Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 32

Gil Jesus

unread,

Oct 29, 2023, 5:10:36 AM10/29/23

to

There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.

QUESTION # 32: Why was Oswald arraigned at 1:35 am ?

John Corbett

unread,

Oct 29, 2023, 6:47:41 AM10/29/23

to

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:10:36 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>
> QUESTION # 32: Why was Oswald arraigned at 1:35 am ?

That's when they decided to arraign him.

Bud

unread,

Oct 29, 2023, 7:15:55 AM10/29/23

to

I didn`t answer this one because I vaguely remember there being some conflict over the time. I didn`t answer the question about the PO box because I vaguely remember the name "Hidel" being on one of the boxes Oswald opened. I may look into these things, I may not.

John Corbett

unread,

Oct 29, 2023, 9:51:26 AM10/29/23

to

The PO Box issue is a bogus one (aren't they all). The name Hidell wouldn't need to appear on
the list of those approved to receive mail. I had a PO Box for a small business I ran on the side.
I would receive mail there and could retrieve it using my key whenever I wanted to. If there was
a parcel received that was too large to fit in the box, I would get a notice in the box instead.
I would take the notice to the counter and would get the parcel no questions asked. There's
no reason Oswald could not have received the rifle the same way. Gil likes to create obstacles
where none existed.

Bud

unread,

Oct 29, 2023, 10:29:15 AM10/29/23

to

Postal Inspector Holmes said otherwise, but I think he is almost certainly wrong about it, I strongly suspect they would put whatever mail in to the box that had the box number on it, regardless of the name. Doesn`t make sense that they would keep track of all the names on all the boxes. I get mail delivered to my house with all sorts of names, they deliver to the location, not the person. I once toyed with the idea of opening one and inviting people to send mail under any name they liked, perhaps with a short message to confirm I got them. But it occurred to me you can`t kill conspiracy ideas that easily, they can always contrive reasons to disregard what they don`t like.

I have gotten the pink slip telling me to pick up a package at the Post Office, and you used to be able to show the slip and get the package, now they ask for ID when they never did before. I wondered about that, because I would see them laying in the street sometimes (the mail carriers were sometime lax how they put them in the doors), and anyone could pick them up (or take them right off the door) and get the package. Not so now. But a slip from inside a PO box is proof of access to the box, so they might not ask for ID in that case.

John Corbett

unread,

Oct 29, 2023, 10:55:39 AM10/29/23

to

In every line of work there are regulations and many of them are not strictly adhered to. Low
level employees develop routines that sometimes bend the rules. Conspiracy hobbyists like to
pretend that never happens unless something nefarious is going on but it is just people being
people. Maybe I was supposed to show ID and the clerk at the counter just didn't bother when
I showed the slip indicating a parcel had arrived for me. He or she would have known to get the
slip out of the PO Box, I would have needed the key so maybe they thought that was good enough.

I learned recently how lax USPS regulations can be. My sister passed away early this year and I
am the executor of her estate. I went to her local post office to have her mail redirected to me.
I was amazed that all I had to do was fill out a form. I showed no ID, no letter proving I was the
executor of her estate. No questions asked. I wondered what would have prevented me from
redirecting somebody else's mail to me. I'm sure there would be laws I would break and probably
be felonies when discovered, but in the mean time I could cause quite a bit of havoc.