Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mark Lane #249 - Billy Clarke & Others Continue To Run
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Ben Holmes
Apr 30, 2013, 10:03:16 AM4/30/13
to
In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed how the Warren Commission simply
wasn't interested in facts that quite credibly show a conspiracy in this case...
now he moves on to the strange facts surrounding Ruby's access to kill Oswald...
"THE Commission presented its findings with finality when it posthumously
convicted Lee Harvey Oswald of the murders of President Kennedy and Officer
Tippit, no matter how much conflicting evidence there was; but it was unable to
determine how Jack Ruby entered the well-guarded basement of the Police and
Courts
Building on November 24. The Commission reached unequivocal conclusions in
matters
which must remain reasonably doubtful to this day; but in a matter most
susceptible to proof � how Ruby got in � it represented the evidence as 'not
conclusive'.
When Oswald was shot, there were 40 to 50 newsmen and cameramen in the basement,
some of whom knew Jack Ruby, and 70 to 75 police officers, many of whom also
knew
him. The Commission thought it 'appropriate to consider whether there is
evidence
that Jack Ruby received assistance from Dallas policemen or others in gaining
access to the basement on the morning of November 24. An affirmative answer
would
require that the evidence be evaluated for possible connection with the
assassination itself.' If it is true, as the Commission claimed, that the
'Dallas
officials, particularly those from the police department, have fully complied
with
all requests made by the Commission,' then the Commission should have been able
to
find a conclusive answer to its question. But it was willing to do no more than
speculate about what occurred and could only conclude that Ruby 'probably'
walked
down the ramp leading from Main Street into the basement." "
Mark Lane is showing the how the Warren Commission simply wasn't interested in
any
facts in this case that would lead to conspiracy... it's amusing to see how
silent
the Warren Commission choir has become over this Mark Lane series... it's
becoming
quite clear that Mark Lane isn't the one who's "dishonest".
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
wasn't interested in facts that quite credibly show a conspiracy in this case...
now he moves on to the strange facts surrounding Ruby's access to kill Oswald...
"THE Commission presented its findings with finality when it posthumously
convicted Lee Harvey Oswald of the murders of President Kennedy and Officer
Tippit, no matter how much conflicting evidence there was; but it was unable to
determine how Jack Ruby entered the well-guarded basement of the Police and
Courts
Building on November 24. The Commission reached unequivocal conclusions in
matters
which must remain reasonably doubtful to this day; but in a matter most
susceptible to proof � how Ruby got in � it represented the evidence as 'not
conclusive'.
When Oswald was shot, there were 40 to 50 newsmen and cameramen in the basement,
some of whom knew Jack Ruby, and 70 to 75 police officers, many of whom also
knew
him. The Commission thought it 'appropriate to consider whether there is
evidence
that Jack Ruby received assistance from Dallas policemen or others in gaining
access to the basement on the morning of November 24. An affirmative answer
would
require that the evidence be evaluated for possible connection with the
assassination itself.' If it is true, as the Commission claimed, that the
'Dallas
officials, particularly those from the police department, have fully complied
with
all requests made by the Commission,' then the Commission should have been able
to
find a conclusive answer to its question. But it was willing to do no more than
speculate about what occurred and could only conclude that Ruby 'probably'
walked
down the ramp leading from Main Street into the basement." "
Mark Lane is showing the how the Warren Commission simply wasn't interested in
any
facts in this case that would lead to conspiracy... it's amusing to see how
silent
the Warren Commission choir has become over this Mark Lane series... it's
becoming
quite clear that Mark Lane isn't the one who's "dishonest".
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
Bill Clarke
Apr 30, 2013, 11:21:41 AM4/30/13
to
In article <kloiv...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
You blooming fool, numerous people have been kicking your stupid ass over your
silly series on Mark Lane since it began. You are just too dumb to know it.
And any silence from the choir is due to boredom from your repetitive bull shit.
When "Mother Jones" comes down on a member of the left Lane must be the ultimate
lying asshole.
Bill Clarke
silly series on Mark Lane since it began. You are just too dumb to know it.
And any silence from the choir is due to boredom from your repetitive bull shit.
When "Mother Jones" comes down on a member of the left Lane must be the ultimate
lying asshole.
Bill Clarke
timstter
Apr 30, 2013, 4:38:50 PM4/30/13
to
Say, is it true that Mort Sahl's wife threw Lane out of their house
when the scales finally dropped from her eyes re him?
Such a shame the kids can't play nice, eh?
Yet ANOTHER person disaffected with Mark Lane.
Informative Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
aeffects
Apr 30, 2013, 6:37:09 PM4/30/13
to
On Apr 30, 8:21 am, Bill Clarke <Bill_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <kloiv40...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
think content Willie old boy, do you need a roadmap to read a few Mark
Lane related RTJ paragraphs? Or is the content above ML#239 simply too
painful to bare? Think Dallas PD, local journalists, access, PD
garage, LHO murdered, surrounded by 70-75 cops.
Yep, I can see why changing the subject and focus is your best move...
> Bill Clarke
> In article <kloiv40...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
Lane related RTJ paragraphs? Or is the content above ML#239 simply too
painful to bare? Think Dallas PD, local journalists, access, PD
garage, LHO murdered, surrounded by 70-75 cops.
Yep, I can see why changing the subject and focus is your best move...
> Bill Clarke
Sam McClung
Apr 30, 2013, 11:48:15 PM4/30/13
to
"aeffects" <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c9c75bf7-c480-4a41...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...
and, per penn jones, half "the force" was in da klan
use "the force" luke?
news:c9c75bf7-c480-4a41...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...
use "the force" luke?
Ben Holmes
May 1, 2013, 8:02:51 AM5/1/13
to
In article <kloni...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
Strangely enough, you failed to make a *SINGLE* statement about the actual facts
that Mark Lane is mentioning here.
How cowardly of you!
>When "Mother Jones" comes down on a member of the left Lane must be the
ultimate
>lying asshole.
This only illustrates your incredible lack of thinking ability.
>Bill Clarke
that Mark Lane is mentioning here.
How cowardly of you!
>When "Mother Jones" comes down on a member of the left Lane must be the
ultimate
>lying asshole.
>Bill Clarke
timstter
May 1, 2013, 8:41:50 AM5/1/13
to
Lord help us! The best Benny can summon as a compatriot is YOU?!!
Even Sidekick Sam McClung comes across as less idiotic, Dave/Ringo!
Yellow Pants has TRULY hit bottom, both here & @ the Amazon thread.
Sorrowing Regards,
aeffects
May 1, 2013, 5:14:54 PM5/1/13
to
On Apr 30, 8:48 pm, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> "aeffects" <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Sam, I'm utterly convinced wannabe lone nut-WCR supporting morons who
dabble on this board are terrified of case evidence, therefore they
are all delinquent paying their college loans and looking for a quick
way out of their dilemma. ...
> "aeffects" <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote in message
dabble on this board are terrified of case evidence, therefore they
are all delinquent paying their college loans and looking for a quick
way out of their dilemma. ...
Sam McClung
May 1, 2013, 9:33:55 PM5/1/13
to
"aeffects" <aeffe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:98360842-e0b0-4172...@af5g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...
college loans...
timstter
May 3, 2013, 5:44:33 PM5/3/13
to
On May 1, 8:37 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
Helpful Regards,
Jason Burke
May 3, 2013, 6:00:32 PM5/3/13
to
past decade or two.
timstter
May 3, 2013, 6:14:39 PM5/3/13
to
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> Thank you for mentioning what's been on all rational folks' mind the
> past decade or two.
LOL! Say, do you think Dave/Ringo used industrial strength carpet glue
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> Thank you for mentioning what's been on all rational folks' mind the
> past decade or two.
to attach the modified Beatles wig to his shiny pate before shuffling
so PATHETICALLY in the general direction of Duluth to give his
<snicker> *presentation* for Fetzer that time?
Video evidence would seem to support this conclusion!
Jovial Regards,
0 new messages