Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mark Lane #10
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Ben Holmes
May 25, 2012, 9:09:06 AM5/25/12
to
In the previous quotes, Mark Lane covered the overpass, and the front of the
TBSD, witnesses near the GK fence, witnesses with the limousine, and sheriff
deputies... now he's moving on:
"Forrest V. Sorrels, the agent in charge of the Dallas office of the Secret
Service, was riding in an automobile approximately five car lengths head of the
Presidential limousine. When the shots were fired, Sorrels immediately looked up
at the knoll on his right because ' the noise from the shots sounded like they
may have come back up on the terrace there'. He testified that 'the reports
seemed to be so loud, that it sounded like to me - in other words, that was my
first thought, somebody up on the terrace, and that is the reason I looked
there'.
Paul E. Landis, Jr, another Secret Service agent, was standing on the right
running board of the car immediately behind the Presidential limousine when the
first shot was fired. 'My reaction at this time,' Landis stated, 'was that the
shot came from somewhere towards the front'.
Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
TBSD, witnesses near the GK fence, witnesses with the limousine, and sheriff
deputies... now he's moving on:
"Forrest V. Sorrels, the agent in charge of the Dallas office of the Secret
Service, was riding in an automobile approximately five car lengths head of the
Presidential limousine. When the shots were fired, Sorrels immediately looked up
at the knoll on his right because ' the noise from the shots sounded like they
may have come back up on the terrace there'. He testified that 'the reports
seemed to be so loud, that it sounded like to me - in other words, that was my
first thought, somebody up on the terrace, and that is the reason I looked
there'.
Paul E. Landis, Jr, another Secret Service agent, was standing on the right
running board of the car immediately behind the Presidential limousine when the
first shot was fired. 'My reaction at this time,' Landis stated, 'was that the
shot came from somewhere towards the front'.
Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
Bill Clarke
May 25, 2012, 9:43:26 AM5/25/12
to
In article <jpo09...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the statements
of Mark Lane.
Bill Clarke
>
>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>
>
My god man, are you completely in denial? Are do you just think if you pretend
>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>
>
nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the statements
of Mark Lane.
Bill Clarke
Ben Holmes
May 25, 2012, 9:58:27 AM5/25/12
to
In article <jpo29...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the accuracy
of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these statements
of Mark Lane.
of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these statements
of Mark Lane.
aeffects
May 25, 2012, 2:11:27 PM5/25/12
to
On May 25, 6:58 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>
>
>
> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
debate (amongst other places)
> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>
>
>
> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>
> >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>
> >My god man, are you completely in denial? Are do you just think if you pretend
> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the statements
> >of Mark Lane.
>
> >Bill Clarke
>
> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the accuracy
> of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these statements
> of Mark Lane.
looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
> >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>
> >My god man, are you completely in denial? Are do you just think if you pretend
> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the statements
> >of Mark Lane.
>
> >Bill Clarke
>
> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the accuracy
> of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these statements
> of Mark Lane.
much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
debate (amongst other places)
Bud
May 25, 2012, 3:17:58 PM5/25/12
to
On May 25, 2:11 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 25, 6:58 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>
> > >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>
> > >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
> > >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
> > >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>
> > >My god man, are you completely in denial? Are do you just think if you pretend
> > >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the statements
> > >of Mark Lane.
>
> > >Bill Clarke
>
> > And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the accuracy
> > of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these statements
> > of Mark Lane.
>
> looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
We have a low tolerance for bullshit. You retards can`t get enough.
> On May 25, 6:58 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>
> > >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>
> > >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over Dealey
> > >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be unable
> > >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>
> > >My god man, are you completely in denial? Are do you just think if you pretend
> > >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the statements
> > >of Mark Lane.
>
> > >Bill Clarke
>
> > And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the accuracy
> > of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these statements
> > of Mark Lane.
>
> looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
> much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
> debate (amongst other places)
it comes he does the see no evil "I don`t see no refutation" shtick.
Goes into a song and dance routine about "logic" and "apples and
oranges" when his hero Lane is caught in a lie, as if it is somehow
our fault that Lane didn`t tell the truth. Just another day in retard
paradise.
Bill Clarke
May 25, 2012, 5:30:11 PM5/25/12
to
In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>ealey
>> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be=
>u pretend
>> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the sta=
>uracy
>> of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these stat=
the old yazoo.
Bill Clarke
aeffects says...
>
>On May 25, 6:58=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>>
>>
>> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>> >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over D=
>On May 25, 6:58=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>>
>>
>> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>ealey
>> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be=
> unable
>> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >My god man, are you completely in denial? =A0Are do you just think if yo=
>> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>u pretend
>> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the sta=
>tements
>> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >Bill Clarke
>>
>> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the acc=
>> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >Bill Clarke
>>
>uracy
>> of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute these stat=
>ements
>> of Mark Lane.
>
>looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>debate (amongst other places)
The only one looking overwhelmed here is your buddy Holmes. He just took it up
>> of Mark Lane.
>
>looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>debate (amongst other places)
the old yazoo.
Bill Clarke
aeffects
May 25, 2012, 6:06:00 PM5/25/12
to
whine... we're here to serve you. It's apparent you haven't a clue
concerning case evidence... I agree, lone nut paradise can be trying
after a while..... carry on!
aeffects
May 25, 2012, 6:10:48 PM5/25/12
to
On May 25, 2:30 pm, Bill Clarke <Bill_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
this isn't alt.vietnam.war Bill'o, you're going to have to do better
than that!
> Bill Clarke
> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
than that!
> Bill Clarke
Bud
May 25, 2012, 7:30:37 PM5/25/12
to
people who said the shots came from the TSBD.
Ben Holmes
May 25, 2012, 10:19:37 PM5/25/12
to
In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>ealey
>> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be=
>u pretend
>> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the sta=
refusals to defend his assertion that Mark Lane lied that prompted this new
series. (He's illustrating quite well his cowardice in this series...)
It seems that the censored forum has sent Jean over here for damage control, but
she's facing an uphill battle, having dealt with a fraction of my two week's
output so far.
A mere 7 pages of Mark Lane's work ...
SEVEN PAGES!!!
I guess I can be accused of "milking it" for all it's worth...
aeffects says...
>
>On May 25, 6:58=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>>
>>
>> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>> >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* over D=
>On May 25, 6:58=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>>
>>
>> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>ealey
>> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to be=
> unable
>> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >My god man, are you completely in denial? =A0Are do you just think if yo=
>> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>u pretend
>> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the sta=
>tements
>> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >Bill Clarke
>>
>> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the
>> accuracy of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute
>> these statements of Mark Lane.
>
>looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>debate (amongst other places)
And, let's give credit where credit is due - it was Billy Clarke's repeated
>> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >Bill Clarke
>>
>> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the
>> accuracy of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refute
>> these statements of Mark Lane.
>
>looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>debate (amongst other places)
refusals to defend his assertion that Mark Lane lied that prompted this new
series. (He's illustrating quite well his cowardice in this series...)
It seems that the censored forum has sent Jean over here for damage control, but
she's facing an uphill battle, having dealt with a fraction of my two week's
output so far.
A mere 7 pages of Mark Lane's work ...
SEVEN PAGES!!!
I guess I can be accused of "milking it" for all it's worth...
Ben Holmes
May 25, 2012, 10:27:02 PM5/25/12
to
aeffects
May 26, 2012, 3:39:47 AM5/26/12
to
On May 25, 7:19 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
can close this board up, anytime. the lone nut fools can't get off
first base, hell, they can't even find their way out of the dugout....
> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
first base, hell, they can't even find their way out of the dugout....
timstter
May 26, 2012, 5:08:39 AM5/26/12
to
chooses, eh?
Just how much of a PATHETIC lick-spittle ARE you, Pavlov?
It's PITIFUL to watch.
Yellow Pants is simply skulking behind his killfilter, pretending his
NONSENSE hasn't been debunked, Pavlov.
Isn't it about time you reached in there a found yourself a SPINE, Ol'
Jelly Back?
It's truly PATHETIC to watch...
Revolted Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Bud
May 26, 2012, 5:16:46 AM5/26/12
to
that you`ve exposed no conspiracy in nearly 50 years. Dismal failure
by any standards.
Bud
May 26, 2012, 5:14:43 AM5/26/12
to
On May 25, 10:19 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
Can you flip forward in the book to where Lane establishes that a
conspiracy took JFK`s life?
> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
conspiracy took JFK`s life?
Ben Holmes
May 26, 2012, 11:27:33 AM5/26/12
to
In article <19621a7b-3ce7-474a...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>
>On May 25, 7:19=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> aeffects says...
>r D=3D
>> >ealey
>> >> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to=
> be=3D
>if yo=3D
>> >u pretend
>> >> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the =
>sta=3D
>ed
>> refusals to defend his assertion that Mark Lane lied that prompted this n=
>ol, but
>> she's facing an uphill battle, having dealt with a fraction of my two wee=
Mark Lane in order to do it. Must hurt!!
aeffects says...
>
>On May 25, 7:19=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> aeffects says...
>>
>> >On May 25, 6:58=3DA0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>> >> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>> >> >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* ove=
>> >On May 25, 6:58=3DA0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>> >> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>r D=3D
>> >ealey
>> >> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to=
> be=3D
>> > unable
>> >> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >> >My god man, are you completely in denial? =3DA0Are do you just think =
>> >> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>if yo=3D
>> >u pretend
>> >> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the =
>sta=3D
>> >tements
>> >> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >> >Bill Clarke
>>
>> >> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the
>> >> accuracy of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refut=
>> >> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >> >Bill Clarke
>>
>> >> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the
>e
>> >> these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>> >much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>> >debate (amongst other places)
>>
>> And, let's give credit where credit is due - it was Billy Clarke's repeat=
>> >> these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>> >much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>> >debate (amongst other places)
>>
>ed
>> refusals to defend his assertion that Mark Lane lied that prompted this n=
>ew
>> series. (He's illustrating quite well his cowardice in this series...)
>>
>> It seems that the censored forum has sent Jean over here for damage contr=
>> series. (He's illustrating quite well his cowardice in this series...)
>>
>ol, but
>> she's facing an uphill battle, having dealt with a fraction of my two wee=
>k's
>> output so far.
>>
>> A mere 7 pages of Mark Lane's work ...
>>
>> SEVEN PAGES!!!
>>
>> I guess I can be accused of "milking it" for all it's worth...
>
>can close this board up, anytime. the lone nut fools can't get off
>first base, hell, they can't even find their way out of the dugout....
Well, if Billy wants to hurl insults my way, he'll be forced to read through
>> output so far.
>>
>> A mere 7 pages of Mark Lane's work ...
>>
>> SEVEN PAGES!!!
>>
>> I guess I can be accused of "milking it" for all it's worth...
>
>can close this board up, anytime. the lone nut fools can't get off
>first base, hell, they can't even find their way out of the dugout....
Mark Lane in order to do it. Must hurt!!
aeffects
May 26, 2012, 4:18:47 PM5/26/12
to
Bill Clarke
May 26, 2012, 5:16:46 PM5/26/12
to
In article <19621a7b-3ce7-474a...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>
>On May 25, 7:19=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups=
>r D=3D
>> >ealey
>> >> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to=
> be=3D
>> >> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the =
>sta=3D
>ed
>> refusals to defend his assertion that Mark Lane lied that prompted this n=
>ol, but
>> she's facing an uphill battle, having dealt with a fraction of my two wee=
close down the moderated group? It is to laugh.
Holmes and Marsh; both liars, both greatly overrate their own knowledge and
ability, both can't admit being wrong or suffering an ass kicking, and both are
confirmed assholes. A good pair except Marsh is the much more intelligent of
the two. But then Marsh doesn't have a faithful long time companion to kiss his
ass every time he post a message.
Bill Clarke
aeffects says...
>
>On May 25, 7:19=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <0377150b-8a08-45f3-8f6a-7ba9d739d...@nl1g2000pbc.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> aeffects says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 25, 6:58=3DA0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>> >> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>> >> >>Mark Lane is continuing to demonstrate that witnesses from *all* ove=
>> aeffects says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 25, 6:58=3DA0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <jpo29u0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Bill Clarke says...
>>
>> >> >In article <jpo09i0...@drn.newsguy.com>, Ben Holmes says...
>>
>r D=3D
>> >ealey
>> >> >>Plaza were pointing to the Grassy Knoll... and the kooks continue to=
> be=3D
>> > unable
>> >> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >> >>to refute these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >> >My god man, are you completely in denial? =3DA0Are do you just think =
>if yo=3D
>> >u pretend
>if yo=3D
>> >> >nothing happened we'll forget you just got your ass kicked about the =
>sta=3D
>> >tements
>> >> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >> >Bill Clarke
>>
>> >> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the
>> >> accuracy of my assertion that the kooks continue to be unable to refut=
>> >> >of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >> >Bill Clarke
>>
>> >> And again, you demonstrate your cowardice even as you demonstrate the
>e
>> >> these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>> >much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>> >debate (amongst other places)
>>
>> And, let's give credit where credit is due - it was Billy Clarke's repeat=
>> >> these statements of Mark Lane.
>>
>> >looks like a steady diet of Mark Lane overwhelms lone nutters...
>> >much the same way Mark Lane overwhelmed WCR defenders in face-to-face
>> >debate (amongst other places)
>>
>ed
>> refusals to defend his assertion that Mark Lane lied that prompted this n=
>ew
>> series. (He's illustrating quite well his cowardice in this series...)
>>
>> It seems that the censored forum has sent Jean over here for damage contr=
>> series. (He's illustrating quite well his cowardice in this series...)
>>
>ol, but
>> she's facing an uphill battle, having dealt with a fraction of my two wee=
>k's
>> output so far.
>>
>> A mere 7 pages of Mark Lane's work ...
>>
>> SEVEN PAGES!!!
>>
>> I guess I can be accused of "milking it" for all it's worth...
>
>can close this board up, anytime.
This would be in the same sense that you insinuate that Anthony Marsh could
>> output so far.
>>
>> A mere 7 pages of Mark Lane's work ...
>>
>> SEVEN PAGES!!!
>>
>> I guess I can be accused of "milking it" for all it's worth...
>
>can close this board up, anytime.
close down the moderated group? It is to laugh.
Holmes and Marsh; both liars, both greatly overrate their own knowledge and
ability, both can't admit being wrong or suffering an ass kicking, and both are
confirmed assholes. A good pair except Marsh is the much more intelligent of
the two. But then Marsh doesn't have a faithful long time companion to kiss his
ass every time he post a message.
Bill Clarke
timstter
May 26, 2012, 5:45:09 PM5/26/12
to
Yap, yap!
Informative Regards,
0 new messages