Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More Wild Stuff From Doug Horne
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Ben Holmes
May 26, 2012, 12:04:12 PM5/26/12
to
The kooks in the censored forum can't refute Douglas Horne, so they simply label
it "wild stuff" to pretend that there's no reason to refute it.
Tony Marsh got nailed to the wall on his uncited and unsupported assertion that
Douglas Horne was "making up stuff" and "misrepresenting the evidence" - but I
suspect that I'll soon be censored for pointing out the truth.
So I crossposted it here for all to see and laugh at:
In article <4fbfd398$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
>
>On 5/25/2012 9:56 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> In article<4fbe69d2$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
>>>
>>> On 5/24/2012 10:12 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> In article<4fba9eef$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/21/2012 12:15 PM, ThePuttKing wrote:
>>>>>> On May 21, 2:02 am, John McAdams<john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>> http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/horne-d1.1.1.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .John
>>>>>>> --------------http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> he is entitled to his opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, but he's not entitled to make up stuff and misrepresent the
>>>>> evidence.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As you just did?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Where? I did not. Is your level of argument like Pee Wee Herman, "I know
>>> you are, but what am I?"
>>
>>
>> You just asserted that Douglas Horne makes up stuff. [as you just made
>> *that* up]
>>
>> You just asserted that Douglas Horne misrepresents the evidence. [as you
>> just did with Douglas Horne]
>>
>> If you cannot cite, give examples, and provide logical argument for such
>> points, then *YOU* are the one who "make up stuff and misrepresent the
>> evidence."
>>
>>
>
>I have cited many examples before.
You just asserted that Douglas Horne makes up stuff. [as you just made *that*
up]
No refutation, so you must presumably accept that statement as true...
You just asserted that Douglas Horne misrepresents the evidence. [as you just
did with Douglas Horne]
No refutation, so you must presumably accept that statement as true...
Stating that you *have*, in the past, cited examples doesn't refute my statement
that if you cannot cite, give examples, and provide logical argument for such
points, then *YOU* are the one who "make up stuff and misrepresent the
evidence."
Cite it *NOW*, and cite it relevant to the current topic... or simply admit that
when I stated "As you just did?" that I was merely 100% accurate.
Since this would be considered "badgering" by the censors, I'll post it in the
open forum as well...
In fact, were this aimed at McAdams - it's a virtually certainty that it would
be censored. Aimed at a presumed CT'er - it might be posted...
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
aeffects
May 26, 2012, 3:59:33 PM5/26/12
to
Top Post
confirmed lone nuts and lone nuts in CT clothing are (to quote long
gone [sic], weird nutter Steve Keating) a **HOOT** LMFAO ! ! ! !
On May 26, 9:04 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> The kooks in the censored forum can't refute Douglas Horne, so they simply label
> it "wild stuff" to pretend that there's no reason to refute it.
>
> Tony Marsh got nailed to the wall on his uncited and unsupported assertion that
> Douglas Horne was "making up stuff" and "misrepresenting the evidence" - but I
> suspect that I'll soon be censored for pointing out the truth.
>
> So I crossposted it here for all to see and laugh at:
>
> In article <4fbfd39...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
confirmed lone nuts and lone nuts in CT clothing are (to quote long
gone [sic], weird nutter Steve Keating) a **HOOT** LMFAO ! ! ! !
On May 26, 9:04 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> The kooks in the censored forum can't refute Douglas Horne, so they simply label
> it "wild stuff" to pretend that there's no reason to refute it.
>
> Tony Marsh got nailed to the wall on his uncited and unsupported assertion that
> Douglas Horne was "making up stuff" and "misrepresenting the evidence" - but I
> suspect that I'll soon be censored for pointing out the truth.
>
> So I crossposted it here for all to see and laugh at:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 5/25/2012 9:56 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> In article<4fbe69d...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 5/25/2012 9:56 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>
> >>> On 5/24/2012 10:12 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>> In article<4fba9ee...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
> >>> On 5/24/2012 10:12 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
timstter
May 26, 2012, 5:56:10 PM5/26/12
to
KUTGW, Dave!
LMFAO Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
timstter
May 26, 2012, 5:58:50 PM5/26/12
to
On May 27, 2:04 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> The kooks in the censored forum can't refute Douglas Horne, so they simply label
> it "wild stuff" to pretend that there's no reason to refute it.
>
> Tony Marsh got nailed to the wall on his uncited and unsupported assertion that
> Douglas Horne was "making up stuff" and "misrepresenting the evidence" - but I
> suspect that I'll soon be censored for pointing out the truth.
>
> So I crossposted it here for all to see and laugh at:
>
> In article <4fbfd39...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
> The kooks in the censored forum can't refute Douglas Horne, so they simply label
> it "wild stuff" to pretend that there's no reason to refute it.
>
> Tony Marsh got nailed to the wall on his uncited and unsupported assertion that
> Douglas Horne was "making up stuff" and "misrepresenting the evidence" - but I
> suspect that I'll soon be censored for pointing out the truth.
>
> So I crossposted it here for all to see and laugh at:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 5/25/2012 9:56 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> In article<4fbe69d...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 5/25/2012 9:56 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
>
> >>> On 5/24/2012 10:12 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>> In article<4fba9ee...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
> >>> On 5/24/2012 10:12 AM, Ben Holmes wrote:
It seems only your loyal factotum, The Lapdog, can be bothered reading
your guff.
No one else gives a toss.
Informative Regards,
0 new messages