Jeffrey G. Brown Accuses BUT Can't Back His Charges With Evidence! aka Re: Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie again shows us what's always on his 'mind'
Doc Tavish
Brown) wrote:
>In article <199809091940...@nym.alias.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless
>Scottie Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
>> > From: jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
>> > Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>> > Subject: Re: Phillips vs. Ferree: that botched circumcision
>>
>>Speaking of circumcisions how 'bout this Jeffrey? Does this make your mouth
>>water? I posed for this myself!
>Doubtful, O Gutless One. Since you haven't the guts to show your true face
>on Usenet, I sincerely doubt you'd be willing to show any other part.
That is not my weiner Jeffrey- even though I know you'd like to think
so! Mine is much much bigger and harder! Remember that I suffer from
priapism? If you don't know what it is then look it up. Perhaps my
priapism is related to my high blood pressure and this is where my
system seeks to relieve the excess pressure! :-)
>I do note, however, that you have once again confirmed your oft-displayed
>obsession with male genitalia. We'll all be sure to remember that, the
>next time you're explaining how you decide that _somebody else_ is a
>homosexual...
You're the one that likes calling other men Scottie and Bobbykins!
Jeffrey, actually all you have in essence is your usual
unsubstantiated accusations. For a person that always demands "hard
evidence" you are sorely lacking in that department. You've accused me
before of forging the famous document which links you to pedophilia
and then you turn around and say you can't prove that I did it. In a
court of law none of your weak and feeble accusations would stand. Do
you have legal proof that I have been doing these current events?
Where are the logs which prove that I have posted the articles of
which you now complain. Am I now to assume that you will next accuse
me of killing Cock Robin and pushing Humpty Dumpty from the wall? All
you do is accuse and call others liars but you can't prove your
current charges. Now let us see the hard evidence!
I really am getting quite bored with your endless train of false and
libelous accusations.
Doc Tavish
>JGB
----
Visit the Official Doc Tavish Libraries at:
http://www.crusader.net/texts/cng/doc
http://www.hatewatch.com/tavish1.html
http://???? number 3 under construction!
Fourth Branch Being Considered!!
Jeffrey G. Brown
>On Wed, 09 Sep 1998 21:35:31 -0400, jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G.
>Brown) wrote:
>
>>In article <199809091940...@nym.alias.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless
>>Scottie Bradbury (doc_t...@bigfoot.com, phi...@phoenix.net) wrote:
>
>>> > From: jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
>>> > Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>>> > Subject: Re: Phillips vs. Ferree: that botched circumcision
>>>
>>>Speaking of circumcisions how 'bout this Jeffrey? Does this make your mouth
>>>water? I posed for this myself!
>
>>Doubtful, O Gutless One. Since you haven't the guts to show your true face
>>on Usenet, I sincerely doubt you'd be willing to show any other part.
>
>That is not my weiner Jeffrey...
I know. As I said, you lack the courage to show any part of yourself in public.
> [...deletia...]
>>I do note, however, that you have once again confirmed your oft-displayed
>>obsession with male genitalia. We'll all be sure to remember that, the
>>next time you're explaining how you decide that _somebody else_ is a
>>homosexual...
>
>You're the one that likes calling other men Scottie and Bobbykins!
We're still left with the fact that you've been posting images of male
genitalia to Usenet, and then accusing _others_ of homosexual tendencies.
> [...deletia...]
>You've accused me
>before of forging the famous document which links you to pedophilia...
False. No such accusation has ever been made. Try to make your lies a bit
less transparent, Gutless.
> [...deletia...]
>I really am getting quite bored with your endless train of false and
>libelous accusations.
Another unintentionally amusing comment, Gutless, given your own fondness
for libel.
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
aem...@is2.nyu.edu
doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
> Jeffrey, actually all you have in essence is your usual
> unsubstantiated accusations. For a person that always demands "hard
> evidence" you are sorely lacking in that department. You've accused me
> before of forging the famous document which links you to pedophilia
> and then you turn around and say you can't prove that I did it. In a
> court of law none of your weak and feeble accusations would stand. Do
> you have legal proof that I have been doing these current events?
> Where are the logs which prove that I have posted the articles of
> which you now complain. Am I now to assume that you will next accuse
> me of killing Cock Robin and pushing Humpty Dumpty from the wall? All
> you do is accuse and call others liars but you can't prove your
> current charges. Now let us see the hard evidence!
Actually, I suppose if Jeff had the time and money (and perhaps he does), all
he'd have to do is sue you and name your ISP (that's phoenix.net) as a
correspondent. They'd likely cooperate in order to be dropped from the suit.
If not, then Jeff could simply subpoena the log files.
>
> I really am getting quite bored with your endless train of false and
> libelous accusations.
Actually, the constant positing on your part that Jeff is a child molester is
beyond libelous. All that's ever been said about you is that you're Nazi
scum, and frankly, I think most courts would find that to be "fair comment."
Scott, your postured indignation impresses no one. With your obvious penis
fetish, you're quite obviously either: a) a teenager who needs a girlfriend;
b) impotent; or my favorite, c) both.
Andrew Mathis
P.S. If you *are* underaged, by the way, I'd be more than happy to meet you
in a coffee shop as opposed to a place that serves alcohol.
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Doc Tavish
>In article <35f846fc....@nntp.ix.netcom.com>,
> doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
<snip>
>Actually, the constant positing on your part that Jeff is a child molester is
>beyond libelous. All that's ever been said about you is that you're Nazi
>scum, and frankly, I think most courts would find that to be "fair comment."
>
>Scott, your postured indignation impresses no one. With your obvious penis
>fetish, you're quite obviously either: a) a teenager who needs a girlfriend;
>b) impotent; or my favorite, c) both.
>
>Andrew Mathis
>
>P.S. If you *are* underaged, by the way, I'd be more than happy to meet you
>in a coffee shop as opposed to a place that serves alcohol.
So is this a back door admission that you are a child molester? You'd
still want to meet me (or is it meat me) after finding out that I'm
under age? Now wonder you and Jeffrey G. Brown have hit it off so
well.
D.T.
aem...@is2.nyu.edu
doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 1998 01:25:30 GMT, aem...@is2.nyu.edu wrote:
>
> >In article <35f846fc....@nntp.ix.netcom.com>,
> > doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >Actually, the constant positing on your part that Jeff is a child molester is
> >beyond libelous. All that's ever been said about you is that you're Nazi
> >scum, and frankly, I think most courts would find that to be "fair comment."
> >
> >Scott, your postured indignation impresses no one. With your obvious penis
> >fetish, you're quite obviously either: a) a teenager who needs a girlfriend;
> >b) impotent; or my favorite, c) both.
> >
> >Andrew Mathis
> >
> >P.S. If you *are* underaged, by the way, I'd be more than happy to meet you
> >in a coffee shop as opposed to a place that serves alcohol.
>
> So is this a back door admission that you are a child molester? You'd
> still want to meet me (or is it meat me) after finding out that I'm
> under age? Now wonder you and Jeffrey G. Brown have hit it off so
> well.
No, Scott, I am *not* a child molester. This is the first and last time I will
answer the charge here. Next time, I'll answer it elsewhere.
Now, getting to the issue of your age, is this your admission that you are, in
fact, some punk teenager?
Andrew Mathis