Question For The Conspiratoids

Richard Weed

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 10:25:50 AM10/26/11

to

Why are you still flogging the JFK case? Aren't JFK CTs kind of passé? Why
not move on to 9/11 conspiracy theories? That's what the kids are into
nowadays.

bigdog

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 10:55:42 AM10/26/11

to

They've been kicking that horse for decades and it still won't move.
They can't figure out that it is dead.

Walt

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 11:22:48 AM10/26/11

to

Weed?..... Why do they call you that? Let me guess........

Hey Weed, If you're interested in what happened on 9/11, then go to
one of those NG's. You obviously know NOTHING about 11/22/63.

aeffects

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 11:35:21 AM10/26/11

to

yet YOU wander the halls preaching your WCR faith... sounds like
fool's folly considering the title of this board anyway...

aeffects

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 11:39:32 AM10/26/11

to

good of you to consider the CT question, we've got 45 specific
questions hereabouts considering JFK's assassination. Answer those
honestly then feel free to consider the assassination "passe." Carry
on!

wgroom

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 12:55:08 PM10/26/11

to

It seems you are describing LNT'ers, in which they only have one
theory per life capability.

wg

Ben Holmes

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 3:19:46 PM10/26/11

to

In article <4ea8...@news.x-privat.org>, Richard Weed says...

>
>Why are you still flogging the JFK case?

Could it be because the facts still haven't changed?

>Aren't JFK CTs kind of passé?

Actually, polling suggests quite the opposite. That the faithful are a smaller
and smaller percentage of the American population.

Indeed, statistically you rank right alongside those who still believe that
Elvis is alive.

>Why not move on to 9/11 conspiracy theories? That's what the kids are into
>nowadays.

Some kooks are.

You seem confused however... you seem to be implying an equality between those
two "conspiracies".

One conspiracy has been accepted by the government, the other "conspiracy" is
only accepted by kooks.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com

Richard Weed

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 7:21:33 PM10/26/11

to

"aeffects" wrote in message
news:4bb15c62-60bc-45b5...@p14g2000pra.googlegroups.com...

I have said nothing about the Warren Report in any post I've made on this
newsgroup. Produce one post (Google link, please) where I have mentioned it.

Richard Weed

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 7:31:31 PM10/26/11

to

"Walt" wrote in message
news:1e0ce972-c675-42ea...@x21g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

I know what happened on 9/11 and am familiar with the 9/11 Truth movement.
My question, which you didn't address, was why after almost fifty years are
people, both pro and anti conspiracy, still obsessing on the JFK
assassination.

Richard Weed

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 7:34:08 PM10/26/11

to

"aeffects" wrote in message
news:32226688-85af-4c6e...@g27g2000pro.googlegroups.com...

So I must pass some kind of test before I can have an opinion about the JFK
pro-conspiracy community? How democratic!

Richard Weed

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 7:35:36 PM10/26/11

to

"wgroom" wrote in message
news:297921ce-e48e-413f...@eh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...

I was asking about people who obsess on the JFK assassination, both pro and
anti conspiracy.

Richard Weed

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 7:49:44 PM10/26/11

to

"Ben Holmes" wrote in message news:j89mg...@drn.newsguy.com...

In article <4ea8...@news.x-privat.org>, Richard Weed says...
>
>Why are you still flogging the JFK case?

Could it be because the facts still haven't changed?

>>Aren't JFK CTs kind of passé?

>Actually, polling suggests quite the opposite. That the faithful are a
>smaller
>and smaller percentage of the American population.

>Indeed, statistically you rank right alongside those who still believe that
>Elvis is alive.

I have expressed no opinion on who killed JFK? Why do you assume I have?

>>Why not move on to 9/11 conspiracy theories? That's what the kids are into
>>nowadays.

>Some kooks are.

>You seem confused however... you seem to be implying an equality between
>those
>two "conspiracies".

>One conspiracy has been accepted by the government, the other "conspiracy"
>is
>only accepted by kooks.

<spam snipped>

Most 9/11 truthers believe there was a conspiracy to kill JFK, James
Fetzer, author of several JFK conspiracy books and articles, being the most
notable. Why is it more "kooky" to believe there was a conspiracy to kill
JFK but that the events of 9/11 were not the result of a government
conspiracy? The truthers (of which I am not one lest you jump to another
conclusion) have their "evidence" just like you do.
.

Walt

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 7:56:33 PM10/26/11

to

People are obsessed with the murder of our 35th president because
commonsense prevails. Most folks know very little about the murder of
John kennedy.....but instinct and commonsense tells them that the
official version is not the truth.

AND if the official government approved story is not the truth, then
obviously something stinks, because LBJ's administration spent 10
months and millions of our tax dollars in preparing a lie to feed
us.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Oct 26, 2011, 8:46:45 PM10/26/11

to

In article <4ea8...@news.x-privat.org>, Richard Weed says...
>
>
>
>"Ben Holmes" wrote in message news:j89mg...@drn.newsguy.com...
>
>In article <4ea8...@news.x-privat.org>, Richard Weed says...
>>
>>Why are you still flogging the JFK case?
>
>
>Could it be because the facts still haven't changed?
>
>
>
>>>Aren't JFK CTs kind of passé?
>
>
>>Actually, polling suggests quite the opposite. That the faithful are a
>>smaller and smaller percentage of the American population.
>
>>Indeed, statistically you rank right alongside those who still believe that
>>Elvis is alive.
>
>I have expressed no opinion on who killed JFK? Why do you assume I have?

Don't need to "assume". You are.

The fact that you're trying to hide that, and that you can't come clean, is the
EXACT sort of dishonest behavior that we associate with LNT'er trolls.

>>>Why not move on to 9/11 conspiracy theories? That's what the kids are into
>>>nowadays.
>
>>Some kooks are.
>
>>You seem confused however... you seem to be implying an equality between
>>those two "conspiracies".
>
>>One conspiracy has been accepted by the government, the other "conspiracy"
>>is only accepted by kooks.

<nonsense snipped>

Why not simply tell the truth?

tom...@cox.net

unread,

Nov 4, 2011, 9:12:38 PM11/4/11

to

Asshole don't know Roberts Rules of Order.

"Old Business FIRST" ! !

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB