LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S SOLE GUILT -- POINT-BY-POINT
David Von Pein
aeffects
> www.Oswald-Is-Guilty.blogspot.com
no advertising shithead..... and NO trolls allowed, that means you
son.....
David Von Pein
www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,776.msg10491.html#msg10491
>>> "These same witnesses found the shells that Oswald ejected [at the J.D. Tippit murder scene]." <<<
And also keep in mind that there were THREE SEPARATE WITNESSES who
found the four shells at the Tippit murder scene too.
THREE different witnesses! -- Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, and
Domingo Benavides.
Do the Anybody-but-Oswald kooks really believe that the THREE Dallas
citizens who picked up the bullet shells were part of some "plot" to
plant shells?
Or do the conspiracy crazies think that the cops "planted" the four
shells in the Davises' yard and then left them there for the three
citizens to find later on?
That's nuts.
And, actually, that last option is not even really an option for the
CTers....and that's because one of the witnesses who picked up two of
the bullet shells (Benavides) picked them up very shortly after the
shooting of Officer Tippit.
Plus, there's the inconvenient fact (for the conspiracy kooks) that
Benavides and both Davis girls said that they SAW the killer (whom
they each later positively identified as Lee Harvey Oswald*)
physically ejecting shells out of his gun right after Tippit was
killed. And AUTOMATIC weapons don't need to have their shells manually
removed from the weapon.
* = Benavides' "positive identification" didn't come on 11/22/63,
that's true. But in 1967 on the CBS-TV special "The Warren Report",
Eddie Barker interviewed Benavides, with Domingo having no hesitation
whatsoever in stating that Tippit's murderer was Lee Oswald.
"You don't forget something like that," said Benavides to the CBS
cameras in 1967.
Yes, a grain of salt should definitely be placed beside Benavides'
1967 words, because he told police on 11/22/63 that he probably would
not be able to positively identify Tippit's killer, which is the
reason he wasn't asked to go downtown to view Oswald in a police line-
up. Hence, he never did.
A TIPPIT ADDENDUM:
This topic of the Tippit shells always reminds me of King Kook (and
big fat liar) Jim Garrison, who actually had the gonads to tell a
national audience in Playboy magazine in 1967 that he thought that
Tippit's killer DID NOT eject ANY shells on the ground that day. And
this is despite the fact that we have THREE different ordinary Dallas
citizens PICKING UP FOUR SHELLS OFF THE GROUND on November 22, 1963!
My blood pressure soars when thinking about this retarded quote of
Garrison's (have your vomit bucket handy as you read this load of
crap):
"The clincher, as far as I'm concerned, is that four cartridges
were found at the scene of the slaying [of Officer Tippit]. Now,
revolvers do not eject cartridges, so when someone is shot, you don't
later find gratuitous cartridges strewn over the sidewalk -- unless
the murderer deliberately takes the trouble to eject them. We suspect
that cartridges had been previously obtained from Oswald's .38
revolver and left at the murder site by the real killers as part of
the setup to incriminate Oswald." -- Jim Garrison; 1967
Shouldn't the above bald-faced lie make everyone who is interested in
the truth surrounding the murders of President Kennedy and J.D. Tippit
want to SCREAM OUT LOUD?!
If not....why the hell not?
Lots more of Kook Garrison's lies are outlined at the links below:
www.Garrison-Carson.blogspot.com
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2317ac73008b3c8a
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9d4772fbe4df0bcd
www.box.net/static/flash/box_explorer.swf?widgetHash=ny0f225ycs&v=1
www.box.net/static/flash/box_explorer.swf?widgetHash=lw7vdwfesk&v=1
aeffects
no advertising shithead.... that means you
son.....
David Von Pein
www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/f4e616588c80f6f6
www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/116558/A-story-that-s-haunted-me
www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/archive/200903/20090316_paxton.html
>>> "Alas, yet another retelling of the myth of the WCR." <<<
Aw, poor "Pam".
But, on the bright side, if all goes well for Bill Paxton and Tom
Hanks (et al) in the next 4.5 years, it appears as though "Pam" will
have another truthful documentary about the events of 11/22/63 to moan
about and to piss on when November 2013 rolls around.
And I'm sure that "Pamela" will thoroughly enjoy attempting to debunk
yet another program that brings the truth of the assassination to a
TV/movie audience. Right, "Pam"?
The raw facts, as we all know, never faze a conspiracist. They'll just
sweep all the known facts and evidence directly into the gutter, like
always.
And, amazingly, CTers like "Pam" don't feel the slightest twinge of
discomfort or uneasiness when they dump in the trash the conclusions
reached by all of these entities:
1.) The WC
2.) The HSCA
3.) The Clark Panel
4.) The Rockefeller Commission
Per the Kennedy conspiracy theorists, EVERY SINGLE ONE of the above
organizations dropped the ball and/or just flat-out LIED about the
assassination of JFK.
ALL FOUR of those outfits got it wrong, according to the all-knowing
CTers.
Even the conspiracy-seeking HSCA got it totally wrong, too, per the
CTers....because virtually all conspiracy believers think that JFK was
hit in the head from the FRONT, which is not what the HSCA determined.
To borrow some verbiage from Vince B.:
"Arrogance thought it already had a bad name. That was before it
met Oliver Stone [and virtually all other JFK conspiracy theorists who
are more than willing to dismiss virtually everything uttered by ALL
FOUR of the Governmental committees and commissions mentioned above]."
aeffects
...
Harvey & Lee by Armstrong read it moron.....