Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

NeoCon BLOG PAGES inside.Bush is an.Islamic-Neocon with a Koran bible.with piks..

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Newt Killer

unread,

Sep 27, 2006, 8:28:04 PM9/27/06

re:Right wing neocon islamic web BLOG PAGES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: comm-21...@craigslist.org
Date: 2006-09-27, 4:59PM PDT

On the blog page, now that your in there. you can search them,...
http://condoleezza-rice-spanking-blog.blogspot.com/
http://condicandy.blogspot.com/
http://condoleezza2008.blogspot.com/
http://condoleezza-rice.blogspot.com/
http://condoleezzariceonline.blogspot.com/

Example..>>> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
Religion in plitics... (islamic at that,,, posing as a christian
faith..)

House Passes Public Expression Of Religion Act: 244 to 173
by Jay on 09-26-06 @ 6:03 pm Filed under ACLU, Church And State, 1st
Amendment, News

Well, we are half way there! Now the legislation needs to pass the
Senate. This will be more difficult to do, so we continue to need all
of the support we can get. The roll call is in from the House and its
not good news for the ACLU! The bill, H.R. 2679, would deny legal fees
and out-of-pocket expenses to be taken from taxpayers and given put
into the pockets of groups like the ACLU when they successfully sue
against references to God and religion in public settings, has passed
by a vote of 244-173! This is good news, but it isn't the end of the
battle. The legislation still needs to pass the Senate and for that to
happen we will need all the support we can get. Keep contacting your
Senators and let them know you support it!

Americans United for Seperation of Church and State are quite upset!
Quote:
The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United, said
the House leadership is obsessed with playing to powerful Religious
Right lobbying groups that have been pressing for the legislation.

"This bill is a sop to the Religious Right, but even worse a dangerous
attack on the First Amendment," Lynn said. "The House leadership is
openly hostile to federal courts for upholding church-state separation
and this bill reflects that motivation. The bill seeks to slam the
courthouse doors on citizens who challenge government-sponsored
religious activities. It is a repugnant affront to the civil rights of
all Americans." end quote

Authors words>>>No it doesn't...it seeks to level the playing field
so the ACLU cannot intimidate small towns and cash-strapped schools are
not beholden to the anti-American, extra-constitutional ACLU agenda.
Heh! I'm sure the ACLU will be condemning this as well...any minute!

Here is the final vote results. There were six Republicans that voted
nay. Make notes.<<<<<< end co

-------------------------------------------

We are fucked.. We are inside the head of a neocon because no one is
supposed to be seeing these that is not supposed to be seeing them....
Or at least the authors seem to give me that feeling......

I got in through the google web, not google news, because I knew what
to look for from the link i found on accident here..
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:VMdB10kGnMIJ:www.docboon.blogspot.com/+%22Talking+right%22+%22list+of+words%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=18

Not many people will ever see that,,, that are not supposed to be
seeing them, (except us) Post this stuff everywhere, tell every one,
get them pissed off and mad.. that is 1984 (the book) full blown in
real time...

Look at the time and date and vote count and ohh ya,,, did you notice
he made note of the 6 republicans that voted against the Neocon bill???

You think they would say that if they thought people were going to read
it who were not actually supposed to be seeing it?..

This is the shit right here guys and gals... Again, we are inside the
head of a Neocon that does not know we are here In my opinion..

----------------------
I think they are deadly serious...

Here is Newts Favorite blog people..
21) Glenn Reynolds (6)
21) Laura Ingraham (6)
21) Sean Hannity (6)
21) Milton Friedman (6)
21) George Allen (6)
20) Antonin Scalia (7)
17) Hugh Hewitt (8 )
17) Ann Coulter (8 )
17) Tom Coburn (8 )
15) Walter Williams (9)
15) Tom Tancredo (9)
14) Victor David Hanson (10)
12) Jonah Goldberg (11)
12) John Bolton (11)
11) Newt Gingrich (12)
10) Dick Cheney (13)
9) Rush Limbaugh (15)
7) Donald Rumsfeld (16)
7) Charles Krauthammer (16)
6) Michelle Malkin (17)
4) Mark Steyn (19)
4) George W. Bush (19)
2) Thomas Sowell (20)
2) Rudy Giuliani (20)
1) Condi Rice (22)

----------------------------------------
http://www.blogsforbush.com/
The Latest Paranoid Conspiracy Theory
By Mark Noonan at 12:27 AM
The first time I heard the phrase "October Surprise" was, I think, in
1988 - in that year, it related to the insane story that in 1980 then
VP candidate Bush the Elder had flown to Paris to negotiate an
agreement with the Iranians to hold the American hostages until after
the election, thus ensuring Carter's defeat and Reagan/Bush's election.
I don't recall all the details, but I know that it was pushed pretty
seriously by Democrats in their attempt to derail the elder Bush's 1988
campaign for the White House. It was stupid from the start, but
Democrats insisted that it be investigated because, well, because they
needed something to hammer Bush with and truth doesn't matter when
you're trying to defeat a Republican.

That was, I believe, the first time senior members of the Democratic
Party signed on to a paranoid conspiracy theory in an attempt to defeat
a Republican - but it wasn't the last. Until just this week, the most
recent October Surprise theory was the 2004 effort to claim that
President Bush already had bin Laden in custody and was holding him
until the last week of the campaign before announcing his capture. The
most recent, courtesy of former Democratic Senator Gary Hart, is that
President Bush will launch a war against Iran in October in order to
shore up support before the election:

Quote:
..the president will speak on national television. He will say this:
Iran is determined to develop nuclear weapons; if this happens, the
entire region will go nuclear; our diplomatic efforts to prevent this
have failed; Iran is offering a haven to known al Qaeda leaders; the
fate of our ally Israel is at stake; Iran persists in supporting
terrorism, including in Iraq; and sanctions will have no affect (and
besides they are for sissies). He will not say: ...and besides, we need
the oil.
Rather neat how Hart works in the ready stand-by in conspiracy
theories, that we are actually going to fight Iran for oil. I have a
few questions:

Where in God's name do we get these people from? How on earth did
America wind up in 2006 with people who believe things less based on
fact that children's fairy tales? I know we've sinned as a nation - but
do we really deserve this?

It isn't so much that there might be military action against Iran -
after all, those who read here regularly know that I think military
action against Iran is an eventual necessity - but the fact that its
tied up in domestic politics and, of course, is a war for oil. Who
knows when it might happen - tomorrow, next month, next year. But do we
have to get Democrats who will try to twist every possible event in to
some sort of evil conspiracy on the part of President Bush. For crying
out loud, Democrats - Chavez is wrong: President Bush isn't Satan.

Get a grip. <<<<< end

Did you catch this part?>>>President Bush will launch a war against
Iran in October in order to shore up support before the election: <<<
his words..

-----------------

The media is not on our side guys.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8324704810936664065&q=the+great+conspiracy

Pay no attention to the pentagon part... They are wrong in my
opinion...It was a plane.. No doubt here..

Now, This is from Google news, The Washington Post from yesterday....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092601486.html

By Alan Cooperman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 27, 2006; Page A04

The House passed a bill yesterday that would bar judges from awarding
legal fees to the American Civil Liberties Union and similar groups
that sue municipalities for violating the Constitution's ban on
government establishment of religion.

Though the bill would prevent plaintiffs from recovering legal costs in
any lawsuit based on the Establishment Clause, House Republicans said
during a floor debate that it was particularly aimed at organizations
that force the removal of Nativity scenes and Ten Commandments
monuments from public property.

"Liberal groups . . . scour the country looking to sue cities and
states with any kind of religious display, regardless of how popular
these displays are," said Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite (R-Fla.). Because
judges often require municipalities that lose such lawsuits to
reimburse their opponents' legal fees, "citizens' precious monuments
are being eroded with their own tax dollars," she added.
The bill, called the Public Expressions of Religion Protection Act,
passed 244 to 173 on a mostly party-line vote.
Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU's Washington legislative
office, said the measure is "election-year red meat for the Christian
right, because they've been complaining they haven't gotten enough from
this Congress."

Fredrickson added that it appears unlikely the Senate will pass the
bill.

"But we're watching it, because it is designed to do real damage to
First Amendment protections," she said. "What the backers of this
legislation are leaving out of the discussion is that fees are only
awarded when we've been successful in showing that someone's
constitutional rights have been violated."

The American Legion, the Southern Baptist Convention and other
conservative groups began pushing for the legislation after a
Pennsylvania judge awarded $2 million to the ACLU of Pennsylvania and
Americans United for Separation of Church and State. The two groups had
successfully sued the school board in Dover, Pa., for requiring science
teachers to teach "intelligent design" alongside evolution. The award
was later reduced to $1 million.

Conservative groups were also irked when a judge awarded $550,000 to
three groups -- Americans United, the Southern Poverty Law Center and
the ACLU of Alabama -- after they prevailed in a lawsuit against former
Alabama chief justice Roy S. Moore's display of the Ten Commandments.

The bill's sponsor, Rep. John N. Hostettler (R-Ind.), said the ACLU and
similar groups are "profiteering" as well as seeking "to remove every
vestige of our religious heritage from public places <<<< end WP

-------------------------------------------------

Do you know who the ACLU is?
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a major American
non-profit organization with headquarters in New York City, whose
stated mission is "to defend and preserve the individual rights and
liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the
Constitution and laws of the United States".[1] It works through
litigation, legislation, and community education.[1]

When your government says it needs to take away your freedoms, so it
can protect you,

Restrict your right to research info like libraries,

Cut school funding to make it harder to get an education,

Removes your rights granted in the constitution so they screw you
legally,

Raises your taxes so high that you have to sell your house or get it
taken away (like both of my folks),

Has both the right and the left wing media under their control to tell
you what they want you to know,

Hires an oil company to build "Secret Prisons" and referres to them as
"Free Speach Centers" in your back yard to keep us "safe" so we don't
get hit by a car while protesting in the streets against them,

If they keep us poor and stupid, it will be easier to make slaves out
of us and control us all..

Plain and simple...

Read what the Blog said about this ACLU..

"It seeks to level the playing field so the ACLU cannot intimidate
small towns and cash-strapped schools are not beholden to the
anti-American, extra-constitutional ACLU agenda"

Now read what the Washington Post actually printed.

"The ACLU and similar groups are "profiteering" as well as seeking "to
remove every vestige of our religious heritage from public places"

THIS IS BAD!!!!

Now read this..
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/170806declarewar.htm
"free speech Center" built by Haliburton for us civilians so we don't
get hit by traffic while we are out in the streets protesting the
government for removing out rights....
[img]http://prisonplanet.com/images/august2006/170806prison.jpg[/img]
Ohhh boy....

_________________
Remember, right-talking is a team sport. You're team can be #1 even
if they lose every game. What is important is that you fill the stadium
with screaming fans. The GOPAC

This might get really ugly, remember, do not trust main steam or fox
new.. Stick to indipendant news sites soon...Double check everything...

Terrorist is in the white house right now.. He is a crazy islamic
fearmonger who wants to make us slave to wash his boat..They all are...

--------------------

Here is a picture of the TERRORIST being given a copy of the Koran..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1565000/images/_1568435_bush300afp.jpg

Here is a picture of the TERRORIST reading the Koran.
http://johnsoncity.blogspot.com/Bush-reads-the-Koran-det.jpg

Here is a picture of the TERRORIST attending his Islamic church.
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5850/bushislamac4.jpg
_________________
Remember, right-talking is a team sport. You're team can be #1 even
if they lose every game. What is important is that you fill the stadium
with screaming fans. The GOPAC

Newt Killer

unread,

Sep 27, 2006, 8:31:41 PM9/27/06

Jim Higgins

unread,

Sep 27, 2006, 8:53:29 PM9/27/06

"Newt Killer" <modp...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159403284.7...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> re:Right wing neocon islamic web BLOG PAGES
>

Please resume your medication, you are babbling incoherent nonsense again.

Jim Higgins

unread,

Sep 27, 2006, 8:54:53 PM9/27/06

"Newt Killer" <modp...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1159403501.5...@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> More Islamo-Neocon Blog sites...

Does this mean you do not want to contribute to the Jeb Bush for President
campaign? Howard "The Scream" Dean must be proud of such an incoherent
babbler.

Newt Killer

unread,

Sep 27, 2006, 9:17:04 PM9/27/06

No funds for jeb,

Howard Dean sent me an email thanking me along with my state senators.

Thanks..

0 new messages