http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=18411&st=210&p=239930&#entry239930
DVP SAID:
You guys can't possibly really be serious in questioning Oswald's
ownership of Revolver V510210, can you? The evidence is a mile deep
that Oswald, in his OWN WRITING (which you also dispute is his,
naturally) ordered both the revolver and the rifle. This is a FACT
beyond dispute (to reasonable people, that is).
In fact, if you were to poll conspiracy theorists off the street who
know at least a LITTLE something about the details of the JFK & Tippit
murder cases, I'd bet that a vast majority would concede that the
revolver and the rifle were Oswald's. (And as I mentioned twice
previously, the "Patsy" plot even makes much more sense from the POV
that the two guns WERE really Oswald's. The evil patsy framers would
then have framed Oswald with HIS OWN WEAPONS.)
And the assertion by some conspiracy theorists that the gun that was
wrested from Oswald's hands during the scuffle in the Texas Theater
was really not Revolver V510210 is an assertion that's almost too
ridiculous to even talk about.
Because if the gun taken from Oswald in the theater wasn't V510210,
then we'd have to believe that the Dallas cops (and/or the FBI) had a
desire to frame Oswald for a cop-killing he never committed (which is
REALLY absurd when thinking about the DPD doing this, since a lot of
those guys knew the slain officer personally, and certainly wouldn't
want to see Tippit's murderer go free).
And if the gun taken from LHO wasn't the V510210 gun, we'd also have
to assume that the cops and Federal agents then engaged in a very
swift and efficient sinister plot of faking all of the various records
pertaining to Oswald's mail-order purchase for the revolver. The cops
must have then somehow convinced at least SOME employees of Seaport
Traders to join in their frame-up of Oswald, because the paperwork
concerning Oswald's revolver purchase was found in the SEAPORT FILES
on November 30th, 1963.
JOSEPH BALL -- "That [Michaelis Exhibit No. 2; linked below] was in
your records, was it, as of November 30, 1963?"
HEINZ MICHAELIS -- "Yes, it was."
http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc151/David_Von_Pein/MISCELLANEOUS%20JFK-RELATED%20PHOTOS/MichaelisEx2.jpg
Did the FBI send an agent to Seaport to "pose" as a Seaport employee
so that this covert agent could then "plant" the "Hidell" invoice in
the Seaport files?
It's only when you get to Internet forums like this one do you find
the incredibly silly theories being tossed around -- such as Oswald
NOT shooting Tippit, Oswald NOT shooting JFK, Oswald NOT purchasing
the revolver, Oswald NOT purchasing the rifle, and Tan Jacket Man
"handing off" some suspicious item to somebody in a two-second film
clip taken shortly after the assassination.
As an additional example of what I mean, this 2003 ABC poll shows that
83 percent of the 1,031 people being polled believed that Lee Oswald
was a gunman in the JFK murder:
"Do you think Lee Harvey Oswald was the only gunman in the Kennedy
assassination, do you think there was another gunman in addition to
Oswald there that day, or do you think Oswald was not involved in the
assassination at all?".....
ONLY OSWALD ----------- 32%
ANOTHER GUNMAN ------- 51%
OSWALD NOT INVOLVED -- 7%
NO OPINION ------------- 10%
http://www.pollingreport.com/news3.htm#Kennedy
How big do you suppose the percentage would be in those first two
categories ("Only Oswald" and "Another Gunman [Plus Oswald too]") if
the respondents consisted only of people who posted regularly at
Internet forums?
David Von Pein
December 2011
http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com