Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 22
18 views
Skip to first unread message
Gil Jesus
Oct 27, 2023, 4:22:16 AM10/27/23
to
There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
Question # 22: Did the Dallas Police record Oswald's interrogation ?
Question # 22: Did the Dallas Police record Oswald's interrogation ?
Bud
Oct 27, 2023, 6:12:35 AM10/27/23
to
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 4:22:16 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>
> Question # 22: Did the Dallas Police record Oswald's interrogation ?
No.
> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>
> Question # 22: Did the Dallas Police record Oswald's interrogation ?
John Corbett
Oct 27, 2023, 6:58:42 AM10/27/23
to
happy?
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:24 AM10/27/23
to
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:58:40 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>There you go, Gil. Bud answered "no" to your simple "yes" or "no" question. Does that make you
>happy?
Corbutt seems unduly pleased that critics are able to catch a believer
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>There you go, Gil. Bud answered "no" to your simple "yes" or "no" question. Does that make you
>happy?
telling a partial truth...
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:24 AM10/27/23
to
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:12:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
0 new messages