Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 12

22 views
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Oct 25, 2023, 5:21:28 AM10/25/23
to

There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.

QUESTION # 12. Why did the Dallas Police give Oswald a Nitrate Test that was known to be unreliable ?

Please reply withe evidence and not just opinion.

John Corbett

unread,
Oct 25, 2023, 7:32:14 AM10/25/23
to
Your question calls for speculation, not evidence.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 25, 2023, 9:06:39 AM10/25/23
to
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:32:12 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
But you speculate ALL THE TIME! Why stop now?

More cowardice...

Bud

unread,
Oct 26, 2023, 6:04:30 PM10/26/23
to
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:21:28 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
To detect nitrates.

NEXT!

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:26 AM10/27/23
to
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:04:28 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
0 new messages