Michael Aquino ‹ Kook of the Year
Alex Constantine
Col. (Major?) Michael "Anti-Christ" Aquino won by a landslide!
‹‹‹‹‹‹
Michael A. Aquino
Date of Birth: 10/16/46
Social Security #568-66-9015
Wells Fargo checking account #0021-625967
(you can call the Wells automated info, 800-869-3557, if you want to
hear about his finances.
‹‹‹‹‹‹
http://www.newsgate.co.uk/uk/uk.politics.philosophy/msg00614.html
-------
In article <969615243.3...@webmail.cotse.com>,
stiffone@N-o_S-p-a-m-cotse.com says...
: ... it seems that their
: children aren't speaking to them!
:
: Pat "Lilith" Butch Sinclair Lewis Wise Aquino hasn't
: spoken to her children in years... and Michael Aquino's
: son Damien has disavowed his daddy (it appears the
: feeling is mutual: Michael's mother disinherited Damien.
: It seems she thought, well, that Michael wasn't Damien's
: daddy. Wanna clarify this for us, Mike?)
:
: Kinda odd that two Satanists who spend so much time trying
: to clear accused child molesters are on such lousy terms
: with their children, isn't it?
‹‹‹‹‹
: Just a little food for thought...
PRESIDIO MONEY TRAIN SCAM?
>No one sued Aquino in the Presidio case. That would have
> left them wide open to a countersuit for fraud, defamation etc.
>The Adams Thompsons made their $3 mil claim against the US
> gvt alone, as owning the day care center. They made NO PUBLIC
> accusations of Aquino to protect themselves from libel
>action. They made allegations ONLY to the SFPD and CID. Same
>with the N.Calif copycat would be money train straphangers.
So, the "N. Calif. copycat" parents *didn't* attempt to sue Aquino.
But you said they were only after money! That's why he was
accused. Now you say they didn't. The people in N. Calif. not only
made their accusations to the police, CID, but they also made
them to the newspapers and picketed the "child care" building
Aquino owned. It was in the media at the time, several friends of
mine saw it.
---------------
Advanced Groups Search
Groups Help Search all groups Search the Web
Groups search result 16 for michael aquino
Search Result 16From: Underground Panther (pum...@erols.com)
Subject: Re: The Michael Aquino Files-long
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
View complete thread (20 articles)Date: 1999/05/29
**Isn't this just another example of the many attempts to victimize Dr.
Aquino?
> This ongoing vendetta says a lot about the conspirators and says nothing of
> credibility about Dr. Aquino.
Who cares?Aquino in my opinion is a cult leader.I don't care how
credible or not he is. Legitamacy and credibility don't mean squat
until I feel to my own satisfaction it does.My opinoion of him will
remain the same until I am satisfied with it by my own searching.You
cannot do anything about an opinion or a question..
I see CULTIST in the rabid ways you people defend him online,in any
forums that ask about him. I mean why does he not speak up for
himself?It's his problem, Instead he has his 'mouthpieces' from the
cult do it.
That smells fishy right there.
He has not released a public statement.Except from iffy sources or
second hand. We do not see him speaking for himself without a
compelling intrest and any 'document' can be easily faked on the web.
Aquino's a big boy right?
The files in thier entirety ARE NOT public,so people will question,and
if he really would expose ALL the evidence files without doctoring
them and the prosecuter would expose ALL his evidence
files,Seperately.
With Aquino keeping out all the propaganda for Aquino.Can he come
clean without heavy dose of propaganda filling in his story???
I don't think so,and that is my opinion.
Hows that for a challenge?
I mean people STILL think O.J. is guilty ,so why not Aquino?
What is the difference there? None to me ..O.J. doesen't have a
depolyable syncophant in every newsgroup defebnding his reputation
with libel threats.Ya'll are cultists.O.J. isn't.
The victims could tell thier side freely,the cultists thiers,then the
public could scrutinize them ALL un hampered and decide the truth for
themselves it might be a different outcome than one Aquino would like
wouldn't it?
Nobody would be questioning Aquino's 'reputation' as a cult leasder
anymore though.
But some of you do not want undefiled truth if it costs the ToS it's
existance.It is the nature of cults to be like this.I didn't expect
anything else..
Another question why could he choose to not commit these things? What
'compelling interests' has he NOT to do this stuff? He's a 'moral
relaitavist'there is no reason to be moral is there no reason for
taboos. He's skilled at manipulating and lesser magic and a gov't
psy-ops guy and is wealthy enough to buy people and batteries of
lawyers and a loyal cult to defend him..
Why would he NOT do it,It's Such a novel 'magickal'challenge for him,
so tasty a game to play so risque.
Catholic priests do this stuff you freely accuse them,Turnabout is
uncomfortable for ANY cult.
Pedophiles are adept at covering thier asses.You never give THOSE
reasons.The ACLU has no ethics or sane boundries of empathy
either.They say yes to all sick things and sane things like a all
loving earth mother,and keep poison able to spread it's propaganda if
they are subtle..
I do not care what has or has not been proven and to WHOM's
satisfaction myself.
But I know kids were harmed by somebody somwhere and that is sick.
My beliefs are valid enough for me.
And they will never change when you think you want me to to change
them.
Do you think they are not valid to me just because some of your
questioners may share the same feelings and opinions too?
Why should it be libel if someone belives Aquino is a molester and
has that opinon, Why not PROVE he isn't one.
And back it up with PROOF.Some people are not satisfied.And that is
your burden to carry Setters,so stop whining about Aquino's chosen
problems or come clean.You are not Aquino so why defend him?Who
benifiets if what Presidio is is TRUE??
Apparently some people ARE NOT satisfied,despite your threats and
protests and it is they who will question Aquino wether or not you
threaten them.
They will always ask why, so get over it.
People love a mystery and I bet that's why some of you joined the ToS
to figure out the 'mystery' of Set's message.
So these questioners are 'evil' because they question a cult leader
providing the 'answers' to your Setian mystery.
Do you really believe you can't find out how to Evolve or Zepyher on
your own, without the Temple to guide you correctly? How wonderfully
convienent for Aquino to position himself as your self appointed
guru,pipeline to an archetype everyone can tap into who can read a
book on Egyptian history or Nazis and use thier imagination and bad
poetry skills.
In case you forgot..
Well, Abused kids are a hell of alot more important than
Set,Satan,Jesus,YaWeh,Allah any myth or you embrace or any cult's
existance,period.
And I DO have a right to my opinion just like you do yours.
Neither opinions are Fact.But other people's opinions PAIN you don't
they? Why is that?
I know you cultists feel differently because the Cult is your life.
You defend it like it is ,you are trained well.
If he did do this stuff he has a very compelling intrest to hide it
from everybody outside the higest echelons of your cult.How high up
are you?
What do you know,I challenge you, come clean.
Aquino has a lot of motivations to cover his ass,like being a cult
leader and all with alot of money and minds to play with and
powertripping rushes and mindgames to play,a 'legacy' to create,
'willing(supposedly)masochists' to serve his whims,
Deployable agents who don't know him defending his
character,protecting his carefully crafted image for him,who are in
the dark too,yet so loyal,a dream to feed to awaiting adoring
fans....A cult leaders work is never done until he's the new messiah.
If someone DOES have a problem with all this stuff whatever it is and
you wish them to be silent and stop'libeling'Aquino well what does
THAT sound like to ears outside your group coming from the mouth of
another'synophantic' cultist?
Sounds just like the same sort of a pressure tactic from a cult I was
in that Aquino himself branched off of,The Church of Satan..
So to me 'truth,'evidence' asside,IMO, Ya'll are a bunch of cultists
and I know all of you have compelling cult based
EMOTIONAL/psychological reasons on all levels of involvement to NOT
question ANY of it really or seriously.
And that alone in itself CLOUDS any perceptions of objective truth.
The LaVeyans never talk about Zeena's claims about Anton openly or
honestly you guys do the same with your presidio stuff.
Linda Blood WAS in your group.So? is she any less valid looking than
YOU are to me? NO!You just defend Aquino,she 'slanders'the cult.
The truth is in there somewhere between you both.And you with your
libel threats stand in the way of finding it.
I got an idea,Why not put Linda Blood herself and Aquino himself head
to head with a independant exit counselor and a out of state un
affiliated cop who knows evidence finding for sex cases,a lawyer who
is an athiest, who is not a setter or into it at all and a exit
counselor psychologist wityh timed responses to all can talk, on
National TV and tackle the 'tough questions'?
Make a series out of it,Reveal all the stuff,freely no law
considerations expose everything to scrutiny.I challenge you,
Show all the evidence first.And don't meddle or skew.
Then see what happens,Let the questions take thier own course.I
challenge the Church of Satan to reveal it's custard agendas and it's
vaults of games and barely legal crap and see where it leads to.
That is why you both fear the'herds',or 'masses'.Because they are
bigger.
They will ask WHY relenlessly!All those awkward questions you hate.
Some of them are very intellegent and not as jaded as you all are,and
they have ethics,empathy and attachments way more than you have in
your cults.They have you outgunned in every aspect.
I challenge the Catholic church to come clean,all cults to withstand
objective scrutiny of everyone,anyone,publically..
But I know they won't because of compelling,compeating intrests that
have NOTHING to do with the truth or accountability. But has
everything to do with what they are doing to people and for what
purposes.
Who cares what the purposes are,conspirasies are bullshit
distractions.
The results of cultic manipulations exist.The damage is there.False
Memory people murk the truth, Shrinks with compelling intrests murk
the truth,victims who are manipulators murk the truth,opposite beliefs
and fears murk truth, and double agendas and compeating intrests all
muddy up clarity on this. WHY?Why not call an asshole cultist an
asshole and let them recieve thier dues.Why not find the truth without
bullshit mixing in?
I don't care about your 'freedom' of religion or speech,I do care
about TRUTH in Advertising in recruitment literature vs the real
cult.I care about people's personalities.
I challenge cultists to follow the starry eyed recruitment literature
in your cults all the way up.Without manipulating,games or
psychologicalsadism.
Be honest and tell potential recruits they will be thought reformed
and be mouthpieces for the leader.
Let's see how many followers come forward when you tell them how you
will do this clearly so that they understand you will erode thier
personality as they are told to put more effort into the group.Tell
them this is what rising up in the hierarchy entails.
Real Credibility or isn't spewed from the mouths of believers or
syncophants, it comes from withstanding open season public scrutiny and
questioning from all sorts of people and then Comparisons made
freely..
Legitamacy and the deliberatly crafted look of pseudo-credibility can
come easily from the syncophant bandwagon.
Real genuine truth in credibility is that earned trust that comes from
PROVEN and scrutinized thouroughly satisfied answers to all questions
to the compleate satisfaction of those who ASK them..
I mean question all things.
But do distinguish between the two sources of legitamacy/credibility
people.
Why be skittish to answer questions TO other's satisfaction
ToSsers/CoSsers? Answer to Thier satisfaction, NOT your satisfaction?
I think you cannot do it in the ToS or the CoS for some reason and so
we circle back to the same old whys...???Same old 'libel'
threats.round and round.
Why Not face scrutiny for real without games???Why?,because it is too
uncomfortable,embarrassing ,you get 'reprimanded 'for asking ,and
makes the group to sick to stand,and you feel too empty inside to
leave.
And all this is great stuff to obscure truth with,psychological sadism
and denial and obediences that play into the sick group dynamics of a
cult.I know it exists.
Same shit different cult to me.
All this is my opinion,any truths you make of it are yours.
Panther
>
Google Web Directory - Cool Jobs - Advertise with Us -
Add Google to Your Site - Google in Your Language - All About Google
©2001 Google
---------
Michael Aquino/Child Molestion Charges
>From: For...@justice.com
>Newsgroups: alt.true-crime
>Organization: Victim's Rights, Inc.
>(These are some of the children in N. Calif that the CID interviewed and
why in part, they titled Michael Aquino from the Temple of Set. I had the
opportunity to view some of these tapes of the interviews by the CID and
indeed they named Michael Aquino as being present. I have come *nowhere
near* to describing the extent and horrific allegations the children made
and exactly what they were exposed to. They said they were bled, tied in
the center of pentagrams (stars) etc...)
>Hans (the Aquino spokesperson) wrote this about two months ago in
alt.satanism:
>h>And as noted previously both Ball and Thrail continued to h>maintain
their complete innocence but said they agreed to a plea h> bargain
because
what else could they do in a witch hunt like that. h>That too happened
over and over again in the h>epidemic of cases like this in the 1980s.
>...(opening DA Statement) "Defendant Daryl Ball, Sr. and co-defendant
Charlotte Thrailkill have been charged by way of felony information with
34 counts of child sexual abuse. A preliminary hearing began in August
1987, and lasted almost a month. Daryl Ball had an earlier case, 14668-c
which was consolidated into the later charges. This case is described as
a
multivictim/multiperpetrator sexual abuse case. Such cases have often
involved the active participation of women, multiple victims young in
age,
sexual penetration, and allegations of ritual abuse. These cases are
distinguished from the incest model by the extreme terror shown by the
victims. See Sexual Abuse in Day Care: A National Study, Final Report
March 1988, David Finkelhor, Ph. D...."
>(Statements evidencing the number of Victims):
>From opening Statements: "Child witnesses Kid #1 and kid #2, Kid#3, Kid
#4 , Kid #5, Kid #6 and Kid#7 were brought forward to testify as well as
parents of some of the children and police agencies that were
instrumental
in the investigation. Their testimony has painted a graphic scenario of
child sexual assault."
>"...On August 18th, child #1 returned to testify. He affirmed his
estimate that Thailkill copulated him 50 times (16:8-10). He testified to
having nightmares about dragons and people killing other people
(74:9-24)."
>.."kid #1 witnessed Thrailkill copulating kid #2, kids #3, kids #4, kids
#5. Kid #1 described being tied up and hung by the feet (123:1-28) and
stated (named five other kids) were also tied up. He described Ball
copulating Kid #2 and Ball inserting a dildo into her (126: 20-28)
Thailkill also used the spike dildo in Kid #2's rectum
>and copulated her daughter and kid #3. Kid #1 was also abused on a night
when defendants had taken him trick or treating (132, 133, 134)."
>..(Testimony of one of the childen)
>Q. Did he say what would happen if you told your mom? A. Yeah
>Q. What did he say would happen if you told your mom about
>Tina's hickey?
>A. He'll kill her and cut her heart out. Q. He'd kill her and cut her
heart out?
>A. And make me eat it.
>Q. And make you eat it?
>A. Yeah.
>Q Did he say anything about your little brother? A. Yeah
>..."(kids name) explained how he saw hypodermic needles at defendant's
house and stated Thrailkill had injected him with the needle in the arm
and some blood came out. Defendant Ball was present as well..".
>"..(kid #1) described a game called "neener, neener, neener, you can't
catch my weiner' which was played with defendant Ball while he was nude.
(156:23-28). The person who won the game was shot by a squirt gun filled
with urine.(157:17-27). He described how Tony Carpino had threatened to
"chop his throat off".(158:6-20) He also described being in a small
swiming pool with other kids, all nude who were threatened to not tell
their parents. (161:1-28, 162:1-9)"
>"...he told of Thrailkill putting a "rocket ship" in his bottom
(170:10-24) He returned to testify Sept. 1, 1987, and described the
defendants fighting over who would get to put the dildo in the children
(RT (/1) 17: 80 28, 18: 1-10)"
>"....(kid #2) also testified on Sept. 1, 1987. He testified that Ball
touched his front private and it hurt (80:7-28) and Ball threatened to
kill his mother (82:8-20). Ball also threatened him with a knife
(84:21-28) and cut him with it."
>"... He went on to relate incidents where the children were tied up with
rope (117; 18-28, 118:1-28. 119: 1-18) He was made to touch his front
private to child #3 privates by defendants (120:17-25) He described being
tied up and hung by the feet (123:1-28) and stated that (kid#1), (kid#3),
(kid#4), (kid#5), and (kid#6) were tied up. He described Ball copulating
Kid #4 (126:14-19) and Ball inserting a dildo into her (126;20-28), 127:
1-11). Thrailkill also used the spike dildo in (kid#1) rectum, and
copulated her daughter and (kid#3)."
>"..He also told of Thrailkill giving him a bath, holding him underwater
for long periods of time and then copulating him (139;20-28), (140:1-19)"
". .. Ball threatened to cut (kid) mother's heart out if he told anyone
and he would make him eat it. (145:8-10) He also told of Thrailkill
holding his head under water in a swimminig pool, and then threatening to
kill his mom if he told (147:12-28:148:1-15) He further described seeing
Ball use a variety of dildoes on the other children (192-196) He
identifed
the rope he had been tied up with as being yellow rope (R.T. (9/3
104:12-28)"
>"Thrailkill also forced him to undergo a a forcible bath where he said
>that the pounding of the water would give him such a headache, and that
then she orally copulated him as he's kicking her to get her away".
>"...(kid#1) talked about "super duper day" when he, his brother, (named
6
kids) went to the office of the apartment manager. There, all the kids
were undressed and touched by defendants, Steve Ruggles, Tory, Terry,
Robin and Pappy. (kid#1) saw the other children sodomized with dildoes,
and were tied up (pgs. 96-105), 155-169)
>"..(another kid). She saw Ball copulate, and use his finger and the red
dildo on (kid#2) (198:4-25)...she described being injected with a needle
behind her knee and at the inner aspect of her arm.. She was violated
with
the red dildo three times and the blue dildo twice "...She also related
testimony about "super, duper child molest day"
>which took place in the apartment manager's office. She identified many
adults who were present and described a banner that read "Super Duper
Child Molesting Day". She explained how a video was made of the sexual
activity, and the kids watched it afterwards" (62:10-27;pgs 101-115)
>"She also told of being in the swimming pool with other children, all
nude, while the adults took photographs (25:1-25). She told about the
tattoo's she had seen on Thrailkill (44" 13-28). She told of a Halloween
trip where kid #3 and #4 were left at a house, and picked up later
(52:7-28; 53:1-28; 54:1-28;). There, she was present when they were told
to strip, and the kids later shared their candy so it would appear that
(another kid) had been trick or treating also
>Kid #1 said he had been sodomized and copulated more than ten times each
(137: 21-26), and described Kid #3 crying when defendant Ball had
attempted intercourse with her (138: 4-16). Kid #1 saw Mike Dugan touch
Kid #2's butt (138:24-26). He also told of Thrailkill giving him a bath,
holding him underwater for long peirods of time and then copulating him
(139:20-28). He saw Kid #3 get kicked and punched around, saw Ball
copulate Kid #3 and Thrailkill use the spiked dildoe on kid #3 (43:1-28).
Ball threatened to cut kid #1's mother's heart out if he told about Kid
#2's hickey (145: 1-6), and he would make Kid #1 eat it.
>prosecutor: Did your real dad, Daryl, ever squeeze your dookie-doo real
hard?
>(perps kid): yes
>Pros: and did it hurt?
>kid: yes
>Pros: what would he say when you would say it hurt? kid: He said..next
time you lay in bed and not, lay still. You go to sleep.
>"This is by no means a complete analysis of all the testimony, but
should
give the Court a sufficient overview of the matter to grasp the horror of
the allegations. Unfortunately, no amount of these excerpts will ever
show
this court the terror, guilt and anxiety that these young victims
suffered
at the time of the acts or during their testimony."
>.."Under 421(a) (6), the Defendant threatened witnesses or prevented
them
from testifying. These children were told not to tell their parents".
"The
crime involved multiple victims. Many of the times when these acts
occured, the children described other children being there and other
children being subjected to things at the same time."
>".. When Counsel, Ms. Dubois, was describing the "orgy Weekend" Dildo,
if
the court was noticing, right behind her, her client was laughing, they
were laughing.."
>The Case was in *Sonoma, Ca,* People v. Ball
>Court No. 14750-C. Call the
>Santa Rosa court house 707-527-1100
>(newspaper article) *The Press Democrat* Wed. Sept. 21, 1988
>" Child sexual abuse case ends with prison terms
>A case that at one time involved more than 50 counts of child sexual
abuse reached a conclusion of sorts Monday when a Santa Rosa Couple was
sentenced to prison for assaults on six children in a Santa Rosa
neighborhood. But while the legal wrangling in the case ended after 18
months, the impact on the victims may never end, one court official said.
In an arrangement designed to spare the children the ordeal of
testifying,
Daryl T. Ball and Charlotte Thrailkill pleaded no contest to a total of
nine counts involving lewd and lascivious conduct with the young victims.
The majority of the allegations against Ball and Thrailkill, involving at
one time up to 52 counts of sexual molestation involving children ages 5
through 8, were to be dismissed as part of the plea bargaining.
>Ball pleaded no contest to two counts of forcible lewd and lascivious
conduct and two counts of lewd and lascivious conduct upon children
without the use of force. Judge Raymond Giordano sentenced him to 24
years
in prison. Thrailkill, who married Ball while both were in jail five days
before pleading no contest to one count of forcible lewd and lascivious
conduct with a child and four counts of the same conduct without force,
was given a 14 year prison term.
>(cut)
>...Officials who interviewed and examined the children said there was no
question they had been the victims of repeated and severe sexual assault.
Deputy Probation Officer James Penn, who did pre-sentencing evaluations
of
both Ball and Thrailkill for the court, said the children have become
involved in psychological treatment, but the damage may be irreparable"
>(These children were witness/victims involved in the *successful
prosecution* of Daryl Ball and Charlotte Thrailkill.
>If you go to some of the RA Web sites that list convictions, you will
see
this case, but you won't find it in any of the debunker books, even dear
Debbie Nathan "missed" it. Aquino was named by some of these children as
being at some of the "gatherings" in the "devil worship club" and
molesting them- not in court but on the CID tapes).
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=michael+aquino&start=10&hl=en&safe=off&
rnum=19&selm=alex6-0403991609180001%40user-38ldhbh.dialup.mindspring.com
>***************
> ... any allusion to myself as
> an "antichrist" would have been nothing more than a
> humorous lampoon on popular Christian superstitions,
> as was not at all uncommon in the 1960s-70s before the
> "Satanic hysteria" of the 1980s occurred.
>
In the Newsweek article dated Nov. 16, 1987 it states that
(Aquino) ".. is forthright about his group's belief's and practices.
In his writings he has prophesied a coming apocalypse in
which only the 'elect' members of his temple will survive and
has identified himself as the Antichrist; he insisted in an
interview that that was meant ironically, because 'I'm sometimes
seen that way by the more superstitious people in conventional society."
-------
Folks, meet Michael "I Coulda Been a Colonel Once" Aquino;
he's returned once again to alt.satanism, his personal
Castle Roissy, for his regular dosage of abuse, humiliation,
and exposure. Once satisfied, he will undoubtedly slink
away to masturbate frantically at the various "Diddled any
toddlers lately?" posts. (Give him credit; it *is*
considerably cheaper than calling 900 numbers!)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=michael+aquino&start=20&hl=en&safe=off&
rnum=21&selm=1F002.55%243n3.143%40nntp1.nac.net
------
Advanced Groups Search
Groups Help Search all groups Search the Web
Groups search result 24 for michael aquino
Search Result 24From: IX Corp. (i...@dillinger.io.com)
Subject: Re: MA's birth data (was Re: Michael Aquino's SSN and Checking
Account Info.)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism, alt.magick
View complete thread (11 articles)Date: 1998/09/29
In article <6up37t$d9n$1...@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net>,
belial <ch...@ghost.co.nz> wrote:
>
>>What I am interested in is the where and if possible the exact when of
>>Michael's birth. He used to claim to be himself the magikal childe of
>>a certain Jack Parsons operation. That was until it was pointed out
>>that said operation was anal sex between Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard.
>>Then Michael decided that the he was joking in the first place. After
>>first denying and then verifiying the details with members of OTO.
>
>
>Holy shit, I'm literally in tears that was SO DAMN FUNNY!
You may have missed out on this one
***********
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=michael+aquino&start=20&hl=en&safe=off&
rnum=24&selm=6uphp0%24nb6%241%40hiram.io.com
In the past, Temple of Set founder and former
High Priest Michael Aquino has pointed out that
he was born nine months after a working by
Jack Parsons designed to produce a "magickal child."
This little gem, by Thelemite David R. "Prospero"
Jones <jdno...@juno.com> proves him correct.
* * * * *
Actually given Aquino's megalomaniacal and puritanical
tendencies I've always been amazed at how interesting
his Enochian material is. My copies of the Book
of the Coming Forth by Night and Diabolicon, obtained
clandestinely (actually as booty from a Setian who
skipped out on his rent), are from 1986 ev.
They contain Aquino's thoroughly entertaining and
interesting translations of the calls, along with
Enochian workings that have to rank as some of the
most peculiar in magick.
First we find that it was Set who actually delivered
the Calls, not only to Dee and Kelly, but rectified
them for M.A. Next we learn that Michael's incarnation
as an avatar of Set was precipitated by an Enochian
magikal ritual conducted by Jack Parsons. Check the
date, if this is the case then it refers to an XIth
degree operation in which, according to the diaries,
Michael Aquino would have to be the result and magikal
child of anal sex between J.P. and L.Ron Hubbard.
Suddenly the whole temple of Set makes sense, its
the metasymbolic consequence of Thelema being fucked
in the ass by Scientology.
Finally we find that when Dr. Aquino enters the council
of the Masters of the Temple, in the 13th aire ZIM,
and is asked for the proper signs, he gives them
the finger and expects them welcome him into their
ranks, needless to say they reject him, so he claims
a higher degree than theirs so he can ignore
their decision. Fascinating stuff.
-Lupo
"They are instructed in excellence in three things from age 5 to 20; to
ride, to draw the bow and to speak the truth." -Herodotus <i...@io.com>
Google Web Directory - Cool Jobs - Advertise with Us -
Add Google to Your Site - Google in Your Language - All About Google
©2001 Google
--------
Advanced Groups Search
Groups Help Search all groups Search the Web
Groups search result 25 for michael aquino
Search Result 25From: an41...@anon.penet.fi (an41...@anon.penet.fi)
Subject: Linda Blood, Michael Aquino, the TOS, and Gini Scott
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
View complete thread (10 articles)Date: 1996/08/26
>Who is Linda Blood?
Don't know who she is personally but she did write a very
factual book on the Presidio and ritual child abuse.
G>Linda Blood is the author of a piece of crap called
>"The New Satanists". She was expelled from the TOS
>as a I* degree and then marketed herself as a
>"escaped/reformed ex-Satanist" to such organizations as the
>American Family Foundation and the Cult Awareness
>Network. (Info from The Devil's Advocate, Vol. 1, #2.
> Published by Ron Harris, not a TOS initiate, from
>The Scroll of Set/Vol. XX-4)
None of that matters. What matters is that she wrote some
very factual information about the Presidio, ritual child
abuse and Michael Aquino. She obviously found him to
be a threat to society. I do too.
CID internal military tapes describe Michael Aquinos
involvement with sexual molest, children, Satanic rituals,
murder, cannablism and his link with Charlotte Thrailkill
and Darryl Ball who were convicted in a mass ritual child
abuse case in Santa Rosa about the same time period.
Miraculously Aquino escaped but was instead discharged
from the service. I believe the military establishment knew
full well what he had done and they released him back to
the public. From other reports, these particular incidents
described are only the beginning of the story.
In other words, the military, which is supposed to protect
its citizens from foreign threat, unleashed a man back
into the community that they knew full well was alleged
to be a serial killer and a ritual child molester.
They had all the gory details.
X>The author quotes from another book, *Satan Wants You*
by Arthur Lyons:
>"He controls members by their belief in his alleged magical
status and powers, and by their own need to believe that they,
too, can gain such powers."
G>Arthur Lyons is/was at least a I* in the COS, and therefore
>unreliable regarding his statements re: TOS, Aquino.
The other people who are unreliable about statements
concerning Michael Aquino are Michael and Lilith Aquino,
Hans, Talon, Balanone, these Gidney people and whatever
other names he is currently masquerading under and/or his
flunkies.
>Any way, I'd like to hear TOSers respond to the
Linda Blood slag of Aquino. Everyone ought to have the
chance to defend him/herself. I'm not saying she's correct.
G>If you read Blood's book (and I urge you not to spend
>money on it, but to borrow it, so as not to feed the animals),
>please note a lack of footnotes, references, dates,
>documentation, bibliography, or even an index!
How do you expect anyone to buy her book when the TOS
has clearly stated several times that it was no longer available.
Keep your story straight people.
Of course, it is still available and of course they have been
lying about this all along.
I was sorry to see that she did not use footnotes in her book
but over the past year I have documented much of her book
for her. This is because we have some of the same sources of
information. She gets her information from a particular
advocacy group which I won't name, Goldstons articles,
military sources, the Lawsuit, speaking to parents of ritually
terrorized kids, and she knew about the CID internal
tapes. She quotes Ehrensafts article which I gave the reference
to etc.. and etc... This is why people first claimed that I was
Linda Blood. And as I've said before, since I've cited so
much documented information any of you reposting it
can be accused of being her and of course Alex C. or
anyone else who happens to be Aquinos target of the moment.
J>In short it is one delusional woman's opinion of religions
>she couldn't make it in.
Getting canned from the TOS was probably the best thing
that could have happened to Linda Blood. You did her
a favor. And this is not "one womans delusion". Many, many
people understand that there is a big problem here with
the "innocent Satanist" theory.
G>The TOS needs no defense from such silly accusations.
You could have fooled me. You have been busily defending
yourselves for an entire year now and doing it in such a way
that people now believe you are guilty because you lie
so much.
G>The TOS, from what I understand, believes TRUTH to be the
>First Form or Principle,
...which has to be overcome, denied and beat out of yourself
if you're going to de-evolve into a blithering, blood-addicted
idiot.
G>and in the interest of it may rebut such allegations.
You people are liars of such magnitude that I'm surprised you
haven't experienced more severe repercussions. I'll tell you
this. Good thing it wasn't my kid.
G>Good for you, thinking before you leap!
>Setians William & Gabrielle Gidney
No wonder you coudn't answer a single question I asked
about any of these case. "Lecturing around the country"
Just another example of the "First Principle" being stomped
out in typical hard-core Satanic tradition.
Curio II
**************
Search Result 91From: Dr. Lao (doct...@dragoncon.net)
Subject: Re: These Court Records Are Fascinating
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
View complete thread (71 articles)Date: 1998/09/24
Michael Aquino wrote:
>As I said, the letters were included as exhibits of record in my
>lawsuit.
This is what Michael Aquino claims. Apparently either Michael
Aquino, the documents, or both lacked credibility since they weren't
taken seriously. Oh! Dr. Lao forgot! It was because Michael Aquino
was a Satanist! That's right That explains it.
>Why should I show them, or any personal papers, to someone
>like yourself who posts insults and accusations anonymously
>and inaccurately?
You don't have to show them to Dr. Lao. You need to post them on the
internet along with all your other little nuggets of "truth."
Posting proof of a government conspiracy for all to see would
certainly shut up some of us cantankerous loud mouths around here.
Imagine our embarrassment! There would be no repercussions to
Michael Aquino because it is all available through the freedom of
information act. Ooops! I forgot what Michael Aquino said, "I did
not care to be the victim of an unsolved, anonymous hit-and-run car
accident, etc." Indeed. It is X-Files time again. In reality, this
newsgroup is getting a pretty good example of Michael Aquino's
"swearing falsely."
>Actually it is because of my respect for the historical excellence
>and authenticity of the 1966-75 Church of Satan that I protest
>subsequent attempts by people like yourself to degrade and
>prostitute its name.
It is because of your "respect for the historical excellence and
authenticity of the 1966-75 Church of Satan" that you tell lies and
show such disrespect? Should Michael Aquino's nose grow any longer,
he would be unable to turn quickly without hitting a home run. In
truth, Michael Aquino seethes with hatred. Hatred for Anton LaVey,
hatred for the Church of Satan, and hatred for those who speak out
against Michael Aquino when he makes delusional statements.
Dr. Lao
**"Post the friggin' documents or sit down." said Slick Bromiezchski.
-------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=michael+aquino&start=90&hl=en&safe=off&
rnum=96&selm=77j573%24glf%241%40nnrp1.dejanews.com
So Dr. Lao and others must conclude that Michael Aquino is less than
: forthcoming because the Helms-Marsh Papers don't reveal what Michael
Aquino
: says they do. He knows it, we know it, the pooch across the street
knows it.
-------
Advanced Groups Search
Groups Help Search all groups Search the Web
Groups search result 99 for michael aquino
Search Result 99From: doct...@hotmail.com (doct...@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: A Whole New Ballgame
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
View complete thread (72 articles)Date: 1999/09/17
alex....@disinfo.net wrote:
>Dear "Doctor Lao",
>The majority of your reply to my message was
>personal attacks and unsubstantiated opinions.
Sorry. Dr. Lao will tone it down a little.
>And you obviously need some understanding of how
>organisations develop and change over time to appreciate
>the points I was making.
Dr. Lao's understanding of organizations would surprise Alex Burns.
>Actually, Aquino documents his claims with interviews, articles,
>and letters, unlike yourself, and some of his points have been
>verified by others like _Rolling Stone_ journalist Lawrence Wright.
Michael Aquino's perspective is distorted, his history is laughable, and
his sources are tainted by those with self-serving agendas. Dr. Lao
knows what he knows about the Church of Satan because he was there at
the time. He also knows that Michael Aquino was not. Michael Aquino has
finally admitted this after long last. He now claims that the early
membership, once touted as "a cut above" were nothing more than LaVey
sycophants. An interesting observation, since it was he who was LaVey's
number one sycophant. As to Lawrence Wright, his motives were
transparent from the start. He even admits so in print. All this is old
news.
>Plus I have seen internal COS documentation and interviewed
>various people as well.
What internal COS documentation? What people? Other enemies of the
Church of Satan? Ever interview anyone without an ax to grind? Dr. Lao
suspects not. Now's your chance.
>Which doesn't prevent me from appreciating LaVey's
>qualities/work or that of individuals when I feel it warrants
> it.
Right. It fits in with the Love/hate, Hero/Villain psychopathology so
rampant in the Temple of Set. At least according to one former member
who posted here recently. It is not surprising that Aquino's obsession
would slough off on his followers. Dr. Lao is reminded of that Twilight
Zone episode where a blowhard severs his own vocal cords to win a bet
that he wouldn't talk for a whole year. The only thing that would keep
Michael Aquino and his followers from talking about Anton LaVey would be
severed vocal cords.
>Your pseudonym and inability to provide any indepth
>information to support your claims doesn't make you a
>good source, I'm afraid.
If you look over Dr. Lao's past posts you will see that he has, on
occasion, given ample proof of his early CoS involvement. Anyone in the
early Church of Satan can corroborate this. Except for Michael Aquino
who insists that "Dr. Lao" appear on his "Church of Satan Database." As
to the Dr. Lao pseudonym, it is merely something to deter others from
attacking the person rather than the argument. To Anton LaVey's
detractors there is no one who has any credibility. Unless they agree
with Michael Aquino, of course. Dr. Lao could be revealed as Elvis
Presley and he would be summarily dismissed as that "drug addicted,
ex-truck driver from Memphis who couldn't play the guitar." Plus they
would claim that Dr. Lao was really dead, which he clearly is not.
>I'll leave it to others to decide if I'm simply an Aquino
>sycophant or good little TOS soldier.
Perhaps Alex Burns already knows the answer to that one.
>As is abundently clear <snip verbiage>
Skip the lengthy Aquino-like passages and stick to the issue, will you
Alex? Thank you very much. <Chinaman mops brow and readies airsickness
bag>
>The 'real work' of TOS can be seen in the quality of being
>and lives of its individuals, and their research and application
>of what TOS defines as Black Magic and the LHP.
Well, excuse Dr. Lao for noticing, Alex, but the Temple of Set hasn't
exactly set the world on fire. The membership numbers less than you
would find in a K-Mart store on any slow Tuesday. Outside of the occult
community, the ToS is completely unknown. Its leader Michael Aquino has
never published anything in the real world and had he quit his day job
and relied on the Temple for support he would have been at the soup
kitchen quicker than you can whistle "Buddy Can You Lend Me a Dime." Is
this the "Real Work" you are referring to? It's nothing to Dr. Lao, but
he was just wondering.
>Once the underlying values-system is understood, the
>outer shell can be any form as the circumstances and
>application contexts require.
Does Alex Burns ever read what he writes? This, Dr. Lao also wonders.
<snip more unintelligible gibberish>
>Although LaVey was High Priest and its
>autocratic leader, it wasn't the Church of Anton LaVey or just a
>LaVey fan-club, and thus the decision wasn't solely his prerogative
>to make.
This is in keeping with Temple scripture that teaches about Infernal
Mandates and other such balderdash. This ToS theistic stance is so far
removed from anything to do with Anton LaVey that it is a wonder that
anyone associates the two. The Church of Satan was Anton LaVey's own
creation. He could do with it anything he wished. Of course it was "his
prerogative."
>Within the context of other information furnished
>by LaVey's relatives and others, his motives appeared
>to be short-term egotistical financial gain -
This is like explaining Copernicus to a flat-earther again, but here
goes: Anton LaVey was a Satanist. As such he lived life by his own code
and on his own terms. He made no secret of his intentions, in fact, he
made a religion of them. For people to question his motives as being
somehow disingenuous or false betrays an appalling cluelessness and lack
of understanding. Dr. Lao will again ask the question: is this Special
Ed? Of course Anton LaVey was an egotist. Satanism champions the ego.
This comes as a big surprise?
>As one former high-level COS Grotto leader (Bradford de Rastrick)
>told me, "LaVey's ideas - the foundation of modern coercive
>techniques in advertising and marketing - should have made him a
>millionare, and COS an Outsider force to be reckoned with.
>Instead, he spent his twilight years on state welfare." QED.
It is indeed unfortunate that Anton LaVey died before he could recover
from his financial woes brought on by his divorce and his (very Satanic)
decision not to recognize the legal system that judged him. Sixty-seven
is far too young to die. But when the grim reaper calls, we all answer.
Death is a part of life. But Dr. Lao knew Anton LaVey to be a clever and
resourceful man. Had he lived, his financial problems would have been no
more than a bump in the road.
>Now, instead of just answering me with another of
>your vitriolic e-mails, why don't you *do* something
>intelligent and examine the people and resources I
>mentioned in support of my arguments?
Ho! Ho! Dr. Lao was there from the beginning, Alex. He stood in the room
and called out the names. He swung wide the sword and thrust high the
sign of the horns. He listened intently as Anton LaVey spoke black magic
in the court of the Crimson King. And he remembers it as if it were
yesterday. Examine Alex Burns' people and resources? Why surely you
must be joking. Surely you must be joking.
Dr. Lao
The Circus of Dr. Lao
http://www.angelfire.com/co/doctorlao/index.html
------
Advanced Groups Search
Groups Help Search all groups Search the Web
Groups search result 111 for michael aquino
Search Result 111From: Curio...@hotmail.com (Curio...@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: Aquino Comments re "Curio" et al.
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy, alt.satanism,
alt.religion.scientology, alt.censorship
View complete thread (13 articles)Date: 1997/12/09
In article <19971206214...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,
xe...@aol.com (Xeper) wrote:
> (1) Dr. John Price is not and never has been a member of the Temple
> of Set. [This sounds like a HUAC hearing!] He is simply a
> newsgroup participant who, like me, is offended by anonymous
> defamation campaigns on the Internet. Because of this we both
> became interested in ascertaining "Curio"'s identity. Other than
> this common interest, we have had no contact or association at all.
Of course not. I don't think Charlotte Thraillkill and Darryl Ball were
"formal members" of the Temple of Set either, were they. But then
again, you denied that Lillian Rossoff, self-described long-time,
temple member was affiliated with you too, especially when she
filed restraining orders against you. BTW, why don't you post that
entire news article you quoted a sentence from.
A> While I cannot speak for him,
> I know that I do approve wholeheartedly of the work the FMSF
> has done, and is continuing to do, to expose and discredit the
> remnants of the "SRA" and other fictitious "child sexual abuse"
> rackets that caused so much devastation during the 1980s, to work
> to reverse the vast harm done to so many innocent victims of those
> scams, and to push - very successfully - for continued reforms in
> the psychiatry and psychotherapy professions to deter any future
> recurrence of such horrors.
The FMSF lies continually about ritual abuse, court cases, and they
harass their opposition. No wonder you support them Michael Aquino.
That's what you do too.
(cut) go to http://www5.electriciti.com/curious to see how Aquino
went after the wrong party.
(cut)
> I then filed suit against E.com explicitly to force the ISP to disclose
> "Curio"'s true identity, so that appropriate criminal and/or civil legal action >could then be initiated concerning her.
You sued E. com as a harassment technique in order to try and intimidate.
You don't really want to go to court because you know that court
proceedings wouldn't really serve you. You can't afford having anyone
access any more material about you through discovery.
> (4) "Curio"'s current claims to have "exposed my lies for two years"
> are easily refuted by anyone who cares to examine my posts in
>DejaNews, as well as the posts of the screen name "Ren...@aol.com"
> that I used to rebut some "Curio" falsehoods in late 96 without personally >dignifying them.
--Do you mean that when you said there was only one victim and
one accusing parent in the Thrailkill/Ball ritual abuse case and I posted
excerpts from the proceedings evidencing at least six victims, that
wasn't catching you in a lie? And when you said there was only
one accusing parent but the victims had different parents, that wasn't
a lie? And when you claimed it was all a "witch-hunt" and "money-train"
and you could not explain how any of these parents or children
benefited monetarily, or any way, by this case, that wasn't a lie?
--Do you mean that when you said you weren't discharged from active
duty and I posted documents from the internal court case evidencing
you most certainly were, that wasn't a lie?
--Do you mean that when you said the judge "made a mistake" when
stating you were suing for being discharged, that wasn't a lie? Even
though your own internal damage claim stated that as well?
....the list goes on and on. In fact, I think I will summarize all your
lies for the web page - for easy viewing.
(cut)
> And of course anyone who cares to do that, and then compares the
> result against "Curio"'s posts, will see the situation readily for what it is:
> a smear-campaign by "Curio" in utter disregard of, and indeed flagrant >contempt for the truth.
This completely pathetic cult leader clearly has much to hide. That's
why he has stalked me on the internet for more than two years and
has engaged in the most attrocious censorship tactics.And why is
it taking you so long to produce the "threat" that I supposedly made
to you Aquino? You know, the one you lied to the press about?
(cut)
> (5) Cancelling of "Curio" Posts: I have no knowledge about the
> technicalities of this or about who might/might not have done such
>a thing.
What's the matter, can't you read? The cancel messages clearly
said they were cancelled by Price; you know, John Price, the man
you just met on the internet? And why did you post your "I am a
Victim of an Internet Stalker" message right after Price was caught -
in the very same thread. Was that just a coincidence?
Take another psyops course, Michael Aquino. You need it.
Curio
***
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
Google Web Directory - Cool Jobs - Advertise with Us -
Add Google to Your Site - Google in Your Language - All About Google
©2001 Google
--------
Advanced Groups Search
Groups Help Search all groups Search the Web
Groups search result 120 for michael aquino
Search Result 120From: Curio (Cu...@ucsd.edu)
Subject: Re: LAPD and Ritual Abuse
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
View complete thread (2 articles)Date: 1997/05/14
xe...@aol.com (Xeper) wrote:
In article <alex-08059...@host30.net3.directnet.com>,
Alex Constantine wrote:
Alex> One of "satanist" Michael Aquino's staunchest advocates,
>Lorne Gilsig of the LAPD, claims that anyone alleging the
>existence of ritual abuse is "crazy."
Very true. Aquino just recently acknowledged knowing Gilsig after
denying it for some time. He also denied knowing John Price. But
in several e-mails to electriciti.com, which has been made public,
Aquino states Price is his friend. I'll post this info later.
>Aqu>I don't recall having made any such statement.
Of course you say that, as well as saying all parents who report
this type of abuse are on a "money train" and anyone who says
differently is a "fundamentalist pedophile." Don't you remember
your "han...@aol.com" incarnation Mr. Aquino? But people need to
understand what your bias might be considering the fact that many people
have accused you of these crimes, you are a High Priest
of a Satanic cult, and of course, your credentials as a
propagandist for the military and apparently - child abusers.
>Aq> What I have maintained, and continue to maintain, was that
>the "Satanic Ritual Abuse" myth that resulted in so many scares
>and scams in the 1980s was based on nothing more than a
>fictional idea planted by Pazder in his later-exposed-as-nonsense
>_Michelle Remembers_ book.
Who exactly exposed that book as nonsense, Mr. Aquino?
The complete fallacy of your argument lies in the fact that
there have been countless books written by occultists devoted to
the teachings of "ceremonial magic" in the last 100 years.
Occultists Aleister Crowley, Arthur Waite, Dion Fortune, MacGregor
Mathers, even Anton LaVey in his Satanic Bible write about occult
rituals. All of these books are much older than "Michelle
Remembers."
There are many present day ceremonial orders which practice the
summoning of "demons" and "sex-magic." We just heard from
one of your friends - Kingsword - who has such a group - the OTA,
offshoot of the OTO. When one combines these factors with people
known to be involved in the military - for instance someone like
you, Mr. Aquino, who has repeatedly declared his loyalty to the
"Prince of Darkness," the argument that *all* these
cases are due to "Michelle Remembers" is clearly ridiculous.
People who are serious occultists are not exempt from child
abuse nor are those pedophile/pornography sex-ring who may be
using occult trappings to confuse the issues.
>Where the Setian/Satanic religion as a legitimate, organized,
>formal-membership religion is concerned, there have been only two
>institutions in the United States with formal organization and
>credentials: the 1966-75 Church of Satan
Mr. Aquino does not "recognize" the current Church of Satan
because he didn't think they were taking "Satan"
seriously enough which inspired him to channel "Set" who demoted
Anton LaVey and promoted Aquino as the spokesperson for the
"Prince of Darkness" which is chronicled in his *Book of Coming
Forth By Night.* At least that's the story.
If you read alt.satanism, which I've been doing for two years,
you will see that Michael Aquino has made enemies for refusing to
acknowledge other Satanic organizations other than his own.
>and the 1975-present Temple of Set. There has never to my
>knowledge - and I was a senior official of the CS 1970-75
>and the CEO of the TS post-75 - been a single instance of "SRA"
>in either.
...Since you won't even acknowledge you were processed out of
the active reserves based on an internal investigation despite
overwhelming documentation to that effect, I'd say you were
a bit biased about what you report.
> Both had/have extremely strong prohibitions against any harm to
>children or animals in their membership-instruction publications
> - the _Satanic Bible_ in the case of the CS and the _Crystal
>Tablet of Set_ in the case of the TS.
How convincing that Satanic organizations write a disclaimer
stating they're not involved in criminal activity. However,
the Satanic Bible does discuss the merits of torturing and
killing a "deserving" person.
>If persons not affiliated with either of these institutions
>have committed any "SRA"-type crimes, I would lay the blame
>for that squarely at the door of the cranks and profiteers
>selling, publicizing, and perversely "glamorizing" the myth
>as a way for sick people to imagine they can be "noticed".
>"Satanic" imagery has been used by many common criminals, from
>Charles Manson to Richard Ramirez, to make shabby, vicious
>acts seem "Geraldo Rivera exotic". There is nothing new about
>this. But I would not call them authentic Setians or Satanists
>by a long shot. At most they would be called "renegade Christians",
>insofar as their image of "Satan" is a negative and harmful
>one based on the teachings of *that* religion.
For someone as rabidly "anti-christian" as you are, Mr. Aquino,
you actually fit the profile quite well. I suggest you go back
and re-read books on ceremonial black magic or consult Kingsword
and discuss how people might be using occult trappings when having
sex with children, since you - as a High Priest of a Satanic cult -
appear woefully ignorant about the historic tradition of the Black
Mass.
>As for "ritual abuse" existing, I cannot help also pointing out
>that there continues to be an epidemic of it within the *Christian*
>community, with a regular parade of priests and ministers being
>arrested,tried, and convicted for such crimes all the time.
(cut)
Please cite a case wherein the abuse appeared to take place within
a ceremonial context. Of course, anyone from any group can ritually
abuse kids. Given the fact that several "SRA" cases took place behind a
Christian front, the stats on this are not going to be accurate.
----
In article <20001129141258.28597.00000311@
ng-fm1.aol.com>, iapetus...@aol.com
(IapetusMonolith) wrote:
>Dr. Aquino, are you aware that many sects of Christianity
>think along these same exact lines? (Except, of course,
>they would place God or Jesus or Jehovah or Yahweh in
>place of Set).
That's OK. To them I would probably echo O'Brien's comment
to Winston Smith in _1984_:
"Do you remember writing in your diary that it did not matter
whether I were a friend or an enemy, since I was at least a
person who understood you and could be talked to? You were
right. I enjoy talking to you. Your mind appeals to me. It
resembles my own mind except that you happen to be insane."
Michael A. Aquino
‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
Advanced Groups Search
Groups Help Search all groups Search the Web
Groups search result 144 for michael aquino
Search Result 144From: Alex Constantine (al...@directnet.com)
Subject: John Price Smears Constantine
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
View complete thread (3 articles)Date: 1997/07/21
In sci.psychology.psychotherapy Alex Constantine <al...@directnet.com>
wrote:
: John M Price wrote:
So Alex, how long were you in the mental hospital back in 1991?
John: As an advocate of Michael Aquino,
a "satanist" who hung Nazi uniforms in his
closet, this smear is exactly what one would
expect from John Price Ð a man who has
fabricated academic credentials so he could
present himself as a professional who supports
Aquino.
For the record, I have never been in or
even near a mental hospital in 1991, or
at any other time in my life.
Price is desperate to discredit critics of
Michael Aquino, and this is a cheap libel
that Price can in no way support.
Ð Alex Constantine
------
Michael Aquino recommends the infamous "Leuchter report" and the Willis
Carto's Institute for Historical Review as unbiased studies of this
interesting "question."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=michael+aquino&start=150&hl=en&safe=off
&rnum=152&selm=7gtac5%2458l%241%40hiram.io.com