Johnny McAdams Caught In A Lie!

Ben Holmes

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 10:23:49 AM1/30/13

to

Taken from the censored forum:

> I evaluate witnesses on their merits.
>
> If you applied the same standard to JFK witnesses you apply to
> scripture, you would reject *all* of them.
>
> So who's being dogmatic?
>
> .John

It's truly amusing that Johnny can say this with a straight face... since he
refuses to name a *SINGLE* eyewitness whom he believes completely in all their
1963-64 statements concerning the murder of JFK.

So the *FACT* is... Johnny *DOES* reject all eyewitnesses. He cherry-picks their
testimony to find things that support his faith, and pretends otherwise.

Now... Johnny refuses to post in an open forum where he cannot control other
people when they refute what he says... so he won't respond here.

But he *DOES* read these posts... as proven by his occasional 'theft' of a post
to
be posted and answered in his censored arena... but *this* post won't be one of
them... anyone care to bet?

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com

Walt

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 11:03:39 AM1/30/13

to

Mc Adams is a liar and a coward...... and a pimp with a stable of
whores.

aeffects

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 2:25:24 PM1/30/13

to

so Walt, how do you REALLY feel? LMFAO!

timstter

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 2:33:24 PM1/30/13

to

The idea of YOU accusing another of lying is LAUGHABLE, Benny.

TB

aeffects

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 2:39:35 PM1/30/13

to

there's that lone nut pustule Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell failed and
dismal standup comic), still hoping for writing assignments, eh
shithead? First douche, ya gotta know how to write then you gotta know
your material -- you've failed moron, best run to Bill Clarke, he'll
show you how to put that nutter-jockstrap on....

Carry on Fatboy, till next week.... ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !

> TB

Ben Holmes

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 3:09:01 PM1/30/13

to

In article <4955e527-3cc5-4b02...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>
>On Jan 30, 8:03=A0am, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:

>> On Jan 30, 9:23=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Taken from the censored forum:
>>
>> > > I evaluate witnesses on their merits.
>>
>> > > If you applied the same standard to JFK witnesses you apply to
>> > > scripture, you would reject *all* of them.
>>
>> > > So who's being dogmatic?
>>
>> > > .John
>>
>> > It's truly amusing that Johnny can say this with a straight face...
>> > since he refuses to name a *SINGLE* eyewitness whom he believes
>> > completely in all their 1963-64 statements concerning the murder of JFK.
>>
>> > So the *FACT* is... Johnny *DOES* reject all eyewitnesses. He
>> > cherry-picks their testimony to find things that support his faith,
>> > and pretends otherwise.
>>
>> > Now... Johnny refuses to post in an open forum where he cannot control
>> > other people when they refute what he says... so he won't respond here.
>>
>> > But he *DOES* read these posts... as proven by his occasional 'theft'
>> > of a post to be posted and answered in his censored arena... but
>> > *this* post won't be one of them... anyone care to bet?
>>

>> Mc Adams is a liar and a coward...... and a pimp with a stable of
>> whores.
>
>so Walt, how do you REALLY feel? LMFAO!

I think Walt is trying to tell the truth with a great deal of politeness...

He surely doesn't want to upset the "Professor"...

ROTFLMAO!!!

Ben Holmes

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 3:12:15 PM1/30/13

to

In article <c959c699-52be-4ed6...@l3g2000pbq.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>
>On Jan 30, 11:33=A0am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Jan 31, 2:23=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Taken from the censored forum:
>>
>> > > I evaluate witnesses on their merits.
>>
>> > > If you applied the same standard to JFK witnesses you apply to
>> > > scripture, you would reject *all* of them.
>>
>> > > So who's being dogmatic?
>>
>> > > .John
>>
>> > It's truly amusing that Johnny can say this with a straight face...
>> > since he refuses to name a *SINGLE* eyewitness whom he believes
>> > completely in all their 1963-64 statements concerning the murder of JFK.
>>
>> > So the *FACT* is... Johnny *DOES* reject all eyewitnesses. He
>> > cherry-picks their testimony to find things that support his faith,
>> > and pretends otherwise.
>>
>> > Now... Johnny refuses to post in an open forum where he cannot
>> > control other people when they refute what he says... so he won't
>> > respond here.
>>
>> > But he *DOES* read these posts... as proven by his occasional 'theft'
>> > of a post to be posted and answered in his censored arena... but
>> > *this* post won't be one of them... anyone care to bet?
>>

>> The idea of YOU accusing another of lying is LAUGHABLE, Benny.

Didn't say a *SINGLE* thing above that you can refute. That makes *YOU* the
liar, doesn't it kook?

>there's that lone nut pustule Tim Brennan (aka Tim Shell failed and
>dismal standup comic), still hoping for writing assignments, eh
>shithead? First douche, ya gotta know how to write then you gotta know
>your material -- you've failed moron, best run to Bill Clarke, he'll
>show you how to put that nutter-jockstrap on....
>
>Carry on Fatboy, till next week.... ROTFLMFAO! ! ! !
>
>> TB

The problem is that Billy can't teach Timmy the evidence... he doesn't know any
of it.

Walt

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 4:47:50 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 2:09 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <4955e527-3cc5-4b02-86c5-9618ab241...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

Mc Adams doesn't deserve to be addressed as "Professor" he's a
perfesser... Errrr... maybe that's spelled pervert?.....

Bud

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 7:20:42 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 10:23 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> Taken from the censored forum:
>
> > I evaluate witnesses on their merits.
>
> > If you applied the same standard to JFK witnesses you apply to
> > scripture, you would reject *all* of them.
>
> > So who's being dogmatic?
>
> > .John
>
> It's truly amusing that Johnny can say this with a straight face... since he
> refuses to name a *SINGLE* eyewitness whom he believes completely in all their
> 1963-64 statements concerning the murder of JFK.

I`m sure he believes almost all of them.

> So the *FACT* is... Johnny *DOES* reject all eyewitnesses.

You are lying.

> He cherry-picks their
> testimony to find things that support his faith, and pretends otherwise.

<snicker> Ben is too stupid to realize he id describing Mark Lane to
a "T".

> Now... Johnny refuses to post in an open forum where he cannot control other
> people when they refute what he says... so he won't respond here.

You won`t debate, you`ll merely attempt to drown him out with ad
hominem. You are a one trick pony. You can`t debate there because you
can`t use the only weapon in your arsenal.

Bud

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 7:21:36 PM1/30/13

to

Or so retards think.

Walt

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 7:27:44 PM1/30/13

to

What's that old saying......Perception is ??????

Jason Burke

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 8:31:28 PM1/30/13

to

Bud, Bud, Bud. Now there you go again, insulting retards. I'm sure you
realize that these dumbfucks have to work their way up to retard status.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 10:31:03 PM1/30/13

to

In article <5cb0a3af-95ba-4a46...@gg5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
Walt says...
>
>On Jan 30, 2:09=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <4955e527-3cc5-4b02-86c5-9618ab241...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> aeffects says...
>>
>>
>> >On Jan 30, 8:03=3DA0am, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:

>> >> On Jan 30, 9:23=3DA0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Taken from the censored forum:
>>
>> >> > > I evaluate witnesses on their merits.
>>
>> >> > > If you applied the same standard to JFK witnesses you apply to
>> >> > > scripture, you would reject *all* of them.
>>
>> >> > > So who's being dogmatic?
>>
>> >> > > .John
>>
>> >> > It's truly amusing that Johnny can say this with a straight face...
>> >> > since he refuses to name a *SINGLE* eyewitness whom he believes

>> >> > completely in all their 1963-64 statements concerning the murder of =

>JFK.
>>
>> >> > So the *FACT* is... Johnny *DOES* reject all eyewitnesses. He
>> >> > cherry-picks their testimony to find things that support his faith,
>> >> > and pretends otherwise.
>>

>> >> > Now... Johnny refuses to post in an open forum where he cannot contr=
>ol
>> >> > other people when they refute what he says... so he won't respond he=
>re.
>>
>> >> > But he *DOES* read these posts... as proven by his occasional 'theft=

>'
>> >> > of a post to be posted and answered in his censored arena... but
>> >> > *this* post won't be one of them... anyone care to bet?
>>
>> >> Mc Adams is a liar and a coward...... and a pimp with a stable of
>> >> whores.
>>
>> >so Walt, how do you REALLY feel? LMFAO!
>>

>> I think Walt is trying to tell the truth with a great deal of politeness.=

>..
>>
>> He surely doesn't want to upset the "Professor"...
>>
>> ROTFLMAO!!!
>
>
>Mc Adams doesn't deserve to be addressed as "Professor" he's a
>perfesser... Errrr... maybe that's spelled pervert?.....

Well, he certainly knows how to slink around wearing a different name. Who knows
what stories his students could tell...

Walt

unread,

Jan 31, 2013, 5:15:00 PM1/31/13

to

On Jan 30, 9:31 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <5cb0a3af-95ba-4a46-95e4-225328ac5...@gg5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

Do you suppose he's another Jerry Sandusky??