Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I have no faith in the truthfulness of my Jew-infested government and its evil little ally (the media) except for the military, and ONLY the veterans
15 views
Skip to first unread message
Crickets
May 23, 2013, 10:24:52 AM5/23/13
to
9/11: Planes/No Planes and “Video Fakery”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
Monday, February 20th, 2012 | Posted by Jim Fetzer
During the research I have done on this question, some of the most
important reasons to question the use of planes on 9/11 are (1) that
Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and, (2)
that, according to FAA Registration records I have in hand, the planes
corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not deregistered until 28
September 2005, which raises the questions, “How can planes that were
not in the air have crashed on 9/11?” and “How can planes that crashed
on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?” We have studies
(3) by Elias Davidsson demonstrating that the government has never
been able to prove that any of the alleged “hijackers” were aboard any
of those planes and research (4) by A.K. Dewdney and by David Ray
Griffin demonstrating that the purported phone calls from those planes
were faked. And (5), as Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) has observed,
although there are millions of uniquely identifiable components of
those four planes, the government has yet to produce even one. My
purpose here is not to persuade anyone to believe the 9/11 planes were
phantom flights on 9/11, but simply to lay out some of the evidence
that supports that conclusion, even though I myself was initially
unwilling to take it seriously. ...
Now you see them ...
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
Now you don't.
BDK
May 23, 2013, 10:56:19 AM5/23/13
to
In article <0c44823c-f6e2-467f-a0d5-
e7033b...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, bongb...@peoplepc.com
says...
>
> 9/11: Planes/No Planes and ?Video Fakery?
> not in the air have crashed on 9/11?? and ?How can planes that crashed
> on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?? We have studies
into that BS?
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
e7033b...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, bongb...@peoplepc.com
says...
>
> 9/11: Planes/No Planes and ?Video Fakery?
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
> Monday, February 20th, 2012 | Posted by Jim Fetzer
>
> During the research I have done on this question, some of the most
> important reasons to question the use of planes on 9/11 are (1) that
> Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and, (2)
> that, according to FAA Registration records I have in hand, the planes
> corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not deregistered until 28
> September 2005, which raises the questions, ?How can planes that were
> Monday, February 20th, 2012 | Posted by Jim Fetzer
>
> During the research I have done on this question, some of the most
> important reasons to question the use of planes on 9/11 are (1) that
> Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and, (2)
> that, according to FAA Registration records I have in hand, the planes
> corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not deregistered until 28
> not in the air have crashed on 9/11?? and ?How can planes that crashed
> on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?? We have studies
> (3) by Elias Davidsson demonstrating that the government has never
> been able to prove that any of the alleged ?hijackers? were aboard any
> of those planes and research (4) by A.K. Dewdney and by David Ray
> Griffin demonstrating that the purported phone calls from those planes
> were faked. And (5), as Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) has observed,
> although there are millions of uniquely identifiable components of
> those four planes, the government has yet to produce even one. My
> purpose here is not to persuade anyone to believe the 9/11 planes were
> phantom flights on 9/11, but simply to lay out some of the evidence
> that supports that conclusion, even though I myself was initially
> unwilling to take it seriously. ...
>
> Now you see them ...
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
>
> Now you don't.
Your brain is gone, just gone. How can you be so stupid that you buy
> Griffin demonstrating that the purported phone calls from those planes
> were faked. And (5), as Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) has observed,
> although there are millions of uniquely identifiable components of
> those four planes, the government has yet to produce even one. My
> purpose here is not to persuade anyone to believe the 9/11 planes were
> phantom flights on 9/11, but simply to lay out some of the evidence
> that supports that conclusion, even though I myself was initially
> unwilling to take it seriously. ...
>
> Now you see them ...
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
>
> Now you don't.
into that BS?
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.
joeturn
May 23, 2013, 11:28:08 AM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 10:56 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> In article <0c44823c-f6e2-467f-a0d5-
> e7033bc29...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, bongblas...@peoplepc.com
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
>
> - Show quoted text -
You should be asking your self how you could believe anything in the
NIST report.Then you will start to wake up from your MK Programming
your TV set has you under their influience. This is a concern to the
population. Such a person that believes in the Governments ex PLANE
ations are a threat to society.
Turn your self in before you snap it is inevitable you are on the
brink of self destruction.
> In article <0c44823c-f6e2-467f-a0d5-
> e7033bc29...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, bongblas...@peoplepc.com
> says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > 9/11: Planes/No Planes and ?Video Fakery?
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > 9/11: Planes/No Planes and ?Video Fakery?
> > Monday, February 20th, 2012 | Posted by Jim Fetzer
>
> > During the research I have done on this question, some of the most
> > important reasons to question the use of planes on 9/11 are (1) that
> > Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and, (2)
> > that, according to FAA Registration records I have in hand, the planes
> > corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not deregistered until 28
> > September 2005, which raises the questions, ?How can planes that were
> > not in the air have crashed on 9/11?? and ?How can planes that crashed
> > on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?? We have studies
> > (3) by Elias Davidsson demonstrating that the government has never
> > been able to prove that any of the alleged ?hijackers? were aboard any
> > of those planes and research (4) by A.K. Dewdney and by David Ray
> > Griffin demonstrating that the purported phone calls from those planes
> > were faked. And (5), as Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) has observed,
> > although there are millions of uniquely identifiable components of
> > those four planes, the government has yet to produce even one. My
> > purpose here is not to persuade anyone to believe the 9/11 planes were
> > phantom flights on 9/11, but simply to lay out some of the evidence
> > that supports that conclusion, even though I myself was initially
> > unwilling to take it seriously. ...
>
> > Now you see them ...
>
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
>
> > During the research I have done on this question, some of the most
> > important reasons to question the use of planes on 9/11 are (1) that
> > Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and, (2)
> > that, according to FAA Registration records I have in hand, the planes
> > corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not deregistered until 28
> > September 2005, which raises the questions, ?How can planes that were
> > not in the air have crashed on 9/11?? and ?How can planes that crashed
> > on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?? We have studies
> > (3) by Elias Davidsson demonstrating that the government has never
> > been able to prove that any of the alleged ?hijackers? were aboard any
> > of those planes and research (4) by A.K. Dewdney and by David Ray
> > Griffin demonstrating that the purported phone calls from those planes
> > were faked. And (5), as Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) has observed,
> > although there are millions of uniquely identifiable components of
> > those four planes, the government has yet to produce even one. My
> > purpose here is not to persuade anyone to believe the 9/11 planes were
> > phantom flights on 9/11, but simply to lay out some of the evidence
> > that supports that conclusion, even though I myself was initially
> > unwilling to take it seriously. ...
>
> > Now you see them ...
>
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
> >http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video...
>
> > Now you don't.
>
> Your brain is gone, just gone. How can you be so stupid that you buy
> into that BS?
>
> --
> BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.- Hide quoted text -
> > Now you don't.
>
> Your brain is gone, just gone. How can you be so stupid that you buy
> into that BS?
>
> --
>
> - Show quoted text -
You should be asking your self how you could believe anything in the
NIST report.Then you will start to wake up from your MK Programming
your TV set has you under their influience. This is a concern to the
population. Such a person that believes in the Governments ex PLANE
ations are a threat to society.
Turn your self in before you snap it is inevitable you are on the
brink of self destruction.
Crickets
May 23, 2013, 12:20:36 PM5/23/13
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
The NAZI CIA don't issue pink slips or accept resignations.
> - Show quoted text -
They'll just drop BDK out over the ocean and let God sort it out.
BDK
May 23, 2013, 9:52:56 PM5/23/13
to
In article <33790738-9678-44f4-8b81-0a55f8b8cbd3
@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, bongb...@peoplepc.com says...
If i worked for the government, maybe I would be worried. Your main
concern should be staying away from the men with needles and nets.
@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, bongb...@peoplepc.com says...
concern should be staying away from the men with needles and nets.
joeturn
May 27, 2013, 11:05:54 PM5/27/13
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
When Fetzer finally addresses the other two missiles that hit the
> - Show quoted text -
Pentagram,he will again be my hero.
The FBI 5 frame release shows two missiles in flight one above and one
below the first missiles fading plume,they called it a water fountain!
Its easy to spot if you big screen the vedion and pause it they slide
your cursor back and forth you can see both of the go forward
backup.there is no mistake those two were not sky warriors,but the
first might have been!
This explains why the explosion happened before the second missile
hit.The thrird missile strike was so close that it seemed like a
single blast. This is why most heard multiple instances.
They even pulled the firemen back out of sight so they could bring
down the roof with cutter charges.
joeturn
May 27, 2013, 11:08:51 PM5/27/13
to
On May 23, 9:52 pm, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> In article <33790738-9678-44f4-8b81-0a55f8b8cbd3
> @d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, bongblas...@peoplepc.com says...
You dont have to worry even the Government will not hire you.One
Ronald Dumbsfell was enough!
> In article <33790738-9678-44f4-8b81-0a55f8b8cbd3
> @d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, bongblas...@peoplepc.com says...
Ronald Dumbsfell was enough!
Padraigh ProAmerica
May 28, 2013, 9:59:43 AM5/28/13
to
I have no faith in the truthfulness of my Jew-infested government and
its evil little ally (the media) except for the military, and ONLY the
veterans
Group: alt.conspiracy Date: Thu, May 23, 2013, 7:24am (EDT-3) From:
bongb...@peoplepc.com (Crickets)
9/11: Planes/No Planes and "Video Fakery"
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
Monday, February 20th, 2012 | Posted by Jim Fetzer
During the research I have done on this question, some of the most
important reasons to question the use of planes on 9/11 are (1) that
Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and,
===================
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
Monday, February 20th, 2012 | Posted by Jim Fetzer
During the research I have done on this question, some of the most
important reasons to question the use of planes on 9/11 are (1) that
Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and,
Lie. They were dqaily flights.
-------------------------
(2) that, according to FAA Registration records I have in hand, the
planes corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not deregistered until
28 September 2005, which raises the questions, "How can planes that were
not in the air have crashed on 9/11?" and "How can planes that crashed
on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?"
=======================
planes corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not deregistered until
28 September 2005, which raises the questions, "How can planes that were
not in the air have crashed on 9/11?" and "How can planes that crashed
on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?"
There were insurance issues that had t be settled.
--------------------------------
We have studies
(3) by Elias Davidsson demonstrating that the government has never been
able to prove that any of the alleged "hijackers" were aboard any of
those planes
Lie. They were filmed boarding by airport security cameras.
----------------------------
and research (4) by A.K. Dewdney and by David Ray Griffin demonstrating
that the purported phone calls from those planes were faked.
====================
that the purported phone calls from those planes were faked.
Lie. Realtives identified the voices and brief converations. The
airvraft were also fitted with Airfone service, and several calls were
sent via that system.
-----------------------------
And (5), as Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) has observed, although
there are millions of uniquely identifiable components of those four
planes, the government has yet to produce even one.
Lie. Serial numbered parts were found from all four aircraft- landing
gear from all four, engines from three, back boxes from the Pentagon and
Shanksville aircraft
----------------------------------
My purpose here is not to persuade anyone to believe the 9/11 planes
were phantom flights on 9/11, but simply to lay out some of the evidence
that supports that conclusion, even though I myself was initially
unwilling to take it seriously. ...
Now
you see them ...
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/
Now
you don't.
Why haven't you left for Iran yet? Is it because you found out Irans
drug laws are much stricter than ours,or you're just too lazy to go?
--
"Never try to outstubborn a cat."--
Robert A. Heinlein--
0 new messages