Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

YAHOO TIM BRENNAN! ! !

75 views
Skip to first unread message

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 24, 2013, 6:26:26 PM5/24/13
to
HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO DEBATE ON
THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

timstter

unread,
May 24, 2013, 7:46:44 PM5/24/13
to
I wouldn't like it in the LEAST, tomnln, on account of your <snicker>
DULCET tones warbling on the radio is total ANATHEMA to me.

Hasn't Batey worked out yet what a fanatical, unhinged CLOWN you are,
tomnln?

Certainly WAAAY past time he grabbed a clue re you and STOPPED giving
you opportunities to spout your insane GARBAGE re the JFK
assassination over the airwaves, tomnln.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

aeffects

unread,
May 25, 2013, 3:16:13 PM5/25/13
to
On May 24, 4:46 pm, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 25, 8:26 am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
>
> > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO DEBATE ON
> > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
>
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB
>
> I wouldn't like it in the LEAST, tomnln, on account of your <snicker>
> DULCET tones warbling on the radio is total ANATHEMA to me.

Brennan (aka Tim Shell failed standup comic) refuse a microphone?
LMFAO, what a complete .john-lone nut pussy... The moron (Brennan aka
Tim Shell failed standup comic is a gutless wonder, Tom! Expect
nothing from him but his cowardice....


> Hasn't Batey worked out yet what a fanatical, unhinged CLOWN you are,
> tomnln?
>
> Certainly WAAAY past time he grabbed a clue re you and STOPPED giving
> you opportunities to spout your insane GARBAGE re the JFK
> assassination over the airwaves, tomnln.
>
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Fresno, Botswana
> *Newsgroup(s) Primo Suck-ass*
>
...

timstter

unread,
May 25, 2013, 6:06:05 PM5/25/13
to
Well YOU'RE the one with the track record as the SUCCEEDED standup
comic, Dave/Ringo.

YOU could go on the Batey show and demonstrate your grasp of <snicker>
*case evidence* Dave/Ringo.

I mean who could forget your truly SHAMBOLIC appearance in Duluth in
the modified Beatles wig?

Right HERE, Dave/Ringo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOvxcgIjZ4w

I'm sure your <snicker> ACT would translate BEAUTIFULLY to radio, Dave/
Ringo.

Stay by the phone!

I'd be expecting that call from Anton Batey ANY minute, if I were you,
Dave/Ringo!

LMFAO Regards,

tom...@cox.net

unread,
May 28, 2013, 8:23:06 PM5/28/13
to
timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 25, 8:26=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO DEBATE
> > O=
> N
> > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=
> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> I wouldn't like it in the LEAST, tomnln, on account of your <snicker>
> DULCET tones warbling on the radio is total ANATHEMA to me.
>
> Hasn't Batey worked out yet what a fanatical, unhinged CLOWN you are,
> tomnln?
>
> Certainly WAAAY past time he grabbed a clue re you and STOPPED giving
> you opportunities to spout your insane GARBAGE re the JFK
> assassination over the airwaves, tomnln.
>
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 14= 4a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!


funny you call what i post as garbage...

it comes from the official volumes tht you have never read.

you should pay me for giving you an education...

now put that pointy hat on and go stand in the corner you fucking dunce !
! !

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 1:49:09 AM6/19/13
to
tom...@cox.net wrote:
> HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO DEBATE
> ON THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?


SHE'S RUNNING HER TITS OFF FROM THIS ONE ! ! !

Sam McClung

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 2:26:20 AM6/19/13
to
nannerb - an urban banana

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Jun 24, 2013, 11:51:06 PM6/24/13
to
timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 25, 8:26=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO DEBATE
> > O=
> N
> > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=
> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> I wouldn't like it in the LEAST, tomnln, on account of your <snicker>
> DULCET tones warbling on the radio is total ANATHEMA to me.
>
> Hasn't Batey worked out yet what a fanatical, unhinged CLOWN you are,
> tomnln?
>
> Certainly WAAAY past time he grabbed a clue re you and STOPPED giving
> you opportunities to spout your insane GARBAGE re the JFK
> assassination over the airwaves, tomnln.
>
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 14= 4a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
===========================================================================
===== YOU STUPID BASTARD;
ANTON LISTENED TO ME IN MY CHAT ROOM FOR SEVEN (7YEARS . THEN, CHECKED OUT
WHAT I SAID IN THE 26 VOLUMES. WHEN HE FOUND ME TO BE TRUTHFULL, HE
INVITED ME TO BE A GUEST ON HIS RADIO SHOW.

WANT ME TO TELL YOU WHY HE HAS NEVER INVITED YOU TO SPEAK ON HIS RDI SHOW?
? ?
===========================================================================
===

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 25, 2013, 5:32:06 PM6/25/13
to
Batey listened to your NONSENSE in your chatroom for 7 years?!!

I always thought conversations in your chatroom went something like THIS:

QUOTE ON:

It's that moment of dawning comprehension that I live for.

It's after 9 PM EST and time to go NUTSACK hunting. I log into Paltalk
and make up a new screen name that won't be recognizable. I double
click "Politics and Social Issues" and from there enter the "Who Killed
JFK?" room.

There, I find what I always find. A chatroom full of 2 or 3 losers --
and this, mind you, is a subject matter that probably should be
attracting several dozen -- and these 2 or 3 losers aren't "chatting"
about anything in this chatroom.

There's no debate or discussion going on. The host of the chatroom has
the microphone and he isn't giving it up for anything. He's telling
his flock what they are required to believe and presumably, they are
absorbing it.

The host sees my new screen name, and he says in that nasal accent,
"Hewwo, ---- -----, ah yoo heah to tawk about de Kennedy
assassinashun?" But you can hear the apprehension in that polite
greeting. He's been through the drill before and he knows what to
half-expect.

I type the name NUTSACK and push "enter". I am a fast typist when I
want to be and I do this several times over and over again rapidly. A
chorus of "NUTSACKs" fills the screen. The agonized reaction from the
host never fails to disappoint.

I've bagged another NUTSACK!

QUOTE OFF

LMFAO Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 25, 2013, 5:49:36 PM6/25/13
to
THIS was pretty amusing re your chatroom, clownnln:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/alt.conspiracy.jfk/hewwo|sort:relevance/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IbVbP5j29YE/dW8TrxszOXoJ

BTW, managed to recruit anyone for your next LOSER debate, absurdnln?

Just a hint. Maybe it's BEST not to go around trying to recruit people using the *C* word.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Jun 25, 2013, 9:50:27 PM6/25/13
to
you've been a nutsack sucker for decades loser ! ! !

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 25, 2013, 11:13:12 PM6/25/13
to
Nutsack!
TB

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 4:23:15 PM6/26/13
to
rob spencer;
you have never had the balls to talk to me i y chat room or ever had the
balls to go toe to toe with me.

you're a fucking communist coward ! ! !

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 4:39:21 PM6/26/13
to
Hi tomnln,

Say, remember when Rob Spencer (or Robber Spent as you so <snicker* *wittily* renamed him, clownnln) pretended to be Azcue's son?

You were BEGGING *Azcue's son* for SCHMEXCLUSIVE information, tomnln, as I recall.

Didn't you kind of smell a rat when the very FIRST post asked you if you were *muos locos* or somesuch, clownnln?

Lord help us that was FUNNY!

LMFAO@U Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 10:46:42 PM6/26/13
to
tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 06:23:15 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> > rob spencer;
> >
> > you have never had the balls to talk to me i y chat room or ever had
> > the
> >
> > balls to go toe to toe with me.
> >
> >
> >
> > you're a fucking communist coward ! ! !
> >
> >
> >
> > tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 11:50:27 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> >
> > > > tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 13:51:06 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > On May 25, 8:26=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A
> >
> > > > > > > > RADIO
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > DEBATE
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > O=
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > N
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > --
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/-----------------
> > > > > > > > ---
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
yeah;
rob was no smayrter than you;

he nevere knew that AZCUE REALLY DID HAVE A SON.

TOO BAD YOUR PARENTS DIDN'T HAVE ONE ! ! !


> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 11:45:38 PM6/26/13
to
Que? Remember when you were literally BEGGING <snicker> *Azcue Jnr* for SCHMEXCLUSIVE information, clownnln?

You should've just read what Azcue Snr had to say in the HSCA volumes, absurdnln.

Ol' Robber Spent made you appear an even bigger CLOWN than you already ARE, milord clownnln.

KUTGW!

TB

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 3:05:42 PM6/27/13
to
TO SHOW YOU HOW FUCKING STUPID YOU ARE
YOU SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT I KNOW WHERE UPU AND YOUR FUCKING FAMILY
LIVE (TEMPORARILY)

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 5:07:34 PM6/27/13
to
Oh I remember now.

Didn't you put copies of photos of the so-called Robber Spent's wife and young daughters on your GARBAGE HEAP of a website and then make all sorts of vile insinuations and veiled threats, labelling them as bimbos?

I seem to recall that you DID and quite probably the nonsense is still on your completely REVOLTING website.

Anton Batey really has got a NERVE trying to give a CRUMB like you more undeserved radio publicity, Rossley.

You belong in a prison cell, NOT on the airwaves, in my view.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 11:11:06 PM6/27/13
to
your view ? ? ?


you don't know the difference between american justice and, nazi justice !
! !

so much for the view of someone blind

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 5:39:51 PM9/21/13
to
TIMMY FORGOT TO MENTION THAT HE(?) IS A REGISTERED NUTSACK SUCKER ! ! !
==========================================================================

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 5:41:28 PM9/21/13
to
tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19 June 2013 15:49:09 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> > tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO
> > > DEBATE
> >
> > > ON THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SHE'S RUNNING HER TITS OFF FROM THIS ONE ! ! !
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > -------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
> >
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
>
> THIS was pretty amusing re your chatroom, clownnln:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/alt.conspiracy.jfk
> /hewwo|sort:relevance/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IbVbP5j29YE/dW8TrxszOXoJ
>
> BTW, managed to recruit anyone for your next LOSER debate, absurdnln?
===========================================================================
=======
> Just a hint. Maybe it's BEST not to go around trying to recruit people
> using the *C* word.
OOOOOOOH, DID SOMEONE KICK YOU IN YOUR CUNT AGAIN? ? ? ?
===========================================================================
========
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 5:47:15 PM9/21/13
to
tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 06:23:15 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> > rob spencer;
> >
> > you have never had the balls to talk to me i y chat room or ever had
> > the
> >
> > balls to go toe to toe with me.
> >
> >
> >
> > you're a fucking communist coward ! ! !
> >
> >
> >
> > tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 11:50:27 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> >
> > > > tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 13:51:06 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > On May 25, 8:26=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A
> >
> > > > > > > > RADIO
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > DEBATE
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > O=
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > N
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > --
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/-----------------
> > > > > > > > ---
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
===========================================================================
====
> Didn't you kind of smell a rat when the very FIRST post asked you if you
> were *muos locos* or somesuch, clownnln?

IT TOOK YOU ALL THIS TIME TO RECOGNIZE SPENCER AS A "RT" YOU GOTTA BE THE
SLOWEST LEARNER IN THE UNIVERSE ! ! ! DOES THIS MEAN YOU'RE GONNA COMMIT
SUICIDE? ? ?
===========================================================================
=====

> Lord help us that was FUNNY!
>
> LMFAO@U Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 5:54:56 PM9/21/13
to
==========================================================================
FROM THE LOOKS OF YOU FATMAN, YOU'VE "BAGGED/SWALLOWED" QUITE A FEW
NUTSACKS ! ! ! DID YOU EVER GET A CALORIE COUNT? ? ?
===========================================================================

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 5:57:07 PM9/21/13
to

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 5:59:34 PM9/21/13
to
In my view, tomnln, Nazi Justice would be too good for you.

You deserve MUCH worse.

Now let's piggyback my BRILLIANT post re Benny onto this thread:

Hi All,

Some of you might have seen the recent discussion re Yellow Pants and
how Ben Holmes earned this name. Basically, Ben was positing a theory
that the presence of *A Lady In Yellow Pants* in the Nix film, and her
absence from the Zapruder film at around the Z 369 point was an
indicator that the Z film was a forgery, as the two films should have
matched at that point.

I recently went back and reviewed some of the threads from March 2008
where Z 369 and *The Lady In Yellow Pants* in the Nix film was
discussed. For those interested, here is the lady herself:

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh18/html/WH_Vol18_0049a.htm

She is the figure closest to Main Street in the above frames from Nix.

Steve Barber started a thread called *Where in [sic] this *lady in
yellow pants* Ben Holmes is talking about?* and at post # 29 I simply
asked if *The Lady In Yellow Pants* was the same figure appearing on
page 21 of the UPI book Four Days, which basically features a color
copy of the above Nix frame.

This provoked a quite mirth inducing response from Benny's sidekick,
David (aeffects) Healy, who claimed at post # 55 that Four Days was
published in black & white and didn't have any color plates, stupidly
getting mixed up with the book Four Dark Days In History.

To cover himself, Healy then claimed at post # 66 to have a
collector's dream *galley proof copy* of Four Days which WAS in black
and white, an absurd claim that Holmes backed him up on, being a
fellow liar and Z film alterationist adherent.

If you are interested, have a look at the exchanges between Holmes and
myself between posts # 59 and # 70 where Holmes finally puts me in the
killfilter. If you can be bothered reading Benny's patented swamp
posts right through, you will see that the reason he gave was that I'd
made an ad hominen attack on him by calling him *Benny* instead of
Ben!

It was surprising that Ben would be upset about *ad hominen* attacks,
given that by post # 68 he had already directed the following terms at
either myself or LN posters in general:

Trolls

Incredibly illiterate or a liar

Illiteracy

Most LNT'ers [sic] are illiterate or liars anyway

Trolls

Why bother to lie?

Prove you a liar

Either you're a liar or the troll being quoted is a liar

Cowards & liars

Just a liar

Gutless coward

Of course, the REAL reason lil' Benny put me in the killfilter was
because he realised that his theory was wrong and he needed to close
down discussion quick before he had to admit his mistake. Yellow Pants
was standing MUCH too far back on the Dealey Plaza grass to ever
appear in the Zapruder film and as the horrible truth dawned on Benny
he hid behind claiming to be insulted by ad hominen!

For those interested, here is the thread that Steve Barber started all
those years ago:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_frm/thread/54ac0ee8510baee4/32582336742cb27b?lnk=gst&q=where+in+this+lady#32582336742cb27b

2013 and Benny is STILL running for cover, STILL refusing to further
discuss his failed Lady In Yellow Pants theory.

Talk about a gutless coward!

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 6:21:02 PM9/21/13
to
You certainly committed RESEARCH suicide when you BEGGED *Azcue's son* for <snicker> SCHMEXCLUSIVE information, clownnln.

Surely even you would've smelt a <snicker> RT [sic] when he kicked off the exchange by asking if you were *muos locos* absurdnln?

Perhaps you should reward yourself with NAZI JUSTICE and stumble into your own woodchipper, you retarded old ruin.

It would be a positive PUBLIC SERVICE, Mr Nutsack.

LMFAO@U Regards,

Sam McClung

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 8:50:15 PM9/21/13
to
ever notice how you never see tim and the guy in the cape in this video in
the same place at the same time?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBnxOUCQD1c

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2013, 10:20:43 PM9/21/13
to
--========================================================================
i certainly scare the shit out of all of you lone nutters with both the
officiasl evidenced/testimony and, my retaliation to your threats ! ! ! !
===========================================================================
==

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 26, 2013, 6:07:49 PM9/26/13
to
Ever notice that you're a fruitcake who thinks that Elvis Presley is still alive?

I certainly have.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 12:23:56 PM9/27/13
to
tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 September 2013 10:50:15 UTC+10, Sam McClung wrote:
> > ever notice how you never see tim and the guy in the cape in this video
> > in
> >
> > the same place at the same time?
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBnxOUCQD1c
>
> Ever notice that you're a fruitcake who thinks that Elvis Presley is
> still alive?
===========================================================================
we also notice when i beat the shit outta you with evidence/testimony you
keep changing your screen name like any ordinary ctiminal ! ! !
===========================================================================
====

> I certainly have.
>
> Informative Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
> 144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 6:47:59 PM9/27/13
to
Ever notice that you can't spell, you <snicker> grammatical *ctiminal* you?

I certainly have!

LMFAO Regards,

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 27, 2013, 9:53:31 PM9/27/13
to
===========================================================================
==== YOU "HVE TO" BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT EVIDENC/TESTIMONY ! ! !
===========================================================================
====
> LMFAO Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...

curtj...@hotmail.com

unread,
Sep 28, 2013, 7:20:24 PM9/28/13
to
Yahoo, not Yoohoo!

On Friday, May 24, 2013 7:46:44 PM UTC-4, timstter wrote:
> On May 25, 8:26 am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
>
> > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO DEBATE ON
>
> > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
>
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB
>
>
>
> I wouldn't like it in the LEAST, tomnln, on account of your <snicker>
>
> DULCET tones warbling on the radio is total ANATHEMA to me.
>
>
>
> Hasn't Batey worked out yet what a fanatical, unhinged CLOWN you are,
>
> tomnln?
>
>
>
> Certainly WAAAY past time he grabbed a clue re you and STOPPED giving
>
> you opportunities to spout your insane GARBAGE re the JFK
>
> assassination over the airwaves, tomnln.
>
>
>

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 29, 2013, 1:37:44 AM9/29/13
to
curtj...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Yahoo, not Yoohoo!
>
> On Friday, May 24, 2013 7:46:44 PM UTC-4, timstter wrote:
> > On May 25, 8:26=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >=20
> > > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO
> > > DEBATE=
> ON
> >=20
> > > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > > --
> >=20
> > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> >=20
> > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > > =
> =A0$9.95/Month 30GB
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > I wouldn't like it in the LEAST, tomnln, on account of your <snicker>
> >=20
> > DULCET tones warbling on the radio is total ANATHEMA to me.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Hasn't Batey worked out yet what a fanatical, unhinged CLOWN you are,
> >=20
> > tomnln?
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Certainly WAAAY past time he grabbed a clue re you and STOPPED giving
> >=20
> > you opportunities to spout your insane GARBAGE re the JFK
> >=20
> > assassination over the airwaves, tomnln.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Informative Regards,
HEY ASSHOLE;

HOW PERFECTFULLY SWEET OF YOU TO PUBLICKLY STATE THAT THE OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF YOUR PRECIOUS WARREN COMMISSION ARE NOTHING BUT,"INSANR GARBAGE" ! ! !


> > Tim Brennan
> >=20
> > Sydney, Australia
> >=20
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> >=20
> > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> >=20
> > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> >=20
> > http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17
> > _0=
> 144a.htm
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 29, 2013, 5:38:02 PM9/29/13
to
PERFECTFULLY?! PUBLICKLY?!! INSANR GARBAGE?!! LOFL!!!

Absolutely CLASSIC clownnln on display!!!!

LMFAO Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Sep 29, 2013, 7:00:20 PM9/29/13
to
===========================================================================
=== YEAH, BUT, I BEAT THE SHIT OUTTA YOU WITH OFFICIAL EVIDENCED/TESTIMONY
DON'T I CDDLES ! ! !
===========================================================================
==

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 2, 2013, 7:25:47 PM10/2/13
to
Not that I recall. You were forced to LIE about CE2121 and Mrs Duran.

In fact, you're STILL lying about it.

As well as being completely unable to spell, <snicker> CDDLES [sic], you are ALSO a damn LIAR, clownnln.

Informative/Corrective Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Oct 3, 2013, 12:20:20 AM10/3/13
to
I CANT WAUT TO MEET YOU CRIMINAL.

I'M REALLY GONNA ENJOY SENDING YOU HOME WITH YOUR EYEBALL IN YOUR FUCKING
POCKET! ! !
===========================================================================
======

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 3, 2013, 4:11:58 PM10/3/13
to
Guess we'll have to put the radio debate on the backburner then, eh, clownnln?

It'll just have to <snicker> waut [sic] eh?

Do you have a lot of success recruiting victims for Batey's *show* with your tactics?

I wouldn't have thought so, clownnln.

I wouldn't have thought so.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 3, 2013, 4:56:50 PM10/3/13
to
On Wednesday, 29 May 2013 10:23:06 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 25, 8:26=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
>
> > > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A RADIO DEBATE
>
> > > O=
>
> > N
>
> > > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
>
> > > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
>
> > > =A0$=
>
> > 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> >
>
> > I wouldn't like it in the LEAST, tomnln, on account of your <snicker>
>
> > DULCET tones warbling on the radio is total ANATHEMA to me.
>
> >
>
> > Hasn't Batey worked out yet what a fanatical, unhinged CLOWN you are,
>
> > tomnln?
>
> >
>
> > Certainly WAAAY past time he grabbed a clue re you and STOPPED giving
>
> > you opportunities to spout your insane GARBAGE re the JFK
>
> > assassination over the airwaves, tomnln.
>
> >
>
> > Informative Regards,
>
> >
>
> > Tim Brennan
>
> > Sydney, Australia
>
> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> >
>
> > *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
>
> > neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
>
> > Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> >
>
> > And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
>
> > http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0
>
> > 14= 4a.htm
>
> >
>
> > X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
>
>
>
>
> funny you call what i post as garbage...
>
>
>
> it comes from the official volumes tht you have never read.
>
>
>
> you should pay me for giving you an education...
>
>
>
> now put that pointy hat on and go stand in the corner you fucking dunce !
>
> ! !
>
>
>
> --
>
> -------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
>
> Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

Que?

Say, heard from *Azcue's son* lately?

Bwaaaahaaahaaahaaahaaa!!!!

LMFAO@U Regards,

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 3, 2013, 5:05:08 PM10/3/13
to
Hey clownnln!

Your completely PATHETIC *Criminal Aliases* page has had precisely TWELVE views!

Wow!

KUTGW, clownnln!

You'll get there one day!

A very long time in the future...

LMFAO@U Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Oct 3, 2013, 8:24:34 PM10/3/13
to
YOU STUPID BASTARD. YOU DIDN'T REALIZE THAT AZCUE DID INDEED HAVE A SON.
===========================================================================
====

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Oct 3, 2013, 8:28:58 PM10/3/13
to
ANTON "KNOWS" I SPEAK THE TRUTH BECAUSE HE HAS THE 26 VOLUMESW YOU ASSHOLE
! ! ! IT'SALSO WHY HE HAS NEVER ASKED YOU TO BE A GUEST ON HIS RADIO SHOWW
! !
===========================================================================
======
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Informative Regards,

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 4, 2013, 5:41:39 PM10/4/13
to
YOU STUPID BASTARD YOU DIDN'T REALIZE THAT *AZCUE'S SON* WAS ROB SPENCER !!!

TB

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 4, 2013, 5:45:42 PM10/4/13
to
Most likely Anton knows that you are a CLOWN, tomnln.

Presumably he puts you on for simple COMEDY value, clownnln.

He's probably snickering up his sleeve @ you as we speak!

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 4, 2013, 5:48:57 PM10/4/13
to
LOL! This is the revolting CLOWN that Batey wants to give YET MORE airtime to?!!

R-O-T-F-L-M-F-A-O!!!!!

TB

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Oct 4, 2013, 8:16:30 PM10/4/13
to
you were too stupid to know that azcue really did have a son! ! !
===========================================================================
===

tom...@cox.net

unread,
Oct 4, 2013, 8:22:34 PM10/4/13
to
tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 September 2013 07:54:56 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> > tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 11:50:27 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> >
> > > > tims...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 13:51:06 UTC+10, tomnln wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > On May 25, 8:26=A0am, tom...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > HEY TIMMY HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF I WERE ABLE TO SET UP A
> >
> > > > > > > > RADIO
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > DEBATE
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > O=
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > N
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > THE RADIO WITH ANTON BATEY? ? ?
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > --
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/-----------------
> > > > > > > > ---
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> LOL! This is the revolting CLOWN that Batey wants to give YET MORE
> airtime to?!!
>
> R-O-T-F-L-M-F-A-O!!!!!
>
> TB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"informed regards"? ? ? ?

just what are you "informed on? ?

it sure ain't got anything to do with official evidence/testimony loser ! !
!

why don't your posts stick to the aids virus ! ! !@
it's the oly thing you're informed on ! ! !
===========================================================================
=
0 new messages