The impeach-Trump conspiracy

[Ubiquitous]

Pressed by Megyn Kelly on his ties to President Trump, an
exasperated Vladimir Putin blurted out, “We had no relationship at
all. … I never met him. … Have you all lost your senses over there?”

Yes, Vlad, we have.

Consider the questions that have convulsed this city since the Trump
triumph, and raised talk of impeachment.

Did Trump collude with Russians to hack the DNC emails and move the
goods to WikiLeaks, thus revealing the state secret that DNC chair
Debbie Wasserman Schultz was putting the screws to poor Bernie
Sanders?

If not Trump himself, did campaign aides collude with the KGB?

Now, given that our NSA and CIA seemingly intercept everything
Russians say to Americans, why is our fabled FBI, having
investigated for a year, unable to give us a definitive yes or no?

The snail’s pace of the FBI investigation explains Trump’s
frustration. What explains the FBI’s torpor? If J. Edgar Hoover had
moved at this pace, John Dillinger would have died of old age.

We hear daily on cable TV of the “Trump-Russia” scandal. Yet, no one
has been charged with collusion, and every intelligence official,
past or present, who has spoken out has echoed ex-acting CIA
Director Mike Morrell:

“On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians
here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all. … There’s no
little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark.”

Where are the criminals? Where is the crime?

As for the meetings between Gen. Mike Flynn, Jared Kushner, Sen.
Jeff Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, it appears that
Trump wanted a “back channel” to Putin so he could honor his
commitment to seek better relations with Russia.

Given the Russophobia rampant here, that makes sense. And while it
appears amateurish that Flynn would use Russian channels of
communication, what is criminal about this?

Putin is not Stalin. Soviet divisions are not sitting on the Elbe.
The Cold War is over. And many presidents have used back channels.
Woodrow Wilson sent Col. Edward House to talk to the Kaiser and the
Brits. FDR ran messages to Churchill through Harry Hopkins.

As for Trump asking Director James Comey to cut some slack for
Flynn, it is understandable in human terms. Flynn had been a loyal
aide and friend and Trump had to feel rotten about having to fire
the man.

So, what is really going on here?

All the synthetic shock over what Kushner or Sessions said to
Kislyak aside, this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its
fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his
presidency.

For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He
presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed
elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in
2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to
overthrow a ruling regime.

Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and
the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his
tweets.

Seeking a rationale for its rejection, this city has seized upon
that old standby. We didn’t lose! The election was stolen in a vast
conspiracy, an “act of war” against America, an assault upon “our
democracy,” criminal collusion between the Kremlin and the
Trumpites.

Hence, Trump is an illegitimate president, and it is the duty of
brave citizens of both parties to work to remove the usurper.

The city seized upon a similar argument in 1968, when Richard Nixon
won, because it was said he had colluded to have South Vietnam’s
president abort Lyndon Johnson’s new plan to bring peace to
Southeast Asia in the final hours of that election.

Then, as now, the “T” word, treason, was trotted out.

Attempts to overturn elections where elites are repudiated are not
uncommon in U.S. history. Both Nixon and Reagan, after 49-state
landslides, were faced with attempts to overturn the election
results.

With Nixon in Watergate, the elites succeeded. With Reagan in Iran-
Contra, they almost succeeded in destroying that great president as
he was ending the Cold War in a bloodless victory for the West.

After Lincoln’s assassination, President Andrew Johnson sought to
prevent Radical Republicans from imposing a ruthless Reconstruction
on a defeated and devastated South.

The Radicals enacted the Tenure of Office Act, stripping Johnson of
his authority to remove any member of the Cabinet without Senate
permission. Johnson defied the Radicals and fired their agent in the
Cabinet, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton.

“Tennessee” Johnson was impeached, and missed conviction by one
vote. John F. Kennedy, in his 1956 book, called the senator who had
voted to save Johnson a “Profile in Courage.”

If Trump is brought down on the basis of what Putin correctly labels
“nonsense,” this city will have executed a nonviolent coup against a
constitutionally elected president. Such an act would drop us into
the company of those Third World nations where such means are the
customary ways that corrupt elites retain their hold on power.


--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.

[TruthBarker]

On 06/09/2017 05:05 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> Pressed by Megyn Kelly on his ties to President Trump, an
> exasperated Vladimir Putin blurted out, “We had no relationship at
> all. … I never met him. … Have you all lost your senses over there?”
>
> Yes, Vlad, we have.
>
> Consider the questions that have convulsed this city since the Trump
> triumph, and raised talk of impeachment.
>
> Did Trump collude with Russians to hack the DNC emails and move the
> goods to WikiLeaks,

That is the common belief, in reality Putin couriered it to Trump

thus revealing the state secret that DNC chair
> Debbie Wasserman Schultz was putting the screws to poor Bernie
> Sanders?

While Trump was calling Paul Rand ugly, Ted a son of a criminal.......
very intelligent debate. Like a mafia Don "whaza mata with yo faze no,
smart guy!"
> h

> If not Trump himself, did campaign aides collude with the KGB?
>

Yes they did, the Russian KGB ambassador.
.

> Now, given that our NSA and CIA seemingly intercept everything
> Russians say to Americans, why is our fabled FBI, having
> investigated for a year, unable to give us a definitive yes or no?
>
> The snail’s pace of the FBI investigation explains Trump’s
> frustration. What explains the FBI’s torpor? If J. Edgar Hoover had
> moved at this pace, John Dillinger would have died of old age.
>
> We hear daily on cable TV of the “Trump-Russia” scandal. Yet, no one
> has been charged with collusion, and every intelligence official,
> past or present, who has spoken out has echoed ex-acting CIA
> Director Mike Morrell:
>
> “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians
> here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all. … There’s no
> little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark.”
>
> Where are the criminals? Where is the crime?
>
> As for the meetings between Gen. Mike Flynn, Jared Kushner, Sen.
> Jeff Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, it appears that
> Trump wanted a “back channel” to Putin so he could honor his
> commitment to seek better relations with Russia.
>
> Given the Russophobia rampant here, that makes sense. And while it
> appears amateurish that Flynn would use Russian channels of
> communication, what is criminal about this?
>

Only our intelligence agencies would not know what he was talking about
to whom. God, what a crook!

> Putin is not Stalin. Soviet divisions are not sitting on the Elbe.
> The Cold War is over. And many presidents have used back channels.
> Woodrow Wilson sent Col. Edward House to talk to the Kaiser and the
> Brits. FDR ran messages to Churchill through Harry Hopkins.
>
> As for Trump asking Director James Comey to cut some slack for
> Flynn, it is understandable in human terms. Flynn had been a loyal
> aide and friend and Trump had to feel rotten about having to fire
> the man.
>
> So, what is really going on here?
>
> All the synthetic shock over what Kushner or Sessions said to
> Kislyak aside, this city’s hatred for President Trump, and its
> fanatic determination to bring him down in disgrace, predates his
> presidency.
>
> For Trump ran in 2016 not simply as the Republican alternative. He
> presented his candidacy as a rejection, a repudiation of the failed
> elites, political and media, of both parties. Americans voted in
> 2016 not just for a change in leaders but for a revolution to
> overthrow a ruling regime.
>
> Thus, this city has never reconciled itself to Trump’s victory, and
> the president daily rubs their noses in their defeat with his
> tweets.
>

He is very fond of fake news, isn't he?

We became a Fourth world nation when Trump took office. Backing out from
climate deal, contentious relations with the Europeans, blanket ban on
people coming to US, on and on and on.... I dont see anything optimistic
for the future.

I say Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up! ..... Maybe Putin can find
a soft place for him in a Russian gulag.

[Bast]

Beezel Bub wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:11:50 -0400, TruthBarker <T.B...@herethere.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Only our intelligence agencies would not know what he was talking about
>> to whom. God, what a crook!
>
>

> So much better to have Hillary in office, you know, the bitch that
> takes money from nations that support terrorism? The same bitch who
> lied about classified emails and got away with it? The same bitch who
> had people killed who were getting *to close*? The same bitch who
> degraded the American people who supported Trump? Shall I go on?





To all the hiitlery-heads out there.
Go back to the third debate and watch it again.
Hitlery was practically having an orgasm talking about hitting the red
button and that the military MUST comply.
...She really wanted to go down in history as the fastest president to turn
the world to ashes. Without even considering that there would no one left to
read about it.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 6/9/2017 2:05 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> [bullshit]

There is no "conspiracy" to impeach Trump.

[artrott...@gmail.com]

Op vrijdag 9 juni 2017 15:27:09 UTC+2 schreef Ubiquitous:

>
> Did Trump collude with Russians to hack the DNC emails and move the
> goods to WikiLeaks, thus revealing the state secret that DNC chair
> Debbie Wasserman Schultz was putting the screws to poor Bernie
> Sanders?

Trump did not do this, most likely DNC employee Seth Rich did it and got killed (murdered in the streets) for it. Assange actually confirmed this by putting out a reward of $ 25,000 for the one that gives the tip that will solve this crime.

>
> Now, given that our NSA and CIA seemingly intercept everything
> Russians say to Americans, why is our fabled FBI, having
> investigated for a year, unable to give us a definitive yes or no?

Yes it seems that nsa / cia even taps and CCTVs The Oval Office how else would the leakers know what is said there? Between Trump and Russian diplomats? What a world are we living in :( The nsa and cia could also edit and manipulate videos, audios and photos they make in The White House, we don't know what fake is and what genuine / real is anymore. Maybe Trump starts doing the same with the audio of talks of him with Comey, maybe he doesn't dare. ...a lie for a lie...

[TruthBarker]

On 06/09/2017 03:06 PM, Beezel Bub wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:11:50 -0400, TruthBarker <T.B...@herethere.org>
> wrote:
>

>> Only our intelligence agencies would not know what he was talking about
>> to whom. God, what a crook!
>
>

> So much better to have Hillary in office, you know, the bitch that
> takes money from nations that support terrorism? The same bitch who
> lied about classified emails and got away with it? The same bitch who
> had people killed who were getting *to close*? The same bitch who
> degraded the American people who supported Trump? Shall I go on?
>

Why did you stop, please go on. It will show the level of brain washing
you have been subjected to. As of now it is very severe.

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

On 06/11/2017 08:33 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:40:48 -0600, Beezel Bub <nu...@bizz.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:44:46 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>> <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 13:06:48 -0600, Beezel Bub <nu...@bizz.invalid>

>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:11:50 -0400, TruthBarker <T.B...@herethere.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>

>>>>> Only our intelligence agencies would not know what he was talking about
>>>>> to whom. God, what a crook!
>>>>
>>>>

>>>> So much better to have Hillary in office, you know, the bitch that
>>>> takes money from nations that support terrorism?
>>>

>>> Such as?

>>
>>
>>>
>>>> The same bitch who
>>>> lied about classified emails and got away with it?
>>>

>>> Why lies do you claim she told?

>>>
>>>> The same bitch who
>>>> had people killed who were getting *to close*?
>>>

>>> Who are these people? And where is the evidence she had them
>>> killed?

>>>
>>>> The same bitch who
>>>> degraded the American people who supported Trump? Shall I go on?
>>>

>>> Please do. But include the valid, verifiable evidence for your
>>> claims. Otherwise you just look like a k00k.
>>
>>
>>
>> LOL,, "What? Do you mean with a cloth or something?"
>>
>> "basket of deplorables"
>
> Lack of evidence, and default admission that you were and are
> wrong, is noted.
>

It's NOT that I'm always right, just that Liberals are always wrong.
--
That's Karma