Eohoe?
>>>>>> Post the MID and/or archive link to any post where I claim you
>>>>>> forgot the image. One is all I ask, but since you're lying about this,
>>>>>> you will only offer avoidance. If you don't run away from reality,
>>>>>> again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would I try to post some non-existant MID to a non-existant claim
>>>>> that you "forgot the image." You're lost somewhere in the Ozone, MORON!
>>>>
>>>> Sorry. I misread what you wrote. You wrote, "...you said I forged
>>>> it." For some reason I read, "...you said I forgot it."
>>>> 100% my mistake. Not that it matters. My position remains it's
>>>> more probable that you faked it, since a professional wouldn't have
>>>> left the 0/0 search result. To anyone who can be honest, this isn't a
>>>> claim that you are the one who faked it. Only that it's more likely
>>>> than not.
>>>
>>> More Aspie gobbledygook............
>>
>> Projecting your position on the spectrum doesn't help you.
>>
Eohoe?
>>>>>>> You make up malicious lies and put them out as fact. That's LIBEL and
>>>>>>> will be addressed when I sue your lame ass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I had ever lied and committed libel, you would have offered at
>>>>>> least one example any of the MANY times I asked for one. Since I've
>>>>>> not done so, you couldn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> Repetitious LIES don't make them any less LIES!
>>>>
>>>> Your continued failure to support your LIE about my committing
>>>> libel is noted.
>>>
>>> For starters, you're calling me a FORGERER, that's ACTIONABLE LIBEL.
>>
>> Cite when I called you such. Pointing out it's more probable than
>> not that YOU faked the picture isn't the same as saying you did.
>> I do wish you would see someone about your constant lying.
>>
Eohoe?
>>> However, you'll never come clean BC the truth damns you as EVIL and
>>> makes you culpable of LIBEL. Why should I enumerate more of your
>>> LIBELS, which I've already done before, as you'll just deny those as
>>> well? Just more of your 'weaponized Stupidity'.
>>
>> You need to cite at least one example of my committing libel.
>> Lying about what I posted still doesn't meet the burden.
>>
Eohoe?
>>> See you in court, LOSER!
>>
>> Has it been four years since you first made that empty threat?
>> No matter how long it's been, it's absolutely clear you will
>> never file suit. You just hoped I wouldn't continue to expose your
>> mental illness with the threat.
>>
Eohoe?
>>>> Why, given you have PROVED your claims of libel are nothing but
>>>> lies, do you continue to make the claim? I really want to know what
>>>> motivates you. Not that I honestly expect you to answer.
>>
>> And I'm not even psychic.
>>
Eoh... Never mind. I've made my point.
>> Please offer proof that I've been adjudge/found legally insane.
>> If you prefer, you may admit that I've exposed another of your MANY
>> pathological lies.
>
>" Kent RE-READ what you have argued through this post. Only a WHACK JOB
>would make the arguments YOU DO."
>-krp, alt.friends 9/6/09
>
At least the context was included.
BTW, quoting a man who suffered from paranoia, to the point he
claimed there was a MASSIVE COALITION FORCE (emphasis his) out to get
him, isn't wise.
>> I question your claims about a conspiracy. If you want people to accept it as valid, you
>> need to present actual evidence of it. Your saying it exists isn't going to be enough.
>
>"NEVER EVER TRUST what this PSYCHOPATH Kent Wills says on this groups."
>-AmerGovtPsychopathsExposer, misc.legal 9/10/06
>
So your position is that Tarun's word alone is enough to prove
there is a conspiracy against him?
Since you have NO evidence for any of your claims, you would
probably have to.
>> Perhaps you could offer actual evidence for your claim of this conspiracy
>> that exists against you?
>
>" Kunt - the amusement value of your posts is in rapid decline again.
>You are endlessly repeating yourself with your IDIOTIC bullshit. I am
>now only selectively responding to you and that is on the decline side
>of the bell curve. You are speeding to the bit bin, Wills. Don't think
>you have won because I IGNORE most of your messages."
>-krp, misc.legal 12/11/09
>
I suppose I'm *technically* still waiting for the evidence of the
MASSIVE COALITION FORCE. Since Ken has died, I don't think he will be
able to provide it. Not that he could when alive. There was no such
conspiracy against him.
Just like you cannot present any evidence for your claims, since
they aren't true.
>If it weren't for the outright LIES and FABRICATIONS that are part of
>your HARASSMENT campaign I would have PLONKED you ages ago. When I get
>that 1st check from the Oil Patch I'll do the Internet a favor by
>getting you banned from posting on Usenet ever again, MORON!
Stay focused. We're addressing your mental illness and the
outright LIES is forces you to post.
Please answer the question I asked of you. How, exactly, is my
guess that YOU faked the image, as opposed to a professional, a lie?
I realize the idea of honesty scares you greatly, but overcome
that fear and answer honestly. Please.