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the
Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
1
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and
for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of
the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the
Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the militia
according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
3
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of
Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the
Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from
timeto time.
_________________________________________________________________
Article 2
Section 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and
Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States,
when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may
require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of
the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of
their respective Offices.
Public Law 93-148
93rd Congress, H. J. Res. 542
November 7, 1973
Joint Resolution
Concerning the war powers of Congress and the President.
Resolved by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States
of America in Congress assembled,
SHORT TITLE
SECTION 1. This joint resolution may be cited as the "War Powers Resolution".
PURPOSE AND POLICY
SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent
of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the
collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the
introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into
situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicate by
the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or
in such situations.
(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically
provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and
proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other
powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or
in any department or officer thereof.
(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to
introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations
where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the
circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2)
specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by
attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed
forces.
The statutory authorization must be constitutional; in this case it is not.
REPOST OF WILLIAM COOPER MESSAGE
From: harvest <har...@whitemtns.com>
Date: Sunday, April 11, 1999 12:48 PM
We have just received the following with which we fully agree and
support. We performed some minor editing so that it is legally,
Lawfully, and morally correct.)
Public Notice and Declaration
This Public Notice and Declaration of Lawful Intent is hereby served
upon the President, Vice President, President's Cabinet, Members of
the Senate, Members of the House of Representatives, departments,
agencies, officials, officers, military officers, employees of the
de-facto government of the United States of America and to all
officials elected or appointed of the several Union States.
The President of the United States of America and his administration
are engaged in a conspiracy to establish world government. Therefore
the President and his administration are engaged in TREASON having
caused a state of insurrection against the Constitution for the United
States of America.
The President of the United States of America has acted against the
Constitution for the United States of America, the North Atlantic
Treaty, and the United Nations Charter upon his own initiative
committing an Act of War against Yugoslavia, a sovereign nation,
without provocation of any kind whatsoever.
The President has ordered or caused to be ordered American military
personnel to be unconstitutionally placed under the command of foreign
and/or International political and military officials, officers, and
organizations and to engage in unconstitutional War. In the commission
of these actions the President of the United States has committed
TREASON, crimes against humanity, and war crimes against the People of
Yugoslavia.
The President has accepted illegal campaign contributions from an
admitted enemy of the United States of America, Communist China, which
contributions constitute bribery and TREASON in that he is giving aid
and comfort to an enemy of the United States of America. Having been
bribed the President has caused defense secrets concerning atomic
weaponry, rocket and satellite technology to be delivered to Communist
China. The President has proposed and supported concessions to build
Shown 36%, press <SPACE> for more, 'q' to quit, or 'h' for help
bases and shipping facilities in the United States, favored nation
status, and membership in the World Trade Organization to be delivered
to Communist China.
The President has caused the FBI, BATF, and IRS as national
political police to invade the sovereign jurisdiction of the Union
States to arrest, and murder Citizens, and seize property without just
compensation. Furthermore these rogue agencies were not lawfully or
Constitutionally formed and are not lawful agencies of the United
States of America.
In the deployment of these rogue agencies against the Citizens of
the several States of the Union the President of the United States of
America has unconstitutionally and unlawfully used military personnel
and equipment against his political enemies amongst the American
People. Reference the murder of Vicki Weaver, the Branch Davidians,
the Oklahoma City Bombing, and other crimes against humanity.
The Commanding Officers of the Military Forces of the United States
of America have abdicated their Oaths of Allegiance. Therefore they
are participants in the conspiracy. Therefore the General Officers of
the Military of the United States of America are engaged in TREASON.
The Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the
Congress have abdicated their Oaths, Responsibilities and Duties, by
these actions giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United
States of America. Therefore the Members of Congress are engaged in
acts of TREASON.
The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the United
States of America have failed to maintain any semblance of a
Constitutional balance of Power. All three branches have exceeded
their Lawful Power and have committed offenses against the
Constitution for the United States of America,
the several States of the Union, and the Citizens of those States. Any
unlawful or unconstitutional act or acts committed by any branch of
government of the United States of America not included in this
Declaration of Intent will not be considered to be excused or ignored.
The government of the United States of America must now be
recognized as an unlawful, unconstitutional de-facto government
engaged in tyranny and TREASON. Therefore all powers of government now
fall to the several States of the Union and to the People. If the
Union States fail to act the Responsibility and Duty to Restore
Constitutional Republican Government falls to the People.
If Constitutional Republican Government is not restored by those
presently in government a de-jure government in exile will be formed
by the American People. If hostilities are forced upon the American
People the de-jure government in exile will be recognized as the
official Lawful and Constitutional government of the United States of
America.
We have reached the threshold from which there can be no return. We
must be of the mind and the one action which serves to reestablish the
Lawful Constitutional Republican Government under the Supreme Law of
the Land, the Constitution for the United States of America, or face
enslavement in a world totalitarian socialist state.
Therefore all Loyal American Patriots are hereby called to Arms,
join or form Militia. All Americans and Militia are forbidden to
engage in any unlawful or criminal act whatsoever. Any man, woman, or
Militia which engages in any unlawful or criminal act, or acts, will
be dealt with severely under the Law or provisions of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice.
The Loyal men and women of the Military Forces of the United States
of America who will honor their Oaths who are in uniform under Arms
must support the restoration of Constitutional Republican Government
with all personnel and equipment immediately if commencement of
hostilities are forced upon the American People.
The Militia is prepared to accept the Lawful command of Loyal Union
State Governors or the highest ranking Loyal General Officer of the
Military of the United States should any have the moral commitment to
his/her Oath and the guts to stand with the People against this
TREASON. All United States government and military personnel who
refuse to support restoration of Constitutional Republican Government
if or when hostilities are forced upon the American People will be
considered in insurrection against the United States of America and
will be destroyed at the first opportunity by any means available.
Personnel who surrender during hostilities will be considered to be
Prisoners of War and will be treated accordingly under the
provisions of the Geneva Convention.
Commanding Officers of all existing Militia are requested to prepare
your units to be ready to deploy within a 24 hour notice when and if
the American People are forced into hostile actions to restore
Constitutional Republican Government in accordance with the Founding
Law set forth in the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united
States of America dated July 4, 1776, all relevant Articles of the
Constitution for the United States of America, and relevant Articles
of the Constitutions for the Several States of the Union. Any person,
persons, organizations, or military force which opposes this Lawful
enterprise once it is forced upon us, will be considered to be engage
in TREASON against the United States of America.
We hereby declare that all orders, declarations, executive decrees,
and laws that are repugnant to the Constitution for the United States
of America are null and void from the date of their inception and are
not recognized by the Citizens of the Several States of the Union. We
hereby declare that any official, officer, judge, or person who
attempts to enforce any unconstitutional order, declaration, executive
decree, or law upon any Citizen of any Union State is engaged in
tyranny and in insurrection against the United States of America.
These acts constitute TREASON.
We do not wish to engage in open warfare against our fellow
Americans. But know this; we are fully committed that all those who
have died that we, their posterity, might live Free under
Constitutional Republican Government shall not have died in vain. We
call upon all those in the government and military of the United
States of America to change your course immediately and restore
Constitutional Republican Government or face the ultimate
consequence of your actions.
We serve notice that any American Citizens of any Union State who
are targeted, arrested, or imprisoned because they signed this Public
Notice and Declaration will be considered to be a political Prisoner
of War and is to be treated as such in accordance with the Geneva
Convention. Violation of this provision of this Declaration will
constitute a War Crime and will be deal with severely under the Law.
Fully embracing the principles and ideals of Liberty and Freedom for
all men and women regardless of race, religion, or place of ancestral
origin, to secure the protection of the Rights of the American
Citizens of the several States of the Union, recognizing that the
protection of the Rights of the Individual is the best and only
guarantee of the ultimate welfare of the whole body of Citizens, and
for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the
protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each
other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
(As a loyal American who took the Oath as a member of the United
States Air Force and United States Navy to protect and defend the
Constitution for the United States of America against all enemies
foreign and domestic, I freely, and with full knowledge, sign the
above and encourage all other loyalAmericans to capture this document,
sign it, obtain as many other signatures as you are able, and send it
to every city, county, State, and federal agency, official, officer,
military command and etc.)
William Cooper
TOP TEN PUBLIC ENEMIES
PUBLIC ENEMY #1: David Rockefeller, 2. Henry Kissinger, 3. Pete
Peterson, 4. Alan Greenspan, 5. George Soros, 6. Robert Rubin,
7. George Bush, 8. Warren Christopher, 9. Bill Clinton, 10. William
S. Cohen.
I would like you to imagine that the Mafia had taken control of our
federal gov't, and most of our local gov'ts. America would be in
dire circumstances, wouldn't it? Well, this is exactly what has
happend; except a far more sinister organization has taken control.
It is David "the devil" Rockefeller, and his Luciferian travellers,
the CFR. These people are responsible for the slaughter of 100s
of thousands of people in their "banker wars." Through the Federal
Reserve they have corrupted our gov't, and stolen trillions of
dollars from the American people. They are now in the process of
turning our Constitutional Republic into a Dictatorship. They intend
to enslave us, and put the survivors of the coming genocide on their
"global plantation."
Pete Peterson is the current head of the CFR and the Concord Coali-
tion. This man is currently waging war against the poor and the
elderly: by robbing them of their pension benefits (Social Security),
and cutting back on Medicare. He believes that these proceeds should
be used to enrich his globalist friends.
This is a Zionist/Freemason conspiracy, and dates back to the founding
of the Illuminati in 1776. A Jew named Adam Weishaupt - who had infil-
trated the Catholic Church - was used by Mayer Rothschild to start the
organization.
Your only chance of surviving: is to network with your local law-
enforcement, have your Sheriff deputize you, and demand that your
state sovereignty be observed -- this means keeping the "baby killers"
out! Also, demand that David Rockefeller, his gang of killers and
thieves (the CFR) be arrested, before they murder anymore of our sons
and daughters (Bosnia, Kosovo, etc.). I would also advise the English
to do the same with the Rothschilds and the RIIA.
There are those who call themselves Jews (Zionists), who are really
members of the synagogue of satan -- rv.2:9,3:9.
At the end of the 1000 years satan is released, and he seduces the
nations of the earth, prior to the end of the world -- rv.20:7-15,
ez.38, 39, 40.
Mimi Weasel
This is a Zionist/Freemason conspiracy
You are a vile, filthy, disgusting, paranoid, stupid and delusional
LIAR:
The "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", Freemasonry and
anti-Semitism. It is most disturbing in these days of renascent
Nazism in Germany, and of anti-Semitism in Europe at large, that
the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is still being used in
academic circles. What people who quote this "book" fail to
mention, and apparently fail to realize, is that the Protocols
is a fake redacted by the Russian secret police nearly 100 years
ago, even before Zionism existed as a political movement. This
essay presents a brief story of the Protocols and their place in
modern Arab nationalism. The "Protocols of the Elders of
Zion", the most notorious and most successful work of modern
anti-Semitism, draws on popular anti-Semitic notions which have
their roots in medieval Europe from the time of the Crusades.
The libels that the Jews used blood of Christian children for
the Feast of Passover, poisoned the wells and spread the plague
were pretexts for the wholesale destruction of Jewish
communities throughout Europe. Tales were circulated among the
masses of secret rabbinical conferences whose aim was to
subjugate and exterminate the Christians, and motifs like these
are found in early anti-Semitic literature. The conceptual
inspiration for the Protocols can be traced back to the time of
the French Revolution at the end of the 18th century. At that
time, a French Jesuit named Abbe Barruel, representing
reactionary elements opposed to the revolution, published in
1797 a treatise blaming the Revolution on a secret conspiracy
operating through the Order of Freemasons. Barruel's idea was
nonsense, since the French nobility at the time was heavily
Masonic, but he was influenced by a Scottish mathematician named
Robison who was opposed to the Masons. In his treatise, Barruel
did not himself blame the Jews, who were emancipated as a result
of the Revolution. However, in 1806, Barruel circulated a forged
letter, probably sent to him by members of the state police
opposed to Napoleon Bonaparte's liberal policy toward the Jews,
calling attention to the alleged part of the Jews in the
conspiracy he had earlier attributed to the Masons. This myth of
an international Jewish conspiracy reappeared later on in 19th
century Europe in places such as Germany and Poland. The
direct predecessor of the Protocols can be found in the pamphlet
"Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu",
published by the non-Jewish French satirist Maurice Joly in
1864. In his "Dialogues", which make no mention of the Jews,
Joly attacked the political ambitions of the emperor Napoleon
III using the imagery of a diabolical plot in Hell. The
"Dialogues" were caught by the French authorities soon after
their publication and Joly was tried and sentenced to prison for
his pamphlet. Joly's "Dialogues", while intended as a
political satire, soon fell into the hands of a German
antisemite named Hermann Goedsche writing under the name os Sir
John Retcliffe. Goedsche was a postal clerk and a spy for the
Prussian secret police. He had been forced to leave the postal
work due to his part in forging evidence in the prosecution
against the Democratic leader Benedict Waldeck in 1849. Goedsche
adapted Joly's "Dialogues" into a mythical tale of a Jewish
conspiracy as part of a series of novels entitled "Biarritz",
which appeared in 1868. In a chapter called "The Jewish Cemetery
in Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve
Tribes of Israel", he spins the fantasy of a secret centennial
rabbinical conference which meets at midnight and whose purpose
is to review the past hundred years and to make plans for the
next century. Goedsche's plagiary of Joly's "Dialogues" soon
found its way to Russia. It was translated into Russian in 1872,
and a consolidation of the "council of representatives" under
the name "Rabbi's Speech" appeared in Russian in 1891. These
works no doubt furnished the Russian secret police (Okhrana)
with a means with which to strengthen the position of the weak
Czar Nicholas II and discredit the reforms of the liberals who
sympathized with the Jews. During the Dreyfus case of 1893-1895,
agents of the Okhrana in Paris redacted the earlier works of
Joly and Goedsche into a new edition which they called the
"Protocols of the Elders of Zion". The manuscript of the
Protocols was brought to Russia in 1895 and was printed
privately in 1897. The Protocols did not become public until
1905, when Russia's defeat in the Russo-Japanese War was
followed by the Revolution in the same year, leading to the
promulgation of a constitution and institution of the Duma. In
the wake of these events, the reactionary "Union of the Russian
Nation" or Black Hundreds organization sought to incite popular
feeling against the Jews, who they blamed for the Revolution and
the Constitution. To this end they used the Protocols, which was
first published in a public edition by the mystic priest Sergius
Nilus in 1905. The Protocols were part of propaganda campaign
which accompanied the pogroms of 1905 inspired by the Okhrana. A
variant text of the Protocols was published by George Butmi in
1906 and again in 1907. The edition of 1906 was found among the
Czar's collection, even though he had already recognized the
work as a forgery. In his later editions, Nilus claimed that the
Protocols had been read secretly at the First Zionist Congress
at Basle in 1897, while Butmi in his edition wrote that they had
no connection with the new Zionist movement, but rather were
part of the Masonic conspiracy. In the civil war following
the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the reactionary White Armies
made extensive use of the Protocols to incite widespread
slaughters of Jews. At the same time, Russian emigrants brought
the Protocols to western Europe, where the Nilus edition served
as the basis for many translations, starting in 1920. Just after
its appearance in London in 1920, Lucien Wolf exposed the
Protocols as a plagiary of the earlier work of Joly and
Goedsche, in a pamphlet of the Jewish Board of Deputies. The
following year, in 1921, the story of the forgery was published
in a series of articles in the London Times by Philip Grave, the
paper's correspondent in Constantinople. A whole book
documenting the forgery was also published in the same year in
America by Herman Bernstein. Nevertheless, the Protocols
continued to circulate widely. They were even sponsored by Henry
Ford in the United States until 1927, and formed an important
part of the Nazis' justification of genocide of the Jews in
World War II. After World War II and the attendant Holocaust,
the Protocols ceased being part of the popular conscience in
Europe in the United States. However, with the birth of the
State of Israel and the eruption of the Arab-Israeli conflict,
they became part of state-sponsored anti-Semitism throughout the
Arab world. anti-Semitic ideas had already been spread by
Christian missionaries in the Middle East since the early 19th
century. This activity erupted in the Damascus blood libel in
1840, which was followed by many recurrences of the libel in
other Arab countries in the latter half of the 19th century.
European anti-Semitic works were already being published in
Cairo in Arabic before the turn of the century. The Protocols
were translated into Arabic from the French edition by al-Khuri
Antun Yamin, probably in the late 1920's. Many editions appeared
starting in the 1950's, mostly in Cairo and Beirut. President
Nasser publicly asserted their authenticity, and his brother,
Shawqi Abd' al-Nasir, published an edition in 1968 entitled
"Brutukulat Hukama Sahyun wa-Ta`alim at-Talmud" ("Protocols of
the Learned Men of Zion and Teachings of the Talmud"). In the
same year, an Islamic congress which convened in Cairo produced
some papers containing anti-Semitic themes which had been
rampant in prewar Europe. Unlike its counterpart in Europe,
antisemitism in the Arab world seems to be officially sanctioned
and promoted. It forms part of religious sermons and appears to
be part of public education. The Protocols today form part of
the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood and its allied Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas), whose part in the Palestinian
intifada is well known. The statement that the "enemies" or the
"Zionist invasion" are behind "secret societies" such as the
"Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, the Lions and others" around the
world for purposes of sabotage is repeated three times in the
Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement. Mention of these
organizations, together with the claim that the "enemies" were
"behind the French Revolution, the Communist revolution and most
of the revolutions we heard and hear about", reveals direct
borrowing from the Protocols and its predecessors. The Protocols
are finally mentioned by name in Article 32: ... The Zionist
plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to
expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have
digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further
expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols
of the Elders of Zion" ("Brutukulat Hukama Sahyun" in the
Arabic original), and their present conduct is the best proof
of what we are saying. In summary, use of the Protocols by
modern day Arabs is living testimony to the transplanting of
classical European anti-Semitism into present-day Arab society.
Bibliography Lucien Wolf. The Jewish
Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
Press Committee of the Jewish Board of Deputies, London
(1920). The Truth About "The Protocols": A Literary Forgery.
From The Times of August 16, 17, and 18, 1921. Printing House
Square, London. Encyclopaedia Judaica. Keter Publishing House,
Jerusalem (1971), entries on Anti-Semitism and Elders of Zion,
Protocols of the Learned. Herman Bernstein. The Truth About "The
Protocols of Zion" (reprinted with introduction by Norman
Cohn). Ktav Publishing House, New York (1971). D. F. Green.
Arab Theologians on Jews and Israel: Extracts from the
Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the Academy of Islamic
Research. Editions de l'Avenir, Geneve (1971). Yehoshua Harkabi.
Arab Attitudes Toward Israel. Israel Universities Press,
Jerusalem (1972). Norman Cohn. Warrant for Genocide: The Myth of
the Jewish World Conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of
Zion (Brown Judaic Studies, No. 23). Scholars Press, Chico, CA
(1981). Bernard Lewis. The Jews of Islam. Princeton University
Press, Princeton, NJ (1984). Mithaq Harakat al-Muqawama
al-Islamiyya - Filastin (Hamas). Filastin, 1 Muharam 1409
A.H.. English version: The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance
Movement, 18 August 1988. Rafi Israeli. The Impact of Islamic
Fundamentalism in the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Survey of Arab
Affairs: A periodic supplement to Jerusalem Letter/Viewpoints
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Jerusalem), No. 13 (2
Elul 5748/15 August 1988). Raphael Israeli. Islamic
Fundamentalism Among the Palestinian Arabs. ibid., No. 17 (14
Av 5749/15 August 1989). Shaul Wallach
--
Mimi Weasel
W's place in history:
The first president in 100 years
to win after losing the popular vote.
The least-experienced candidate to
become president in the last 100 years.
The first convicted criminal to be appointed Resident!
Unknown
>He has no authority to suspend the Bill of Rights for foreigners,
>no power to create law, and no emergency powers under the Con-
>stitution. These actions violate the Separation of Powers of the
>Constitution,
Up to this point you are absolutly correct.
> and are designed to turn our Constitutional Republic
>into a totalitarian Dictatorship called the Luciferian New World
>Order.
>REPOST
>
>THE OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY IS A TROJAN HORSE!
>
>It is in reality a national police force and is unconstitutional:
If this is true then so are Federal Marshals which are essentially the same thing.
>Executive Orders do not create law, that would be a violation of
>the Separation of Powers of the Constitution. This also applies
>to Bush's State of Emergency. There are no emergency powers granted
>to the President in the Constitution.
The is true. Such powers were granted by LAW with the War Powers Act which do give the president
sweeping powers including the power to declare states of emergency which extend the time limit of
those powers. Such a state of emergency has been nonstop since the act was passed (that's why you
see the gold fringed flag in courts).
<snip>
>You took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution
>against enemies both foreign and "DOMESTIC," not to obey unconsti-
>tutional statutes or orders. Also, it was established at Nuremberg
>that just following orders is no excuse for murder or mayhem.
If you honestly believe that the executive orders are Unconstitutional then put your money where
your mouth is. Challenge them in court.
But win or lose remember LaMere's Law (People get the kind of government they want or deserve).
<snip>
>REPOST
>
> An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution is not law. When the
> Constitution and an act of Congress are in conflict, the Constitution must
> govern the case to which both apply. Congress cannot confer on this court any
> original jurisdiction. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited,
> and those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten is the reason the
> Constitution was written.
> -- Marbury vs. Madison
Absolutely right! But it takes a COURT to rule that such an act is unconstitutional.
> The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having
> the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and
> ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
> its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An
> unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had
> never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to
> settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
> Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow
> that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no
> power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts
> performed under it ....
> A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An
> unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.
> Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land,
> it is superseded thereby.
> No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are
> bound to enforce it.
> -- American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Volume 16, Section 177
>
<snip>
Michael Ejercito
> He has no authority to suspend the Bill of Rights for foreigners,
> no power to create law, and no emergency powers under the Con-
> stitution. These actions violate the Separation of Powers of the
> Constitution, and are designed to turn our Constitutional Republic
> into a totalitarian Dictatorship called the Luciferian New World
> Order.
>
Michael
hamilton
meje...@marvelonline.net (Michael Ejercito) wrote:
yet another Bush supporter has already given up on fighting the terrorists
and want to give up our country without a fight
Harrison Numbugger
Ejercito) wrote:
actually , he's siding with the Constitution. YOU and those who
support bush and ashcrofts repeated attacks on our country , our
Constitution and our freedom are doing the work of the terrorists for
them.
why do you hate our Constitution? why do you hate freedom? why do you
hate justice?
>
> Michael
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
--Benjamin Franklin, 1759
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
With NINE Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
Michael Ejercito
wrote:
No, I want to contiunue fighting these terrorists wherever they
are.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
<leftof...@peace.now> wrote:
>On 2 Dec 2001 15:53:29 -0800, meje...@marvelonline.net (Michael
>Ejercito) wrote:
>
>>Secret Squirrel <squi...@echelon.alias.net> wrote in message news:<99f59b011a3e076b...@anonymous.poster>...
>>> He has no authority to suspend the Bill of Rights for foreigners,
>>> no power to create law, and no emergency powers under the Con-
>>> stitution. These actions violate the Separation of Powers of the
>>> Constitution, and are designed to turn our Constitutional Republic
>>> into a totalitarian Dictatorship called the Luciferian New World
>>> Order.
>>>
>> Yet ANOTHER Bush critic sides with terrorists.
>>
>
>actually , he's siding with the Constitution. YOU and those who
>support bush and ashcrofts repeated attacks on our country , our
>Constitution and our freedom are doing the work of the terrorists for
>them.
The squirelly one is lying.
Michael
Da Squid
You talk a lot but have not seen any action. If you believe in your
message so much, why don't you file suite in court? Oh yes, those are
Admirality courts and therefore controled by the NWO. You must be
getting plenty of exercise walking as there is a saying about what BS
does.
Secret Squirrel <squi...@echelon.alias.net> wrote in message news:<99f59b011a3e076b...@anonymous.poster>...
Lurker@home
"Secret Squirrel" <squi...@echelon.alias.net> wrote in message
news:99f59b011a3e076b...@anonymous.poster...
[paranoid rant snipped]
You forgot to mention the black helicopters.
Liberal Klown
<leftof...@peace.now> wrote:
>On 2 Dec 2001 15:53:29 -0800, meje...@marvelonline.net (Michael
>Ejercito) wrote:
>
>>Secret Squirrel <squi...@echelon.alias.net> wrote in message news:<99f59b011a3e076b...@anonymous.poster>...
>>> He has no authority to suspend the Bill of Rights for foreigners,
>>> no power to create law, and no emergency powers under the Con-
>>> stitution. These actions violate the Separation of Powers of the
>>> Constitution, and are designed to turn our Constitutional Republic
>>> into a totalitarian Dictatorship called the Luciferian New World
>>> Order.
>>>
>> Yet ANOTHER Bush critic sides with terrorists.
>>
>
>actually , he's siding with the Constitution. YOU and those who
>support bush and ashcrofts repeated attacks on our country , our
>Constitution and our freedom are doing the work of the terrorists for
>them.
Congress, Senate committees and the courts have turned you into a
knee-jerked liar.
-
"To kill Americans and their allies, civilians, and military is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it."
Osama bin Laden, Feb. 23, 1998