Hey, Supreme Court - You F'd Up!
Patrick Thomas McGranaghan
reid jeffrey alan wrote:
> On 29 Jun 1997, Andrew Harger wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > DETHMaster <dethm...@earthlink.net> wrote in article <dethmaster-
> > > Maybe you should have also checked to see how many of the people
> who were
> > > turned down when trying to buy a gun got one later...
> > > --DM
> >
> > Ah yes, this same argument applies to crack cocaine. No reason to
> outlaw
> > it, because if you want it you can just buy it illegally.
> >
> > -andy
>
> That's right, same with prostitution, gambling, and all those other
> horribly icky vices. Legalize man, and then smoke it.
>
> JR
The govenrment would be inclined to monopolize off this and more money
for Big Brother's Armies. Besides the Government could more easily
subdue a "Drunkard, drugged out, society of whores.
Patrick
reid jeffrey alan
So, what are we now? Legalizing these things would not result in their
proliferation. And anyway, to hell with the govt.
JR
jd...@earthlink.net
nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
> Score one for the porn peddlers and the American Criminal Lovers Union
>
> this week. Sorry to say.
Yeah, "nob...@nowhere.com", ain't it cool??? I would like to celebrate
this landmark judicial decision by saying...
FUCK! SHIT! PISS! COCKSUCKER! FAGGOT! FUCKER!
How's that??? ; )
JimKeller2
Given that 85-90% of people who use guns to commit crimes have long
criminal records, wouldn't it make sense to give them a Brady Law
background check during their parole hearing, and not release the ones who
fail. In other words, don't let these violent assholes out of prison in
the first place. Oh, you say that our prisons are overcrowded? Simple-lets
release all the people whose only crime is simple drug use or possesion.
It seems really stupid to me to let a violent con out of prison, and then
try various scams-Brady, Megans Law, etc.-to prevent these dickheads from
buying guns or terrorizing citizens.
Jim Garnett
John Luce wrote:
> Michael Campana wrote:
[snip]
> > “Starfleet uniforms are designed for comfort even in
> > the most extreme environments.”
> > -Worf
>
> Ditto, rec.sport.golf
rec.sport.golf is designed for comfort even in
the most extreme environments???
Jim
--
--My grandmother's brain was dead, but her heart was still beating.
It was the first time we ever had a democrat in the family
--If you haven't taken the World's Smallest Political Quiz, visit the
web page http://www.self-gov.org/quiz.html
Fred Cherry
jd...@earthlink.net writes:
>nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>How's that??? ; )
It's been done before, and by no less that a judge of a United States
District court. In Miller v. Reddin, 293 F. Supp. 216, 226, it sez:
The court could go on with the libidinous litany of depravities,
degradations, debasements and defilements. But before going on to each
individual book we continue only to point out that we find in these
books every four letter word that is common in this type of obscenity.
The Court thought long and hard before mentioning these words. But if
we are to be accurate in our findings and correct in our conclusions we
must "tell it as it is". The four letter words must be listed because
they are used in these books: cock, ball, cunt, piss, shit, fuck, suck.
And they are used in descriptions of sexual and excretionary organs and
functions, utilized and exploited again and again, often at the same
time and in the same place and by the same persons all in visual or
physical contact. These books indeed boggle the imagination.
(end of quote)
This judge's opinion boggles the imagination. I am familiar with one of
the books he is criticizing. It is a book written by Akbar di Piombo. This
is NOT a pornographic book. It is a book of satire, something like the
works of Rabelais. Then in another book the judge is pissed of because a
fictional character, "Lord Justice Strongcock", is shown in a bad light.
There was something similar to that in the case of Southeatern Promotions
v. Conrad, 420 U.S. (I forgot the page at which the case starts, but
anyone can look at the index at the start of the volume). In that case,
Warren Burger, former Chief [in]Justice of the United States Supreme
Court, in a dissenting opinion, blows his stack because there is a
fictional character in the rock musical "HAIR", named Burger.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Fred Cherry
Modemac <mod...@shell1.tiac.net> writes:
>nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>> Score one for the porn peddlers and the American Criminal Lovers Union
>> this week. Sorry to say.
>If this gives us the opportunity to create some *better quality* porn,
>then I'm all for it.
>--
> Reverend Modemac (mod...@tiac.net)
> First Online Church of "Bob" "There is no black and white."
> URL: http://www.tiac.net/users/modemac/
> (FINGER mod...@sunspot.tiac.net for a FREE SubGenius Pamphlet!)
I consider myself to be a connoissewer of pornography and, as a
connoissewer of pornography, it is my opinion that the finest pornography
is produced in Sweden.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)