Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 29

52 views
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Oct 28, 2023, 4:51:28 AM10/28/23
to
There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.

Oswald was placed in lineups that included "fillers" who were blonds, mid 30s, wearing jackets, sweaters and vests, teenagers and even a Mexican.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/lineups-1-2.png

QUESTION # 29 : How many witnesses described the Tippit shooter as any of these ?

Bud

unread,
Oct 28, 2023, 4:58:51 AM10/28/23
to
Some said Oswald was wearing a jacket when they saw him.

NEXT!

Hank Sienzant

unread,
Oct 29, 2023, 10:02:31 PM10/29/23
to
On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 4:51:28 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
Apparently, you won’t be happy unless the Dallas police rounded up all the Oswalds doubles that were roaming Dallas according to the critics, and put all of them in the lineup with Oswald.

Tell us, Gil, how closely do the others in a lineup have to match the suspect, according to Supreme Court rulings?

How closely do the others resemble the suspect, Ted Bundy, in this lineup photo, for example?
https://www.ladbible.com/entertainment/film-and-tv-story-behind-chilling-photo-taken-of-ted-bundy-in-police-line-up-20190125

PS: All except Bundy are actual police officers. Bundy only pretended to be a police officer when kidnapping Carol DaRonch.

NoTrueFlags Here

unread,
Oct 29, 2023, 11:39:57 PM10/29/23
to
Hank has to use a lineup from another case because he knows that the Oswald lineups don't stand to scrutiny.

John Corbett

unread,
Oct 30, 2023, 8:45:35 AM10/30/23
to
On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 10:02:31 PM UTC-4, Hank Sienzant wrote:
Gil thinks Oswald's lineup looked like this one:

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7UPpzI496cQ/Wr54MX3W2RI/AAAAAAAAxuA/mY1t9R2zdMci4EzH4_E7GkFFsfv5h6sWACLcBGAs/s1600/ep735%2B%25282%2529.jpg

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 30, 2023, 9:19:42 AM10/30/23
to
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 01:58:49 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 30, 2023, 9:19:45 AM10/30/23
to
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 19:02:29 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 30, 2023, 9:19:47 AM10/30/23
to
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:45:33 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 4:51:28?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>>> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>>>
>>> Oswald was placed in lineups that included "fillers" who were blonds, mid 30s, wearing jackets, sweaters and vests, teenagers and even a Mexican.
>>> https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/lineups-1-2.png
>>>
>>> QUESTION # 29 : How many witnesses described the Tippit shooter as any of these ?


Logical fallacy deleted.

Hank Sienzant

unread,
Oct 30, 2023, 8:58:43 PM10/30/23
to
Run, Ben, run!

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 31, 2023, 9:36:10 AM10/31/23
to
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:58:41 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant

Hank Sienzant

unread,
Nov 3, 2023, 6:04:04 PM11/3/23
to
On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 10:02:31 PM UTC-4, Hank Sienzant wrote:
Gil? Nothing to add here? No corrections to make or clarifications sought?

Hank Sienzant

unread,
Nov 3, 2023, 6:08:29 PM11/3/23
to
No, Hank uses a lineup from another case — more than a decade later — to establish that lineups don’t have to have exact duplicates of the suspects (or anything close) to be a legitimate lineup. This i# one of those bogus conspiracist talking points that don’t reflect real-life practices. As established by the photo I cited.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Nov 3, 2023, 6:12:38 PM11/3/23
to
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 15:08:27 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant

Ben Holmes

unread,
Nov 3, 2023, 6:13:07 PM11/3/23
to
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 15:04:01 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

Hucksterl? Nothing to add here? No corrections to make or
clarifications sought?
0 new messages