Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

US militia, not Osama behind Anthrax scare: Expert

5 views
Skip to first unread message

TRUTH

unread,
Oct 18, 2001, 3:24:23 PM10/18/01
to
http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=983950989

Check out this web-page. It says the militia is behind the anthrax scares.


Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2001, 12:20:24 PM10/19/01
to
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:24:23 -0400, "TRUTH" <no...@nonehere.com>
posted:

>http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=983950989
>
>Check out this web-page. It says the militia is behind the anthrax scares.

The Enemy HAS TO put the blame on the American Militia since
DESTROYING AMERICA IS THEIR OBJECTIVE AND THE MILITIA IS THE LAST
BASTION AGAINST SUCH VILENESS!!!


-----------------------------------------
JOIN OR FORM A LAWFUL FREE STATE MILITIA!
PREPARE TO FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM AND FOR
THAT OF YOUR POSTERITY!
-----------------------------------------

Andrew Carol

unread,
Oct 19, 2001, 12:34:02 PM10/19/01
to
In article <3bd0528e...@news2.ripco.com>, <Fre...@Liberty.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:24:23 -0400, "TRUTH" <no...@nonehere.com>
> posted:
>
> >http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=983950989
> >
> >Check out this web-page. It says the militia is behind the anthrax scares.
>
> The Enemy HAS TO put the blame on the American Militia since
> DESTROYING AMERICA IS THEIR OBJECTIVE AND THE MILITIA IS THE LAST
> BASTION AGAINST SUCH VILENESS!!!
>

So where was the Militia on Sept 11th? Or since?

I bet they are crying like babies wishing they had gotten the anthrax
shots years ago rather than protesting them as some kind of evil plot
to weaken our military.

--- Andy

militiaguy

unread,
Oct 19, 2001, 7:25:45 PM10/19/01
to
Most folks wouldn't know this article even existed if you hadn't drawn
attention to it.
Looks like you are doing a better job of getting out their word than the so
called ENEMY.
"For lack of wood...a fire goes out"
Why do you keep bringing this up? I guess there is no such thing as bad
press when
you haven't had any in a while.
http://sonoguy.tripod.com/

<Fre...@Liberty.com> wrote in message
news:3bd0528e...@news2.ripco.com...

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 12:09:13 PM10/22/01
to
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:34:02 -0700, Andrew Carol
<aaca...@coastside.net> posted:

>So where was the Militia on Sept 11th? Or since?

Not in the "belly of the Beast", if that's what you're suggesting.

The Militia were about, but considering the Tactical situation, what
would have had them do? Most Militia members do NOT tend to travel by
commerical airliners since that entails the Shameless, and Ultimately
FUTILE Violation of the Right to be Secure Against UNREASONABLE
Searches - I was an airline passenger FOR THE VERY LAST TIME back in
1992.

Now, should this ANTI-Citizen Self-Sufficiency MADNESS Finally come to
an end and Citizens are RESPECTED in their Right to Keep and Bear Arms
ANYWHERE they go, Including aboard commercial aircraft, THEN you'll
see the Militia in Action should an Act of Air Piracy be Attempted!

IF I had been aboard a plane where a hijacking or other Act of Air
Piracy was being Attempted, Armed or NOT, I would NOT have hesitated
in doing WHATEVER I COULD, with or without assistance, to PREVENT its
completion. On the other hand, myself, and others of a similar Love of
Freedom and Liberty i.e. American Patriots, would typically NOT be
aboard a commercial airliner because we'd already MORE THAN HAD ENOUGH
INJUSTICE a LONG time ago and had Long since VOTED WITH OUR FEET,
Refusing to be airline passengers UNLESS and UNTIL our RIGHTS were
Respected!!!

>I bet they are crying like babies wishing they had gotten the anthrax
>shots years ago rather than protesting them as some kind of evil plot
>to weaken our military.

Not very likely, as the reasons for NOT getting the shots are EVEN
MORE VALID RIGHT NOW than they were then!
------------------------------------------------
The Liberties of our Country, the Freedom of our
civil Constitution, are Worth Defending at ALL
Hazards.
--- Samuel Adams
------------------------------------------------

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 12:34:04 PM10/22/01
to
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:25:45 GMT, "militiaguy"
<beaver_...@yahoo.com> posted:

> Most folks wouldn't know this article even existed if you hadn't drawn
>attention to it.
>Looks like you are doing a better job of getting out their word than the so
>called ENEMY.
>"For lack of wood...a fire goes out"
>Why do you keep bringing this up? I guess there is no such thing as bad
>press when
>you haven't had any in a while.

It's called an EARLY WARNING. The Patriot/Militia network system
(Marxist Hillary called it a "vast right-wing conspiracy", remember?)
in this Nation has for many years been gathering Intelligence which
then becomes WELL KNOWN to Patriots/Militia Nationwide LONG BEFORE,
often SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE the Enemy either leaks it, gets publically
caught at it, or deliberately promulgates it among the Vast Herds of
Sheople.

While it's certainly True that; "For lack of wood...a fire goes out",
it's also True that ARSONISTS are Well Known for either Re-Starting
them, and/or SETTING NEW ONES - CONSTANTLY!!!
---------------------------------------------
The American Milita - REAL Homeland Security!

"...To the Security of a FREE State..."
---------------------------------------------

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 12:37:51 PM10/22/01
to

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 12:18:07 PM10/23/01
to
>Nope, that'd be the National Guard..

Nope, Poopy-Diapers, the Militia ARE the Citizen-Soldiers, Exactly as
I've stated.

Here, get educated - if you can, or Will:

The Militia refers to a Concept of a Universally Armed people,
not to any specifically organized unit. When the Framers refer
to the equivalent of our National Guard, they uniformly used
the term "Select Militia", and distinguished this from
"Militia". Debates over the Constitution constantly refer to
organized militia units as a Threat to Freedom comparable to
that of a Standing Army and stressed that such organized units
DID NOT CONSTITUTE, and indeed, were philosophically opposed
to the Concept of a Militia."

--- Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution
Committee On The Judiciary
97th Congress United States Senate
Second Session - February 1982

This Congress chose to do, in interest of organizing reserve
military units which were NOT LIMITED in deployment by
Strictures of our Power over the Constitutional Militia,
which can be called forth ONLY to execute the Laws of the
Union, Suppress Insurrection and Repel Invasions. The modern
National Guard was Specifically Intended to AVOID Status as
the Constitutional Militia.
--- House of Representatives
Report # 141 - 73rd Congress
First Session - February 5th, 1933

That the National Guard is NOT the Militia referred to in the
Second Amendment is even clearer today. Congress has organized
the National Guard under its Power to Raise and Support
Armies, and NOT its Power to provide for organizing, arming
and disciplining the Militia.

--- Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution
Committee On The Judiciary
97th Congress United States Senate
Second Session - February 1982

You're SHOT DOWN by the TRUTH again, Poopy-Diapers.
-----------------------------------
The American Militia
Over 22 Million Strong and Growing.
-----------------------------------

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 5:03:04 PM10/23/01
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:38:32 -0500, Kurt Lochner
<kurt_l...@shotsnail.messin.bee-cee.com> posted:

I've already PROVEN that you're full of it, Poopy-Diapers.
--------------------------------------------------------------
RESTORE AMERICA!
*** http://williamcooper.com ***
WAKE UP! LEARN THE TRUTH!
*** http://williamcooper.com ***
the
*** HOUR OF THE TIME ***
(HOTT)
WBCQ "The Planet" 7.415MHz Shortwave 9pm-10pm CT Mon-Thu
--------------------------------------------------------------

militiaguy

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 8:33:18 PM10/23/01
to

"Kurt Lochner" <kurt_l...@shotsnail.messin.bee-cee.com> wrote in message
news:3BD5B928...@hotmail.com...
> free...@bile.pooper.sychophant.com deleted:
> >
> > Kurt Lochner replied <snip for brevity>

> > > > > > > http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=983950989
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Check out this web-page. It says the militia is behind the
anthrax scares.
> > > > >

> > > > > </begin excerpt>
> > > > >
> > > > > US militia, not Osama behind Anthrax scare
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip again, for mercy's sake>

If you believe that one, then you will have no problem believing
in this one...
http://sonoguy.tripod.com/biological.html

Noah Zark

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 9:38:22 PM10/23/01
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:09:13 GMT, Fre...@Liberty.com wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:34:02 -0700, Andrew Carol
><aaca...@coastside.net> posted:
>
>>So where was the Militia on Sept 11th? Or since?
>
>Not in the "belly of the Beast", if that's what you're suggesting.
>
>The Militia were about, but considering the Tactical situation, what
>would have had them do? Most Militia members do NOT tend to travel by
>commerical airliners since that entails the Shameless, and Ultimately
>FUTILE Violation of the Right to be Secure Against UNREASONABLE
>Searches - I was an airline passenger FOR THE VERY LAST TIME back in
>1992.
>
>Now, should this ANTI-Citizen Self-Sufficiency MADNESS Finally come to
>an end and Citizens are RESPECTED in their Right to Keep and Bear Arms
>ANYWHERE they go, Including aboard commercial aircraft, THEN you'll
>see the Militia in Action should an Act of Air Piracy be Attempted!
>
>IF I had been aboard a plane where a hijacking or other Act of Air
>Piracy was being Attempted, Armed or NOT, I would NOT have hesitated
>in doing WHATEVER I COULD, with or without assistance, to PREVENT its
>completion. On the other hand, myself, and others of a similar Love of
>Freedom and Liberty i.e. American Patriots, would typically NOT be
>aboard a commercial airliner because we'd already MORE THAN HAD ENOUGH
>INJUSTICE a LONG time ago and had Long since VOTED WITH OUR FEET,

Do you have to walk on your hands to do that?

Kevin Stall

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 10:33:57 PM10/23/01
to
Sorry but none of your quotes qualify as an authoritative source. A
sub-committee is just a group of guys who are meeting in the capitol, they
have no legal force. And just because some nutter congressman made a
statement that the NG isn't the militia does not mean it's true.


<Fre...@Liberty.com> wrote in message
news:3bd59527...@news2.ripco.com...

Lee Langlois

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 8:52:36 AM10/24/01
to
"TRUTH" <no...@nonehere.com> wrote in message news:<h%Fz7.310$J61....@newsfeed.slurp.net>...

> http://www.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=983950989
>
> Check out this web-page. It says the militia is behind the anthrax scares.

More communist demonization of patriotic Americans. It is these
traitors who are probably behind the anthrax attacks.

Lee Langlois

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 8:58:49 AM10/24/01
to
Fre...@Liberty.com wrote in message news:<3bd445b9...@news2.ripco.com>...

What we really need is a party that believes in freedom and Democracy.
Hitler was an evil man, but had sense enough to start his own party,
when he saw that the Communist were about to take over Germany.

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 9:53:45 AM10/24/01
to
>>I've already PROVEN that[..]
>
>Yup, that's why you keep [..]

Why I keep shooting down your Anti-American LIES, Poopy-Diapers.

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 9:58:14 AM10/24/01
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:33:57 +0800, "Kevin Stall" <kst...@bigpond.com>
posted:

>Sorry but none of your quotes qualify as an authoritative source. A
>sub-committee is just a group of guys who are meeting in the capitol, they
>have no legal force. And just because some nutter congressman made a
>statement that the NG isn't the militia does not mean it's true.

It's because the Militia is REALLY NOT the NG, that it's True!
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Who are the Militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared,
then, that we shall turn our Arms each man against his own
bosom? Congress shall have NO Power to disarm the Militia.
Their Swords, and EVERY OTHER TERRIBLE IMPLEMENT OF THE
SOLDIER, are the Birth-Right of an American... The unlimited
power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal
or state governments, but where I trust in God it will Ever
Remain, IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE."
--- Tench Coxe
--------------------------------------------------------------

David Walker

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 3:35:08 PM10/24/01
to
tomc...@juno.com (Lee Langlois) wrote in message news:<1134d14b.0110...@posting.google.com>...

> Fre...@Liberty.com wrote in message news:<3bd445b9...@news2.ripco.com>...
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:25:45 GMT, "militiaguy"
> > <beaver_...@yahoo.com> posted:
> >
> What we really need is a party that believes in freedom and Democracy.
> Hitler was an evil man, but had sense enough to start his own party,
> when he saw that the Communist were about to take over Germany.

Uhm, the Communists were NEVER close to taking control in Germany.
The biggest percentage teh Communists got in the 1920s was about 10%
of the Weimar electorate. The closest Germany ever came was in the
1919 collapse that ended with teh formation of Wemar. Essentially in
1919 there was no real central authority ANYWHERE in Europe east of
the Rhine and north of the Alps: Germany, Austria-Hungary, The Ottoman
Empire, and Russia were all in Libertarian heaven: No central
government -- no taxes, no army, no police. Just Armed Militias
preying on each other, doesn't it sound liek FUN?

militiaguy

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 7:38:33 PM10/24/01
to

"Lee Langlois" <tomc...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1134d14b.0110...@posting.google.com...

> Fre...@Liberty.com wrote in message
news:<3bd445b9...@news2.ripco.com>...
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:25:45 GMT, "militiaguy"
> > <beaver_...@yahoo.com> posted:
> >
> > > Most folks wouldn't know this article even existed if you hadn't
drawn
> > >attention<snip>>

> While it's certainly True that; "For lack of wood...a fire goes out",
> > it's also True that ARSONISTS are Well Known for either Re-Starting
> > them, and/or SETTING NEW ONES - CONSTANTLY!!!
> > ---------------------------------------------

> > Looks like you just provided the kindling for re-starting a
conspiracy fire.
http://sonoguy.tripod.com/

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 25, 2001, 9:57:47 AM10/25/01
to
>--Do you need me to explain that fact[..]

You've NEVER dealt with Facts, ONLY LIES, third-rate
Change/Damage-Control AgentPoopy-Diapers.

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Oct 25, 2001, 10:17:07 AM10/25/01
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:03:33 -0500, third-rate Change/Damage-Control
Agent Poopy-Diapers posted:

>"In essence, the conflict that exists today
> is no more than an old-style struggle for
> power, once again presented to mankind in
> semi-religious trappings."
>--Albert Einstein, April 18, 1955

It's called the Mystery Schools, Poopy-Diapers, and American
Patriots/Militia Know all about it.
To learn more about it:

http://williamcooper.com/tmplrs.htm

http://williamcooper.com/illumina.htm

Scotius Maximus

unread,
Dec 6, 2001, 10:09:45 PM12/6/01
to
Guns are a symbol of the right of the individual to do as he
pleases with his own life, and that's why the dictatorial types don't
like them. Please remember, however, that in an era of helicopter
gunships and F-15s, rifles are not quite what they once were in terms
of personal security. The Clintonistas definately had ambitions for
making the government the supreme opinion on anything of importance in
America, but now it's many people in the Bush cabinet who want to do
that. Regardless, the issue here is the Militias of the US, and as far
as I am concerned, they are mostly harmless. They are unliked by their
government because they believe they have rights that are not at
governments' discretion to give or not give, and they are correct.
They certainly are not behind the anthrax attacks. You better check
your local chapter of Hamas and Hezbollah praisers for those
scoundrels, and yes, I'm talking about the neo-nazis.

Fre...@liberty.com

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 7:17:31 PM12/19/01
to
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 03:09:45 GMT, palo...@mnsi.net (Scotius Maximus)
posted:

> Guns are a symbol of the right of the individual to do as he
>pleases with his own life, and that's why the dictatorial types don't
>like them.

That's for sure.

>Please remember, however, that in an era of helicopter
>gunships and F-15s, rifles are not quite what they once were in terms
>of personal security.

Perhaps not, but they'll do just fine. Think Unconventional and
Dynamic. Recall History, including that of Afghan Rebels vs the Soviet
Union, and of course, do read Sun-Tzu's "The Art Of War" - the
concepts are still Valid today.

>The Clintonistas definately had ambitions for
>making the government the supreme opinion on anything of importance in
>America, but now it's many people in the Bush cabinet who want to do
>that.

Of course, those lyrics by the Who say it so well; Meet the new boss,
SAME AS THE OLD BOSS.

>Regardless, the issue here is the Militias of the US, and as far
>as I am concerned, they are mostly harmless.

They're obviously not harmless to Despots (but that's GOOD), else they
wouldn't be so Hell-Bent on their Demise.

>They are unliked by their
>government because they believe they have rights that are not at
>governments' discretion to give or not give, and they are correct.

I certainly hope so!

>They certainly are not behind the anthrax attacks.

Of course not. Branding Patriots/Militia as 'terrorists' is the
ENEMY'S TACTIC.

>You better check
>your local chapter of Hamas and Hezbollah praisers for those
>scoundrels, and yes, I'm talking about the neo-nazis.

The 'neo' Nazis are RUNNING THIS ONCE FREE COUNTRY OF OURS RIGHT
NOW!!!

But they're a Hybrid, known as CommuNazis, the Result, the Synthesis
of that Dialectic Manipulation known as WWII. Besides, it's natural
for Nazis, or ANY other kind of Socialists to end up getting into
Communism since ALL Socialists are ultimately Communists-in-Training
anyway.

0 new messages