Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Happy Assassination Eve Everyone!
147 views
Skip to first unread message
Chuck Schuyler
Nov 21, 2023, 9:33:32 AM11/21/23
to
Oh, the anticipation this Assassination Eve!
Tomorrow marks the 60th anniversary of the start of the Greatest Hobby of All-Time! St. Oswald will be bringing his bag of goodies for all the good little children in Conspiracyville! The excitement builds!
David Healy has hung his colostomy bags over the fireplace with care, hoping St. Oswald soon will be there. Healy brews another cup of hot Agent Orange with a cinnamon stick. Word salad to follow.
Merry St. Oswald Day, Healy!
Gil has written St. Oswald yet another letter for the celebratory festivities surrounding Assassination Day. "Dear St. Oswald," GIl writes. "Can you pretty please bring me a truck with a good transmission this year? I've been a good boy and have defended you mightily at various internet discussion boards. P.S. There are mean people at one of the boards, and I know you know who they are. Could you kill them with the rifle I know you didn't use on 11/22/63? Thanks in advance, St. Oswald. I remain your devoted follower, Gil"
Merry St. Oswald Day, Gil!
Gil's toady Ben Holmes has finally thrown in the towel and will miss the Assassination Day festivities in favor of hiding out at the Encino Judo Club, doing what he does best: molesting. A lump of coal for Ben, and maybe an arrest if the cops find the tapes he's made.
Merry St. Oswald Day, Holmes!
The incel known as the Toilet will be enjoying Assassination Day from his usual lair in mommy's basement, clacking away on his computer keyboard and providing mirth to all on this festive day with posts showcasing his humorous take on St. Oswald. He remains sort of the Eastern Orthodox St. Oswald adherent among the JFK Truthers with his belief that Oswald shot at JFK's motorcade from the Grassy Knoll, but nevertheless, Gil and Ben and the rest of the Merry Band of Believers welcome him with open arms into the brotherhood. He's a fighter for truth! Merry St. Oswald day, Toilet!
Don Willis is too nice to make fun of, so I'll just say it: Merry St. Oswald Day, Don!
And Boris the Truther, a/k/a David Drummond? Who knows where he's at. Perhaps he's at Ground Zero yelling at the FDNY over "pulling" WTC Building 7 on 9/11. Oh well, you're not forgotten on this festive day, Boris. Merry St. Oswald Day, Boris!
And for all of the good little boys and girls in Conspiracyville, MERRY ST. OSWALD DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tomorrow marks the 60th anniversary of the start of the Greatest Hobby of All-Time! St. Oswald will be bringing his bag of goodies for all the good little children in Conspiracyville! The excitement builds!
David Healy has hung his colostomy bags over the fireplace with care, hoping St. Oswald soon will be there. Healy brews another cup of hot Agent Orange with a cinnamon stick. Word salad to follow.
Merry St. Oswald Day, Healy!
Gil has written St. Oswald yet another letter for the celebratory festivities surrounding Assassination Day. "Dear St. Oswald," GIl writes. "Can you pretty please bring me a truck with a good transmission this year? I've been a good boy and have defended you mightily at various internet discussion boards. P.S. There are mean people at one of the boards, and I know you know who they are. Could you kill them with the rifle I know you didn't use on 11/22/63? Thanks in advance, St. Oswald. I remain your devoted follower, Gil"
Merry St. Oswald Day, Gil!
Gil's toady Ben Holmes has finally thrown in the towel and will miss the Assassination Day festivities in favor of hiding out at the Encino Judo Club, doing what he does best: molesting. A lump of coal for Ben, and maybe an arrest if the cops find the tapes he's made.
Merry St. Oswald Day, Holmes!
The incel known as the Toilet will be enjoying Assassination Day from his usual lair in mommy's basement, clacking away on his computer keyboard and providing mirth to all on this festive day with posts showcasing his humorous take on St. Oswald. He remains sort of the Eastern Orthodox St. Oswald adherent among the JFK Truthers with his belief that Oswald shot at JFK's motorcade from the Grassy Knoll, but nevertheless, Gil and Ben and the rest of the Merry Band of Believers welcome him with open arms into the brotherhood. He's a fighter for truth! Merry St. Oswald day, Toilet!
Don Willis is too nice to make fun of, so I'll just say it: Merry St. Oswald Day, Don!
And Boris the Truther, a/k/a David Drummond? Who knows where he's at. Perhaps he's at Ground Zero yelling at the FDNY over "pulling" WTC Building 7 on 9/11. Oh well, you're not forgotten on this festive day, Boris. Merry St. Oswald Day, Boris!
And for all of the good little boys and girls in Conspiracyville, MERRY ST. OSWALD DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JE Corbett
Nov 21, 2023, 10:30:14 AM11/21/23
to
Gil,
I know you mean well but knock it off already. I did it. I killed Kennedy. I killed Tippit.
Those were the only two things in my life I ever succeeded at. Why do you insist on
denying me the credit I deserve?
Regards,
Lee
Gil immediately tore up the note.
Chuck Schuyler
Nov 21, 2023, 10:58:16 AM11/21/23
to
Donald Willis
Nov 21, 2023, 11:51:12 AM11/21/23
to
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 6:33:32 AM UTC-8, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
> Oh, the anticipation this Assassination Eve!
>
> Tomorrow marks the 60th anniversary of the start of the Greatest Hobby of All-Time! St. Oswald will be bringing his bag of goodies for all the good little children in Conspiracyville! The excitement builds!
>
> David Healy has hung his colostomy bags over the fireplace with care, hoping St. Oswald soon will be there. Healy brews another cup of hot Agent Orange with a cinnamon stick. Word salad to follow.
>
> Merry St. Oswald Day, Healy!
>
> Gil has written St. Oswald yet another letter for the celebratory festivities surrounding Assassination Day. "Dear St. Oswald," GIl writes. "Can you pretty please bring me a truck with a good transmission this year? I've been a good boy and have defended you mightily at various internet discussion boards. P.S. There are mean people at one of the boards, and I know you know who they are. Could you kill them with the rifle I know you didn't use on 11/22/63? Thanks in advance, St. Oswald. I remain your devoted follower, Gil"
>
> Merry St. Oswald Day, Gil!
>
> Gil's toady Ben Holmes has finally thrown in the towel and will miss the Assassination Day festivities in favor of hiding out at the Encino Judo Club, doing what he does best: molesting. A lump of coal for Ben, and maybe an arrest if the cops find the tapes he's made.
>
> Merry St. Oswald Day, Holmes!
>
> The incel known as the Toilet will be enjoying Assassination Day from his usual lair in mommy's basement, clacking away on his computer keyboard and providing mirth to all on this festive day with posts showcasing his humorous take on St. Oswald. He remains sort of the Eastern Orthodox St. Oswald adherent among the JFK Truthers with his belief that Oswald shot at JFK's motorcade from the Grassy Knoll, but nevertheless, Gil and Ben and the rest of the Merry Band of Believers welcome him with open arms into the brotherhood. He's a fighter for truth! Merry St. Oswald day, Toilet!
>
> Don Willis is too nice to make fun of, so I'll just say it: Merry St. Oswald Day, Don!
I only object to that "St."--O had to have been a shooter or at least an accomplice in Dealey. However, yes, a saint in Oak Cliff. Guess I'm one of the few holdouts on that front...
> Oh, the anticipation this Assassination Eve!
>
> Tomorrow marks the 60th anniversary of the start of the Greatest Hobby of All-Time! St. Oswald will be bringing his bag of goodies for all the good little children in Conspiracyville! The excitement builds!
>
> David Healy has hung his colostomy bags over the fireplace with care, hoping St. Oswald soon will be there. Healy brews another cup of hot Agent Orange with a cinnamon stick. Word salad to follow.
>
> Merry St. Oswald Day, Healy!
>
> Gil has written St. Oswald yet another letter for the celebratory festivities surrounding Assassination Day. "Dear St. Oswald," GIl writes. "Can you pretty please bring me a truck with a good transmission this year? I've been a good boy and have defended you mightily at various internet discussion boards. P.S. There are mean people at one of the boards, and I know you know who they are. Could you kill them with the rifle I know you didn't use on 11/22/63? Thanks in advance, St. Oswald. I remain your devoted follower, Gil"
>
> Merry St. Oswald Day, Gil!
>
> Gil's toady Ben Holmes has finally thrown in the towel and will miss the Assassination Day festivities in favor of hiding out at the Encino Judo Club, doing what he does best: molesting. A lump of coal for Ben, and maybe an arrest if the cops find the tapes he's made.
>
> Merry St. Oswald Day, Holmes!
>
> The incel known as the Toilet will be enjoying Assassination Day from his usual lair in mommy's basement, clacking away on his computer keyboard and providing mirth to all on this festive day with posts showcasing his humorous take on St. Oswald. He remains sort of the Eastern Orthodox St. Oswald adherent among the JFK Truthers with his belief that Oswald shot at JFK's motorcade from the Grassy Knoll, but nevertheless, Gil and Ben and the rest of the Merry Band of Believers welcome him with open arms into the brotherhood. He's a fighter for truth! Merry St. Oswald day, Toilet!
>
> Don Willis is too nice to make fun of, so I'll just say it: Merry St. Oswald Day, Don!
David
Nov 22, 2023, 3:02:41 AM11/22/23
to
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 6:33:32 AM UTC-8, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus
Nov 22, 2023, 4:17:55 AM11/22/23
to
On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:02:41 AM UTC-5, David wrote:
> you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event like the assassination of a President of the US and wish people a "happy" on the eve of its anniversary.
> you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
It tells the world a lot about the asshole's character.
Let's hope Chuckles never walks into a convenience store during a robbery or is a victim of a mass shooting where his brains are splattered all over the place.
And people aren't wishing each other a "happy" on the eves of its anniversary.
It's more than just tasteless.
Chuckles is a sick motherfucker.
JE Corbett
Nov 22, 2023, 7:18:04 AM11/22/23
to
On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 4:17:55 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:02:41 AM UTC-5, David wrote:
> > you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
> Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event like the assassination of a President and try and exonerate
> On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:02:41 AM UTC-5, David wrote:
> > you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
his assassin.
I agree.
Chuck Schuyler
Nov 22, 2023, 10:20:21 AM11/22/23
to
I'm paraphrasing what you've written here before, but you've noted that YOUR NOT THAT INTERESTED in what happened that day; your focus is EXHONERATING OSWALD in some fantasy court where you are acting as his Johnny Cochrane. In fact, when asked for explanations for what happened that day, YOU AVOID RESPONDING.
Now that's sick, and an injustice to JFK. Even your fellow co-religionists The Toilet and the very gentle Don Willis feel Oswald was guilty of horrible crimes on 11/22/63.
You don't realize how lost you are. You don't realize you are consumed by conspiracism.
Oswald's mother thought her son was a great man in American history. No doubt if you freely spoke your mind, you'd feel the same way.
Sick.
Steven Galbraith
Nov 22, 2023, 10:46:42 AM11/22/23
to
He claims that the witnesses in the Tippit shooting were all liars or coerced to lie. They committed numerous crimes - perjury, obstruction of justice, et cetera. It's okay for him to accuse them of these crimes even though they weren't, by his standard, proven in court. But if someone says Oswald was a criminal he is furious.
Ben Holmes
Nov 27, 2023, 11:53:40 AM11/27/23
to
post facts.
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
They do no research of their own, preferring to take the lazy way out
and fall back on the conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.
You can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from their posts.
What they DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and ( when that
doesn't work ) insults.
Steven Galbraith
Nov 27, 2023, 12:46:56 PM11/27/23
to
"CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
Ben Holmes
Nov 27, 2023, 12:48:20 PM11/27/23
to
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:46:54 -0800 (PST), Steven Galbraith
<stevemg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>DPD motorcycle officer Jame Chaney, riding right behind JFK during the assassination, was interviewed by the FBI. Here, in part, is what he told them about the location of the "noises", i.e., shots.
>
>"CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>
>Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
Of course, this moron is happy to accept hearsay evidence. As long as
<stevemg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>DPD motorcycle officer Jame Chaney, riding right behind JFK during the assassination, was interviewed by the FBI. Here, in part, is what he told them about the location of the "noises", i.e., shots.
>
>"CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>
>Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
it supports his belief.
Ben Holmes
Nov 27, 2023, 12:48:28 PM11/27/23
to
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:30:11 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>A few years ago, Oswald left the following note in Gil's stocking,,,
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>A few years ago, Oswald left the following note in Gil's stocking,,,
Ben Holmes
Nov 27, 2023, 12:48:38 PM11/27/23
to
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:58:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, it's the only "success" Oswald had in life...
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, it's the only "success" Oswald had in life...
Ben Holmes
Nov 27, 2023, 1:54:47 PM11/27/23
to
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 04:18:02 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 4:17:55?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> eve of its anniversary.
>
>I agree.
Amusing! Corbutt agrees with normal people...
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 4:17:55?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:02:41?AM UTC-5, David wrote:
>>> you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
>> Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event
>> like the assassination of a President and wish people a "happy" on the
>>> you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
>> Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event
>> eve of its anniversary.
>
>I agree.
Amusing! Corbutt agrees with normal people...
Ben Holmes
Nov 27, 2023, 1:55:02 PM11/27/23
to
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:49:19 -0800, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:20:19 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
><chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:17:55?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
>
>Yes.
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:20:19 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
><chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:17:55?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:02:41?AM UTC-5, David wrote:
>>> > you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
>>> Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event like the assassination of a President of the US and wish people a "happy" on the eve of its anniversary.
>>> It tells the world a lot about the asshole's character.
>>> Let's hope Chuckles never walks into a convenience store during a robbery or is a victim of a mass shooting where his brains are splattered all over the place.
>>> And people aren't wishing each other a "happy" on the eves of its anniversary.
>>>
>>> It's more than just tasteless.
>>> Chuckles is a sick motherfucker.
>>
>>Was I making fun of the deaths that day ...
>>> > you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
>>> Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event like the assassination of a President of the US and wish people a "happy" on the eve of its anniversary.
>>> It tells the world a lot about the asshole's character.
>>> Let's hope Chuckles never walks into a convenience store during a robbery or is a victim of a mass shooting where his brains are splattered all over the place.
>>> And people aren't wishing each other a "happy" on the eves of its anniversary.
>>>
>>> It's more than just tasteless.
>>> Chuckles is a sick motherfucker.
>>
>
>Yes.
Ben Holmes
Nov 27, 2023, 1:55:09 PM11/27/23
to
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:20:19 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:17:55?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 3:02:41?AM UTC-5, David wrote:
>> > you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
>> Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event like the assassination of a President of the US and wish people a "happy" on the eve of its anniversary.
>> It tells the world a lot about the asshole's character.
>> Let's hope Chuckles never walks into a convenience store during a robbery or is a victim of a mass shooting where his brains are splattered all over the place.
>> And people aren't wishing each other a "happy" on the eves of its anniversary.
>>
>> It's more than just tasteless.
>> Chuckles is a sick motherfucker.
>
>Was I making fun of the deaths that day ...
>> > you are shitting your pants these days... amazing, handlers putting the hammer on you slugs? Ouch!
>> Only a sick, worthless piece of shit would take a tragic event like the assassination of a President of the US and wish people a "happy" on the eve of its anniversary.
>> It tells the world a lot about the asshole's character.
>> Let's hope Chuckles never walks into a convenience store during a robbery or is a victim of a mass shooting where his brains are splattered all over the place.
>> And people aren't wishing each other a "happy" on the eves of its anniversary.
>>
>> It's more than just tasteless.
>> Chuckles is a sick motherfucker.
>
Yes.
BT George
Nov 27, 2023, 2:30:36 PM11/27/23
to
Gil Jesus
Nov 28, 2023, 6:52:19 AM11/28/23
to
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 12:46:56 PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
> "CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>
> Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
Dallas Motorcycle officer James Chaney tells a newsman that he thought the first shot sounded like a motorcycle backfire and he turned around to his LEFT and looked back.
> "CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>
> Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
He heard a second shot and turned forward in time to see President Kennedy, "struck in the face by the second bullet".
https://youtu.be/V-wi6JnYhng
Now tell us, Professor, how a bullet fired from behind can strike someone anywhere near the face.
JE Corbett
Nov 28, 2023, 7:02:51 AM11/28/23
to
face. Tell us where in the below photo you see a gunshot wound.
http://i0.wp.com/www.nationalenquirer.com/wp-content/uploads/old_neq/article_images/jfk_stry_a_0.jpg?resize=451,400
In all likelihood, Chaney was describing the head shot which caused a skull flap to drop down over the right side of JFK;s head.
Why do CTs accept witness statements as factual which can easily be refuted by other evidence?
Gil Jesus
Nov 28, 2023, 7:08:00 AM11/28/23
to
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:02:51 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
> Tell us why you believe Chaney's account that JFK was struck in the face.
It's corroborated by other evidence:
> Tell us why you believe Chaney's account that JFK was struck in the face.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_NHCCuTk3U
JE Corbett
Nov 28, 2023, 7:51:57 AM11/28/23
to
Why don't we see a bullet wound in JFK's face in the autopsy picture of his face?
Just who or what corroborates Chaney?
JE Corbett
Nov 28, 2023, 7:58:25 AM11/28/23
to
both entrance wounds? If you believe he latter, why were there no exit wounds and no bullets were in the body at autopsy?
NoTrueFlags Here
Nov 28, 2023, 8:45:04 AM11/28/23
to
Ben Holmes
Nov 28, 2023, 11:05:40 AM11/28/23
to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 04:02:49 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 6:52:19?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
>He said "in the face".
Good of you to quote what Gil already quoted... now answer the
question.
Or run like the coward you are... again.
>Why do CTs accept witness statements as factual which can easily be refuted by other evidence?
Because there's no evidence that does what you claim.
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 6:52:19?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 12:46:56?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
>> > "CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>> >
>> > Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
>> Dallas Motorcycle officer James Chaney tells a newsman that he thought the first shot sounded like a motorcycle backfire and he turned around to his LEFT and looked back.
>> He heard a second shot and turned forward in time to see President Kennedy, "struck in the face by the second bullet".
>>
>> https://youtu.be/V-wi6JnYhng
>>
>> Now tell us, Professor, how a bullet fired from behind can strike someone anywhere near the face.
>
>Chaney didn't say near the face.
Nor did Gil say this. Only you.
>> > "CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>> >
>> > Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
>> Dallas Motorcycle officer James Chaney tells a newsman that he thought the first shot sounded like a motorcycle backfire and he turned around to his LEFT and looked back.
>> He heard a second shot and turned forward in time to see President Kennedy, "struck in the face by the second bullet".
>>
>> https://youtu.be/V-wi6JnYhng
>>
>> Now tell us, Professor, how a bullet fired from behind can strike someone anywhere near the face.
>
>Chaney didn't say near the face.
>He said "in the face".
question.
Or run like the coward you are... again.
>Why do CTs accept witness statements as factual which can easily be refuted by other evidence?
Ben Holmes
Nov 28, 2023, 11:06:09 AM11/28/23
to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 04:51:56 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:08:00?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:08:00?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:02:51?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
>>> Tell us why you believe Chaney's account that JFK was struck in the face.
>> It's corroborated by other evidence:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_NHCCuTk3U
Logical fallacies deleted.
>>> Tell us why you believe Chaney's account that JFK was struck in the face.
>> It's corroborated by other evidence:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_NHCCuTk3U
Ben Holmes
Nov 28, 2023, 11:07:08 AM11/28/23
to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 04:58:24 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 6:52:19?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
question.
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 6:52:19?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 12:46:56?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
>>> "CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>>>
>>> Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
>> Dallas Motorcycle officer James Chaney tells a newsman that he thought the first shot sounded like a motorcycle backfire and he turned around to his LEFT and looked back.
>> He heard a second shot and turned forward in time to see President Kennedy, "struck in the face by the second bullet".
>>
>> https://youtu.be/V-wi6JnYhng
>>
>> Now tell us, Professor, how a bullet fired from behind can strike someone anywhere near the face.
Logical fallacy deleted. Corbutt has now TWICE run from Gil's simple
>>> "CHANEY said he was positive that all the noises he heard were coming from behind his motorcycle and none of these noises came from the side or the front of the position in which CHANEY was located. "
>>>
>>> Source/link: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62475#relPageId=170&search=James_Chaney
>> Dallas Motorcycle officer James Chaney tells a newsman that he thought the first shot sounded like a motorcycle backfire and he turned around to his LEFT and looked back.
>> He heard a second shot and turned forward in time to see President Kennedy, "struck in the face by the second bullet".
>>
>> https://youtu.be/V-wi6JnYhng
>>
>> Now tell us, Professor, how a bullet fired from behind can strike someone anywhere near the face.
question.
Gil Jesus
Nov 28, 2023, 12:33:40 PM11/28/23
to
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 8:45:04 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
> Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
What Chaney heard and what he saw indicates that Kennedy was shot from two different directions. The frontal shot is corroborated by the description of other witnesses.
> Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
The body was wisked away from Dallas by the Secret Service to prevent an autopsy in which the coroner, Dr. Earl Rose, would have seen it.
The Zapruder film was secreted away to prevent the public from seeing that the Secret Service slowed the limo down when the shooting started in order to make it easier to kill the President.
Ben Holmes
Nov 28, 2023, 12:46:17 PM11/28/23
to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:33:39 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Chaney was such a dangerous eyewitness, that to this day, believers
lie about what he said.
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
lie about what he said.
JE Corbett
Nov 28, 2023, 1:52:45 PM11/28/23
to
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 12:33:40 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 8:45:04 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
> > Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
> What Chaney heard and what he saw indicates that Kennedy was shot from two different directions. The frontal shot is corroborated by the description of other witnesses.
How do the witnesses who saw the throat wound and thought it was an entrance corroborate Chaney's statement that JFK
> On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 8:45:04 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
> > Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
> What Chaney heard and what he saw indicates that Kennedy was shot from two different directions. The frontal shot is corroborated by the description of other witnesses.
was shot in the face? They are describing two different wounds so there is no corroboration between them.
> The body was wisked away from Dallas by the Secret Service to prevent an autopsy in which the coroner, Dr. Earl Rose, would have seen it.
was an exit.
> The Zapruder film was secreted away to prevent the public from seeing that the Secret Service slowed the limo down when the shooting started in order to make it easier to kill the President.
public viewing. Had they chosen to do the latter, they had the legal right to do so.
Ben Holmes
Nov 28, 2023, 2:33:48 PM11/28/23
to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:52:43 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 12:33:40?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
Are you a moron?
>> The body was wisked away from Dallas by the Secret Service to prevent an autopsy in which the coroner, Dr. Earl Rose, would have seen it.
>
>Dr. Rose was on the FPP that saw all the autopsy photos and x-rays and agreed with all his colleagues that the throat wound
>was an exit.
With no evidence??? How stupid of him!
>> The Zapruder film was secreted away to prevent the public from seeing that the Secret Service slowed the limo down when the shooting started in order to make it easier to kill the President.
>
>The Z-film was not secreted away.
You're lying again.
<jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 12:33:40?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 8:45:04?AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
>> > Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
>> What Chaney heard and what he saw indicates that Kennedy was shot from two different directions. The frontal shot is corroborated by the description of other witnesses.
>
>How do the witnesses who saw the throat wound and thought it was an entrance corroborate Chaney's statement that JFK
>was shot in the face? They are describing two different wounds so there is no corroboration between them.
They are both shots from the front.
>> > Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
>> What Chaney heard and what he saw indicates that Kennedy was shot from two different directions. The frontal shot is corroborated by the description of other witnesses.
>
>How do the witnesses who saw the throat wound and thought it was an entrance corroborate Chaney's statement that JFK
>was shot in the face? They are describing two different wounds so there is no corroboration between them.
Are you a moron?
>> The body was wisked away from Dallas by the Secret Service to prevent an autopsy in which the coroner, Dr. Earl Rose, would have seen it.
>
>Dr. Rose was on the FPP that saw all the autopsy photos and x-rays and agreed with all his colleagues that the throat wound
>was an exit.
>> The Zapruder film was secreted away to prevent the public from seeing that the Secret Service slowed the limo down when the shooting started in order to make it easier to kill the President.
>
>The Z-film was not secreted away.
Ben Holmes
Nov 29, 2023, 7:44:20 PM11/29/23
to
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:46:37 -0800 (PST), Steven Galbraith
<stevemg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>It is absolutely bizarre...
What's absolutely bizarre is your cowardice on this topic.
<stevemg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>It is absolutely bizarre...
What's absolutely bizarre is your cowardice on this topic.
Hank Sienzant
Nov 29, 2023, 9:43:35 PM11/29/23
to
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 12:33:40 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 8:45:04 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
> > Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
> What Chaney heard and what he saw indicates that Kennedy was shot from two different directions. The frontal shot is corroborated by the description of other witnesses.
> The body was wisked away from Dallas by the Secret Service to prevent an autopsy in which the coroner, Dr. Earl Rose, would have seen it.
Elsewhere, you accuse Dallas authorities, specifically the DPD and the DA, Henry Wade, of conniving to frame an innocent Oswald. Your argument would be stronger if the entire operation was contained to Dallas, and Dallas authorities. That means Dr. Earl Rose should be part of the frame-up as well.
> > Chaney was talking about the head shot, I think. JFK was shot in the temple and Chaney probably saw that. Though he did "say" that he thought the shots had come from behind and to his right. He slipped up when he said JFK was shot in the face.
> What Chaney heard and what he saw indicates that Kennedy was shot from two different directions. The frontal shot is corroborated by the description of other witnesses.
> The body was wisked away from Dallas by the Secret Service to prevent an autopsy in which the coroner, Dr. Earl Rose, would have seen it.
Of course, unfortunately for you, Rose didn't get to perform the autopsy, so instead of bitching about how the Dallas authorities controlled everything, you have to expand the conspiracy to include the autopsists.
But now you are expanding the conspiracy to frame Oswald, to include three medical men from Bethesda, Maryland. How did Henry Wade and the DPD convince Humes, Finck, and Boswell to help cover up their treasonous activities to frame Oswald?
Please document your charges that the Bethesda autopsy is fraudulent - that charge, although unstated by you - follows from your complaint that “The body was wisked away from Dallas by the Secret Service to prevent an autopsy in which the coroner, Dr. Earl Rose, would have seen it”. The Bethesda autopsy reveals no such development, Gil. So it is either fraudulent, or you are simply expanding your conspiracy to keep your beliefs alive.
The autopsy reveals that JFK was not shot in the face, and that Chaney was wrong to say he was.
> The Zapruder film was secreted away to prevent the public from seeing that the Secret Service slowed the limo down when the shooting started in order to make it easier to kill the President.
Let’s start with someone simple…. Marina Oswald. Did she lie to help frame Oswald? Do you exclude her from the frame up?
Ben Holmes
Nov 30, 2023, 11:06:55 AM11/30/23
to
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:43:33 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
>Elsewhere, you...
Claim the following, yet refuse to support it:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
>Elsewhere, you...
Claim the following, yet refuse to support it:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
0 new messages