Bernard "Macho" Barker As "Badgeman"?
Sam McClung
in the TSBD also identified Bernard "Macho" Barker as someone he saw behind
the north knoll fence after the shooting.
In what is traditionally known as the Badgeman area in the Moorman photo
which sold at auction for $175,000 earlier this year, it appears a human
head may be visible with the head and chin just clearing the triangluar
picket fence tops about 5 feet tall, the "badge" being not a badge but
something else in front of the fence, sunlight or something else being
confused in the past for the discharge of a firearm in front of the person's
head, with an even bigger light spot or something else area to the right of
the "flash."
There appears to possibly be a large X centered over the left eye area and a
fainter large X over the right eye area of the person.
Only about the top right quarter of the front of the head seems to be lit by
direct sunlight.
http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/images/badgeman.jpg
Walt
> Dallas County Deputy Seymour Weitzman, who identified the 7.65 Mauser found
> in the TSBD also identified Bernard "Macho" Barker as someone he saw behind
> the north knoll fence after the shooting.
>
> In what is traditionally known as the Badgeman area in the Moorman photo
> which sold at auction for $175,000 earlier this year, it appears a human
> head may be visible with the head and chin just clearing the triangluar
> picket fence tops about 5 feet tall, the "badge" being not a badge but
> something else in front of the fence, sunlight or something else being
> confused in the past for the discharge of a firearm in front of the person's
> head, with an even bigger light spot or something else area to the right of
> the "flash."
an even bigger light spot or something else area to the right of the
"flash."
If the smaller "flash" was the muzzle flash of a rifle....Then the
bigger "flash" to the right must have been the muzzle flash of a
shotgun. Maybe there were two snipers there.....One with a rifle and
the other with a shotgun.
Watta ya think..... I'll bet we could run around in circles on this
idea for a long time.
Sam McClung
news:e74f6a45-7947-44e6...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 01:05, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> Dallas County Deputy Seymour Weitzman, who identified the 7.65 Mauser
>> found
>> in the TSBD also identified Bernard "Macho" Barker as someone he saw
>> behind
>> the north knoll fence after the shooting.
>>
>> In what is traditionally known as the Badgeman area in the Moorman photo
>> which sold at auction for $175,000 earlier this year, it appears a human
>> head may be visible with the head and chin just clearing the triangluar
>> picket fence tops about 5 feet tall, the "badge" being not a badge but
>> something else in front of the fence, sunlight or something else being
>> confused in the past for the discharge of a firearm in front of the
>> person's
>> head, with an even bigger light spot or something else area to the right
>> of
>> the "flash."
>
>
> an even bigger light spot or something else area to the right of the
> "flash."
>
> If the smaller "flash" was the muzzle flash of a rifle....Then the
> bigger "flash" to the right must have been the muzzle flash of a
> shotgun. Maybe there were two snipers there.....One with a rifle and
> the other with a shotgun.
> Watta ya think..... I'll bet we could run around in circles on this
> idea for a long time.
better yet, a 155 howie, might convince more people of smoke too
can you imagine the chain-smoking team running it? a team of doc hollidays
from tombstone "i've got two howies, one for the both of you"
that's partially why i don't buy into the muzzle flash about a second after
the head shot badgeman story, selling people on getting the howie into
location beforehand doesn't fit in with the size package oswald carried up
the knoll, though a pattern of carrying oversized packages might be
established against oswald
of course, maybe gordon arnold brought the howie in, he was in uniform,
wasn't he?
good thing roger craig was on the spot and caught macho, making macho a
prime candidate for badgemanship, since lawrence, rogers, and harrelson were
in other locations behind the fence, and chauncey was back in the trainyard
behind a train, oblivious to what was really going down...
then there was that lady who could have driven out of the lot a car even
hotter than the borrowed downtown lincoln mercury car demonstrator never
assigned, but going there means believing roger craig...
curtjester1
Beverly Oliver saw Roscoe White in partial uniform when she went up
the steps. She saw him prior when Roscoe's wife worked at Ruby's and
he picked her up. And also Jack, Roscoe's son, saw a film cannister
in his possessions with Army man's labeled on the cannister. And a
guy who said he corresponded with Lee Bowers who lived in Canada said
Bowers saw two policemen back of the fence and were shooters. Al
Navis said he misplaced the letter, though.
CJ
Sam McClung
news:cedaa2c9-d6d8-4704...@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 1, 11:05 pm, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> Dallas County Deputy Seymour Weitzman, who identified the 7.65 Mauser
> found
> in the TSBD also identified Bernard "Macho" Barker as someone he saw
> behind
> the north knoll fence after the shooting.
>
> In what is traditionally known as the Badgeman area in the Moorman photo
> which sold at auction for $175,000 earlier this year, it appears a human
> head may be visible with the head and chin just clearing the triangluar
> picket fence tops about 5 feet tall, the "badge" being not a badge but
> something else in front of the fence, sunlight or something else being
> confused in the past for the discharge of a firearm in front of the
> person's
> head, with an even bigger light spot or something else area to the right
> of
> the "flash."
>
> There appears to possibly be a large X centered over the left eye area and
> a
> fainter large X over the right eye area of the person.
>
> Only about the top right quarter of the front of the head seems to be lit
> by
> direct sunlight.
>
> http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/images/badgeman.jpg
+ Beverly Oliver saw Roscoe White in partial uniform when she went up
+ the steps. She saw him prior when Roscoe's wife worked at Ruby's and
+ he picked her up. And also Jack, Roscoe's son, saw a film cannister
+ in his possessions with Army man's labeled on the cannister. And a
+ guy who said he corresponded with Lee Bowers who lived in Canada said
+ Bowers saw two policemen back of the fence and were shooters. Al
+ Navis said he misplaced the letter, though.
+ CJ
interesting stuff on oliver / white
who was jack? ricky? seems my conclusion on the ricky white story was part
truth, part misunderstanding, and part disinfo, like most stuff which makes
it into media print
going to revisit the story due to your post, thanks
curtjester1
> "curtjester1" <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah, Ricky instead of Jack.
CJ
robcap...@netscape.com
Robert Morningstar has done some interesting work in this area with
the photos, and he s quite convinced that the "badgeman" could be
either JDT or White (I think he says it is JDT). It gets confusing to
people as we are all speculating to varying degrees and a million
people have claimed or been named to be the shooter on the Knoll.
Walt
wrote:
HOT DAMN!!!..... The stupid bastard said: "we are all speculating to
varying degrees "....
Do you want to tell that to your old homosexual pervert buddy........
You and he refer to my speculations as "lies"
But other peoples speculations are NOT lies.....Because they have
published them in a book....
and a million
people have claimed or been named to be the shooter on the Knoll.-
robcap...@netscape.com
Show me where I claim as FACT that Tippit, White, Harrelson, Souetre,
Mertz, Frenchy, Hunt, et.al. were the GN snipers (or any other
location sniper). I do NOT claim things to be FACTS like you do when
I can't prove them.
The fact you don't even get what you are doing wrong is what is really
scary.
>
> But other peoples speculations are NOT lies.....Because they have
> published them in a book....
>
> and a million
> people have claimed or been named to be the shooter on the Knoll.-
> Hide quoted text -
>
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Walt
Whoa there ya lying scumbag......Did you or did you not write:..."we
are all speculating to varying degrees "....
THAT'S the crux of my post..... The FACT that you admitted that "we
are all speculating to varying degrees "....
and yet you and yer homosexual buddy call my speculations "lies"
Do try to pull yer usual duck and run crap.....be a man for once and
admit that you wrote..."we are all speculating to
varying degrees "....
>
robcap...@netscape.com
See how scary this is??? Walt can't even follow a train of though, or
he is really desperate, as he doesn't see the difference.
Here is the difference for the logic impaired, i.e. Walt:
1) Speculating for speculating sake. Most CTers do this from time to
time, I do it sometimes to try and make pieces fit together.
2) Speculating, but claiming it to be FACT, AND attack anyone who
doesn't agree that your "speculating" is FACT. This is what Walt does
on a constant basis.
> THAT'S the crux of my post..... The FACT that you admitted that "we
> are all speculating to varying degrees "....
> and yet you and yer homosexual buddy call my speculations "lies"
Show me how 1 and 2 are the same.
> Do try to pull yer usual duck and run crap.....be a man for once andadmit that you wrote..."we are all speculating to
>
> varying degrees "....
When do I duck & run? In fact, I would say I'm a glutton for
punishment as I see these through much longer than is really sane to
do. I try and talk reason with a guy who calls me "Stupid B-----d"
all the time. I must be nuts!
Don't get your undies in a knot, I did NOT say anything to get you off
the big hook you placed yourself on. Show me how 1 and 2 are the same.
Walt
The stupid bastard wrote:...." I must be nuts!"
"Nuts" as in..... not rational, crazy, insane,...etc There's no
question about it....I've told you several times that a little couch
time might help you.
The FACT that you refuse to accept that you're trying to duck and run
from your statement of...." we are all speculating to varying degrees
"....is PROOF that you are a squirmin wigglin maggot.
Speculating is speculating....... Whether it's you, or I, or anybody
else...... There are no "varying degrees" .....
Some theories are more logical than others but they are still just
speculation until they are demonstrated to be correct. I've
demonstrated that the videos TAKEN AT THE TIME of the rifle being
puuled from beneath the boxes show that Craig was lying.
Now rhen maggot....are you going to stand up like a man ...or are you
going to continue to squirm and wiggle.
>
> Don't get your undies in a knot, I did NOT say anything to get you off
> the big hook you placed yourself on. Show me how 1 and 2 are the same.- Hide quoted text -
robcap...@netscape.com
This doens't change the fact you are prodigious liar, in fact, I think
you are like Nixon, you can't stop lying.
> The FACT that you refuse to accept that you're trying to duck and run
> from your statement of...." we are all speculating to varying degrees
> "....is PROOF that you are a squirmin wigglin maggot.
Speculating and claiming said speculation to be FACT are two DIFFERENT
things. Notice how Walt ALWAYS avoids what he knows shows the truth?
This is why it is impossible to reach a reasonable conclusion with him
as he lies more than a rug.
> Speculating is speculating....... Whether it's you, or I, or anybody
> else...... There are no "varying degrees" .....
It sure is, BUT claiming said speculations are FACTS without proof to
back it up is a whole other matter. Why do you lie even about this
point?
> Some theories are more logical than others but they are still just
> speculation until they are demonstrated to be correct. I've
> demonstrated that the videos TAKEN AT THE TIME of the rifle being
> puuled from beneath the boxes show that Craig was lying.
No you haven't, you have given your theory that is NOT consistent with
everyone who was there. Only a delusional person, or a liar, would
act like they have proven anything. It is funny Walt is again
defending the WC's version of events, isn't it?
> Now rhen maggot....are you going to stand up like a man ...or are you
> going to continue to squirm and wiggle.
Squirm and wiggle? You are the one who can't even see his own lying
stance is different from pure speculating. You won't even admit it is
different either.