info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bud answers all of Gil's irrelevant questions
79 views
Skip to first unread message
John Corbett
Oct 26, 2023, 7:23:43 PM10/26/23
to
Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason
with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.
direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason
with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.
Message has been deleted
Gil Jesus
Oct 27, 2023, 5:07:24 AM10/27/23
to
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
< more useless comments, lies and insults >
Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.
Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.
You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?
It's all a big joke to you.
It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
This isn't entertainment.
But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.
You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ
< more useless comments, lies and insults >
Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.
Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.
You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?
It's all a big joke to you.
It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
This isn't entertainment.
But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.
You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ
Bud
Oct 27, 2023, 6:10:39 AM10/27/23
to
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 5:07:24 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> < more useless comments, lies and insults >
>
> Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
What specifically is wrong with the answers I gave?
> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> < more useless comments, lies and insults >
>
> Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
Every one is undoubtedly true, you just hate the truth.
> It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.
Your questions are loaded with assumptions that you have failed to show are valid. It is shifting the burden, where your implied (but not supported) ideas are the default that must be "refuted".
> Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
> You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
If you want better answers ask better questions.
> You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.
> You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?
> It's all a big joke to you.
> It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
> This isn't entertainment.
> But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.
> You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
> And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ
John Corbett
Oct 27, 2023, 6:56:19 AM10/27/23
to
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 5:07:24 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> < more useless comments, lies and insults >
>
> Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
> It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.
>
> Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
You make a mockery of it every day by trying to exonerate his killer so spare me the righteous
> < more useless comments, lies and insults >
>
> Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
> It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.
>
> Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
indignation.
> You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
demonstrated the ridiculousness of your questions.
> You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.
when you get challenged.
> You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?
>
> It's all a big joke to you.
Yes, you are.
> It's all a big joke to you.
>
> It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
The subject is not a joke. Your treatment of it is.
> It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
> This isn't entertainment.
But you are.
>
> But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.
Those three things are strangers to you.
> But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.
>
> You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
> And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ
Keep pretending you are accomplishing something with your silly ass hobby.
> You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
> And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:25 AM10/27/23
to
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
>direct answer to every one of them.
You're lying again, Corbutt. Indeed, the very first one I saw this
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
>direct answer to every one of them.
morning was a QUESTION from Chickenshit in response to the question...
it was CERTAINLY not a "direct answer."
Of course, we already know you're a proven liar.
> I made the mistake of trying to reason
>with Gil about how pointless his questions were.
believers NEED to run from the evidence in this case.
> I realize now...
That you don't know the answers?
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:25 AM10/27/23
to
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:56:17 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 5:07:24?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
>
>Bud has answered...
There you go again...
>> You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.
Logical fallacy deleted.
>> You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?
>>
>>
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 5:07:24?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
>> < more useless comments, lies and insults >
>>
>> Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
>> It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.
>>
>> Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
Logical fallacy deleted.
>> < more useless comments, lies and insults >
>>
>> Bud's idiotic "answers" could only be seen as answers by another idiot.
>> It's all a big joke to people like the chickenshit coward "Bud" and you, people with no moral compass.
>>
>> Shame on him and you for making light of the most gruesome assassination of a US President in history.
>> You make light of this murder by either refusing to answer questions that need to be resolved, or by "answering" them in idiotic fashion.
>
There you go again...
>> You can't even give an honest answer to a simple "yes or no" question.
>> You people just can't take it seriously, can you ?
>>
>> It's all a big joke to you.
>>
>>
>> It says something about your character when you come on line and take this subject as some kind of a joke from which you "entertain" yourselves.
>>
>> This isn't entertainment.
>>
>>
>> But then again, honesty, decency and truth was never your strong point, as I, and others have exposed in the past.
>>
>>
>> You people are nothing more than dogshit, you prove it every day.
>> And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ
Well stated, Gil.
>> And we all know what eventually happens to dogshit.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58sP8azcHfQ
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:25 AM10/27/23
to
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:10:37 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Bud
Oct 27, 2023, 1:56:10 PM10/27/23
to
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:18:25 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
> <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
> >direct answer to every one of them.
> You're lying again, Corbutt. Indeed, the very first one I saw this
> morning was a QUESTION from Chickenshit in response to the question...
The answer to my question answers Gil`s question.
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
> <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
> >direct answer to every one of them.
> You're lying again, Corbutt. Indeed, the very first one I saw this
> morning was a QUESTION from Chickenshit in response to the question...
If they didn`t give an explanation for why they did what they did, then no explanation is available.
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 3:07:13 PM10/27/23
to
Gil Jesus
Oct 28, 2023, 7:33:24 AM10/28/23
to
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
He never even responded to question 3.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/_IWVwgl9VG0
You lie about everything.
John Corbett
Oct 28, 2023, 8:59:26 AM10/28/23
to
On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:33:24 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> > Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
> > direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason
> > with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
> > was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.
> Liar.
>
> He never even responded to question 3.
OK, Bud. Go stand in the corner. Naughty boy.
> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> > Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
> > direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason
> > with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
> > was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.
> Liar.
>
> He never even responded to question 3.
Ben Holmes
Oct 30, 2023, 9:19:43 AM10/30/23
to
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Indeed true... it would not be an easy task to pick out any truth from
Chickenshit's posts.
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Chickenshit's posts.
Ben Holmes
Oct 30, 2023, 9:19:44 AM10/30/23
to
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 05:59:24 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:33:24?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:33:24?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:23:43?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
>>> Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
>>> direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason
>>> with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
>>> was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.
>> Liar.
>>
>> He never even responded to question 3.
Logical fallacy deleted.
>>> Bud demonstrated the irrelevancy of Gil's questions simply by giving a
>>> direct answer to every one of them. I made the mistake of trying to reason
>>> with Gil about how pointless his questions were. I realize now that there
>>> was no point to trying to reason with Gil. The process is foreign to him.
>> Liar.
>>
>> He never even responded to question 3.
0 new messages