Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Gordon Allows Already-Disproven Prayer Man Claim On Education Forum

157 views
Skip to first unread message

Scrum Drum

unread,
Nov 27, 2021, 2:44:15 PM11/27/21
to
Greg Doudna just re-opened the Prayer Man thread on the Education Forum and gave approval to Andrej Stancak's hack-work as showing Prayer Man is Oswald:

Andrej Stancak -- After studying through again your your research on this thread I am convinced your detailed case for Prayer Man being Oswald is as strong as it can be absent a sharper photograph to give facial recognition. Point after point checks out and matches, as you bring out. Height, 5'9". The Type 2 male pattern hairline true of ca. 25% of males. The grayscale of the shirt in the black-and-white in agreement with the maroon/reddish color of the shirt Oswald was wearing, CE151. The identification of Sarah Stanton as to Wesley Frazier's left, as Frazier himself said. The body language analysis is interesting. The lack of any other identification of PM, including from Frazier. The agreement with Oswald's own claims of where he was at the time of the assassination, according to the various versions of the notes taken of Oswald after his arrest.


In this false approval above Doudna says that Stancak has proven Prayer Man is 5 foot 9 and has also proven Stanton is to Frazier's left...Stancak has done nothing of the sort...In order to compensate for Prayer Man obviously being Stanton's 5 foot 4 height Stancak created the Rube Goldberg excuse that Prayer Man is contorted with one foot on the step in both Weigman and Darnell...5 years ago I asked Stancak to create a computer graphic cartoon depicting this...Stancak lied and said he would but never did...Gordon came in and pampered the cheating Stancak telling him to take his time and we would wait...We have been waiting 5 years and Stancak still hasn't carried out his promise...The reason Stancak never produced a cartoon graphic for Wiegman is because he is aware it will refute his claim that Prayer Man is 5 foot 4 because he has a foot on the step...Any accurate depiction of Prayer Man in Wiegman will show that for him to have a foot on the step would require his left shoulder to move in to the sun and brightly illuminate it...The sole reason Stancak lied and never produced an overhead graphic for Wiegman is because he already tried this graphic and realized it showed exactly what I am saying here...In other words Stancak knew he refuted himself so he held back the overhead graphic for Wiegman and that is just fine with the assholes on the Education Forum who stay quiet while inferior researchers support this dirty dishonesty...When Stancak tried to alter the graphics to suit his theory by making Prayer Man's leg 3 inches longer in order to stretch it to the step I was the only one to notice...Stancak would have gotten away with that and his work would then be referenced on the Education Forum if it wasn't for me working through others to get Stancak to admit his trickery...When I forced Stancak to recognize his forging the leg longer to make his theory work he lied once again and said he would correct it...He never did...Instead of taking responsibility for the rotten research and falsification of evidence he was allowing on his website Gordon responded to my catching Stancak cheating by making a rule that no one could post for me and that my research was not to be allowed on the Education Forum at threat of punishment...

The next lie Doudna makes is he says Stancak has shown Stanton to Frazier's left...He hasn't...What Stancak did was take the small face of Pauline Sanders that he discovered between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens and say it is Stanton...When I posted that Wiegman was taken at the same Z-257 time as Altgens and its 90 degree perspective shows that Stanton is not in the spot that Stancak shows her in his Darnell computer graphic that idiotic hack Stancak ignores it with Gordon's full assistance knowing that my banning is aiding him from answering for his easily-refuted stupid claims that are obviously based on his need to force the evidence towards Prayer Man...

Doudna goes on to commit the research offense of ignoring that we have already had the "clearer image of Prayer Man" shown to us by Chris Davidson...Davidson backed it up with metadata and also affirmed his enhancement showed the face of a woman on Prayer Man...So does Davidson come in and correct Stancak or Doudna?...No, he stays quiet and refuses to back his own discovery while lesser-skilled researchers ignore it...You can literally show this worthless research community that Prayer Man has a woman's face and that still isn't good enough with the social media hacks...

Doudna is a Greg Parker troll farm member so his political approval of Stancak's pseudo-science hack-work is based on his need to agree with the blowhard Parker and his garbage agenda...Because the ignoramus Gordon has banned me I am unable to strip Doudna down naked as far as his false entries...A theory that has been disproven repeatedly and extensively from many different approaches is still walking around uncontested on the Education Forum thanks to that asshole James Gordon who sees his total power as more desirable than competent research...

DiEugenio knows Prayer Man is Stanton...He admitted it to me on Facebook...But that is OK because this useless research community has always kept a side game going of fucking-over certain researchers as a sort of blood sport that they savor like a Roman Coliseum...None of the great brain trust on the EF enter a single word against Doudna's stupidity and running roughshod across credible evidence...The game here is for that personal grudge enforcer who calls himself a moderator, Gordon, to put a death strangle on the one skilled researcher capable of exposing him and his dirty board...Rotten research? - no problem...The reason Doudna posts what he posts is because the Prayer Man cult has hijacked the JFK internet and removed my input by means of censorship...Doudna has posted this because the information that refutes it has been dishonestly removed from the forums where Doudna is reading it...We have a research community that cries out against ignoring of evidence and banning of researchers by the government but then turns around and practices the same thing against its own even quicker...

Hank Sienzant

unread,
Nov 28, 2021, 8:02:17 AM11/28/21
to
Welcome to the other side. Now you understand what it’s like trying to argue with people committed to a belief despite all the evidence to the contrary. Good luck with your journey.

Scrum Drum

unread,
Nov 28, 2021, 1:41:33 PM11/28/21
to
On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 2:44:15 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:



> Welcome to the other side. Now you understand what it’s like trying to argue with people committed to a belief despite all the evidence to the contrary. Good luck with your journey.


James Gordon is just an ignorant asshole...He has no problem with that Dumb-ass fest he is running in the Prayer Man thread over there on the Education Forum or its seriously damaging effect on JFK research...Gordon seeks and gives welcome space to those who know nothing about the topic and are just feeling it out while sadistically excluding the person who knows the most about it in order to shine his own British bully balls...Gordon is a piece of shit because he enjoys it and takes no responsibility for how it affects JFK research or his website even...In any case Hank's response shows the danger to the credibility of the JFK research world that Gordon's sadistic exclusion creates...The world will see JFK research as being populated by hacks and idiots who offer low grade bullshit as their main input...

That guy Butler is nuts and out in left field, yet he was the one to post Davidson's enhancement that showed a woman's face on Prayer Man...Thanks to the bullies Greg Parker, James Gordon, and Jim DiEugenio (Kamp is too stupid to merit mention) the game being played over on the Education Forum is one of never mentioning the name of the guy who solved it...Any silly hack-work and zany argument is OK as long as it isn't my conclusive proof that Vincent Palamara said was extraordinary research...So, does Davidson come in to defend his own discovery?...No, he stays quiet because that serves the purpose of the mean-spirited barbecue-ing of deliberately fucking-over myself...Does Vincent Palamara, who gave me a whole page in his book, come in to defend the guy who proved that if Oswald is in the second floor Lunch Room that therefore he can't be Prayer Man?...No, these guys make a conscious decision that the clique and its dirty enforcement by an idiot moderator (Gordon) is more important than objective fair research and that's how those who have hijacked the JFK internet run their dirty program with its dirty agenda...This is a guy that Kathy Beckett advised to start his own website...A person doesn't recommend starting his own website to another person who doesn't have good material...Healy recommended me for televised producing of JFK evidence...Debra Conway agreed 100% with my Prayer Man discoveries and withdrew Kamp's Lancer award because of it...Yet, when it comes to Gordon's bully board these people stay quiet under his British bastardry and help enforce the censoring of a researcher who they otherwise agree has merit...That's cowardice and caving to bullies...These people would rather conduct their embarrassing crusade of time-wasting idiotic mulling of credulous research from the same old hacks than do what their own website tells the public it is there for...

In any case, one of the frames Butler posted of Davidson's enhancement shows a clearly-seen woman's face on Prayer Man...Because Stancak is leading that thread via erroneously-applied credibility from lesser-skilled researchers Gordon is allowing the participants in that thread to ignore conclusive evidence...That thread is dead in the water because Stancak is being allowed to get away with accepting credit for showing Stanton to Frazier's left...The person Stancak showed in his bogus research was not Stanton...It was Pauline Sanders and therefore proved the opposite of what Stancak was contending...It proved that since Stancak has located Sanders in Altgens that therefore Stanton must be in another spot...These Gordon-approved hacks are ignoring that Stanton not being visible in Altgens to Frazier's left means the only other spot she can be is the Prayer Man spot that Lovelady said she was in when he said she was over next to him on the far right of the entranceway...The hacks cherry-pick their evidence, but they still haven't answered this and none of them is going to voluntarily do so as long as Gordon bails them out...If I were fairly allowed my earned place amongst my peers I would clean up in there in about 10 seconds...Gordon says I am too insulting but the real problem here is he is too incompetent...

Stancak did his best pretend rational voice analysis by contending that if Prayer Man were Stanton we would see Stanton's white hair on Prayer Man in Darnell...This is a false claim because with some camera equipment and certain types of film light-colored hair can appear dark in shade...I already explained this to Stancak and asked him to please show anyone in Darnell who is in the shade who has visible light-colored hair...If Stancak bothered to notice the objects in the shade in Darnell are all dark and what that is telling you is Darnell's camera and film do not show light-colored objects well in shade...Plus Stancak has no evidence that Stanton did not dye her hair that day or even wear a wig...The flaw in Stancak's one-sided approach is he ignores all the rest of the evidence that proves Prayer Man is Stanton...And there is plenty of it like Stanton's dress buttons being visible going down the front of a dress that has uniform-colored fabric from shoulder to knee...Stancak uncredibly ignores that if this were Oswald you would see the break between shirt, belt, and pants instead of the uniform-colored dress we see in Darnell...Stancak ignores the basic evidence that what these dummies are calling a camera is actually Stanton's purse...If you go to my Prayer Woman Facebook page Sarah's grand daughter sent me a photo of that purse...The current posters at the Education Forum are also too dumb to realize that the glowing object is Sarah's hand sticking in to the same sun that the rest of her body would be in if she had a foot on the step...Gordon allows Stancak to run naked on his website and ignore that if Prayer Man had a foot on the step that sun you see illuminating Prayer Man's hand would be illuminating the left side of Prayer Man's body...The fact it isn't is proof that Prayer Man has both feet on the landing platform and is therefore provably 5 foot 4 - which just so happens to be Stanton's exact height as told to me by her grand daughter...Those assholes at the Education Forum - Gordon tells them to ignore a skilled researcher with his conclusive evidence and they obey...Stancak is never made to answer that if Prayer Man had a foot on the step his center of gravity would pull forward over that foot and therefore pull the rest of his body in to the sun that the hand is glowing in...If you look at Stancak's own overhead graphic for Darnell you can see his graphics easily show this and this is why Stancak refuses to produce that graphic on the Education Forum because he knows it refutes his foot on the step claim...Stancak pretends he's too busy to make that graphic...He's a liar...The only reason he doesn't produce it is because he knows it will prove me correct...And the rest of the assholes on the Education Forum pretend they are too busy to read my evidence here...


Scrum Drum

unread,
Nov 30, 2021, 1:54:08 PM11/30/21
to
On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 1:41:33 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:



If you notice Lone Nutters like Bojczuk, Steve Roe, Parnell, Cohen, Von Pein, etc don't criticize Parker's Prayer Man crap...They stay away from it...


This makes me suspect that Parker and his ROKC website are a Counter-Intelligence operation designed to look like Conspiracy researchers but they are really government gremlins whose job it is to permanently screw-up JFK research...

Scrum Drum

unread,
Dec 4, 2021, 2:16:02 PM12/4/21
to
On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 1:54:08 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 1:41:33 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
> If you notice Lone Nutters like Bojczuk, Steve Roe, Parnell, Cohen, Von Pein, etc don't criticize Parker's Prayer Man crap...They stay away from it...
>


There's a great advantage to cowardly banning and running as Greg Parker shows...

Lone Nutter Jeremy Bojczuk just linked Parker's bullshit side-track filibuster on the Education Forum and directly violated the no posting for banned members rule that was used to remove my research from the Education Forum...The no posting for banned members rule wasn't really a serious rule it was just that asshole Gordon's way of doing personal abuse against me as moderator because I showed what an incompetent bombastic ass he was and how he didn't know what he was doing as moderator...Gordon is the type of lowlife and poseur who is not beneath abusing his moderator power and making vindictive rules targeting individuals in order to get personal revenge against someone who disproved his website's pet theory...As you can see, Lone Nutter Bojczuk's being allowed to flagrantly break the no posting for banned members rule and post Parker's ROKC filibuster, that Parker used to get around honestly answering my Prayer Man evidence, shows that the rule is not serious and is just Gordon's pathetic way of punishing someone who disproved his favorites...Anyone who has a good grasp of the Prayer Man issue can see the people arguing it depend on removing and ignoring me from the discussion...It is accurate to say that the current Prayer Man discussion being overseen by that idiot crook Gordon on the Education Forum directly depends on my good evidence being kept from the conversation...The people doing it are petty hacks whose input shows they don't have a very good grasp of evidence analysis who are the type that would take advantage of unfair banning (censorship) to avoid the correct evidence...Mob rule now exists on the Kennedy internet...Since most researchers are of the skill level of those who are currently arguing the evidence on the Education Forum they team up and exert themselves as a majority and then use that false majority to attack and ban those with 3 percentile skill who can articulate the correct evidence...They do this by promoting persons like themselves to moderator positions who then give biased rulings to their own under the guise of moderation... They then label it fair moderation instead of the insider cronyism that it is...It is pathetic seeing people pretend credibility while trying to force Sarah Stanton to be Oswald on the front steps...The Prayer Man issue has led to the destruction of Peer Review quality on the JFK internet all with the full approval of Jim DiEugenio who uses his current Oliver Stone popularity to its max to avoid honestly addressing this...Jim DiEugenio knows he left the Prayer Man theory out of his documentary because he knows it is bullshit, but he's not honest and stays quiet about that obvious omission...You can see the Prayer Man people trying to process that omission while avoiding directly confronting Jim on it in order to hash out its obvious meaning...But they do that by dishonestly censoring and ignoring my input because they know I have put the best explanation to it that they don't want to hear...Knowing I was deadly to his lazy approval of Prayer Man Jim pulled the low move of telling Gordon he did the right thing by banning me...A credible moderator would see someone trying to get rid of someone who disproved his claims...

Scrum Drum

unread,
Dec 6, 2021, 1:09:38 PM12/6/21
to
On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 2:16:02 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 1:54:08 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:



Jeremy Bojczuk is over in the Prayer Man thread saying it doesn't matter if Oswald was seen on the front steps the conspiracy would have just added other commies to the plot and gone on from there...It is important to note that Bojczuk is a member of Parker's troll farm and is a well-known Lone Nutter pain in the ass...So while the Prayer Man people ignore me and my input they also ignore the very important fact that a staunch Lone Nutter, Bojczuk, favors the Prayer Man theory even though the Prayer Man theory is a strong CT theory that exonerates Oswald...It is important to keep score on this because Bojczuk is a strong anti-Armstrong poster of the Parker troll farm variety...

Because the Education Forum and the Kennedy internet is run like a private social media friend's club these very important loyalties and affiliations never get adequately exposed...There is a fatal rift of hypocrisy that originates from this schism because Jim DiEugenio gives loose blessing to Parker and his nut farm but he never comes back to explain his approving of people who take a hard supporting position for Lone Nutter claims like Bojczuk...Bojczuk represents an important bridge between Parker's Lone Nutter denial of very important evidence like Armstrong as does DiEugenio's unaccountable support of these sources...

The claim that the conspirators would not have minded Oswald blowing the plot by showing up on the front steps is preposterous and is just the Parker crew making up silly excuses when cornered by common sense fact...Bojczuk's claim is evidence that the fantasist Parker responds to evidence he can't get around by making up imaginary solutions and sticking to them...It is incredible that otherwise intelligent researchers let him get away with that, but they do...And the main reason they do is because of peer pressure to stay in good stead with the friend's group...

So why does a pain in the ass Lone Nutter like Bojczuk side with the Prayer Man theory and what does it tell you about the current JFK research community?...What does it tell you about Parker and his real purpose?...What does the avoidance of this conflict by the Education Forum members tell you?...What does it tell you about the Prayer Man theory in general?...Prayer Man is false yet Bojczuk advocates for it on the Education Forum...Armstrong is true yet Bojczuk strongly wages against it on the Education Forum...The guarding of this unholy alliance and bridge between the nutcase Parker and his evidence marring, Bojczuk, and DiEugenio is the main source of failure on the JFK internet...Banning those who see it and correctly criticize it will not solve the problem...

Scrum Drum

unread,
Dec 12, 2021, 1:09:10 PM12/12/21
to
On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 1:09:38 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 2:16:02 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:



Thanks to that criminal James Gordon the discussion of Prayer Man is limited to persons like Jake Hammond who probably just learned of the theory a month ago...Gordon is an asshole who doesn't care if the world is misled and their understanding is harmed by the research he allows on his website...Gordon is an idiot and all he cares about is if he is in power...He doesn't give a damn if an already-disproven theory is still galloping along on his website and persons who really shouldn't be allowed to assume the position they do on the issue are given undue legitimacy...

Gordon is keeping the best source on the subject (myself) deliberately out of the conversation for reasons of personal grudge...Gordon is not a credible moderator who moderates by quality of argument and material...He's a social media booby and intellectual dim-wit who moderates by favorites...How fair is it and how respectful of the membership and their right to see the best evidence is it for Gordon to deliberately exclude the guy who solved it?...

This is a dirty community...It has disgraced and discredited itself through the Prayer Man issue...I guess I am the research community's Assange...

Scrum Drum

unread,
Dec 18, 2021, 10:52:44 AM12/18/21
to
On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 1:09:10 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 1:09:38 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:



Jake Hammond has found a random woman in the Dealey Plaza photography and is saying that was Prayer Man...


Hammond just found out about Prayer Man a month ago and is now posing himself as a teaching authority...


Hammond says Prayer Man has a camera and therefore is that random woman with a camera...He doesn't have the photo analysis skills to realize the glowing object is Sarah's obese hand glancing the sun/shade border...The camera claim arose from idiots who were anxious to get involved but lacked the skill (just like the Prayer Man theory itself)...Those idiots mock the real buttons and their significance and then go out and claim a non-existent camera...


Hammond has done no reading on the subject and is not familiar with the studies that showed there were only two women on the landing platform...Pauline Sanders and Sarah Stanton...There were no strangers from the street...


The Education Forum doesn't mind if unskilled hacks and boobies do coloring book kindergarten "research" on the subject and waste board space mis-leading the public as long as the one person who solved it is deliberately excluded...That is the only "rigor" they require is censorship based on personal grudge because they are stung that I refuted their idiotic theory...Gordon is an asshole who doesn't mind if everything but the correct solution wastes people's time on that board and the rest of the cowardly members don't speak up even though they credit me elsewhere...Some hero DiEugenio is...He's a bum whose only interest is domination...



healyd...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 18, 2021, 6:00:21 PM12/18/21
to
On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 10:41:33 AM UTC-8, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 8:02:17 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 2:44:15 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
>
>
>
> > Welcome to the other side. Now you understand what it’s like trying to argue with people committed to a belief despite all the evidence to the contrary. Good luck with your journey.
> James Gordon is just an ignorant asshole...He has no problem with that Dumb-ass fest he is running in the Prayer Man thread over there on the Education Forum or its seriously damaging effect on JFK research...Gordon seeks and gives welcome space to those who know nothing about the topic and are just feeling it out while sadistically excluding the person who knows the most about it in order to shine his own British bully balls...

why should anyone, ANYONE give a shit about your protestations? You can even authenticate the film-frames as to their originality... grow up trooper! Better yet, find a new home crybaby...
<snip the remaining character assassination(s)

Scrum Drum

unread,
Dec 18, 2021, 6:18:15 PM12/18/21
to
I already answered your stupid film frames canard...


No one in the research community is questioning the authenticity or provenance of the Prayer Man photography...You are trolling Healy because I answered this each time you posted...You are the one who has failed here because you're just taking trolling shots in the dark and are the one who can't explain on a technical basis what is wrong with the Prayer Man photography...You offer nothing in terms of showing why the images are not original or why they couldn't be used to show what they do...


If you look at the Prayer Man and Sarah Stanton threads on the Education Forum Davidson came in and protested that he had provided enough technical sourcing validation...Only, typical of Davidson, he didn't elaborate enough...


You already failed this issue because you refuse to go to the source (Davidson) on the Education Forum and challenge his sourcing for his enhancement like you troll me here...You're chickenshit to do that to Davidson because you know he'll rip you a new one...


The bottom line, troll boy Healy, is you have failed to discredit Davidson's enhancement and the clearly-seen woman's face in it...


This JFK research community is a bunch of retards who punish you for not being as dumb and dishonest as them...

Scrum Drum

unread,
Jan 14, 2022, 12:53:10 PM1/14/22
to
On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 6:18:15 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 6:00:21 PM UTC-5, healyd...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 10:41:33 AM UTC-8, Scrum Drum wrote:




Even though Gordon made a no proxying for banned members rule Greg Doudna is being allowed to post Greg Parker's claim that Alex Hidell was allowed to receive packages at Oswald's Dallas Post Office Box...



That no posting for banned members rule was made solely to prevent my evidence that refuted Prayer Man from being posted at the Education Forum...

Scrum Drum

unread,
Feb 2, 2022, 3:42:48 PM2/2/22
to
On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 12:53:10 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 6:18:15 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 6:00:21 PM UTC-5, healyd...@gmail.com wrote:



Sandy Larsen wrote:

" Jeremy doesn't like these three things so he labels them as far-fetched inventions. But what they really are are theories used to explain seemingly irreconcilable contradictions in the evidence. Jeremy doesn't like them and so he want's us to ignore the contradictions in the evidence. And he says that's okay because we don't need these things to prove a conspiracy. But as I said earlier, some of us want the whole truth, even when it is inconvenient for us. "

Pretty noble and haughty from Larsen just like the things DiEugenio writes...Hard to imagine this came from the person who deleted his own photo analysis of Lovelady & Shelley on the Elm St extension because he realized it refuted the Prayer Man theory...

The present noble and haughty speech-making JFK research community membership is quite content banning an innocent researcher and ignoring his significant discoveries so they can pontificate noble lip service (and avoid admitting the "inconvenient" Prayer Man evidence)...

Brian Doyle

unread,
Aug 20, 2023, 9:54:36 AM8/20/23
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 3:42:48 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 12:53:10 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 6:18:15 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:



The only reason that asshole and coward James Gordon gets away with thinking his excuses for censoring my evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton from the Education Forum are valid is because the cowardly assholes who call themselves the membership say nothing and don't defend a fellow researcher who gets persecuted and banned for the crime of posting the correct evidence...

robert johnson

unread,
Aug 20, 2023, 3:10:32 PM8/20/23
to
Your non-existent evidence is exactly that!

Brian Doyle

unread,
Sep 7, 2023, 12:07:24 PM9/7/23
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 3:42:48 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 12:53:10 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:



When I was a member of the Education Forum Gordon made up a rule that was only applied to myself as he rode my back on every post...Gordon said only the best images would be allowed in the thread...

On the cover of Bart Kamp's new disinformation book "Prayer Man More Than A Fuzzy Picture" Kamp used a very poor image of Prayer Man instead of Davidson's clear image...By allowing the Prayer Man hijackers to promote this false book on the Education Forum Gordon is violating his own rule that only the best images should be used...

Gordon is criminally dishonest because he is trusted to rule fairly on matters like this as a moderator...It is plainly obvious to any person of average intelligence (which apparently doesn't include Gordon) that the reason Kamp used a highly distorted, blurry image of Prayer Man on the cover of his book is because Davidson made it too clear Oswald wasn't Prayer Man...Davidson was from a clear frame where Wiegman's camera was steady for that frame...So therefore it conforms to Gordon's best image edict...By allowing the Prayer Man shills to ignore this evidence and post a poor image on purpose, in order to deceive the membership, Gordon is participating in violating his own rule without challenge...He's banning people for what he is guilty of...It just goes to show what a bumbling fool Gordon is as moderator and how much he doesn't know what he is doing...

How many points do the scumbag mods get for violations like this?...Sandy - how many points does a moderator get for stealing nearly a year's worth of members funds?...

robert johnson

unread,
Sep 7, 2023, 1:00:48 PM9/7/23
to
SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU USELESS BORING TROLL CUNT
0 new messages