> Conspiracy for the Day -- March 17, 1994
> ==========================================
> ("Quid coniuratio est?")
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>SECRET RESEARCH ON ANTI-GRAVITY AND SPACE FLIGHT ORGANIZED
>BY THE GERMAN SECRET SOCIETIES DURING WORLD WAR II
>by Vladimir Terziski
>[Excerpts]
[ lots and lots of bullshit deleted ]
Just two questions - if Germany really had these flying saucers - why weren't
they used in WWII ? And if Germany was so far ahead in this particular field
of technology, why were the Americans the first to have nuclear weapons ? I
would think anybody capable of building an anti-gravity device should be able
to build a simple nuclear bomb as well.
--
(__)
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ (oo)
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Eric Doenges /--------\/
_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ (e...@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de) * o| ||
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ ||----||
_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ ooo~~ ~~
>bi...@firefly.prairienet.org (Brian Redman) writes:
>
>> Conspiracy for the Day -- March 17, 1994
>> ==========================================
>> ("Quid coniuratio est?")
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>SECRET RESEARCH ON ANTI-GRAVITY AND SPACE FLIGHT ORGANIZED
>>BY THE GERMAN SECRET SOCIETIES DURING WORLD WAR II
>>by Vladimir Terziski
>>[Excerpts]
>
>[ lots and lots of bullshit deleted ]
>
>Just two questions - if Germany really had these flying saucers - why weren't
>they used in WWII ? And if Germany was so far ahead in this particular field
>of technology, why were the Americans the first to have nuclear weapons ? I
>would think anybody capable of building an anti-gravity device should be able
>to build a simple nuclear bomb as well.
This is not an authoritative reply and readers (as always) are free
to think what they wish, however, it MAY be that the post for that
particular day (March 17) may have had some connection to St. Pat's
day and "blarney" etc.
--
>In a previous article, e...@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (Eric Doenges) says:
>>bi...@firefly.prairienet.org (Brian Redman) writes:
>>
>>> Conspiracy for the Day -- March 17, 1994
>>> ==========================================
>>> ("Quid coniuratio est?")
>>>
>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>SECRET RESEARCH ON ANTI-GRAVITY AND SPACE FLIGHT ORGANIZED
>>>BY THE GERMAN SECRET SOCIETIES DURING WORLD WAR II
>>>by Vladimir Terziski
>>>[Excerpts]
>>
>>[ lots and lots of bullshit deleted ]
>>
>>Just two questions - if Germany really had these flying saucers - why weren't
>>they used in WWII ? And if Germany was so far ahead in this particular field
>>of technology, why were the Americans the first to have nuclear weapons ? I
>>would think anybody capable of building an anti-gravity device should be able
>>to build a simple nuclear bomb as well.
>This is not an authoritative reply and readers (as always) are free
>to think what they wish, however, it MAY be that the post for that
>particular day (March 17) may have had some connection to St. Pat's
>day and "blarney" etc.
That's correct - I'm not an authority on anti-gravity devices, space flight,
secret bases under the south pole or anything else. However, my post has
nothing to do with St. Pat's day - I was just wondering aloud. Another
question - what happened to all this technology ? Why didn't the Americans,
British and Soviets manage to kidnap any of the German scientists working on
these devices (like they "persuaded"/kidnapped the men working on the V1/2s) ?
And if they did, why has nothing of this sort appeared yet ? Anybody with the
know-how to utilize gravity in the way discribed would be able to make a
fortune.
Yes, I am not an authority on the subject - but common sense tells me that it
is utterly impossible to totally conceal the technology described for 50 years
and more. Until you can come up with positive proof I will continue to believe
the post I originally responded to is complete bullshit. (By the way, I saw a
picture of one of those 'flying saucers' with a piston motor the other day -
I'm not denying research was done in that direction, I just don't think very
much came from it.
[...]
>and more. Until you can come up with positive proof I will continue to believe
>the post I originally responded to is complete bullshit. (By the way, I saw a
*DUH!!* Can *you* say "St. Patrick's Day?" Can *you* say "Blarney?"
^^^^^^^
(Just wait until April Fool's day. This guy will have a heart attack.)
>*DUH!!* Can *you* say "St. Patrick's Day?" Can *you* say "Blarney?"
>^^^^^^^
>(Just wait until April Fool's day. This guy will have a heart attack.)
Ok, Ok - stupid me, seems I missed the point. I guess this comes from reading
too much netnews instead of working. Won't happen again (I hope)